Can Having Too Many Positive or Mixed Reviews Harm An Escort's Creditibility??

[RadioRob]

Hi JD,

 

I have not had the pleasure of meeting you yet, but it is from your reviews and your contributions here on the forum that I have given you a place on my wish list! Long before you ever joined this forum though, you were already on my list because of your reviews and the pictures you had on your RB ad...if I go on the belief that a hot man actually looks hotter than his pictures (providing they're not fakes, of course, which I am confident yours aren't), then I knew from just looking at your online pictures that sometime, somewhere, I will enjoy meeting you!

 

I've met JD at the Daddy's luncheon in DC and again afterwards at Dave's place for the special demonstrations... his pictures are absolutely not fake.

[BabyBoomer]

JD- Keep doing what you're doing. Have you ever had a client tell you that they were hesitant to hire you because of your number of reviews? Enjoy the rest of your time in GA!

 

~ Boomer ~

[down_to_business]

I guess I can somewhat understand how too many reviews could be considered a bad thing. Some clients may be under the "delusion" that they are the one and only person said escort entertains and having thousands of reviews may make that fantasy hard to swallow.

 

For me personally, I am ok with a lot of reviews as long as they aren't all first time reviews or read the same. The one thing that triggers my unshakable skepticism is when a negative review is immediately followed by a glowing review (or reviews) from a first time reviewer. That is game over as far as I am concerned.

 

In general, more reviews are good because reviewers all have different styles and some tell you absolutely nothing of use at all.

[m4hotness]

JD, the only reasoning I see that one might feel that too many reviews might hinder a client from hiring are;

1) the escort now has an inflated ego and may not try as hard to please said client.

2) having an abundance of positive reviews may cause the escort to amend his pricing at a rate that is much higher than what the market dictates for that area.

3) lets say that the escort advertises as versatile but all the reviews state that he was the top, may cause future clients to think that is the only activity the escort is interested in doing.

 

Sorry for such a long post. Loved your review #92. Would love to try it but scared of such big endowments. Lol.

[dcguy20]

I have generally consulted reviews not only to see the positive, but to see if anyone has had a negative experience. They certainly have swayed me to hire two. There was a well-reviewed escort that I had seen a couple of times, but when reviews for him popped up frequently, and the scenarios were very similar, I decided to stop hiring him. For some reason, those reviews were a turn-off for me.

 

On another note, there was another well-reviewed (now retired) guy here who received a review here from a woman. That totally dissuaded me from hiring him.

 

I'd be more concerned if I had numerous bad reviews than anything else. The one thing I dislike is feeling pressured to write a review as I'm walking out the door. I usually won't re-hire after that. Just my 2 cents.

[jimboivyo]

a bunch of positive reviews from different stand up folks is always a good sign

 

folks are making this a bigger issue about this than there should be. there's never a problem with getting a thumbs up review. it means youre doing something right

[Guest]

Escorts with tons of review from 1st and 2nd-time reviewers are usually shysters, although they may be good escorts. There are lots of obvious examples of which most of us are familiar. I take a dim view on escorts with tons of first and second time reviews. In this case, they're clearly using this site as a free advertising site.

[+ quoththeraven]

Escorts with tons of review from 1st and 2nd-time reviewers are usually shysters, although they may be good escorts. There are lots of obvious examples of which most of us are familiar. I take a dim view on escorts with tons of first and second time reviews. In this case, they're clearly using this site as a free advertising site.

 

Can you please explain? I don't know how someone can be a good escort and a shyster. Or do you mean good businessman and successful escort? Could you PM me the obvious examples, because I can't think of any.

 

Isn't the review section free advertising for all escorts anyway? How are escorts with tons of first and second time reviews different from other escorts? Those who are new to the biz are likely to have mostly, if not entirely, first and second time reviewers. For another, as someone who's reviewed three times, I can assure you my first and second reviews have no less integrity than the third and my third doesn't magically have more integrity than the first two.

 

Skepticism is fine and good and understandable. Blanket rules of thumb that don't take variables into account aren't.

