Jaroslav

As I understand, RM is based in the Netherlands, not Germany. 

15 hours ago, jeezifonly said:

Great marketing strategy

”I’m available (sort of)                  to spend time (all that’s guaranteed) with men (a few of you) Contact me (if you dare) and I’ll get back to you (?) soon (if your CV, resume, full nude photos and 3 current credit references all pass inspection)”

 

Who’s interviewing whom here?!

On 3/14/2023 at 12:20 PM, BtmBearDad said:

What I was amused at was when I decided to end our back and forth with a polite “Thanks for your time, but I don’t think we’re a match” he was almost upset that I declined him. 

I had a guy do that to me once too. What too many of these guys fail to understand is that I’m not looking to have a quick fuck and call it a day. If you advertise boyfriend experience, expect some level of “interview” before the client commits. And if from that it’s not a fit, that’s the risk of advertising extended time. 

On 3/11/2023 at 10:15 PM, Marc in Calif said:

What's with the tongue sticking out in so many of his pics? 

Probably trying to be playful. Or suggest something 😈 

7 minutes ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

A new generation of 'escorts' (and I use the term loosely) think this is Grindr while getting paid.

That’s a good way of putting it. Several guys I’ve contacted recently seem to think I’m supposed to cater to them, not them to me. I find it’s the youngest crowd too. If you can believe the ages these guys put. I know a guy who’s profile says he’s 24 when he’s actually 35. I suppose 24 sounds more appealing. 

Right. On that profile. In the other thread here on him, others have has encounters with him in other places. That’s why I was wondering if there might be other intel. 

It would seem so

Is there any recent intel on Zander Lane?

https://rentmen.eu/ZanderL

His profile is expired but that doesn’t always mean much. 

Does this mean no one has an experience? 😱 

So, of course, we all here enjoy hiring guys. We get to select the idea fucker and set the terms.

But if you’re looking for something more, escorts really aren’t it.

Has anyone had any success with Compatible Partners or known anyone who has? I have a friend who swears by eHarmony, where she met her husband, but I’ve been hesitant to bite the bullet with real dating apps.

Any and all details welcome!

I didn’t read the whole thread.

But—I’ve been creative with pork lately. Super cheap. I’m taking advantage of that while it’s the case. Pork isn’t always cheaper than chicken!

I just got off the phone with Comcast. Needless to say, I had a poor experience although the problem was “addressed.”

I’ll simply say this: whoever agrees to transactional service, the one receiving the service always makes out worse than the one providing it. You won’t convince me otherwise. Whether it’s $10/mon or $400/hr. The service provider always comes out ahead in a transactional interaction. The service recipient has to decide how much they’re willing to be taken advantage of.

I will never pay RM as long as reviews can be deleted, regardless of cost or reason. The only reason I would pay RM is to review and since they’ve shown no qualms over taking down reviews, I’m not paying. 

You can call the ocean the sky all you want and we’ll all know it’s still the ocean—and think you’re delusional for believing it.

People can say whatever they want. We all know what’s going on. The circumlocution just makes me roll my eyes. “Okay, honey. If you say so.”

2 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

It's the same kind of legal dance that marijuana dispensaries play.

"It's for medicinal purposes only" . 😉

We all know, half the customers are there to get high, but you MUST stay within the legal narrative in your marketing.

Unless, of course, you live in any number of states where recreational marijuana is legal. Then all of a sudden that pretense is dropped. So really we know what’s up. So when we’re talking among ourselves, let’s not circumlocute. Just say it. I don’t know that anyone here, while writing in this forum, is compelled to keep up a legal charade.

On 3/1/2023 at 5:57 PM, Unicorn said:

reality is that it's just legal sophistry, IMHO.

My opinion too. So you’ve got company! 

31 minutes ago, Unicorn said:

Let's be honest with ourselves. With escorts, all that's lost is the pretense. 

👏🏻 

Where does this idea come from that if I say it’s not for sex it’s therefore not for sex?

