rvwnsd

I don't get bent out of shape when a provider asks me to provide an uber/lyft, but my preference is the provider furnishes his own transportation, especially when they have a higher fee for an outcall than for an in call.

It is not heading toward a demise. The one or two escorts who don't accept cash are the exception, not the rule. Same with businesses (mostly restaurants) who don't accept cash. There are large banks (Truist and TD Bank come to mind) who don't have ATMs throughout the country. Anyone who banks there and is travelling outside of their footprint (Eastern US) is SOL. However, if someone conducts a business and anticipates travelling, they should bank somewhere that has nationwide ATM coverage or buck up and carry cash. PS: As for credit union shared branches, not all member credit unions' branches are shared. For example, Arizona Financial Credit Union's Biltmore branch does not offer shared branching, but their branch in East Phoenix does. Likewise, Sunwest's ATMs are not on the shared network, but their branches are. (Which is bizarre, but that's a credit union for you)

There was a similar store in Chicago when I was a kid. Then one day, they actually went out of business. Turned out, the department of consumer services received one too many complaints, pulled their business license and, "poof" they were gone. At the time, Chicago had a very strict ordinance about going out of business sales, as it was pretty common for stores to pull that stunt. But back to the topic - every time I see "book me now before I'm gone" I think "Don't let the door hit you on the way out."

Damn! i am dying to know what "Breast bikini flirting SPA" is.

Is your computer an Apple or Windows device? If Windows, you might want to consider using a 3rd-party password manager that works on all of your devices. (i use LastPass) If Apple, then the Apple password manager is fine.

Thanks for following up. Very happy to hear. Hopefully, he comes to Phoenix.

Moderator's Note: Thanks everyone for reading and following the moderator's note posted on Friday. There seems to be some confusion about what we can and can't post. Here's a refresher: CAN'T include the given name (first and last, first only, or last only) of Austin Wolf, his partner, and/or any named victims in the body of a post or reply to a post. CAN include a link to a news story or other artifact that include his given name. If the link itself contains his given name, use the link icon and when given the option to include text, enter something like "link to story" or some such, as below: And one last thing: When you disagree with another member's viewpoint, comment about the viewpoint and not the person. Thanks

No, he could not fire you. But he could file a complaint with one of his superiors or HR. Then they will take disciplinary action, which could result in your termination. You've mentioned you work for a large firm. They tend to have human resources policies. See the policy on personal relationships among colleagues (or something like that).

And I should have been more clear (I clarified). Haven't finished my first cup of coffee yet. 🥱

WOW. That's a lot more than what I paid were you to multiply his hourly by the time it would take to have dinner and hang out. Feel free to PM me for details. Edited for clarity.

I've hired him and, as his ad states, he is into worship only. However, his body is in amazing shape and I had a lot of fun with him.

How could we? He changes his name too frequently! 🤣

Given OF's nervousness around words like "meet" and their now-abandoned refusal to host adult content, it would not surprise me if they take his account down. However, it wouldn't surprise me if the account remains active.

Third paragraph of the story linked in the OP.

Well, a video of Austin Wolf and an off-duty, in-uniform flight attendant having sex in an airplane's lavatory went viral a few years ago. Per this news story, he had no comment and wanted to focus on "getting his life back together." IIRC, he was also accused of secretly filming hookups without his playmates' permission.

Moderator's Note: This is, indeed, a sad, serious story. It is impossible to think how I'd react if my niece or nephew were to be a victim of such a thing. My guess is that we all feel the same way. Therefore, a couple of reminders: Please keep the jokes to a minimum or, better yet, to none. Think about how you would feel if a loved one were a victim and someone on the Internet made a joke about them and/or their alleged victimizer. Please refrain from posting Austin Wolf's given name when replying to this topic. The same applies to any victims who might be named in news accounts. Posting a link to a news story (such as the one at the top of the thread) is OK, even if the story contains personal information. Just don't include the content here. Please avoid copying and pasting content. Include a link, using this icon . Thanks for keeping the topic on track. PS: Ignoring a moderator's or administrator's warning/note is violation of our Community Guidelines.

Agree. Looks like the same guy, but more defined and less beefy than in his RM ad. I think he looks better now. If I were still in Southern California, I'd be messaging him on Twitter (given his RM ad has expired) about a meetup.

He used "Kevin" and "Kev." Will didn't call himself "Will Tantra." He was just "Will."

There is a link to his Rentmasseur ad in the original post, but here it is again: https://rentmasseur.com/Kev Yes, same guy.

🙏THANK YOU🙏 Please keep us posted. PS: I'd take on for the team if he lived closer to me. Not ready to take a 6-hour road trip to see him in OC.

There aren't many bodybuilders in LA, either. Seems like they have all migrated to Florida.

Excellent point @APPLE1. A smart provider will address negative commentary calmly and professionally. You are right - that works well. Sadly, we have seen many instances where a provider refers to our members collectively as "pathetic old men," "old ladies," and "queens" and finds it necessary to rant about whatever has touched a nerve. That's when things don't go well. Fortunately, that doesn't happen very often.

Speaking as a 20+ year member of this site and its predecessors, the providers who routinely participate in the site are generally those who deliver high-quality experiences to their clients. Unless a provider enjoys being excoriated, it would make zero sense for a provider who delivers bad experiences to participate in this forum. Over the years we have had providers who expressed unpopular opinions freely and frequently. In fact, we still do. Also, as others have pointed out, "reviews" have not been permitted in the public forum. When the companion review site went dark in the advent of the previous owner's death, the rules around reviews were relaxed to allow members to share more details than they had in the past. Old habits die hard, and our members tend to avoid sharing details so as not to run afoul of the rules. All this being said, on a routine and regular basis members share unsatisfactory experiences in threads about well-reviewed/well-regarded providers. However, well-reviewed providers are well-reviewed for a reason: they provide good experiences to their clients. Also, members communicate via direct message, which helps them avoid hiring providers who are not a match. I've lost count of the times a member's message endorsing a provider made me realize the provider was not a match for me. Bad experience avoided. UPDATE: I forgot to mention the non-member providers who receive bad feedback, join, and make comments about the members in general and those who commented about them. That usually does not end well for them. Their response essentially validates the negative feedback. They have a habit of learning their lesson and not returning.

Likewise. Oh, and they have to do what they say they will do.

Thanks. I haven't had occasion to use the function recently. The review in question was posted quite a while ago and, of course, they deleted it. Will keep this in mind for next time, which hopefully never occurs.