[+ quoththeraven]

Hi JD,

 

I have not had the pleasure of meeting you yet, but it is from your reviews and your contributions here on the forum that I have given you a place on my wish list! Long before you ever joined this forum though, you were already on my list because of your reviews and the pictures you had on your RB ad...if I go on the belief that a hot man actually looks hotter than his pictures (providing they're not fakes, of course, which I am confident yours aren't), then I knew from just looking at your online pictures that sometime, somewhere, I will enjoy meeting you!

 

As far as having too many positive reviews, for a man like you, with only positive feedback, from multiple and diverse reviewers, quite a few being forum members with multiple reviews posted, I would say: don't worry your beautiful head about this issue, it should be a complete non-issue for escorts such as yourself, whose reviews and reputations give them 100% credibility as among the top professionals available! Keep doing what you're doing, babe, and don't worry about the small sh*t!

 

TruHart1

 

Augh, I forgot about this when I was responding to your PM. Now that they're "conversations" instead, I want to rename them in Italian -- a la Whipped Guy -- and call them conversaziones. I hope I spelled that right.

 

Anyway, I wanted to tell you that your assumption is spot on: J.D. is even better looking and hotter in person than he is in his photos.

[JDXXX]

For me, there is kind of a sweet spot of maybe 5-20 positive reviews. My practice is to hire well-reviewed escorts, and, doing this, I have never had a disappointing experience. So, 4 or 5 is the minimum I want to see. And I'm not exactly sure why, but I do tend to pass heavily-reviewed escorts by. Somebody with only a few reviews could be an undiscovered gem. But there are some men in whom I am so interested that I will give them a try no matter how many reviews they have.

Hey Rudy -

Do you pass heavily reviewed escorts cause you may feel they're not as good or going to exceed your expectations as well as the less highly reviewed guys?

[JDXXX]

There's really no telling what other people think, JD. Some guys won't consider hiring an escort who isn't "well-reviewed," a term whose definition varies from client to client. Other guys think a preponderance of reviews is a bad sign. Still others complain that clients who are new to hiring don't write reviews while others question the veracity of first- or second time reviewers. Who can possibly keep up with these conflicting views? Moreover, who wants to?

 

There's no sense worrying whether someone will or won't hire you because you have too many reviews. Ask yourself: do you really want a client who is that mistrustful? My advice is to focus on what you can control: the service you provide. If you provide excellent service and do your best to please your clients you will win repeat business.

 

Hi Rvwnsd,

I agree with you totally with everything you said and will continue to always do great as that's all you can do - right?

[JDXXX]

Sometimes the tastiest pie is the humble variety. Then again, others prefer the strong flavor of rhubarb. You can't be everything to everybody!

Well said, Nate. I agree. Not all escorts are going to be everyone's cup of tea or everything to everyone at all times. Just not a reality.

[JDXXX]

Can you please explain? I don't know how someone can be a good escort and a shyster. Or do you mean good businessman and successful escort? Could you PM me the obvious examples, because I can't think of any.

 

Isn't the review section free advertising for all escorts anyway? How are escorts with tons of first and second time reviews different from other escorts? Those who are new to the biz are likely to have mostly, if not entirely, first and second time reviewers. For another, as someone who's reviewed three times, I can assure you my first and second reviews have no less integrity than the third and my third doesn't magically have more integrity than the first two.

 

Skepticism is fine and good and understandable. Blanket rules of thumb that don't take variables into account aren't.

 

Hey Quoththraven -

 

I agree as to a lot of what you said as I found a lot of the first time reviewers can be just as "valuable" as the ones who are not first and second timers. They are still reviews no matter what position they're in or how many they write. If the review is legit, superb, and not fake - why should it matter? Well said, my dear. For example - my 92nd review was from a first time reviewer which was a smash. Not to say not all of my reviews are good, but this particular one seem to be the "center piece" of all my past reviews and again - this came from a first time reviewer as his review about me raised eyebrows for which I am thankful he did such a stellar review like he did as it just goes to prove that first timers can be just as good as anyone else who are not first time reviewers. To me - everyone is equal in regards to reviews whether they're first time reviewers or not as it only sharing an experience with the escort of they're choice at the time.

[JDXXX]

Augh, I forgot about this when I was responding to your PM. Now that they're "conversations" instead, I want to rename them in Italian -- a la Whipped Guy -- and call them conversaziones. I hope I spelled that right.

