WolfRamNHard

Ok, I was trying to avoid turning this into a navel-gazing (foreskin gazing?) exercise since this thread is in essence about being circumcised, not about being uncut. Moreover, I didn't want to detract from the advice that you've been getting from other circumcised members, which I figure is more useful to you than my casual ramblings about The Foreskin. But with your permission, here goes.
 
If any of the following bothers or bores anyone, just ignore it and move on to something more interesting to you, no reason to spend precious time complaining. If it happens to intrigue you or entertain you in any way, then I'm glad to be of service.
 
- Should go without saying but not all uncut dicks are the same. On the one hand there are those where the foreskin retracts all the way back during erection and the foreskin becomes nearly imperceptible. At the other extreme are those with phimosis which is actually abnormal. Most fall somewhere on the continuum between these extremes, in my experience.
 
- Similarly, not all circumcised penises are the same, as you all know. Some are cut back more proximally, others maintain some residual foreskin. It's interesting to conjecture whether those that are cut "all the way" are less sensitive than those that still possess a little bit of skin.
 
- As a teenager I used to have these weird theories about how the presence or absence of foreskin makes your dickhead grow differently during puberty, in terms of size and shape. Experience has taught me that none of those theories were true.
 
- The biggest dick that I have ever had sex with was uncut. However, the 2nd biggest was cut. I'm convinced that foreskin status has nothing to do with size. If anyone has actual data to disprove this, I'd love to see it.
 
- I'm always surprised by how many cut guys don't know this so I'm going to mention it here. Uncut penises don't require much in the way of lube. I prefer no lube at all, in fact I actively dislike it. The non-keratinized mucosa, the "precum", the protection of the prepuce and the limited exposure to air all combine to provide adequate lubrication. If needed I prefer saliva because it doesn't create a gooey mess. (Obviously I'm talking about masturbation, not anal).
 
- I find cut erect dicks to be aesthetically very pleasing to look at in real life and in porn, and I do like to admire them visually. However, playing with uncut dicks is more enjoyable to me when it comes to oral and handjobs. I'm *not* referring to playing around with the foreskin which some people are into. I'm talking about the actual texture and feel of foreskin-covered erection in my hand or in my mouth. Something very primal about it. As far as anal, there's no significant difference where I'm concerned.
 
- Speaking of anal, I've known some uncut guys who prefer to not retract their foreskin all the way during penetration because of sensitivity. In fact, I've known some who actually leave their dick fully sheathed when they put on a condom.
 
- Foreskin-shaming is a real thing. I experienced it first-hand while growing up. These guys who claim to have "never seen an uncut dick" just need to take an art class or something. Pretty much all Classical, Renaissance and Baroque male nudes have intact foreskin.
 
- I sometimes wonder how frequently the opposite occurs in Europe and Latin America, i.e., do cut boys get teased at school since uncut is more common? I'm aware that historically anti-Semitism has an association here (being cut marked you as being either Jewish or Muslim since Gentiles are supposed to be uncut). But hopefully contemporary attitudes have improved?
 
- Somebody once actually implied that I might be anti-Semitic because I admitted that I gravitate towards other guys with uncut dicks. Whatevs!
 
- It is true that I (subconsciously) disproportionately pick out European and Latin men, and it probably does have to do with the fact that they are much more likely to be uncut (unless they happen to be Jewish or Muslim). To each his own. I remember the first uncut guy that I had sex with, an exchange student. It was an eye-opening, mind-blowing experience for me because up to that point I had become used to being with guys who were mostly clueless about foreskin-covered dongs. In other words, my tendency towards Euro men is quite simply the pursuit of great sex, and not much more than that. They know how to treat it right because they have one too!
 
- I've found that escorts are really good with uncut dicks, presumably because of their vast experience with all things sex-related (or maybe I've just been very lucky in that regard).

Very well stated!

Marketing is one thing, I get that. But real life is much more complicated and nuanced.
 

Marketing is one thing, I get that. But real life is much more complicated and nuanced.
 

Ok, I was trying to avoid turning this into a navel-gazing (foreskin gazing?) exercise since this thread is in essence about being circumcised, not about being uncut. Moreover, I didn't want to detract from the advice that you've been getting from other circumcised members, which I figure is more useful to you than my casual ramblings about The Foreskin. But with your permission, here goes.
 
