oscarkin

https://www.massagem4m.com/masseur/14838/

 
It IS a dance, and the possibilities change from moment to moment. That's part of the fun. Youngboldone, get right on I-71 North and head up to see Brian Kevin.

https://rentmen.eu/RUGBYPLAYER
Anyone had recent experience with this guy? Based in Montreal but travels.

https://rentmen.eu/RUGBYPLAYER
Anyone had recent experience with this guy? Based in Montreal but travels.

https://rentmen.eu/RUGBYPLAYER
Anyone had recent experience with this guy? Based in Montreal but travels.

Test drove. Didn’t buy

https://www.massagem4m.com/masseur/14838/

 
It IS a dance, and the possibilities change from moment to moment. That's part of the fun. Youngboldone, get right on I-71 North and head up to see Brian Kevin.

[ATTACH=full]289[/ATTACH]
 
 
[ATTACH=full]292[/ATTACH]
 
[ATTACH=full]303[/ATTACH]
 
 
[ATTACH=full]290[/ATTACH]

Sir, he's a good find, please review him!
 

 

 
Here you have some other similar types of men!

I've always thought that the term "otter" also implies younger -- maybe like a bear to be.

Yes -- even his own description of "boy (man) next door" suggests some uncertainty about which is more appropriate. Whichever it is, he's cute. I think I would go with "cuddly like a teddy bear" over "wild like a bear."

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=otter

https://rentmen.eu/TEDY_BEAR

https://www.massagem4m.com/masseur/14838/

 
It IS a dance, and the possibilities change from moment to moment. That's part of the fun. Youngboldone, get right on I-71 North and head up to see Brian Kevin.

Agreed. Though I prefer the more technical term: tridigital chronofacial verifier

Thanks

Agreed. Though I prefer the more technical term: tridigital chronofacial verifier

Thanks, Mike. That's a really interesting perspective. I think that much of what I'm reacting to is fifty different versions of "come hither, fetch me," with only the scenery and the lighting and the costumes changing. In those cases, the excess photos feel more like overplaying the fantasy than trying to illustrate different aspects of a real person.

I've been noticing lately that some escort ads (I'm thinking of Rentmen in particular but I don't think it's limited to that) contain an extraordinarily large number of photos of the escort in question. I'm not talking about ten or fifteen photos. I'm talking about forty or fifty. I'm not exactly sure what I'm reacting to here but I find this plenitude vaguely disquieting. For one thing, it seems that too many photos actually make the escort seem less attractive. If so, this is literally a case of overexposure. Why so many photos? Whatever happened to the idea -- common in the history of art -- that less is more? That concept has always been true of erotic art. But apparently not of escort ads.

Agreed. Though I prefer the more technical term: tridigital chronofacial verifier

I've been noticing lately that some escort ads (I'm thinking of Rentmen in particular but I don't think it's limited to that) contain an extraordinarily large number of photos of the escort in question. I'm not talking about ten or fifteen photos. I'm talking about forty or fifty. I'm not exactly sure what I'm reacting to here but I find this plenitude vaguely disquieting. For one thing, it seems that too many photos actually make the escort seem less attractive. If so, this is literally a case of overexposure. Why so many photos? Whatever happened to the idea -- common in the history of art -- that less is more? That concept has always been true of erotic art. But apparently not of escort ads.

I've been noticing lately that some escort ads (I'm thinking of Rentmen in particular but I don't think it's limited to that) contain an extraordinarily large number of photos of the escort in question. I'm not talking about ten or fifteen photos. I'm talking about forty or fifty. I'm not exactly sure what I'm reacting to here but I find this plenitude vaguely disquieting. For one thing, it seems that too many photos actually make the escort seem less attractive. If so, this is literally a case of overexposure. Why so many photos? Whatever happened to the idea -- common in the history of art -- that less is more? That concept has always been true of erotic art. But apparently not of escort ads.

Thanks, Mike. That's a really interesting perspective. I think that much of what I'm reacting to is fifty different versions of "come hither, fetch me," with only the scenery and the lighting and the costumes changing. In those cases, the excess photos feel more like overplaying the fantasy than trying to illustrate different aspects of a real person.

I've been noticing lately that some escort ads (I'm thinking of Rentmen in particular but I don't think it's limited to that) contain an extraordinarily large number of photos of the escort in question. I'm not talking about ten or fifteen photos. I'm talking about forty or fifty. I'm not exactly sure what I'm reacting to here but I find this plenitude vaguely disquieting. For one thing, it seems that too many photos actually make the escort seem less attractive. If so, this is literally a case of overexposure. Why so many photos? Whatever happened to the idea -- common in the history of art -- that less is more? That concept has always been true of erotic art. But apparently not of escort ads.

Agreed. Though I prefer the more technical term: tridigital chronofacial verifier

Agreed. Though I prefer the more technical term: tridigital chronofacial verifier