 

Anyway, I wanted to tell you that your assumption is spot on: J.D. is even better looking and hotter in person than he is in his photos.

Thank you, sweetheart as that means a lot coming from you. . Much love and HUGS.

[JDXXX]

I think there are two separate issues here:

 

I suspect an escort who gets multiple reviews from first-time reviewers each week. I mean, what's causing this guy to get a dozen reviews a week, all from guys who have never written one before?

 

Separately, there's the question of an escort who has multiple reviews from established reviewers over a long period of time. Some potential clients may be more interested in finding the ingenue who has yet to have all those experiences, fresh meat as it were. Others may prefer the tried and true. And that's great. No escort can be every flavor for every guy, nor should he want to be. The catch is to meet the clients who like what you have to offer (newness? credibility? the boyfriend experience? a hard rough fuck?) and not worry about those who are looking for something else.

 

Kevin Slater

 

Hi Kevin -

 

I appreciate your input, and will take all this in as a "learning tool" for future reference as to me - it's good and "valuable" information to consider and take in. We all as escorts can learn from what you said, and see this as a "wake up call". LOL. HUGS to you my friend, and thanks again for your input. Greatly appreciated brother. Love JD.

[JDXXX]

I like to read the reviews, but I also pay attention to the reviewer's name and his comments about himself. If I see a sensationally glowing review written by a 20-30 year old guy, I am skeptical of the validity of his review as far as how the escort might be with an older gentleman.

 

Hi Phil,

 

Glad to know how you review an escort based on the reviewers age and experience as I can how that can be a good way to see if a review is legit or not. Good Point. HUGS.

[JDXXX]

No. I just remember a few people posting last fall (I have only been on the boards since October) that they didn't hire escorts with lots of reviews because of the notion that it's due to an active PR effort by the escort.

 

Campaigning for EOY is something else entirely.

 

Hi Will,

 

I see how that can be a problem, but like I say to people all the time - we can't control when clients submit reviews or not tell them when to write them. If they're good reviews - why question it as the escort is gaining great success from that client's feedback on the excellent service that was provided.

[Guest]

Can you please explain? I don't know how someone can be a good escort and a shyster. Or do you mean good businessman and successful escort? Could you PM me the obvious examples, because I can't think of any.

 

Isn't the review section free advertising for all escorts anyway? How are escorts with tons of first and second time reviews different from other escorts? Those who are new to the biz are likely to have mostly, if not entirely, first and second time reviewers. For another, as someone who's reviewed three times, I can assure you my first and second reviews have no less integrity than the third and my third doesn't magically have more integrity than the first two.

 

Skepticism is fine and good and understandable. Blanket rules of thumb that don't take variables into account aren't.

 

Really? You can't understand that someone can be a liar and a good fuck at the same time? I find that difficult to believe. It's also certainly not the case that new escorts have mostly first-time reviews. I have reviewed a number of escorts for their first review. When an established escort has tons of reviews, and many more by 1st and 2nd time reviewers than by established reviewers, it's a pretty safe bet that most of those reviews are written by the escort himself, and that's also often apparent by the writing style. Anyone who pays attention can tell.

[JDXXX]

For me there is no such thing as "too many reviews". That's like saying "he's too hot" or "he's too kind/awesome".

 

With that being said, I always apply a healthy level of skepticism on any review. Someone could have 20 first time reviews with names I've never heard of that also seem similar to one another in terms of writing style that I would probably not treat with much credibility. However at the same time, there could be another person with the same number of reviews that have a mix of first time reviewers vs multi-time reviewers that I would see differently. In addition, I've spent time with guys that were well reviewed that I had the time of my life with and would love to keep them to myself forever and a day.... and others just as well reviewed that I would not bother ever re-engaging again. So it's never the number of reviews that really matter for me. It's the contents that matter to me.

 

Hey Rob,

 

Good pointers. Like I said to myself - everyone has different points of views based on experiences with all kinds of escorts. Not everyone is going to have the same experiences and they're reviews are going to reflect those different types of experiences from different clients on that escorts performance in providing the client with an unforgettable experience.