If any of the following bothers or bores anyone, just ignore it and move on to something more interesting to you, no reason to spend precious time complaining. If it happens to intrigue you or entertain you in any way, then I'm glad to be of service.
 
- Should go without saying but not all uncut dicks are the same. On the one hand there are those where the foreskin retracts all the way back during erection and the foreskin becomes nearly imperceptible. At the other extreme are those with phimosis which is actually abnormal. Most fall somewhere on the continuum between these extremes, in my experience.
 
- Similarly, not all circumcised penises are the same, as you all know. Some are cut back more proximally, others maintain some residual foreskin. It's interesting to conjecture whether those that are cut "all the way" are less sensitive than those that still possess a little bit of skin.
 
- As a teenager I used to have these weird theories about how the presence or absence of foreskin makes your dickhead grow differently during puberty, in terms of size and shape. Experience has taught me that none of those theories were true.
 
- The biggest dick that I have ever had sex with was uncut. However, the 2nd biggest was cut. I'm convinced that foreskin status has nothing to do with size. If anyone has actual data to disprove this, I'd love to see it.
 
- I'm always surprised by how many cut guys don't know this so I'm going to mention it here. Uncut penises don't require much in the way of lube. I prefer no lube at all, in fact I actively dislike it. The non-keratinized mucosa, the "precum", the protection of the prepuce and the limited exposure to air all combine to provide adequate lubrication. If needed I prefer saliva because it doesn't create a gooey mess. (Obviously I'm talking about masturbation, not anal).
 
- I find cut erect dicks to be aesthetically very pleasing to look at in real life and in porn, and I do like to admire them visually. However, playing with uncut dicks is more enjoyable to me when it comes to oral and handjobs. I'm *not* referring to playing around with the foreskin which some people are into. I'm talking about the actual texture and feel of foreskin-covered erection in my hand or in my mouth. Something very primal about it. As far as anal, there's no significant difference where I'm concerned.
 
- Speaking of anal, I've known some uncut guys who prefer to not retract their foreskin all the way during penetration because of sensitivity. In fact, I've known some who actually leave their dick fully sheathed when they put on a condom.
 
- Foreskin-shaming is a real thing. I experienced it first-hand while growing up. These guys who claim to have "never seen an uncut dick" just need to take an art class or something. Pretty much all Classical, Renaissance and Baroque male nudes have intact foreskin.
 
- I sometimes wonder how frequently the opposite occurs in Europe and Latin America, i.e., do cut boys get teased at school since uncut is more common? I'm aware that historically anti-Semitism has an association here (being cut marked you as being either Jewish or Muslim since Gentiles are supposed to be uncut). But hopefully contemporary attitudes have improved?
 
- Somebody once actually implied that I might be anti-Semitic because I admitted that I gravitate towards other guys with uncut dicks. Whatevs!
 
- It is true that I (subconsciously) disproportionately pick out European and Latin men, and it probably does have to do with the fact that they are much more likely to be uncut (unless they happen to be Jewish or Muslim). To each his own. I remember the first uncut guy that I had sex with, an exchange student. It was an eye-opening, mind-blowing experience for me because up to that point I had become used to being with guys who were mostly clueless about foreskin-covered dongs. In other words, my tendency towards Euro men is quite simply the pursuit of great sex, and not much more than that. They know how to treat it right because they have one too!
 
- I've found that escorts are really good with uncut dicks, presumably because of their vast experience with all things sex-related (or maybe I've just been very lucky in that regard).

Ok, I was trying to avoid turning this into a navel-gazing (foreskin gazing?) exercise since this thread is in essence about being circumcised, not about being uncut. Moreover, I didn't want to detract from the advice that you've been getting from other circumcised members, which I figure is more useful to you than my casual ramblings about The Foreskin. But with your permission, here goes.
 
If any of the following bothers or bores anyone, just ignore it and move on to something more interesting to you, no reason to spend precious time complaining. If it happens to intrigue you or entertain you in any way, then I'm glad to be of service.
 
- Should go without saying but not all uncut dicks are the same. On the one hand there are those where the foreskin retracts all the way back during erection and the foreskin becomes nearly imperceptible. At the other extreme are those with phimosis which is actually abnormal. Most fall somewhere on the continuum between these extremes, in my experience.
 
