mike carey

More than one level of meaning there!

If he wasn't there, it can't be Budapest then.

Gasp!

Budapest?

Eid Mubarak. By possible cosmic, but more likely lunar coincidence, it's also Ash Wednesday.

Requiescat in pace. Semper fi.

Yes, your post two up (after the 3 months later banner) was the new thread you posted. The moderators moved it into this existing thread about Shane.

It is correct grammar, although the case can be made for both versions. If you think about it, it's saying that it's the day about presidents, not really the day that belongs to presidents. There is no Independence's Day, but with Presidents Day the word ending in 's' makes it appear as if it should be possessive case. For a closer parallel illustration, it's Martin Luther King Day, not 'King's'.

I agree, but if that were the case, they wouldn't be able to offer a 'musky' experience, which is what the OP wanted.

With masseurs (whose pattern of appointments is likely to be different from escorts) you should consider the feasibility or their meeting such a request. They will often see several clients with often relatively short intervals between them. For them to honour your request, they likely need to be deodorant-free for appointments before yours, something they may not be prepared to do. But you could still ask.

His ad also shows him as 'not available'. In the past we've seen escorts who change their location to Nuuk or Nome. I've also seen an escort from Vegas suddenly appearing in Bozeman or Fargo (or somewhere similarly well known as an escort haunt). It's just possible that they might be using some random location to take themselves out of the search results for where they really are. Just a thought.

I won't mention abuse shouted in a fake French accent, in a general direction, from a castle battlement.

Not funny, perhaps, but a fun map. And you need to be aware of one historic name.

Such a caustic remark.

I thought the baby's face said, 'Just another Tuesday.'

Oh? Was that today?

I'm not sure this is the right question to ask. Yes, there is a possibility that you could be scammed on either an in- or out-call. Perhaps a more appropriate question is to ask how likely it is that you will be scammed in an escort interaction. If the answer is 'not very likely', then the question of whether it is more likely when you host or when they do, becomes less pressing. It's probably more productive to try to understand what things you should look for to assess whether a scam is likely or not. What the yellow and red flags are, how to evaluate their behaviour. Then, when to give the benefit of the doubt and when to withhold it. This would not be the first thread in which this issue had been discussed.

Gentlemen, a new thread on deposits was opened seven or eight hours ago and ran for over a page fairly quickly. Predictably it rehearsed many of the same opinions as have been expressed on this topic over the years. @56harrisond posted a useful link to some of the earlier threads. One, in 2023, ran for over six pages in a little over a month before pizza was served. Another ran during December last year and is still active, and we've now combined it with today's thread. Despite it's wider title, still reflected here, it focussed almost entirely on the issue of deposits, something it shared with the new thread. A reminder that, as indicated by the asterisk in the title, we issued a warning in December to stay on topic. That warning continues to apply to the now-combined thread.

Is that all?

At the top of the page, click on the icon second from the right (you won't see the exclamation mark icon with the number one in your view): And this screen will pop up: With that you can customise the view you see. I have the random option selected, and this is in 'dark' mode, so it might vary in the light mode.

Or as a well-known British entertainer once said, I'm bisexual, I buy sex.