Jump to content

Gay Cheerleader of the Week Award


Doug69
 Share

This topic is 6163 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

A new award has been announced . . . to be bestowed upon the Gay Cheerleader of the Week here, the poster who writes the most slavishly ass-kissing and mindless, pointless "I agree!" posts each week - posts that have absolutely no purpose or point other than to cheer other posters on.

 

http://www.polarbearrepublic.com/images/templates/redskinside.jpg

 

While he will almost certainly win it every week, I want to be the first to congratulate JTBrooklyn for his outstanding body of obsequious, slavish work this week, consisting of the following riveting gems (posts re-printed in their empty entirety):

 

<<

 

* Flame. I could not have said it better! As a matter of fact "I know" I couldn't ! LOL :+

 

* Blue is Definitely a very "BRIGHT" Flame. You Rock Guy! :+

 

* Yeswell..LOL LOL :+

 

* That's Juan.. Always likes to be On Top of Everything! You Rock .. :+>>

 

I've never understood what prompts someone to get so emotionally invested in the personality disputes here that they actually make the choice to take time out of their lives to post for no reason other than to say "You tell 'em!" to someone they like who is insulting someone they don't like, but I can't help but admire the effort.

 

Congratulations to JT, Gay Cheerleader of the Week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hopefully, if he's lucky, he'll rack up as many trophies for that award as you have, over the years, for fuckin' asshole of the week.

 

You should head back over to retardland so you can be the first to read it's one post of the week.

 

I'd rather be a cheerleader like JT than a miserable failure like you any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Cum on guys! Having some FUN is what this is supposed to be

>all about...

>

>Let's cut the name calling business… and stop picking on JT…

>or anyone else for that matter...

>

 

Absolutely. No more name calling. And Doug, I'm know that I'm obsessing, kinda like your BN thing, but what about this VaHawk freak, who REALLY is the MOST wonderful, EXCITING, poster recently on this site. He JUST SO MOST deserves an honorable mention.

 

Later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doug..Things Slow at "Stooge Central"? Once again you have nothing better to do, But Quote JT BKLYN?

IF my Ex's Paid as much attention to what "I said" as apparently you do, I might not have had to Divorce them! LOL

I will now just "Lurk" and wait for Blue Flame.. If you decide to take a shot at him,He will "Kick your Butt" in about 5 Sentences or less.LOL

"Thanks" to all who took the time to even bother with a reply to What's his Name! :+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I've never understood what prompts someone to get so

>emotionally invested in the personality disputes here that

>they actually make the choice to take time out of their lives

>to post for no reason other than to say "You tell 'em!" to

>someone they like

 

What about a person who takes time to cut n paste a few examples of said posts plus inserting a photo of cheerleaders to drive the point home. What would you call that person?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Here comes the OCD princess.

 

Conway, what happened to that lawsuit you were threatening to file against me on behalf of deej last month? Why hasn't it been filed? You're not letting the mere fact that you aren't a lawyer and know nothing about law stop you from filing it, are you? LOL! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you still obsessing over something that purportedly happened weeks ago. I can't decide which is stronger, your OCD tendencies or your schizoid hallucinations.

 

You should take your meds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Conway, what happened to that lawsuit you were threatening to

>file against me on behalf of deej last month?

 

I'll take this opportunity to remind you I turned the offer down (although you knew this already).

 

You know damned good and well the offer was turned down yet you continue to ask why it hasn't proceeded. That behavior is called trolling, Woodlawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>Conway, what happened to that lawsuit you were threatening

>to

>>file against me on behalf of deej last month?

>

>I'll take this opportunity to remind you I turned the offer

>down (although you knew this already).

>

>You know damned good and well the offer was turned down yet

>you continue to ask why it hasn't proceeded. That behavior is

>called trolling, Woodlawn.

 

No, deej, it's called mocking a fool. A fool who pretended to be a scary trial lawyer in a ludicrous attempt to intimidate people he hates. I realize it frustrates you that there is now a message board where some of the many people who dislike you can say whatever they please about you while you are totally powerless to do anything about it. But you should not let your frustration prod you to tell lies. Especially such obvious lies. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>>Conway, what happened to that lawsuit you were threatening

>>to

>>>file against me on behalf of deej last month?