- Similarly, not all circumcised penises are the same, as you all know. Some are cut back more proximally, others maintain some residual foreskin. It's interesting to conjecture whether those that are cut "all the way" are less sensitive than those that still possess a little bit of skin.
 
- As a teenager I used to have these weird theories about how the presence or absence of foreskin makes your dickhead grow differently during puberty, in terms of size and shape. Experience has taught me that none of those theories were true.
 
- The biggest dick that I have ever had sex with was uncut. However, the 2nd biggest was cut. I'm convinced that foreskin status has nothing to do with size. If anyone has actual data to disprove this, I'd love to see it.
 
- I'm always surprised by how many cut guys don't know this so I'm going to mention it here. Uncut penises don't require much in the way of lube. I prefer no lube at all, in fact I actively dislike it. The non-keratinized mucosa, the "precum", the protection of the prepuce and the limited exposure to air all combine to provide adequate lubrication. If needed I prefer saliva because it doesn't create a gooey mess. (Obviously I'm talking about masturbation, not anal).
 
- I find cut erect dicks to be aesthetically very pleasing to look at in real life and in porn, and I do like to admire them visually. However, playing with uncut dicks is more enjoyable to me when it comes to oral and handjobs. I'm *not* referring to playing around with the foreskin which some people are into. I'm talking about the actual texture and feel of foreskin-covered erection in my hand or in my mouth. Something very primal about it. As far as anal, there's no significant difference where I'm concerned.
 
- Speaking of anal, I've known some uncut guys who prefer to not retract their foreskin all the way during penetration because of sensitivity. In fact, I've known some who actually leave their dick fully sheathed when they put on a condom.
 
- Foreskin-shaming is a real thing. I experienced it first-hand while growing up. These guys who claim to have "never seen an uncut dick" just need to take an art class or something. Pretty much all Classical, Renaissance and Baroque male nudes have intact foreskin.
 
- I sometimes wonder how frequently the opposite occurs in Europe and Latin America, i.e., do cut boys get teased at school since uncut is more common? I'm aware that historically anti-Semitism has an association here (being cut marked you as being either Jewish or Muslim since Gentiles are supposed to be uncut). But hopefully contemporary attitudes have improved?
 
- Somebody once actually implied that I might be anti-Semitic because I admitted that I gravitate towards other guys with uncut dicks. Whatevs!
 
- It is true that I (subconsciously) disproportionately pick out European and Latin men, and it probably does have to do with the fact that they are much more likely to be uncut (unless they happen to be Jewish or Muslim). To each his own. I remember the first uncut guy that I had sex with, an exchange student. It was an eye-opening, mind-blowing experience for me because up to that point I had become used to being with guys who were mostly clueless about foreskin-covered dongs. In other words, my tendency towards Euro men is quite simply the pursuit of great sex, and not much more than that. They know how to treat it right because they have one too!
 
- I've found that escorts are really good with uncut dicks, presumably because of their vast experience with all things sex-related (or maybe I've just been very lucky in that regard).

Ok, I was trying to avoid turning this into a navel-gazing (foreskin gazing?) exercise since this thread is in essence about being circumcised, not about being uncut. Moreover, I didn't want to detract from the advice that you've been getting from other circumcised members, which I figure is more useful to you than my casual ramblings about The Foreskin. But with your permission, here goes.
 
If any of the following bothers or bores anyone, just ignore it and move on to something more interesting to you, no reason to spend precious time complaining. If it happens to intrigue you or entertain you in any way, then I'm glad to be of service.
 
- Should go without saying but not all uncut dicks are the same. On the one hand there are those where the foreskin retracts all the way back during erection and the foreskin becomes nearly imperceptible. At the other extreme are those with phimosis which is actually abnormal. Most fall somewhere on the continuum between these extremes, in my experience.
 
- Similarly, not all circumcised penises are the same, as you all know. Some are cut back more proximally, others maintain some residual foreskin. It's interesting to conjecture whether those that are cut "all the way" are less sensitive than those that still possess a little bit of skin.
 
- As a teenager I used to have these weird theories about how the presence or absence of foreskin makes your dickhead grow differently during puberty, in terms of size and shape. Experience has taught me that none of those theories were true.
 
- The biggest dick that I have ever had sex with was uncut. However, the 2nd biggest was cut. I'm convinced that foreskin status has nothing to do with size. If anyone has actual data to disprove this, I'd love to see it.
 
