Austin Wolf

[chelseanyc]

From Str8upgayporn.com:

 

Austin Wolf Continues To Post Escort Clients’ Phone Numbers, Says He’s Too Famous For Grindr

[+ Gar1eth]

From Str8upgayporn.com:

 

Austin Wolf Continues To Post Escort Clients’ Phone Numbers, Says He’s Too Famous For Grindr

 

From the tweet in the article, I couldn't tell whether Tyler was calling out Austin or Saxon West.

 

I met Austin-he seemed a bit reserved. And he wasn't that greatest kisser. He kept a cock ring on. But he never was fully hard. Of course since I don't bottom that didn't matter. But I would have liked to have seen it. Unfortunately I was 'too excited' to be with a famous porn star and ended up not being able to top him.

 

 

 

Gman

[+ tristanbaldwin]

Know I'm joining the party here kind of late, and although I'll be in the minority in saying it from what I read so far....I don't think Steve is the dick at all, here's the reason.

 

If Steve is the one who suggested the 3 some with escorts A and B(Austin Wolf), and then realizes that the ATM won't allow for full withdrawl to cover both..he canceled escort A(with whom he ostensibly has seen before and probably has a great relationship with), and intends to procede onwards 1 on 1 with Escort B(Austin Wolf). 98% of the appointments I cover/seem to get are 1 on 1, so why would Wolf balk at the prospect of doing the 1 on 1 with the client? To me, if someone only had the resources to see one of us, and he picks ME, even though it might suck for Escort A; to me it's a compliment that the person is only in NYC for a limited time and would prefer to see me...and will see / make it up to Escort A at some other point.

 

There is a gentleman on this forum that I've done some three ways with, and we constantly have a hard time finding a third who ACTUALLY follows through...they cancel out last minute all the time. But does that stop us from having a great time, 1 on 1? No. The Sign of professionals are people who adapt, overcome, and find a way to bring out that smile.

 

Eisenhower presents a good alternative, though- if Escort A already knew this client, he should be willing to take a check, Paypal, or I Owe You from him. Although I rarely take checks, I've literally told a routine client who forgot to get the money before- just get me whenever is convenient...and he sure did. Trust is hard to build in this industry- but once you've built it, it's there to last.

 

Surprised there's so much flare up over this- I don't think Steve was in the wrong at all.

[Guest countryboywny]

I totally agree with Tristan..

For me, the bottom line for all this drama is that Austin Wolf will never see my money. Done, over.

[Guest MikeThomas]

Nice to read Tristan supporting the client. However, I went back and read the original post and it seems that the client had AW make all of the arrangements with the third and it was then AW's job to cancel the third. Seems to me it put AW into an akward position when it was the client who didn't plan ahead.

 

Anyway, after reading more about AW, he's no longer on my bucket list.

 

Tristan still is though! When are you coming back to Dallas??

[+ tristanbaldwin]

I just went back and re-read the original as well- and you're right...if AW was told to secure the other guy, and then has to be the one to cancel him...it does kinda put him in a predicament..because I'm sure the other guy(Escort A) was bitching. However, if Escort B(Austin) still had the option to work because the guy did have the money to at least pay his half of the arrangement, why wouldn't he capitalize on that? Perhaps as a matter of 'loyalty' to the other escort, that's why Austin went cold on the client, or was simply too frustrated based on the time investment back and forth texting or calling(which, I honestly don't think was probably too difficult, this is a multi-task type situation...you can do this while cooking eggs for christ's sakes).

 

However, the flags that stand out to me in this- client could have simply bullshitted and said he was sick or had a family situation come up, as a reason to cancel. Instead, he sheepishly admits that he didn't have the resources to go ahead with both guys, but still wanted to pursue an arrangement with one. Gets immediate points in my book for being honest, and trying to make good on a situation, rather than going silent, as was the response that was given to him by the working guys.

 

As an escort- let's say someone was hiring me and AJ, or me Ace or whoever. Not trying to involve specific names here. Insert name ______. If I'm friends with them, and the client comes clean and says he's only got the ability currently to hire one, and it happens to be the other guy and not me, am I going to be pissed and not want him to take the job, just because I got dropped from the equation? NO! I'd want both the client and my friend to have fun, do their thing, it is what it is. You get the guy on the next go around, and if anything, he's going to be more appreciative of the fact that you handled the back-off well.

 

Sometimes the less you ask for, the more you get. The smaller hook sometimes catches a bigger fish in long run. Plenty of energy out there for us all.

 

And Mike- I'll be back in Dallas October 27,28,29! =P

[Guest countryboywny]

 

Sometimes the less you ask for, the more you get. The smaller hook sometimes catches a bigger fish in long run. Plenty of energy out there for us all.

 

Love your attitude, TB!! Two thumbs WAY UP!

[AdamSmith]

Sometimes the less you ask for, the more you get. The smaller hook sometimes catches a bigger fish in long run.

 

One of the smartest things I've ever read here! Absolutely true in all kinds of businesses.

[mike carey]

And Mike- I'll be back in Dallas October 27,28,29! =P

Oh, you meant Mike Thomas!

[whipped guy]

One of the smartest things I've ever read here! Absolutely true in all kinds of businesses.

Ditto!!!!!!!

[caliguy]

Seems to me it put AW into an akward position when it was the client who didn't plan ahead.

 

Except no one was inconvenienced. He had a full day to explain the situation to his partner. I'd say it's part of the business. At the very least act like an adult instead of ignoring him. Can't believe so many here defended that.

 

Hearing this now sure seems to fit everything the OP was going through with him. He has a hate relationship with clients.

[Guy Fawkes]

It's kind of bad form to post to a year old thread. I've split it out to reduce confusion.

 

http://usercontent2.hubimg.com/4161931_f260.jpg

[+ Robster]

It's kind of bad form to post to a year old thread. I've split it out to reduce confusion.

 

Tristan's post (the 3rd post in this new thread), and most of the posts that follow, don't make sense without the context of that other thread.

 

How exactly does that reduce confusion?

 

Rob

[Guy Fawkes]

And so just how long are we going to call him a dick?

[+ purplekow]

I suggest we call a spade a spade and a dick a dick. In this case, AW might not have revealed himself to the dick he proved to later. This may have been resurrected to reveal that the latest indiscretion on AW's part was not the first time his character was questioned.

[+ tristanbaldwin]

I'm going to chime in here and simply call Whipped Guy a dick, just to add fuel to the fire, and because we all love him so much. In fact, I'll call BvB a dick too, just to wake him up. And whoever this TB guy is...naming his abbreviation after a communicable disease...he's a dicccckkk!