411 Cody Dean

[nsguy45]

former lurker doth protest too much, methinks.

[+ freecahill1965]

Too funny. You cattily remark about short "fortune cookie" sentences, then say very little, and when it's pointed out, you say you're "too subtle". It's good if you can fool yourself.

You are trolling again.

[former lurker]

You are trolling again.

 

Repeating yourself without substance doesn't really do much. Have you met the guy? Do you have a first hand basis for any comments?

[+ nycman]

former lurker...has a bad reputation of defending bad escorts.

 

I suspect he is a con-artist escort himself....but given his varied defenses

of various bad escorts....it’s hard to tell exactly which one he is. He survives

by scamming clients and creating confusion here, so it’s harder to pick

out the losers. My gut is that he’s been around too long to actually be

“Cody Dean”. Although based on this thread it’s certainly a possibility.

 

I have to say he’s better at it than most, but eventually it becomes obvious.

I’m betting he’s one of the many alias’ of a well known Vegas scammer.

“Alpha Mega Huge Muscle Vegas”....he changes his name hourly....but it’s

always some variation on those words....and it’s always a scam.

 

Either...or...doesn’t matter. All of his posts are mindless trolling.

 

Today he joins Mocha on my elite “ignore” list.....good riddance!

[+ azdr0710]

the profiles, past posts, and other information of most members here can be easily found by left-clicking on their name near their avatar.....

 

former lurker's past posts, several months ago, have a good bit different tone than his very recent ones, which now seem combative.....I don't know if he's a provider in disguise or has made a decision to be a troll....or what......

[former lurker]

former lurker...has a bad reputation of defending bad escorts.

 

I suspect he is a con-artist escort himself....but given his varied defenses

of various bad escorts....it’s hard to tell exactly which one he is. He survives

by scamming clients and creating confusion here, so it’s harder to pick

out the losers. My gut is that he’s been around too long to actually be

“Cody Dean”. Although based on this thread it’s certainly a possibility.

 

I have to say he’s better at it than most, but eventually it becomes obvious.

I’m betting he’s one of the many alias’ of a well known Vegas scammer.

“Alpha Mega Huge Muscle Vegas”....he changes his name hourly....but it’s

always some variation on those words....and it’s always a scam.

 

Either...or...doesn’t matter. All of his posts are mindless trolling.

 

Today he joins Mocha on my elite “ignore” list.....good riddance!

 

Have you met him? Did he do wrong by you? Why are you so negative?

 

It's also lazy and unreasonable to associate any pushback to a false identity. I could call you a scammer, with no merit, just as you have. If this is your version of "betting", you wasting your money. I'm a client. Older. Not anything special. It really amazes me how in this age of the internet people make up all sorts or shit and pose it as reality.

[+ JEC]

Sometimes on this site I feel like I’m watching “The Boys in the Band”...... turning

[former lurker]

the profiles, past posts, and other information of most members here can be easily found by left-clicking on their name near their avatar.....

 

former lurker's past posts, several months ago, have a good bit different tone than his very recent ones, which now seem combative.....I don't know if he's a provider in disguise or has made a decision to be a troll....or what......

 

So thanks for noticing tone. It's been about response. I'm not a provider -- god, I wish I had the looks. I don't. I'm in my mid fifties, puffy, and grateful for any attention I get, which is generally paid attention.

[+ freecahill1965]

Repeating yourself without substance doesn't really do much. Have you met the guy? Do you have a first hand basis for any comments?

Your trolling refers to the content nature of your posts.

[Reluctant Daddy]

Sometimes on this site I feel like I’m watching “The Boys in the Band”...... turning

 

I was thinking more along the lines of The Women

[bostonman]

and grateful for any attention I get

 

...which is exactly what you're doing on this thread. Trolls do what they do for attention. I'm sad that you feel you have to do it this way. There would be friendlier and more rewarding ways of finding attention out here. And I mean this sincerely.

[+ JEC]

I was thinking more along the lines of The Women

Except the boys in the band are even more cunty

[Reluctant Daddy]

Except the boys in the band are even more cunty

 

Speaking of which.....

 

http://www.playbill.com/production/the-boys-in-the-band-booth-theatre

[former lurker]

Your trolling refers to the content nature of your posts.

Your trolling refers to the content nature of your posts.

 

So again, you offer an opinion but not substance. I'll offer an observation about your posts. Some of them are negative and obvious fakes. Thanks. But I think we can figure those out "fey robert" for example. Second, you trash guys you have not met. I just don't get that.

[bostonman]

Except the boys in the band are even more cunty

 

I read the play when I was in high school, in the process of my coming out. I remember hating it so much, and not identifying with any of the characters. I already knew that gay men didn't all live and behave like that, but the stereotypes and cruel bitchiness and divisiveness really bothered me. I've never seen the film, I've never seen the play onstage. And that's fine with me. As someone who works in theatre, I certainly don't expect all shows to be "relevant" or current in their outlook - otherwise we'd have ditched most of the classics long ago. But why anyone wants to revive this terrible and backward-looking piece of shit, I'll never know.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

But why anyone wants to revive this terrible and backward-looking piece of shit, I'll never know.

 

This is another case of the cast selling the story, not the story selling the audience

[bostonman]

This is another case of the cast selling the story, not the story selling the audience

 

yes - but surely Mantello and his cast could be "selling" a much better story?

[+ freecahill1965]

A

So again, you offer an opinion but not substance. I'll offer an observation about your posts. Some of them are negative and obvious fakes. Thanks. But I think we can figure those out "fey robert" for example. Second, you trash guys you have not met. I just don't get that.

Again, you are trolling. I am not sure the purpose but I hope you have a great weekend otherwise.

[Reluctant Daddy]

the stereotypes and cruel bitchiness and divisiveness really bothered me

 

And one only needs to look at many of the posts in forums like this to understand the relevance in the community today.

Edited March 4, 2018 by Reluctant Daddy

[+ Awwshuck]

 

former lurker's past posts, several months ago, have a good bit different tone than his very recent ones, which now seem combative.....I don't know if he's a provider in disguise or has made a decision to be a troll....or what......

 

Ah suspect former lurker needs some dick

[GBoi]

Too funny. You cattily remark about short "fortune cookie" sentences, then say very little, and when it's pointed out, you say you're "too subtle". It's good if you can fool yourself.

 

Quod erat faciendum

[former lurker]

Ah suspect former lurker needs some dick

 

I've actually gotten more than my share in the last week. But always up for more.

[former lurker]

Quod erat faciendum

 

Quod erat faciendum

 

You could have used "QED" which is a bit

This is another case of the cast selling the story, not the story selling the audience

 

I'm not sure about the tech, but I've always appreciated your perspective. You seem to be a really great guy.

[+ Awwshuck]

But always up for more.

 

We're all "pulling" for you

[Inkdnaija00]

Okaayyyyy..... moving forward... who here has actually met him and has thorough thoughtful reviews?. He's coming to dc with with Luke I think. Pm me if you want too. Thank you