- I'm always surprised by how many cut guys don't know this so I'm going to mention it here. Uncut penises don't require much in the way of lube. I prefer no lube at all, in fact I actively dislike it. The non-keratinized mucosa, the "precum", the protection of the prepuce and the limited exposure to air all combine to provide adequate lubrication. If needed I prefer saliva because it doesn't create a gooey mess. (Obviously I'm talking about masturbation, not anal).
 
- I find cut erect dicks to be aesthetically very pleasing to look at in real life and in porn, and I do like to admire them visually. However, playing with uncut dicks is more enjoyable to me when it comes to oral and handjobs. I'm *not* referring to playing around with the foreskin which some people are into. I'm talking about the actual texture and feel of foreskin-covered erection in my hand or in my mouth. Something very primal about it. As far as anal, there's no significant difference where I'm concerned.
 
- Speaking of anal, I've known some uncut guys who prefer to not retract their foreskin all the way during penetration because of sensitivity. In fact, I've known some who actually leave their dick fully sheathed when they put on a condom.
 
- Foreskin-shaming is a real thing. I experienced it first-hand while growing up. These guys who claim to have "never seen an uncut dick" just need to take an art class or something. Pretty much all Classical, Renaissance and Baroque male nudes have intact foreskin.
 
- I sometimes wonder how frequently the opposite occurs in Europe and Latin America, i.e., do cut boys get teased at school since uncut is more common? I'm aware that historically anti-Semitism has an association here (being cut marked you as being either Jewish or Muslim since Gentiles are supposed to be uncut). But hopefully contemporary attitudes have improved?
 
- Somebody once actually implied that I might be anti-Semitic because I admitted that I gravitate towards other guys with uncut dicks. Whatevs!
 
- It is true that I (subconsciously) disproportionately pick out European and Latin men, and it probably does have to do with the fact that they are much more likely to be uncut (unless they happen to be Jewish or Muslim). To each his own. I remember the first uncut guy that I had sex with, an exchange student. It was an eye-opening, mind-blowing experience for me because up to that point I had become used to being with guys who were mostly clueless about foreskin-covered dongs. In other words, my tendency towards Euro men is quite simply the pursuit of great sex, and not much more than that. They know how to treat it right because they have one too!
 
- I've found that escorts are really good with uncut dicks, presumably because of their vast experience with all things sex-related (or maybe I've just been very lucky in that regard).

Marketing is one thing, I get that. But real life is much more complicated and nuanced.
 

Relax, it's just skin. I'm sorry I just looked at the Rules and saw no subjects other than reviews that weren't up for discussion.
 

I always wonder WHY people are so obsessed with what OTHERS are ? If you are comfortable being who you are, why worry about anyone else. If you are that hung up on labels, you will never really be able to make a meaningful connection with anyone, because there might always be a smidgen of disapproval. As for hiring, as I said before, if the escort will provide you what you request, what difference does his sexual identification make ? For the most part, hiring is a fantasy anyway, so just conjure up your own image of him and have your violent Orgasm !

You got a point, not always majority is right. I would just argue here (although it is inconsequential to determine who is right or wrong) that you hold the mainstream point of view. Most people tend to simplify reality as you do.
You have another point, we are programmed to classify and categorize in order to make sense of reality. Not argument here, the disagreement is on those categories. I think that classifying human sexuality in homo/hetero/bi is misleading and empoverishing, that our desire is much more fluid than a solid binary system. In my opinion sexuality has a too heavy subjective component to be understood through objective categories. Better than "understood", to be "experienced".

Does it really make any difference if the escort is providing what YOU want ? I wouldnt give a fuck what label he puts on himself.

Sexually fluid and indiscriminate. #Allbodypartsmatter

I think simply providing your stats. Age/build/race is enough. "Asking if" is allowing yourself to suffer the effect of racism over and over. YOU are a human being requesting time from a person who is supposed to be skilled in CUSTOMER SERVICE. You shouldn't just assume it's alright to be prejudiced. State your stats and fact and ask if they have time for you. If the answer is no, you can walk away assuming they are busy rather than humiliating yourself over and over being reminded that some people in this world are still assholes.

But most people do not, as a matter of fact, look at skin tone as a phenotype, and many never will (in our lifetimes at least). Ergo, the problems will continue to exist.