Oops! I hired a guy who advertised “his time” with pictures of himself in seminude and outright nude pictures, and guess what happened?! Sex! That was never the plan! Never! Believe that and I’ll sell you a bridge in Brooklyn…

3 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

The point they seem to be making on Seeking is that it's a RELATIONSHIP site, not a hook-up/ escort site.

If you're in a "relationship" it's normal to buy things for your guy ( or gal ) especially if there's a big difference in your economic situations ( exactly the dynamic of Seeking ). Helping with the rent, or buying a Versace jacket for your boo, is not illegal. Paying for sex, is.

It’s a matter of what is said and what is meant. Especially when There’s a power/means differential.

If the relationship (or transaction) ends when the sex isn’t up to par (likely for the daddy or client), then we know the sex is part of the exchange. Just because you don’t explicitly say it doesn’t mean we don’t all know it’s part of it. The idea that because it’s not said so therefore isn’t meant is silly. We can believe what we want, but everyone knows what’s up.

On 2/27/2023 at 5:37 PM, jeezifonly said:

Happy to pay fee for time.

This is exactly what I meant above. We all *know* this is some sort of self-deceptive lie some folks tell themselves to say it’s not compensation for sex. Saying something doesn’t make it that.

By your logic, @jeezifonly, extra fine service would be extra time, nothing more, if the service we’re paying for is time.

On 2/27/2023 at 8:08 PM, Unicorn said:

Yes, they do, and they will ban anyone who hints of $$ for intimacy. 

Isn’t that about as ingenuine as saying that the compensation we pay escorts is for time and time alone? Everyone knows what is afoot. 

I wanted to also say before it submitted…

Those mentions of looking for sugar daddies I also find a bit offputting when looking to hire. I feel like I’m going to be handled as a second-class client because I’m not looking to go all in for the all-inclusive care-for-you experience. That could be my baggage but it’s what I feel.

Question: does SA explicitly forbid any mention of sugaring in exchange for a sexual partnership? I honestly don’t know because I haven’t explored it. I’m not really into the idea of sponsoring someone to live a carefree life on my dime, so I haven’t ever really considered sugaring something I would enjoy. Perhaps there’s more to it than that, but at the end of the day, it seems that you have to enjoy enabling to enjoy sugaring…Not that it’s wrong if you do; just not for me.

Really a simple question: when did escorting become about the escort getting a service from the provider? I see more and more ads that seem more like Seeking Arrangements profiles. I’m not interested in being an escort’s sugar daddy. That’s a service to the escort. To me, the escort is a service provider to me. If I wanted something more than a weekly BFE with a regular, then I would go to something like Seeking Arrangements, not Rentmen. It’s not a complete 180 on the roles, to be sure, but the lines definitely seem fuzzier than before with more and more escorts looking for “sugar.” I thought the transaction was “client pays, escort provides.” Am I missing something?

Yellowtail or Josh, depending how fancy you want to be. Unless of course you’re doing something specific, then a specific wine. I do prefer heritage wines. Don’t be afraid to forego cooking wines. They’ll work, sure, but why cut corners with your cooking? Aren’t you worth quality ingredients? You don’t have to break out a $500 bottle, but something that’s decent enough to drink alone should do the trick. Yellowtail and Josh really fall into this category. Not for the discerning palette’s discriminating taste alone, but perfect when melded with other ingredients. I don’t use cooking wines for the same reason I don’t buy generic ketchup. Some things just need the tested mark of quality. 

6 hours ago, alrajee said:

I scroll past Rentmen and Grindr/Tinder profiles that don't show their face.

I figure if you’re going to sell me something and part of your product is your body, then I should see your face. Likewise, if you’re serious about actually meeting up with clients, then you should show clients your face. I see it like basic escort etiquette. If an escort has out-the-gate expectations for every potential client, clients can have the same. For me, it’s considering hiring you only if you post your face. No face. No hire from Jaroslav!

 I also appreciate more than simply 20 pictures of your dick and 20 of your ass. A nice few pictures of everything from intimate to day-to-day gives a much better idea of who you are than six of your dick, even if one is beside a Suave shampoo bottle. Maybe one of you with your dog? 

Some very attractive men (boyfriends and escorts) have gotten very ugly after they’re personality came out. The reverse is true for the homelier types too…