RadioRob

This was resolved on Friday. If you’re still having problems, clear your browser cache.

Something went wonky with the system editor. I’ve reset it back to system defaults and that seems to have fixed it. I’m boarding a flight back home now so I’ll need to recreate some of our custom buttons and editor configurations later but it should at least let people reply again.

It sounds like the accessibility settings most likely got turned on accidentally. Try pressing Windows + Ctrl + C. You can also go to Settings > Ease of Access (or Accessibility) > Color filters and toggling it to the "off" position.

You can use Command and "0" together (Cmd and Zero keys) to reset the page zoom. Cmd and +/- will zoom in and zoom out (Cmd and plus sign or Cmd and minus sign).

The note was not meant to call out any specific person. During those attacks, tons of people just report each one they see. It's not a huge deal to close a duplicate report, but was just calling it out so individuals have less work reporting and we have less work closing.

Also if you do see a major spam attack, feel free to report just a single post per account. The moderators have a tool that when used will remove ALL content they posted automatically. You don’t need to report each message as that first one once processed will clean up the rest by that user automatically. If you do happen to report multiple from the same account, it’s not a big deal… it just means we have to close that additional report as a duplicate as it will have already been handled. Thanks again for helping keep the site clean and safe!

Greetings! I implemented a change this morning to require new accounts (less than 30 days old) to require moderator approval for new posts in an effort to mitigate some of the recent increased spam attacks. Once a new account has 5 unique pieces of content approved (new topics, replies, etc), they’ll automatically be updated to no longer require moderator approval. Again, this is only being done as a spam mitigation mechanism. I’m not looking to censor new users or prevent discussion. Posts that are not spam and that don’t violate the community guidelines will be approved as quickly as possible. I would just ask that folks remember we have a small team of volunteers who moderate the site and this is a side gig for all of us. So if it takes a little bit of time for us to see/approve a topic, it’s not personal! Thanks! Rob

We never see/use the phone number. It’s used by the merchant provider as part of their automated fraud screening process. The site does not host/store any personal data. If I don’t keep it, it can’t be stolen or be required to turn over on the off chance we should ever get a court order. With that said, I’ll see if our merchant provider can add HK to the country list!

It depends on how the image was submitted. If the image was uploaded, it's handled differently than someone who links to a remotely hosted image.

Can you explain to me how you are making legal claims like this but at the same time know him and have a great time with him, etc? Please quit trying to pass yourself off as a client. And also quit wasting my time with bull crap legal claims. There are no images, photos, or videos in this thread that would be subject to a DMCA complaint. The rest of your legal claims are baseless and will be ignored going forward. Feel free to consult with an actual lawyer and if they feel they have a legal claim to make... they may reach out to our legal team.

This is something not directly supported in the form software we use. I’ll add it to the backlog wishlist though and look at the feasibility of adding it manually.

All of the moderators have my phone number. I explained what was happening to everyone that pinged me. I did not have my offline list as this happened while I was traveling for my day job. (Yes a perfect storm of crap to happen at once!)

I have reason to suspect at least one account posting in this thread may be the provider himself as: - that account was just recently created - that account has reported multiple topics that discuss the provider which were not found to be in violation of our community guidelines. - that account also has an over the top glowing review of the provider. Normally any one of three would not be suspicious, but combining all three does give me pause. Take that for what you will.