former lurker
-
Posts
2,915 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
former lurker got a reaction from Strafe13 in JAMES XL
No. You were at fault, not him. Why should you get back what ostensibly is to protect him from your very scenario?
-
former lurker got a reaction from Aaron_Bauder in JAMES XL
Stop. You were an ass. And you continue to trash him. You never met him. And it was all due to your own poor behavior. So just stop. It's both pitiful (you) and spiteful for you to keep degrading James.
-
former lurker got a reaction from Golem in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from Strafe13 in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from hornytwells in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from LookingAround in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from builder boy in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from NJmusclelover in JAMES XL
You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.
-
former lurker got a reaction from sexymonk in JAMES XL
Shame on you. Reflect on your own conduct. Condemning others for responding to your clear failings is pathetic. It could cost him business, even though it's clearly you're own fault from your descriptions. I suppose you'll see it otherwise, and justify, and rationalize. Too bad. But don't trash him when it's really you that caused all of this. Maybe grow up?
-
former lurker got a reaction from LTH in JAMES XL
Shame on you. Reflect on your own conduct. Condemning others for responding to your clear failings is pathetic. It could cost him business, even though it's clearly you're own fault from your descriptions. I suppose you'll see it otherwise, and justify, and rationalize. Too bad. But don't trash him when it's really you that caused all of this. Maybe grow up?
-
former lurker reacted to caliguy in JAMES XL
The problem is that it seems to be recurring issue with you not being ready.
-
former lurker got a reaction from LTH in Any recent info on BryceJordan?
There is so much here that makes no sense. Why, if you had such a bad experience, did you seek out another? If, as you said, he told you your weight would be an issue, it seems he did you a solid by forgoing a session rather than pretending it would work. Also, the stuff you said about cauliflower, etc. just fucking rude. I suppose you'd be open to being judged on your physical appearance given how freely you trash someone else.
-
former lurker got a reaction from + Tarte Gogo in Adrian Moss pic/vid collection
No offense intended, but you seem to have expressed a lot of negative experiences. So I'm wondering: are you experiencing more negative stuff, is it because you're more adventurous or more negatitve? And I'd have to say, some of the stuff you've said is not only unsupported (at least in your posts) but fairly offensive. For example: 3 no shows -- means you have no basis to judge anything other than a willingness to see you. And givien the "no shows", what's your basis for proclaiming him a drug user and stating there are much better available?
-
former lurker got a reaction from m.yi in Any recent info on BryceJordan?
There is so much here that makes no sense. Why, if you had such a bad experience, did you seek out another? If, as you said, he told you your weight would be an issue, it seems he did you a solid by forgoing a session rather than pretending it would work. Also, the stuff you said about cauliflower, etc. just fucking rude. I suppose you'd be open to being judged on your physical appearance given how freely you trash someone else.
-
former lurker got a reaction from + José Soplanucas in Landon Mycles aka Marcus Mojo
Timarrie Baker. What a stud. I just wish he was on my side of the continent.
-
former lurker got a reaction from escortrod in Conflicted about escort's tone - what would you do?
I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.
-
former lurker got a reaction from Golem in Conflicted about escort's tone - what would you do?
I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.
-
former lurker got a reaction from + José Soplanucas in Conflicted about escort's tone - what would you do?
I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.
-
former lurker got a reaction from natmas02 in Conflicted about escort's tone - what would you do?
I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.
-
former lurker got a reaction from + honcho in Conflicted about escort's tone - what would you do?
I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.
-
former lurker got a reaction from + glutes in For your consideration: Sabastian(sic) Cruz
Get thee to the woodshed!
-
former lurker reacted to Beancounter in Chad White in Dallas
I saw that he had received another 1-Star rating. I just saw Chad for a second time last week and it was better than the first time. I was going to post another 5-Star rating for him but you have to wait 30 days before posting another review according to RM. I don’t know what to make of another 1-Star rating. His pictures are accurate, he’s very nice and a great kisser. I do know his first 1-Star rating was by a client that tried to get a full escort session after requesting only a massage. He wanted a full service session at the Massage rate.
I stand by my comments. He’s a good find and I’m a very satisfied customer.
-
former lurker reacted to Beancounter in Chad White in Dallas
Try to stay up, @lookingforfunny. The client contacted escort for a massage only. Client shows up and forces himself upon escort wanting a full escort experience but didn’t want to pay for it. Escort politely declines and tries to continue with massage. Client gets pissed off and leaves a one star review. Bottom line.....client is too friggin cheap to pay the escort rate and thinks he can get the escort experience at a massage rate.
-
former lurker got a reaction from natmas02 in When escorts cancel at the last minute
Grow up. These are people. And they operate in a difficult environment, with legal and health risks. The strident nature of your comment suggests a severe lack of empathy, a sense of entitlement when "hiring", and a sense that because you're hiring, the escort is contracted to do your bidding regardless of his health or his concerns. Fairly ugly I'd say. But your other posts don't display this sort of disregard for the escorts, so I'll cut you some slack, while disagreeing strenuously with this one post.
-
former lurker got a reaction from Bertster in Real Deal 411 on The Gamechanger
Geez! What a spectacular way to expose yourself as a supreme asshole. I suspect you'll just change your forum name in an effort to purge the stench from your venom, but in your next incarnation you won't be able to hide the venom anyway. Do a favor to the lads who escort, and put your money to better use than hiring them. Instead, find a good therapist and work through your issues.