purplekow

Well I have a few friends in LA area and I will send out the word to them about this animal. Networking may help this sweet guy. I know you saw him being dumped buy you can get him checked for a chip. Maybe the dumper is not the owner. Thanks for your work for an animal that needs just one sympathetic dog lover to find him.

There are Rottwieler rescues that will come and get the dog. I live across the country so I am a no but please keep trying to find a no kill shelter or Rottweiler rescue. www.rottrescuela.org. There is a Facebook page and a phone number on the Facebook page. 818-399-67++. Not sure it is okay to print out the whole phone number. but I believe it you want 2 you can figure this out 4 the last two numbers. They seem to be located in Sun Valley which means nothing to me but may mean something to you.

Well I would either cut the donation to cover the fee or just call it a day and look for another worthy institution to accept my money without a charge. I understand there is paperwork and bookkeeping that needs to be covered, but 6.5% fee to make a donation is not something that is going to encourage charitable gifts.

I did binge the first season of The Sinner on your recommendation. Story was interesting though there were some pretty big plot holes. I would recommend it. As to Sex/Life, I skim watched the first season. I do not feel I need to go back and watch the segments I skipped and despite the full frontal, I will probably not go back and watch the second season if there is one. Well, if the husband and the boyfriend get together, that might draw me back. Even the orgy scene was not really compelling.

At the least you knew not to waste time with him. Ikt was not rude just direct and clear. Secondly, if he had decided to forgo his usual standards and give you the privledge of paying for his services, it may well have been a disappointment given his clearly stated preferences. Blunt is temporarily painful but in the long run, it is an attribute of which we could use more.

Watch out for the pedophiles

Gee I thought it was Train erst rainer

As for me, I preferred the husband's round beefy ass to the boyfriend's long dick. In general, thought the husband is better looking, better body and a much hotter ass. Since the husbands package remains unveiled, I assume the boyfriend has a significant advantage there. But all in all, put in the husband column.

Flowers are indeed discouraged due to scent and allergies. As for a gift for those that assisted you, while monetary gifts are generally discouraged, some health care workers such as aides are not making a lot of money. A card with words of thanks is great, especially to those that have made a special effort. And if there happens to be a gift card in there, well these things happen

Your friend from out of town should have been informed of your relationship with the guy you were introducing him to. If he is your fiend, that would have been enough to insure that nothing would happen without at least a mention to you beforehand. The hookup wa just that. He was a guy you had sex with a few times, including wild sex the on the first date. I have always had the philosophy that if you are going to have sex with me when we first meet, you are probably having sex with as many people as you can have sex with on first meeting. So I would have expected nothing more than the sex buddy to try and hit on your friend. I would have expected my friend to be my friend and give me a heads up if he was interested in being another one in the long line of first meet sex partners with your hook up guy. Also, for me, I might have gone the three way route but hey I am a horny fuck who likes drama even after 50.

5 11 190 is nice and he definitely has a well defined and toned body. Agree with you that muscle god is not quite accurate. Needs about 15 pounds more of muscle and I might consider deifying him.

Difficult to find a C list celebrity who is out and gay and would appear on this horrible show. So it needs to be someone headed to the D list. Carson fits the bill. The new Queer Eye guys are C list but some are headed up the to the B list so they would not do it.

I have ignored people when their posts seem repetitious and designed to incite discord. I will go a time with them on ignore and eventually, if they continue to show up on the forum, I will unblock them and see if things have changed.

Great body but a bit a false advertising there. He states that he is a big muscular dude and lists himself at 5 8 and 170. No doubt he has a hot torso but would not call that big.

I have always hired escorts younger than I. However, they are not young by escort standards. The youngest escort I ever hired was 30 at the time I hired him. Right now I mainly am hiring men in their late 40s and early 50s. They are fit, fun and experienced and though I am only two of those three, a good time is had by all.

This probably does not rise to a level of a crime, though I suppose local ordinances may differ. I do agree that if it were an employee who did this, that punishment would be appropriate, possible to the level of firing.

I was at a Stop and Shop today and overhead they played a commercial about Stop and Shop supporting LGBT...not sure how far down the alphabet they went. As I was shopping, I came across a display with some rainbow knick knacks such as Pride Mini flags, rainbow employee badge holders, rainbow key chain. I reached to get a rainbow drink cozy. I intended to buy one to give to my next guest as a small token and intended to put his fee in the cozy. The cozy I picked out had no price tag and as I searched I noticed that all the cozies were tagless and then on looking further, I noticed that all the items on display did not have a price tag and in fact the tags had been cut off leaving only that annoying plastic item that holds the tag in place. The display was right next to the service desk and the service person at the store was helpful and she seemed honestly annoyed at the situation. When I said that it looked to have been done on purpose, she just sighed and said "of course they did" She then offered to get me the price and get it to me before I checked out. I told her to get the price pf each item as I intended to buy some of each. She said she would and that she would have the tags reaffixed to each item. So now I have a bunch of Gay Pride Kitsch.