[JDXXX]

This is pretty much the same approach I take, however I don't necessarily pass on the guys who have many reviews - especially if they've been escorting for many years. What I do find is that sometimes when I hire someone who has many (e.g. 50+) reviews, they don't always live up to my expectations - though I suspect in such instances my expectations may have been raised by seeing that the guy has 75 glowing reviews in the first place. Sometimes highly-rated guys do manage to exceed even my inflated expectations (e.g. Tyger, Kristian, Andrew Justice, and Simply Adam to name a few), sometimes they don't (I know better than to insert actual names here, Lol), but I've never had what I would consider to be a "bad" experience with a highly-rated guy.

 

Another completely unscientific gauge I use is to compare the number of reviews a guy has vs. the amount his name comes up in the Forums. If someone has quickly amassed 75 reviews and is hardly mentioned at all in the Forums, then as we say in Texas, that suggests "sumtin just ain't right".

 

Hi Tguy,

 

I think too if one is a "highly rated" reviewed escort - there shouldn't be any question of them being good and exceeding your expectations to the fullest. If someone has nothing but positive/outstanding reviews from several individuals - what's there to question, but hire them. LOL. What you got to lose. Nothing. . HUGS.

[JDXXX]

I've met JD at the Daddy's luncheon in DC and again afterwards at Dave's place for the special demonstrations... his pictures are absolutely not fake.

 

Awwww - You're sweet, Rob!! Thank you!!! Enjoyed spending time with you in DC as well as your a terrific guy and hope to get to know more of you in the future sometime. . HUGS.

[JDXXX]

Hi JD,

 

I have not had the pleasure of meeting you yet, but it is from your reviews and your contributions here on the forum that I have given you a place on my wish list! Long before you ever joined this forum though, you were already on my list because of your reviews and the pictures you had on your RB ad...if I go on the belief that a hot man actually looks hotter than his pictures (providing they're not fakes, of course, which I am confident yours aren't), then I knew from just looking at your online pictures that sometime, somewhere, I will enjoy meeting you!

 

As far as having too many positive reviews, for a man like you, with only positive feedback, from multiple and diverse reviewers, quite a few being forum members with multiple reviews posted, I would say: don't worry your beautiful head about this issue, it should be a complete non-issue for escorts such as yourself, whose reviews and reputations give them 100% credibility as among the top professionals available! Keep doing what you're doing, babe, and don't worry about the small sh*t!

 

TruHart1

 

Hi TruHart -

 

I am looking forward to meeting you too, sweetie and hope it's sooner then later as our day to meet as good things comes to those who wait anyday. LOL. So sweet of you to share your encouraging kind words of wisdom as I agree by not sweating the small stuff as yes, the reviews I have do speak for themselves, and hope everyone else here on the forum notice that as well. Hopefully enough to be hired more and more as time goes on. My creditability and high praise from clients should lift everyone's possible fears that I'm good at what I do, and would not fail the client by all means. Take pride at being an escort as well as my reviews as they're legit and right on point from another source(the client) what I have to bring to the table as a very high professional who is serious about his job for which I am entirely. Which more and more forum members could hire me to see that as a reality to what the reviewers say about me without being scared in hiring me for various reasons which I cant name what those reasons are, but can say it's easy to overcome if given a chance. I'm sure most of you can agree. .

 

Thanks Tru for being such a sweetheart and can't wait to meet you. Really are a GEM and a great cheerleader to most of us high reviewed/recommended escorts who need it from time-to-time. . HUGS. Helps quite a lot - Believe me - it does.

[JDXXX]

I guess I can somewhat understand how too many reviews could be considered a bad thing. Some clients may be under the "delusion" that they are the one and only person said escort entertains and having thousands of reviews may make that fantasy hard to swallow.

 

For me personally, I am ok with a lot of reviews as long as they aren't all first time reviews or read the same. The one thing that triggers my unshakable skepticism is when a negative review is immediately followed by a glowing review (or reviews) from a first time reviewer. That is game over as far as I am concerned.

 

In general, more reviews are good because reviewers all have different styles and some tell you absolutely nothing of use at all.

