José Soplanucas

Of course, you should do whatever fits you. However, when people make these plans I cannot help but think that they should stay at their original home if they do not want to learn the language and get integrated with their new home.

Thanks to teleworking you do not need to wait to retire for that. I am working with my employer on a plan for my next few years (in October I could go on early retirement and they do not want to lose me) where I will be working from abroad for increasing periods. This year, besides short trips, I will be in South American from mid nov to mid jan. My next contact would increase those 2 months to 4, and so on. I am excited.

A couple of months? I would advise more time exploring and getting acquainted with potencial destinations. Moving to a place you have only researched on line or visited a few times is not a good idea.

You may also want to check Chile. Chile and Uruguay are quite stable political and economic systems. I find both countries less fun and less diverse than Argentina and Brazil. But they are all very close and it would be easy to live and have your money safe in Chile or Uruguay while you travel for fun to their neighbor nations.

You want to return to Canada from where, if I may ask?

I wouldn't describe him as a joke, but he did clean my place.

And by the way, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG ABOUT BUMPS. I think the friend @Monarchy79 did not have breakfast that morning.

@azdr0710 is joking, but it is funny because his joke has a lot of truth. Be patient, and you will establish yourself with your consistency (or lack of). Besides, if you have been paying attention you may have already noticed, sometimes being ignored is a blessing.

I've evolved from very detailed reports to more general assessments as you suggest. Several times I had to edit or delete my reports by the provider's request. My reports were very positive but, they explained to me, they were willing to do with me stuff they would not regularly do, and they did not want to create false expectations.

Not at all. Just get in my shoes as a reader. This is what you wrote: You did not write "because I felt unsafe". You seemed to be referring to some objective danger.

Yes, there are saunas. There are no saunas with prostitution, but there are several bathhouses for hooking up.

That is exactly why his comments confused me. Cuba is probably the safest country in Latam, if you are a tourist.

What do you mean by the level risk is high? I know a lot of people who hired and hooked up with no issues.

Did you not hire any locals? Did you hook up for free with any locals?

The escorts in Buenos Aires are quoting 30 bucks and above to local clients. The prices my contacts are passing me are higher than in Rio, and the service quality is consistently lower.

I love the app. I have been using for about 3 years now, and it helped me to be a safer driver and have less infractions tickets to pay.

+1 Plus, it is up to the escort's business model. Some include the transportation cost in their fees, some charge it to the client as an additional cost. If someone does not like, move to the next instead of preaching how things should be done, according to them of course.

May I ask how many athletes have come out? And then compare it to other human activities.

Generational replacement (B) is expected and predictable. I think interesting that clients' average age is now lower (A), as this is new (to me). This is one reason to explain the increase in escorts rates in the US that no one brought before to the table. (or I missed in case someone did)

You just casually dropped this. I think it is interesting. What did you exactly mean? A- there is a noticeable reduction in today's client's average age B- the new generation of clients, while average age remains unchanged

I never found a better strippers event. You could have more sex in Rockhard, but the energy at Chocolate Tuesdays has no match.

I miss Rockhard DC. And if we go even further, Chocolate Tuesday @Wet!

The overwhelming majority of forum fans (whether or not they log in), I think, are lurkers and we have no idea of who they are. About the active participants, I do not think our demographics are very diverse, and if we compare it against USA's, I do not think we are representative. Let me list a few variables, even when some of them are obvious (like women's under representation). Women are under represented Men younger than 50 are under represented Ethnic/racial minorities are under represented Aliens are under represented College graduates are over represented White men are over represented Gay men are over represented Bi sexual men are under represented Mid and Upper Middle class are over represented Blue collar workers are under represented Closeted gays are under represented Politics is perhaps where we are more representative (of the US): not very diverse, and leaning towards the center-left (I am convinced the Right would never win national elections if voting were an obligation.). However, I do think Conservatives are under represented. I am not sure about religion as it was not a very discussed topic, not even in the Politics Forum times. However, I have the impression that Christianism (putting together all its branches, including Catholics) may be over represented, and other religious groups under represented. I remember very few Jews, Agnostics, and Atheists. I cannot remember any Muslims or Hindus. Of course, I have no data to back any of these statements, feel free to correct my mistakes. I would say that we could be much more diverse than we are.