Jump to content

Your Daily Nick Jonas


jjkrkwood
This topic is 3230 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
I think he's going to age nicely like Wahlberg and Efron.

 

 

Even if he doesn't, the cock is the last thing to age, so my head will still be between those thick thighs. I just wont look up !

Posted
Even if he doesn't, the cock is the last thing to age, so my head will still be between those thick thighs. I just wont look up !

 

Do you know something about his tallywacker size that we don't, @jjkrkwood ?

 

Nick Jonas has that time stands still look-- he will look like he's in his twenties for 20 years!

 

He's only 24 now. While you might be right, I'm going to wait until he's 35 to decide that.

 

Gman

Posted
Do you know something about his tallywacker size that we don't, @jjkrkwood ?

 

 

 

He's only 24 now. While you might be right, I'm going to wait until he's 35 to decide that.

 

Gman

 

Several of the gossip blogs claim he's taking steroids to get that buff body. His brother is alleged to be doing the same. I hope that's not the case but it would not be a surprise.

Posted
Several of the gossip blogs claim he's taking steroids to get that buff body. His brother is alleged to be doing the same. I hope that's not the case but it would not be a surprise.

 

I'm going to assume you are are taking about Joe and not Kevin. I hadn't noticed -not that I really look for him-him looking particularly hunky.

 

(Note:I doubt I'd see much of Nick either if online gay websites didn't keep reporting on him)

 

Gman

Posted
Just because.......

 

http://i.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/nick-jonas-wonderland__oPt.jpg

 

"Your too sexy beautiful. Everybody want's a taste."

 

Nick is so "deliciously beautiful." I could render him one hell of a memorable "tongue bath" as we both experience some long-lasting "afterglows!" :p :rolleyes: :p

Posted
Several of the gossip blogs claim he's taking steroids to get that buff body. His brother is alleged to be doing the same. I hope that's not the case but it would not be a surprise.

 

We all know what steroids look like on a body. Nick is not doing steroids.

Posted
We all know what steroids look like on a body. Nick is not doing steroids.

 

Nick is so "deliciously beautiful." I could render him one hell of a memorable "tongue bath" as we both experience some long-lasting "afterglows!" :p :rolleyes: :p

 

I'm going to assume you are are taking about Joe and not Kevin. I hadn't noticed -not that I really look for him-him looking particularly hunky.

 

(Note:I doubt I'd see much of Nick either if online gay websites didn't keep reporting on him)

 

Gman

 

Several of the gossip blogs claim he's taking steroids to get that buff body. His brother is alleged to be doing the same. I hope that's not the case but it would not be a surprise.

 

Projection on my part! I doubt he will lose his hair and if he stays in shape it's 24 for 20 years!

 

Even if he doesn't, the cock is the last thing to age, so my head will still be between those thick thighs. I just wont look up !

 

I think he's going to age nicely like Wahlberg and Efron.

 

More on him

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/nick-jonas-butt-dedicated-to-sync.117743/

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/nick-jonas.103927/

Posted
We all know what steroids look like on a body. Nick is not doing steroids.

 

As I noted, this allegation of steroids comes from several gossip blogs. Blind Gossip has several posts about steroid use by one or more of the Jonas brothers. The most recent linked below. TMZ has had comments alluding to same. In these instances with celebrities the gossip columns publish snippets of innuendo, some times for months or even years, until the truth is publicly revealed. I said it was alleged and hoped it wasn't true. If one of the brothers is using steroids the truth will come out eventually.

 

http://blindgossip.com/?p=80854

Posted
As I noted, this allegation of steroids comes from several gossip blogs. Blind Gossip has several posts about steroid use by one or more of the Jonas brothers. The most recent linked below. TMZ has had comments alluding to same. In these instances with celebrities the gossip columns publish snippets of innuendo, some times for months or even years, until the truth is publicly revealed. I said it was alleged and hoped it wasn't true. If one of the brothers is using steroids the truth will come out eventually.

 

http://blindgossip.com/?p=80854

 

 

But honestly, why should we care ? It's not our business. People in show business often transform their bodies for roles they play. In Nicks case, he has played several recent roles where he was required to portray an extremely physically fit athlete, or alpha-macho persona. So what if he does steroids to achieve "a look". I am sure he isn't doing it in some back alley. It probably under doctor supervision. It's his body and his life, and our nose's shouldn't be in his biz.... And does he need to tell us about it ? If he chooses to. Public figures ARE entitled to have some privacies. All we need to do as Fans is "look" and "appreciate"....

Posted

Not everyone who goes on steroids does it to get huge, many do it just to get lean. I wouldn't say there's no way he's using.

He's also unusually ripped for someone with diabetes.

Posted
Not everyone who goes on steroids does it to get huge, many do it just to get lean. I wouldn't say there's no way he's using.

He's also unusually ripped for someone with diabetes.

Steroids usually increase insulin resistance and up your sugar. That would be dangerous for a diabetic.

