corndog

I don't think you're going to get a useful answer to this question.
 
Clients, especially those who value "discretion," would like to believe that providers don't keep any records, and there is no "little black book," digital or otherwise.
 
Some providers probably keep records with varying levels of detail about their clients. It's totally understandable that they would like to remember which clients to avoid, and it would be a good business practice to keep track of clients' likes and dislikes, and even personal details so they can easily make repeat clients feel valued.
 
Keeping these records is a good business practice. Disclosing that you do is not.

I met him in February, and left a review on rentmen (he requested a review there, rather than here). In case you don't use a VPN to enable the text of the reviews on rentmen, here is what it said:

I don't remember his rate, and I think he listed it in his ad at the time, but I think it was reasonable.

Some of us are wondering what the warning was. It sounded serious.
 
Are the garotos trying to blackmail customers?
 
Did you get back to the U.S. and can now tell us what precaution to take?
 
Thanks in advance

I was there last Thursday evening. The first two dancers started at 7pm, and it's my understanding that more were coming at 9pm. I wasn't there long enough to find out.
 
It's still a work in progress, but I think it has promise.

I was there last Thursday evening. The first two dancers started at 7pm, and it's my understanding that more were coming at 9pm. I wasn't there long enough to find out.
 
It's still a work in progress, but I think it has promise.

This is really the only part that matters. Whether we choose condoms or PrEP, or both, each of us is responsible for our own sexual health.

I was raised to be a germaphobe, too. However, sometimes you've got to think through how rational it all is. Consider this scenario:
 
Let's say I've invited a guy over for... well, what we're usually talking about on this forum... and then he urinates without washing his hands. My first instinct is "OMG! He just peed, touched his penis, and didn't wash his hands!" And then, it occurs to me that I'm probably about to put that penis in my mouth, and I realize that whether he has washed his hands is last thing I should concerned about.

I was raised to be a germaphobe, too. However, sometimes you've got to think through how rational it all is. Consider this scenario:
 
Let's say I've invited a guy over for... well, what we're usually talking about on this forum... and then he urinates without washing his hands. My first instinct is "OMG! He just peed, touched his penis, and didn't wash his hands!" And then, it occurs to me that I'm probably about to put that penis in my mouth, and I realize that whether he has washed his hands is last thing I should concerned about.

I realize that most people may be looking at his cock in that photo, but the body shown in that one is not nearly as defined as the rest of his shots.

I was raised to be a germaphobe, too. However, sometimes you've got to think through how rational it all is. Consider this scenario:
 
Let's say I've invited a guy over for... well, what we're usually talking about on this forum... and then he urinates without washing his hands. My first instinct is "OMG! He just peed, touched his penis, and didn't wash his hands!" And then, it occurs to me that I'm probably about to put that penis in my mouth, and I realize that whether he has washed his hands is last thing I should concerned about.

I was raised to be a germaphobe, too. However, sometimes you've got to think through how rational it all is. Consider this scenario:
 
Let's say I've invited a guy over for... well, what we're usually talking about on this forum... and then he urinates without washing his hands. My first instinct is "OMG! He just peed, touched his penis, and didn't wash his hands!" And then, it occurs to me that I'm probably about to put that penis in my mouth, and I realize that whether he has washed his hands is last thing I should concerned about.

Better a cynic than a chump.
 
Don’t get down on yourself, OP. I’ve had many a client tell me to follow my gut. It’s the right route to go, protecting yourself. You feel you’ve pushed him away? If you think this guy is actually bona fide, and you’re still desirous, by all means extend an olive branch — but don’t feel melancholy if he balks.

In my opinion, if they hang around you and provide good company/conversation, they've earned something. If you're totally disinterested, I think you should say so right off the bat, or just not really engage in conversation. But, if you take up their time, you should at least offer them a drink, or tip them $5 or so. In many cases, I've felt like a guy earned his tip chatting with me, and I'll agree to a lap dance in the back, just as a formality to compensate him for the time already spent.

I recently had sort of the opposite situation...
 
The guy, who I had met before, texted me for a follow up meeting on Monday. Unfortunately, I was out of town, but I proposed Wednesday instead. He replied "that will work!"
 
Then Wednesday came, and I texted him to confirm. It had been less than 48 hours since we had agreed on Wednesday. I heard nothing back from him, and texted him a couple more times during the day. Nothing.
 
About a week later, I got a text from him saying that he had been out of town. This is lame. First of all, it seems unlikely that this out-of-town trip popped up within the 48 hours since I had last communicated with him, and secondly, where could he have been that he couldn't send a quick message to let me know that he was not going to be able to make it? Jail, maybe. (I'm mostly kidding about that, he doesn't seem like the jail type.)
 
He's been texting me every couple days with increasingly sexy and provocative messages and photos. I haven't responded at all. He's hot, but I'm feeling like if I wanted to deal with this kind of flakiness, I could just use Grindr for free.

