411 on this guy in Los Angeles?

[Kyle Clinton]

Does anyone have any word or personal experience? https://rentmen.com/Alexalexander

[BabyBoomer]

It looks like he's using 2 different dick pix.

 

~Boomer ~

[Kyle Clinton]

Could be. Hard to tell. Spoke with him today and set appointment for Saturday. Crossing my fingers. Nice guy on the phone. He's fairly new to RM (since March) and only 25 (a little young for me normally) but conversation and "vibe" was really good so decided to take one for the team. Will report here but hoping to get any red flags prior should there be one from Daddys Forum members. Thanks for the reply Boomer!

[+ DickyF]

Let us know! Great looking guy. Imho his dick pix look the same with the gentle curve to the left. (1 pic is of a mirror). But let us know.

[+ Kman]

bumping this one, anyone meet this stud?

[+ Kman]

bump, anyone?

[+ LAdude424]

I;ll add my bump. @Kyle Clinton Did you take the plunge?

[coriolis888]

Spoke with him today and set appointment for Saturday.

 

Will report here but hoping to get any red flags prior should there be one from Daddy's Forum members.

 

 

 

I'll add my bump. @Kyle Clinton Did you take the plunge?

 

 

Six months since the scheduled meeting.

 

Nothing reported.

 

I hope he is okay.

[+ José Soplanucas]

Six months since the scheduled meeting.

 

Nothing reported.

 

I hope he is okay.

 

He signed up last time on November 19th. He survived that meeting.

[coriolis888]

 

He signed up last time on November 19th. He survived that meeting.

 

That is good to know -

[Kyle Clinton]

Hey guys! I've been M.I.A. for a while. Sorry for the delay in seeing these posts and in replying...Alexander...yes...met up in July. My brief report is:

 

He's a sweet guy. Don't think the photos he uses on RM with face are him. He's a nice looking guy but not as beautiful as the face in those pics. His body is big but not as cut as in those pics either. I'd step out to say that the side-shot pic of his body with erect pipe is likely him because it's plenty big. A couple weeks later, he reached out (on his own accord) and texted me to see if I was interested in another get-together. I don't care for that style of "keeping in touch". My terms. My preference. With that "red flag" move, I'll (for sure) not give a second thought connecting. But...in all reality, it's the dishonesty of the photos some of these guys use in their profiles that angers me. I get that bodies "shift" depending on diet and the like but when it's not your face? Draw the line because it feels like you think I'm a fool. Sometimes I'll still give you a chance and other times not. I gave this one a chance because he was still good looking and he certainly was nice.

[rvwnsd]

Hey guys! I've been M.I.A. for a while. Sorry for the delay in seeing these posts and in replying...Alexander...yes...met up in July. My brief report is:

 

He's a sweet guy. Don't think the photos he uses on RM with face are him. He's a nice looking guy but not as beautiful as the face in those pics. His body is big but not as cut as in those pics either. I'd step out to say that the side-shot pic of his body with erect pipe is likely him because it's plenty big. A couple weeks later, he reached out (on his own accord) and texted me to see if I was interested in another get-together. I don't care for that style of "keeping in touch". My terms. My preference. With that "red flag" move, ...

 

Understand why one would not hire an escort for a repeat when said escort appears to be using someone else's pictures. Also understand, despite feeling differently, that one might not want an escort to contact them about a future meeting. However, I am uncertain as to how an escort following up about a future hire is a warning sign of potential danger, which is what a red flag is.

[+ azdr0710]

A couple weeks later, he reached out (on his own accord) and texted me to see if I was interested in another get-together. I don't care for that style of "keeping in touch". My terms. My preference. With that "red flag" move, I'll (for sure) not give a second thought connecting.

 

I am uncertain as to how an escort following up about a future hire is a warning sign of potential danger, which is what a red flag is.

 

thanks for the report of your meeting, Kyle.....

 

I gotta agree that your belief that his version of "customer follow-up" is a red-flag is, perhaps, too critical .....it's a rather harsh dismissal of him, to be honest, since customer follow-up, even in this context, is a mainstay of good business practice......you only have to give a polite "thanks for the note....I'll give you a call when I'm ready to meet again"-style reply and move on......arguably, this is more "soliciting more business" than "customer follow-up", but a very brief reply is polite and professional

 

appreciate your comments....it's possible this may not survive the "no reviews in the forum" protocol, so we hope you'll submit a daddysreview if it comes to that.....

[+ Gar1eth]

But couldn’t the term ‘red-flag’ also be a personal warning sign? In this case I took it to mean that it was the type of behavior that didn’t appeal to @Kyle Clinton.

 

Although for me personally as long as it wasn’t too intrusive, and of course depending on how I liked the experience, I probably wouldn’t mind an occasional discreet inquiry from an escort.

 

Gman

[Kyle Clinton]

Understand why one would not hire an escort for a repeat when said escort appears to be using someone else's pictures. Also understand, despite feeling differently, that one might not want an escort to contact them about a future meeting. However, I am uncertain as to how an escort following up about a future hire is a warning sign of potential danger, which is what a red flag is.

 

To be more clear of my personal preference...perhaps after more than one single appointment, a followup and suggestion for a repeat session would be more appropriate had I initiated that second (or even 3rd) appointment already. This scenario would show I'm clearly interested in more appointments. Only then is a more comfortable relationship established. Again...my personal preference because privacy is important.

[Kyle Clinton]

thanks for the report of your meeting, Kyle.....

 

I gotta agree that your belief that his version of "customer follow-up" is a red-flag is, perhaps, too critical .....it's a rather harsh dismissal of him, to be honest, since customer follow-up, even in this context, is a mainstay of good business practice......you only have to give a polite "thanks for the note....I'll give you a call when I'm ready to meet again"-style reply and move on......arguably, this is more "soliciting more business" than "customer follow-up", but a very brief reply is polite and professional

 

appreciate your comments....it's possible this may not survive the "no reviews in the forum" protocol, so we hope you'll submit a daddysreview if it comes to that.....

Maybe a text message like, "Just wanted to say 'hi' and tell you I really enjoyed meeting you and hope to hear from you again. Hope you're well." However the text was much more direct and too obvious in it's intent for making money because business was likely slow that week/month. I completely "get" that but there is a more subtle way of "fishing". Like...compliment me by first telling me you had a fun time with me. Again...direct and obvious (when you hardly know me) is uncomfortable. In a service business, I prefer service to be the goal first and $$ to be secondary. As a customer, most of us want to at least feel that way even though $$ is a major component.