 

Gman

Posted

I figure just as nearly all actresses are getting face lifts and boob jobs, almost all actors are periodically juicing. As are plenty of regular folks. There are so many completely ripped 30somethings and 40somethings today, and the human race simply doesn't evolve that much in 30 years.

Posted

JUICE does a body Good !

 

 

http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e15/11419237_1035161689834932_1980445017_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTAwNDQ3MDY0MzM4Mjg2OTE2OQ%3D%3D.2

Posted
I figure just as nearly all actresses are getting face lifts and boob jobs, almost all actors are periodically juicing. As are plenty of regular folks. There are so many completely ripped 30somethings and 40somethings today, and the human race simply doesn't evolve that much in 30 years.

 

While these all have medical downsides, the biggest danger with surgery is lack of skill or negligence and foreseeable and unforeseeable complications. Hopefully the foreseeable complications are minimized by testing and informed consent and patients look at a surgeon's record and level of expertise, but things can always go haywire.

 

Juicing has known adverse consequences that are likely to arise unless steroids are used sparingly (and probably only once in a lifetime). But conservative use is at odds with the reason why steroids are used.

 

Sorry, I can't do the shoulder shrug on this one and agree it's all the same thing.

Posted
While these all have medical downsides, the biggest danger with surgery is lack of skill or negligence and foreseeable and unforeseeable complications. Hopefully the foreseeable complications are minimized by testing and informed consent and patients look at a surgeon's record and level of expertise, but things can always go haywire.

I know this is a wild tangent, but there has been some discussion in the media here about out of pocket expenses people here have to pay between what health insurance pays and the fees that a surgeon charges (it would all be covered in a public hospital but you might have to wait, perhaps too long; examples were cited of prostate surgery having gap costs of $5,000 in Sydney, but about $400 in Melbourne). The issue arises from health insurance companies seeking to control what can be charged and using data to determine that. One of the issues is that patients (and GPs) have no idea who is a good surgeon (they use friendship networks, rumour, bedside manner reputations) but with data, the insurers have a much better idea. Surgeons are aghast that their clinical results may be used by patients in determining whether to hire them!

Posted
I know this is a wild tangent, but there has been some discussion in the media here about out of pocket expenses people here have to pay between what health insurance pays and the fees that a surgeon charges (it would all be covered in a public hospital but you might have to wait, perhaps too long; examples were cited of prostate surgery having gap costs of $5,000 in Sydney, but about $400 in Melbourne). The issue arises from health insurance companies seeking to control what can be charged and using data to determine that. One of the issues is that patients (and GPs) have no idea who is a good surgeon (they use friendship networks, rumour, bedside manner reputations) but with data, the insurers have a much better idea. Surgeons are aghast that their clinical results may be used by patients in determining whether to hire them!

 

The problem is data doesn't really tell you that story. There are far more variables that go into a patient outcome than can reasonable be stored and analyzed. And many of these have little to nothing to do with the skill of the doctor. The doctor who takes the harder cases will be expected to have a higher mortality rate, but how do you tell how much higher it should be without other identical cases to compare it to? 30% higher is reasonable but 40% higher means she's a bad surgeon?

That's just one example. Then there is the fact there's very wide random variation in outcomes of many conditions. My brother's wife had cancer and had "less than 6 mos to live" for almost 3 years. My BIL has been morbidly obese, diabetic, addicted to painkillers, on multiple psychotropic drugs for anxiety and bipolar disorder for about ten years and still kicking at 62. His mother, who's not much lighter, has been in similar shape for almost 30 years. Nothing kills some people. If they did "the right" things they'd probably live to 120.

Posted
While these all have medical downsides, the biggest danger with surgery is lack of skill or negligence and foreseeable and unforeseeable complications. Hopefully the foreseeable complications are minimized by testing and informed consent and patients look at a surgeon's record and level of expertise, but things can always go haywire.

 

Juicing has known adverse consequences that are likely to arise unless steroids are used sparingly (and probably only once in a lifetime). But conservative use is at odds with the reason why steroids are used.

 

Sorry, I can't do the shoulder shrug on this one and agree it's all the same thing.

 

I'm not sure if it's technically steroids, but I think there are more guys doing male hormone replacement therapy - simply bringing their testosterone levels to the higher end of the normal range as opposed to "superhuman" levels. I've been debating seeing someone about giving that a try(I'm 45).

Posted
I'm not sure if it's technically steroids, but I think there are more guys doing male hormone replacement therapy - simply bringing their testosterone levels to the higher end of the normal range as opposed to "superhuman" levels. I've been debating seeing someone about giving that a try(I'm 45).

 

I tested for and came up positive for "Low T"... I consulted a doctor about hormone replacement to increase energy levels and sex drive... I have other medical issues like high BP and cholesterol, and a mal-functioning kidney, and was advised NOT to go down the hormone road since it can create a lot more problems in MY case than solve. A lot of doctors will just prescribe them willy-nilly... You need to consult a reputable doctor that you TRUST.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...