In my opinion, if they hang around you and provide good company/conversation, they've earned something. If you're totally disinterested, I think you should say so right off the bat, or just not really engage in conversation. But, if you take up their time, you should at least offer them a drink, or tip them $5 or so. In many cases, I've felt like a guy earned his tip chatting with me, and I'll agree to a lap dance in the back, just as a formality to compensate him for the time already spent.

In my opinion, if they hang around you and provide good company/conversation, they've earned something. If you're totally disinterested, I think you should say so right off the bat, or just not really engage in conversation. But, if you take up their time, you should at least offer them a drink, or tip them $5 or so. In many cases, I've felt like a guy earned his tip chatting with me, and I'll agree to a lap dance in the back, just as a formality to compensate him for the time already spent.

I'm guessing that you're taking about Kuala Lampur, but, please, avoid unexplained abbreviations. It isn't always easy to figure them out.
--TIAFFP

In my opinion, if they hang around you and provide good company/conversation, they've earned something. If you're totally disinterested, I think you should say so right off the bat, or just not really engage in conversation. But, if you take up their time, you should at least offer them a drink, or tip them $5 or so. In many cases, I've felt like a guy earned his tip chatting with me, and I'll agree to a lap dance in the back, just as a formality to compensate him for the time already spent.

Escorts, be smart. Don't slap on surcharges.
 
Either eat the cost as a part of what could likely be repeat business or build it into the quoted rate.
 
People hate resort fees at hotels for good reason.

I recently had sort of the opposite situation...
 
The guy, who I had met before, texted me for a follow up meeting on Monday. Unfortunately, I was out of town, but I proposed Wednesday instead. He replied "that will work!"
 
Then Wednesday came, and I texted him to confirm. It had been less than 48 hours since we had agreed on Wednesday. I heard nothing back from him, and texted him a couple more times during the day. Nothing.
 
About a week later, I got a text from him saying that he had been out of town. This is lame. First of all, it seems unlikely that this out-of-town trip popped up within the 48 hours since I had last communicated with him, and secondly, where could he have been that he couldn't send a quick message to let me know that he was not going to be able to make it? Jail, maybe. (I'm mostly kidding about that, he doesn't seem like the jail type.)
 
He's been texting me every couple days with increasingly sexy and provocative messages and photos. I haven't responded at all. He's hot, but I'm feeling like if I wanted to deal with this kind of flakiness, I could just use Grindr for free.

I think that it can also mean that the person is negative, but ok with having sex with HIV+ persons who are on treatment and have suppressed their viral load to "undetectable." At this point, it is a well-accepted fact that when someone is undetectable, they are incapable of transmitting HIV. "U=U"
 
Having said all that, it seems like a bad idea to ever take someone's word for their HIV status, whether they claim they're "negative," "on PrEP," or "Undetectable," their claim may or may not be true. Each of us should always take responsibility for our own sexual health, whether that means using condoms or PrEP.

I think that it can also mean that the person is negative, but ok with having sex with HIV+ persons who are on treatment and have suppressed their viral load to "undetectable." At this point, it is a well-accepted fact that when someone is undetectable, they are incapable of transmitting HIV. "U=U"
 
Having said all that, it seems like a bad idea to ever take someone's word for their HIV status, whether they claim they're "negative," "on PrEP," or "Undetectable," their claim may or may not be true. Each of us should always take responsibility for our own sexual health, whether that means using condoms or PrEP.

I think that it can also mean that the person is negative, but ok with having sex with HIV+ persons who are on treatment and have suppressed their viral load to "undetectable." At this point, it is a well-accepted fact that when someone is undetectable, they are incapable of transmitting HIV. "U=U"
 
Having said all that, it seems like a bad idea to ever take someone's word for their HIV status, whether they claim they're "negative," "on PrEP," or "Undetectable," their claim may or may not be true. Each of us should always take responsibility for our own sexual health, whether that means using condoms or PrEP.

I think that it can also mean that the person is negative, but ok with having sex with HIV+ persons who are on treatment and have suppressed their viral load to "undetectable." At this point, it is a well-accepted fact that when someone is undetectable, they are incapable of transmitting HIV. "U=U"
 
Having said all that, it seems like a bad idea to ever take someone's word for their HIV status, whether they claim they're "negative," "on PrEP," or "Undetectable," their claim may or may not be true. Each of us should always take responsibility for our own sexual health, whether that means using condoms or PrEP.

Multiple other threads about him:
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/massage-by-gio-visiting-la.150063/#post-1793821
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/411-on-yizus-aka-gio.145996/#post-1737142
 
He also advertises here:
https://rentmasseur.com/yizus
 
His pics are accurate, and I've only seen good comments. I'd give him a B for massage skills, and a B+ for "extras." He seems like a nice guy.