mike carey

For bigvalboy pecs.
http://66.media.tumblr.com/94f4a1703723e67410b91393b7ba9011/tumblr_n07cqniuQP1tp3i3yo1_500.jpg

Gman

I thought this was a thread about a new font.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

He's not part of Black Lives Matters. He's stirred up by the same things they are, but he's not a protestor, and you are not doing the facts any good by linking them.
 
Charlie Manson had every right to march in a nonviolent anti-black/white supremacist protest, but that's not what he did. He committed murders in the name of precipitating a race war. That is the right analogy, not the Black Panthers.

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbmqBH1WIAQFTmi.jpg

If I were a venture capitalist I'd be investing in pitchforks.

No, no, no, no! DILFs are not 'Daddies' in the normal sense, they are the hot young men you see at the beach or the camping ground playing with their toddlers.

No, no, no, no! DILFs are not 'Daddies' in the normal sense, they are the hot young men you see at the beach or the camping ground playing with their toddlers.

No, no, no, no! DILFs are not 'Daddies' in the normal sense, they are the hot young men you see at the beach or the camping ground playing with their toddlers.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

He gave you a line

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

Me to him: Send me a pic with no clothes.

I understand why you are calling him a terrorist, after all that term has become so commonplace since 9/11, however I take issue with its broad usage and the fact that it's almost exclusively used in reference to followers if Islam. I feel it's a word designed to separate "Us" from "Them". Many indications show that the Orlando shooter may well have been "one of us" (or at least had the desire to be). To call him a terrorist but not call a terrorist other mass shooters, like the one at Sandy Hook or the Aurora Theatre, misses the point that all violence comes from the same place.
 
I just believe that the term "terrorist" is used to simply define someone's motive and rarely is it that simple. The shooting in Orlando, I believe was a combination of mental illness, self-loathing, easy access to weapons, in addition to ideologies he was brought up with. Yes, he pledged his allegiance to Isis, however I think he was just trying to make it bigger than himself, though in truth it was entirely about his own struggle.

I don't have any issues with the number of pictures a guy may have in his profile. @Mikegaite sums it up well, a variety of pictures provide a sense of appearance and insight into a guy's personality. Profiles with only one or two pictures fail to keep my interest and I usually move on to another profile.
 
A variety of candid and professional, or posed, shots work best. I also like to see a guy dressed up in business attire. This gives me an idea of his fashion sense and whether or not one can feel comfortable with him as a companion for a dressy occasion.
 
Take a look at Mike's profile. https://rentmen.com/MikeGaite I think it's a fine example of variety. We have Mike nude. Mike in briefs. Mike in bed. Mike out of bed. Mike in workout gear. Mike with rope. Mike tied up. Mike tied up and gagged. Mike in the shower. Mike still tied up, gagged, and blindfolded. And, of course, Mike in a suit. (Damn, I need a cold shower after writing this paragraph.)
 
I also agree that @Eric Hassan and DavidSF have great sites as well. I'd add @SimplyAdam to that roster. In summary, I'd say more pictures are better than fewer and not over exposure at all.

Finally...my kind of cat video.
 
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1105578089512710