>>

>>I'll take this opportunity to remind you I turned the offer

>>down (although you knew this already).

>>

>>You know damned good and well the offer was turned down yet

>>you continue to ask why it hasn't proceeded. That behavior

>is

>>called trolling, Woodlawn.

>

>No, deej, it's called mocking a fool.

 

The fool is the guy (you) who keeps harping on an issue that was never an issue to begin with, and then accuses others of telling lies when they point out your foolishness.

 

You're a liar, Woodlawn. You have no ground to stand on here.

 

Conway made an offer and I turned it down. Yet you keep beating a dead horse. That's either trolling or stalking, and neither is a particularly attractive trait.

 

>I realize it frustrates you that there is

>now a message board where some of the many people who dislike

>you can say whatever they please about you while you are

>totally powerless to do anything about it.

 

[h2]ROFL![/h2]

 

The lies and fantasies over there are some of the best entertainment on the planet! Watching supposed adults toss around insults that wouldn't fly on any grade school playground is priceless.

 

Lessee ... who are the frightened shadow boxers going to accuse of being me today? Hmmm .... you'd have to have new posters for that and you don't have any of those. I guess that game is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I'll take this opportunity to remind you I turned the offer

>down (although you knew this already).

 

The hilarious part of what Conway did is not that he threatened a lawsuit and then failed to commence it.

 

The hilarious part is that he pretended online to be a trial lawyer - writing multiple posts claiming that he had a history of winning jury verdicts, claiming he could represent you pro bono, etc. - only to then reveal in several posts his complete ignorance of the law - both substantive and procedural. He made statements which reflected fundamental confusion about the issues on which he was trying to opine that no first year law student (or even Law & Order watcher), let alone any lawyer, would ever make.

 

Or, to put it more simply, Conway wanted to make himself seem important and powerful by lying about what he does for a living. He came here, beat his chest, claimed to be a successful trial lawyer, and then revealed with his posts that he was simply lying.

 

It's one of the most intensely humiliating things I've seen someone do to themselves on the Internet. And the things he said about "defamation per se" which revealed that he was no lawyer were genuinely some of the funniest things I've ever read from someone trying to talk about the law (and that's saying a lot!).

 

It was a truly memorable, hilarious and pitiful event - watching someone come and be so lacking in self-esteem that they have to pretend to be a lawyer and then humiliate themselves by saying the most misinformed possible things about the law that can be said.

 

I know that, personally, I can never get angry about anything Conway writes, or think about anything else when I see his name, other than this incident. No matter what he says, he will always be the Person Who Lied About Being a Trial Lawyer and Then Hilariously Exposed Himself. So it's hardly a surprise that Woodlawn remembers it, too.

 

I can understand why both you and he want to forget it and bully people into avoiding a discussion of it. But that is quite unlikely to happen. I still get hearty belly laughs when I think about it, and that's likely to go on for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How on earth would any lawyer commence any suit if the client if offered the service to declined it.

 

The hilarity you experienced is only overwhelmed by our dumbfoundeness at your inability to understand or the intellectual dishonesty

you display by floating a completely false story here.

 

You know very well, I never made any such posts claiming the things you state that I wrote above. If I did, it's easy enough for you to link. So, knock yourself, you intellectual turd.

 

Maybe, we should add "stupid" or "lying" to your existing title of "fuckin' asshole" (for the official record of course).

 

You wrote: "I still get hearty belly laughs when I think about it, and that's likely to go on for awhile."

 

But, you also get hearty belly laughs watching handicapped children getting off of a school bus...which is precisely why people think of you as the biggest asshole they know.

 

I thought Trilingual described you quite well on one of the other boards yesterday. It must make you quite proud to have alienated yourself from having any positive social relationships on two continents now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>How on earth would any lawyer commence any suit if the client

>if offered the service to declined it.

 

As I said (but you understandably ignored), the humiliating part for you is NOT that you threatened a lawsuit and then didn't go forward with it.

 

The humiliating part is that you claimed to be a successful trial lawyer only for you to then provide the indisputable proof - in the form of your own ignorance - that you were lying about this. It doesn't get much more humiliating than THAT.