Its seems on all sorts of scripted shows, especially soap operas, characters are caught thinking out loud. I know this is a plot device to advance story lines. I am curious if you think out loud and have those thoughts undermined your sinister plans for revenge? I do occasionally think out loud, usually to urge myself into action when thinking in my head just is not enough. Now where did I put my keys?

I fully support her personally but as far as my representation of the Department, I have tried to be representative of their wishes. I usually preface comments from the Advisory committee with a statement that "the committee brought forth" whereas if I make a statement on my own, I clearly state that to be the fact. The committee is made of Chairs from other Departments who know full well that I am my Departments representative and that I work daily with one of the candidates. OF the other three candidates, one I have known for 30 years and the other two for more than 10. I have worked with all the others and when I speak of them, I do not hesitate to point out positive things they have done. I do not believe asking for a different interview order that may or may not aid my candidate is a ruse or a subterfuge. In the end, I had no more influence on the interview order than others, but I was the only one who brought it up as a consideration. And as a paint, I understand that interview order may not be a big factor. My question really involved whether there was any data to settle the discussion I had with a colleague as to whether it did or did not. I think going last is an advantage, but as others have pointed out, going first is at times considered an advantage.

From What I have read, there are arguments for first interviewed and last interviewed defending on a variety of factors. These interviews are being done for one hour, one day a week over four weeks. As the four candidates are known to most of the committee, there may well be favorites based on prior relationships. Any little advantage may not overcome that. The one advantage the person going last might have is based on the question panel. The committee has decided that all four candidates will be asked the same 11 questions with an opening statement and a closing statement. The person going last may learn what questions are being asked as these things have a way of leaking out. I think the format should be changed to allow a candidate to be questioned based on their individual strengths and weaknesses. That was deemed unfair by the committee as a whole in a close vote. I am in a position to have a larger than average stake in the outcome, as the person getting the position will be the Chair of my department. The Committee members are Chairs of other Departments. I have a non-voting role and I am there to act as a liaison between the Department and the Committee. I was selected by the Department as a whole to Chairthe Committee that is advising the Selection Committee of the Department's needs and wants and to report back to the Department concerning the selection process. Pretty much, I am the middle man in a three person game of Telephone. .

Clearly labels have a role in life. If you were going to test the dog before adopting it, it may play some role in your choice. Once you have it, would you give him up because he is not genetically what you though he would be? Canine M. Butterfly, love the idea of the ideal dog but not the dog itself. I do not envision you to be that guy.

They are equally qualified on initial evaluation by the committee as a whole. I have worked with all four for at least 10 years. I am confident that the one I favor is capable of doing a better job than the others. She is also the only non white and only female candidate with a an all white male committee. She also has the most important position right now and would need to be replaced which will likely work against her as it would be easier to take one of the others who have positions which are more readily filled. In fact, at the first search committee meeting one of the members said flat out, why do we have to interview her, we should just let her stay where she is, without the qualifying rhetoric about being difficult to replace.

No matter the length or the girth, hung is anything I can't fully accommodate orally, so few guys are hung by that standard. . As I very rarely do anal, hung is anything that makes me breath hard which is pretty much everybody.

I had two big black dogs. I always thought of them as Newfoundland Labrador mixes. No matter what they were, I loved them and they were great companions and protectors. Why bother labeling your dog, tell people what you think he is and call it a day. Save the cash and buy him a toy and a few pounds of bones.

I am on a committee which is to interview four candidates for a job that they are all equally qualified to fill. I have a favored candidate and I convinced the chairman of the committee to interview in reverse alphabetical order rather than alphabetical order. This moved my candidate's interview position from first to last. I felt that by doing so, I increased her chances of success. My thinking is that by the time the fourth candidate is interviewed, she will only have to outshine one candidate, Each member of the committee would have likely picked their favorite from the first three and though it may be a different candidate for each member of the committee, she would only have to outshine that one candidate. In discussing this with a friend, they are of the opinion that it does not matter as she still needs to be the best candidate. I think that when it comes down to it, it will always be between her and one other candidate per decider whereas in any other interview position you will be compared to two or three candidates head to head and must outshine each one, one at a time. So game theorists, who is right on this? Is going last an advantage or not?