maninsoma

First of all it's important to remember that just because a post about an escort purports to be from a client doesn't necessarily make that true. I was researching a provider yesterday and found a thread from a year ago where one person chimed in to offer high praise. Another member responded, "Welcome to the forum," which is an indirect way of questioning the veracity of the post since it might actually just be the provider or someone who's friends with him creating an account here to drum up business. Turns out that person made no other post on this site after that first one. How likely is it that someone would join a site like this just to post one glowing review of one provider? As to being skeptical about legitimate praises posted by genuine clients, as others have written it may just be that they had great chemistry with someone that won't necessarily translate to every client that provider sees. This is true for everything in life. I might love a particular restaurant and someone else will find it lacking; it doesn't make either of us right or wrong. One of my biggest disappointments in hiring was with someone who had glowing reviews on the previous site (back in Hooboy's days). For me he showed up a bit late, sweaty and couldn't get hard. I suspect he was coming down from a meth binge. I didn't review him since my experience was such an outlier.

I can sort of understand his perspective if at the outset you had a clear negotiation to see him on a discounted basis due to your economic situation at the time; he may feel like you continued to take advantage of a discount that you no longer needed, and at the same time paid another provider more. That being said, as others have written it's this guy's responsibility to set his rate and if he wasn't satisfied to be paid the discounted rate by you on an ongoing basis he should have communicated to you that you'd have to start paying more. As others have written, it does seem like this is about more than money, though. It sounds like he has a fragile ego and your behavior (paying a discounted rate to him while paying more to someone else) has been interpreted by him as an indication that you think he's less worthy. I stepped on a weird land mine once while trying to schedule a first time appointment with someone. We were having what I considered to be a pleasant back-and-forth chat online in anticipation of meeting and I made some comment about how I liked one of his porn scenes a lot because his scene partner was so sexy. I guess he took that as me saying he wasn't as sexy as the other guy and blasted me for insulting him. He then blocked me. I could sort of understand my faux pas after the fact, but I really wasn't trying to convey that he was less sexy than the other guy. I wouldn't have been pursuing an appointment with him if I didn't find him sexy.

While I agree that paying up front is never wise, I also don't think that the suggestion that this can allow someone to withhold payment after a session has completed is ethically wrong. If you get on someone's table and he has no skills, then get up relatively quickly, tell him you aren't satisfied with his skills, pay a portion of the fee and leave. If you stay, however, and endure whatever the provider has to give then you should pay the agreed-upon rate. When it comes to the "extras," that's where it can get more murky. If you really want the extras, it's best to just hire an escort. If you want specific extras but want them from someone advertising as a masseur, it's best to clearly address expectations up front so you can focus your hiring on guys who are willing to give you what you want.

The reality is that most men will respond sexually if their genitals are being manipulated (assuming they don't have any sort of erectile dysfunction), even if they aren't attracted to the person doing the manipulation. It's just biology. As to whether you're bi, only you know. Were you turned on by the woman (her face, her body) or were you just horny and anyone would have sufficed?

I was only addressing the issue of how to respond to a fire, not any behaviors that would start a fire in the first place.

Flailing a towel at a fire has to be the worst thing one could do apart from throwing an accelerant like gasoline on it.

That's absurd that he uses that. I cannot imagine what clients think unless the actual massage is minimal and it's mostly being used as a lubricant.

Do you actually mean Vaseline as in petroleum jelly by itself, or one of their moisturizer/lotions that also contains other ingredients? I can imagine someone using the latter, but the former sounds like it would be exceptionally greasy when used all over. (Great for a sexual lubricant if you're not using condoms and even recommended by dermatologists to cover small wounds while they are healing, but I've never heard of someone wanting to use it on the entire body.) Not that it matters, I guess, because the other negatives would make me stay away anyway.

Almost everything about his ad, other than his photos, is unappealing.

I clicked on this video because the object owner looked so hot. Once the video started playing, I immediately recognized him as Ryan Reynolds. I didn't know he had done a film where there was an Antiques Roadshow spoof in it.

I wouldn't expect a "new" filter to show "new to that city," only actually new ads. If you think about the complexity of what you think "new" should do, it would not only have to rely on a data field like "date ad created" (which it does) but also keep track of every ad that's ever appeared in any given location and then only show ads that have never been displayed in that city in the past.

Money is another thing to consider. Just reading between the lines, it doesn't sound like your partner is the kind of escort who developed a highly successful career and then managed to invest his proceeds to secure his future. (I am writing this just based on him having stopped escorting but then going back to it because "his circumstances" prevent him from doing anything else.) Are you okay with him being financially dependent on you as you grow older? I obviously don't know you or your partner, but is substance use part of the picture? Is that a factor in why he chooses to escort (for some, drugs and sex go hand-in-hand) or in the "circumstances" that make it difficult for him to get other employment?

Wow, tough crowd. I don't find his answers that off-putting. Very rare is the interview portion on Rentmen interesting and this guy's is no exception, but I find his answers pretty standard "I have to write something and this is Rentmen, so I'm going to write about my physical appearance, traveling, and partying." I guess I'm saying that if I was interested in hiring him, his answers wouldn't sway my decision.

I'll ask the obvious (at least to me) question: How does one get to the point of being engaged without knowing something as basic as what each other does for a living, or even as a side-hustle?

Happy birthday to Dick Van Dyke. BTW, the kid who played the son was Larry Mathews and he is still alive (and 70 years old).