wow!.....thanks for the suggestion of Infamous, which I just finished watching......whereas Capote seemed quieter, less flashy, and nearly documentary-like, Infamous seemed more wide-ranging, analytical, and a bit Hollywood-ed-up......I think I felt more moved by Infamous if my being a bit more stunned and reflective when it was over is an indication......Bullock's acting was restrained, professional, and seemed accurate......Jones's Capote was more flashy/flamboyant (exaggerated?) than Philip Seymour Hoffman's portrayal, but both seemed fantastic after I settled into the eccentricities of Capote himself......the kiss was a surprise in Infamous - I didn't think they'd make that assumptive leap of faith about their relationship........both entirely fun to watch....
thanks @Benjamin_Nicholas for the reminder that this other interpretation was out there!!
now back to the thread subject!!....books!!