truth in advertising

[pierrot]

Don't you wish there were some standardization of the statistics given by escorts and their reviewers? To begin at the beginning, cock size. I notice some reviewers willingly join in the exaggeration by adding an inch or two when they fill out the form. I've hired four escorts. One was pretty truthful, and by far the biggest, probably 8.5 or 9 x 7. Of the other three, one listed at 8.5x7 was about 7x6.5 (still quite big), the other two both listed as 7 inches were about 6 and 5 respectively.

Notice almost no one lists themselves as 6 inches, which is about standard. I estimate from this tiny survey that most cock stats are exagerated by 1-2 inches.

Height and age also tend to be exagerated. Guys listed as 6'1" are often 5'10", etc, and 35 year olds become 28 or so.

I know there's no way to keep people from exagerating their own stats, but at least reviewers should try to be as truthful as possible and not just pick up what the guy before him (possibly a plant) wrote.

Anyone else care to share their observations on this?

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

>Don't you wish there were some standardization of the

>statistics given by escorts and their reviewers? ...

>Anyone else care to share their observations on this?

 

Yep, here's mine:

 

Ummm... that is on the list a couple of hundred or so from the top. Let's see...

 

1. to perpetually have the HOT body and reflexes of a 32 yo with the knowldege and experience I have gained with a coupte of extra decades of mileage

2. independently wealthy

3. 9 x8 steel hard dick that goes for hours and hours

4. an ass to die for

5. to be versatile

6. hair

...

...

...

99. to get the cute, bagboy to put the cans in the bottom of the bag, not on top of the the soft items and produce

100. to get the bagboy to bottom... hmmm, forgot...by this wish I am versatile now --- get the bag boy to flip-flop with me

101...

...

 

 

I know it is on the list somewhere, just have to go another 70 or 80 I'm sure... :+

 

The point is why waste time wishing for things that just ain't gonna happen. Move on with life, live it as you find it take it your own hands. And BTW conduct your own research in truth in advertising -- it is more fun than waiting for a gold standard that ain't never gonna materialize.

 

[+ deej]

>99. to get the cute, bagboy to put the cans in the bottom of

>the bag, not on top of the the soft items and produce

>100. to get the bagboy to bottom... hmmm, forgot...by this

>wish I am versatile now --- get the bag boy to flip-flop with

>me

 

 

Forget about the cans and get him in the sack.

[Prime Muscle]

"Don't you wish there were some standardization of the statistics given by escorts and their reviewers? To begin at the beginning, cock size."

 

I agree that there should be some standardization especially when using descriptions like "hung" or "endowed". My question is how big does a cock have to be before you are "hung" or "endowed"? What about "well-hung" or "horse-hung".

 

Good observation about some reviewers mis-lableing.

[bigguyinpasadena]

Well Bobby,come on over,I am working on a standerized PETER METER,which-when patented-will be the tool recognized by the dept.of weights and meassures.

Not only will it give accurate measurements(length,width,hardness(using a MOHS number)But will,once and for all settle the dispute aboute dick size.It goes from"you got to be kidding"thru average,hung,horse hung,and YOU"VE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!

[woodlawn]

>Height and age also tend to be exagerated. Guys listed as 6'1"

>are often 5'10", etc, and 35 year olds become 28 or so.

>I know there's no way to keep people from exagerating their

>own stats, but at least reviewers should try to be as truthful

>as possible and not just pick up what the guy before him

>(possibly a plant) wrote.

>Anyone else care to share their observations on this?

 

A couple of observations.

 

First, a number of industries use ads that are false or misleading. The Times recently ran an article comparing the advertised prices of telephone calling plans with the amount that a typical subscriber actually pays. The ads generally leave out taxes and fees associated with a given plan that raise its actual cost by as much as 18% above the price consumers are told. It is not unheard of for companies to plant "consumer reviews" that actually come from people who are being paid to shill for the company; Sony Pictures was caught doing this to advertise one of its movies last year, for example.

 

It's difficult to say whether prostitutes use false advertising to a greater or lesser extent than other sellers of goods and services. One key difference is that there is no real enforcement mechanism that penalizes those who do use deception. A client who is deceived can write a negative review on this website. But since there is no real incentive for a client to do that, it's logical to assume that relatively few of those who could do it actually do.

 

I think one can conclude that deception in escort ads will continue to be a major problem until some effective method of penalizing deceptive advertising is created.

[+ Lucky]

"I think one can conclude that deception in escort ads will continue to be a major problem until some effective method of penalizing deceptive advertising is created."

 

I'll bet lawyers can come up with some real good ideas on deceptive advertising regulations.

[woodlawn]

>"I think one can conclude that deception in escort ads will

>continue to be a major problem until some effective method of

>penalizing deceptive advertising is created."

 

>I'll bet lawyers can come up with some real good ideas on

>deceptive advertising regulations.

 

 

See: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/menu-ads.htm

[JamesK840]

penalizing

 

I think the best penalty is to say goodby if an escort's obviously lied about something important to you. If it's not that big a deal then just mention it in a review. Now, if only there was a place for clients to "review" escorts...

[pierrot]

Of course there's no way to standardize what escorts claim about themselves. I meant the original statement as a rhetorical question.

However, client reviewers COULD refrain from continuing the deception by just picking up the "9+" claim when they know that the guy is really about 6.

[VaHawk]

>My question

>is how big does a cock have to be before you are "hung" or

>"endowed"?

 

According to the official handbook of the Southern Sisterhood Society of Size Queens:

 

You are "hung" from the nearest tree if it less than 8"

You are "endowed" with riches if it is more than 10"

 

:+