Nobody has said anything about the pain and suffering we small mouth fellows experience, particularly at the TMJ region of the mouth. Seriously I sometimes walk around the next day sore and uncomfortable. Come to think of it, I hurt in a number of places after an encounter. No pain, no gain I suppose.

I must respectfully but adamantly object to your statement as it is simply wrong. STIs, including gonorrhea and chlamydia, do not always have a discharge from the penis. Indeed, an asymptotic infection- meaning the person feels fine and has no penile discharge- can commonly occur. This is readily found in the medical literature.
 
And this makes logical sense. If a man is having burning in his penis, or having outright puss-like discharge coming out, he isnt feeling his most sexy. Rather than running to sex he is running to the physician. It's the people with NO symptoms that are infecting others because they dont know.
 
Consider changing the sources of your healthcare advice.
 
Be safe.
Be informed.
And be well.
 
Warmest regards.

Two great words that go great together.
 
Don't they?
 
http://xhamster.com/movies/904129/amareur_ass_massage.html

Good to know, thanks!

If someone can view a picture of you on their phone, they can save a copy of it with a screen shot.
 
Snapchat does not delete pictures. And has recently added a "here are your memories" (i.e., previous snapchats) feature similar to Facebook's "memories" feature. Read the Terms Of Service, not the marketing, PR, or social media "buzz" about an app before using it if you are worried about privacy.

QTR - I'm glad to have you back. You went on hiatus soon after I joined this forum. I was wondering about you just the other day because I remembered learning a lot from your posts when I first joined.
 
Coming back to the topic, I'm glad to hear about your positive experience with online dating.
 
I do quite a bit of app dating myself, and it has its ups and downs like everything else. I find that some apps are better than others, depending on what one is looking for. I can't speak for straight dating apps, but Scruff works well for me, and more recently I started using Surge, which has worked out really well so far. A while back, I tried Grindr for a week before giving up on it, for many reasons but the biggest reasons were too many spam/robot profiles and too many headless torsos.
 
Faces are important to me, so I prefer that either the profile have a face pic, or at the very least, the other person send me a face pic privately when we're chatting.
 
My app profile has my face pic, my stats and what I like to do (work, fun, sex, etc.) but there's nothing on there about what I *don't* like for several reasons. I'm generally flexible about most things so there are very few hard and fast rules, and I don't want to discourage anyone from contacting me for something that may not be all that important in the grand scheme of things. Also because I sometimes enjoy trying new things and stepping outside my comfort zone.
 
As far as explicit pics, I don't have any for privacy reasons. When asked I tell them they can just see it in person if we hook up. If they can't handle that, then so be it. However, I think Surge has a feature where if you send someone a pic during your private chat, they can only open it once. It then becomes inaccessible and disappears so they can't save it or do anything with it (similar to Snapchat). That sounds promising and I might be open to trying it sometime for explicit pics.
 
Dating can be frustrating at times. There are those who are too afraid to meet in person, others just want to collect pics. Some are not honest in their profiles. And some truly don't know what they're looking for, so they can be wishy-washy. But there are some real gems out there that make it worth the effort. With younger guys, I have found that it helps to be assertive and persistent, and pay them genuine compliments from time to time while flirting.
 
I don't usually have sex on the first couple of dates. I prefer spending that time getting to know the other person better and evaluating chemistry. That seems to work for me.
 
I'm sure others do things differently, and I too would be interested in hearing different perspectives on this.

Sorry you have to go through this.
 
That's the United States for you. Racism and other forms of bigotry aren't usually on the surface here, but simmering underneath instead. That's because most Americans are theoretically aware that certain words and actions are rude or improper, and nobody wants to be labeled as racist or bigoted. Overt racism is not commonly displayed here publicly or in polite company, unlike in certain other countries, but it's the actions and "reading between the lines" that give it away.
 
I suspect that even if an escort in the US has a problem with your race, they will not openly admit as much. More likely, they will probably make some other excuse or just not respond to you.

www.xhamster.com/movies/3018718/all_male_carwash.html

Interesting topic. Escorts must be really thick-skinned or have healthy egos (or both) to be able to survive the constant scrutiny. Kind of the opposite of many clients I imagine (thin skinned and fragile egos). I know I could never do it.

@bigvalboy thanks it is an ancient ceremonial gold mask of the Asante Kingdom, where my dad is originally from.