 

Hi Down -

 

I will say that too many "good" reviews - is never a bad thing if they're all legit and not fake. Mixed/Negative reviews......maybe, but if they're all amazing reviews - that's never bad - that's good. Even if they are from first timers. I don't knock the first timer reviewers as they are the very ones who gave me a chance to shine in many ways and who voted for me to win "Newbie's Choice Of The Year". LOL. If it wasn't for those first timers - I would not have won or be where I am today.

[JDXXX]

Really? You can't understand that someone can be a liar and a good fuck at the same time? I find that difficult to believe. It's also certainly not the case that new escorts have mostly first-time reviews. I have reviewed a number of escorts for their first review. When an established escort has tons of reviews, and many more by 1st and 2nd time reviewers than by established reviewers, it's a pretty safe bet that most of those reviews are written by the escort himself, and that's also often apparent by the writing style. Anyone who pays attention can tell.

Hello Unicorn -

This is where have to step in and correct something that has to be explained regarding established escorts with first time reviews.

 

Yes, you do have a point that maybe an established escort having a ton of reviews from first time or second time reviewers are from the escorts themselves, but not in all cases under the sun here as some escorts are not as lucky as other well liked escorts in always landing reviews from "seasoned" review members from the forum/Daddys website. Like I said to quoththeraven myself - Read below -

 

"Due to a lot of the "well-seasoned reviewers" from the forum not hiring me or wanting to give me a chance cause of unknown reasons at times, it's lacking in me having "seasoned" reviews that are not from first timers. Maybe if people from the forum will be more opened to hiring me like the first timers do - I would have a lot more "seasoned" reviews out there, so people will see more and more I am like many well liked escorts such as EOY's or other established escorts on this site that I am legit. I have been told at one point and time last year - cause of the fact I have so many first time reviews and not enough "seasoned" reviews - it does raise some red flags which is crazy in a way as geez- it's more of the first timers who's actually giving me a chance and writing some awesome reviews verses the forum members who are more at times are not hiring me and unable to write reviews cause of those reasons. It's like a catch 22 here with this issue. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. LOL."

 

I want you to take this in as valuable information in my situation is that some forum members don't give me or certain other established escorts a chance not cause of the reviews but do to other possible unknown reasons. I do remember a forum member sharing with me on here(which was written on this thread) due to my endowment was why he was hesitate in hiring me, but would like to one day try. Due to reasons such as that and more is what makes me lack in getting reviewed/hired by "seasoned" members from the site or from the forum. It's unfortunate, but it happens, and that's why I strongly agree with what quoththeraven has informed you cause not all cases is where the escort who has excellent reviews from first timers are all doing it themselves. Maybe it's those first timers who gives us a chance to shine is what can encourage you guys from the forum/site to see what positive experiences they've have encountered. Especially if they're all legit positive reviews - why question it. Most of my reviews are from first timers, but hey - they are the ones who got me to where I am today which is as you know "Newbies Choice Of The Year" for which I am graciously grateful for that - Big time. Hopefully from that - it'll open doors for more business from forum members which will bring "seasoned" reviews.

 

No disrespect by any means to you, Unicorn - I just had to set the record straight on this one as established escorts don't always have the fortunate circumstance in being hired by all established reviewers from the site. I wish It wasn't that way, but it is, but it's good we have another way of getting reviews when the "seasoned" reviewers are unable to and that source is from the first timers who can share of what that amazing escort can bring to the table for others who are uncertain about that particular escort they're looking to possibly hire, but not sure of due to lack of either "seasoned" reviews or not enough reviews past 5 or 6.

[JDXXX]

I agree with Kevin. Its a little off when escorts have a zillion reviews by first time reviewers. However if there are mixed by multiple time and first time all saying the same things, I'd say its more legit.

 

Hey Killian Baby,

 

Thanks for your input baby as it's always a joy to get your feedback. Like I expressed to everyone on this thread - it can be a red flag - I agree - no argument there, but it depends on the situation. Like in my case - it was more first timers who gave me a chance and my break to winning "Newbies Choice Of The Year". First time reviewers I think serve a purpose to where others wouldn't hire, but it's from those first time reviewers that can open up the door for the "seasoned" reviewers who do hire to see what the escort does bring forth to the table is to why they should hire that amazing escort. . Almost got tongue twisted on that one, babe. LOL. Love and Hugs to you as always, baby. .