 

>You know very well, I never made any such posts claiming the

>things you state that I wrote above. If I did, it's easy

>enough for you to link. So, knock yourself, you intellectual

>turd.

 

I thought you'd never ask! LOL! It's my favorite thread *ever*. Of course I can link to it. Here's the link: http://babydb.male4malescorts.com/m4mdc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=7&topic_id=55520

 

And here are some of my favorite, most humiliating parts from you, threatening Woodlawn with a big, bad lawsuit that you were going to bring pro bono on behalf of Deej (LOL!), all from Conway, the pretend, make-believe "trial lawyer":

__________________

 

<<You're confusing my reason for offering Deej free clounsel

with his reason for seeking legal sanctions against Woodlawn.

. . . .

Certainly damaging somone's reputation by claiming that he is

a meth addict is enough to support a slander suit in and of

itself whether Deej takes up my offer for pro bono

representation or not.

. . .

Obviously, you don't even know the difference between a criminal claim and a civil claim. But please do keep yapping. Hating you is going to be one of the easiest sells I have ever made to a jury.

. . .

All lawsuits can be incredibly expensive to defend whether

they have merit or not. Especially if the plaintiff was to

receive pro bono counsel. That's my professional experience.

 

I imagine that your personal information could be gleaned

rather easily either from a subpoena of the owners of this

board or EZ Board followed by a subpoena of your IP. From

there you could be served and deposed. In the deposition,

we'd find how much you really know versus how much harmful

gossip you are spreading.

_______________________________

 

LOL! Do you want me to post next all of the utterly idiotic statements you made about defamation per se which forced anyone with an even passing familiarity with the law to immediately know that you are no more of a trial lawyer than JT Brooklyn?

 

Or can you have a burst of honesty and confess that you were lying when you claimed to be a trial lawyer offering to represent Deej pro bono?

 

And, bless you for re-activating what is unquestionably my favorite discussion to take place on this Board in some time. My laughter is so strong it's like it happened just yesterday! Bless you, Conway.

 

And please - if you don't like my post - don't sue me pro se!! That would be scary!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. But, I don't see where I claim to be an attorney in that text.

 

You're obviously confusing the fact that I offered to pay the cost of Deej's counsel and that I know how to sell a jury with some misconstrued assumption on your part that I offered to represent Deej personally as his attorney. To the best of my knowledge, Deej lives in an entirely different state from me, half a country away. I would had to have been a member of the bar in Deej's home state (or some state where the slander took place) to represent him even if I was an attorney.

 

In addition to being an asshole, you've been a sucker for my subterfuge, proving that you're an asshole who's not very smart. If you were smart, which you're obviously not, you would have read my statements more closely, you would have determined that I work very closely with attorneys who take clients to trial. Making Defendants look like even more pompous assholes than they are and making Plaintiffs look like horribly harmed victims is a real gift.

 

I expect such an intellectual faux pax from Woodlawn because he's mentally ill and I'm sure that all of the voices in his head cloud the messages that his brain receives. I would have thought that you would have been slightly more of a challenge. But, you weren't. Instead you were proven to be, yet again, just a blustering presumptive idiot.

 

You're the kind of guy that I can make have an embarrassing temper tantrum in the court room or the board room. You're exactky the kind of guy who is my bread and butter.

 

It's amazing how quickly you jumped to assumption. You have proven that your uncontrollable ego is substantially bigger than your pea brain today. I already knew it. But, I thought it would be fun to show the other members of this message board what a fuck up you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And she could probably make them in a more literate fashion than you ever could.

 

Why don't you go back to putting your ankles behind your head while the smart people talk (at least the one smart person in this subthread).

 

Or maybe you can go reveal the real identity of your clients to the general public as you have in the past.

 

personal attack removed an a warning sent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>I'll take this opportunity to remind you I turned the offer

>>down (although you knew this already).

>

>The hilarious part of what Conway did is not that he

>threatened a lawsuit and then failed to commence it.

 

But that is exactly the part that you and Woodlawn have been harping on for weeks.

 

You, yourself, now admit that it isn't the point yet you both keep bringing it up. Incessantly. You're stirring up shit around an issue that does not exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...