Wesley -- very hung guy in NYC

[gregkidman]

Anyone been with him?

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=232894

 

Is he a good top?

[+ Italiano]

nobody?...

[niceguyaz]

There was a review of Wesley a number of years ago. He is apparently a very masculine, well endowed, talented top. He used to live in Chicago. Pics of him on Adam4Adam are a number of years old. I contacted him by e-mail several years ago - he is a very direct, no nonsense and business only type of man.

[+ Axiom2001]

Wesley is beautifully endowed. I think I'd be up for the major challenge!!!! - -

[+ Italiano]

so, no recent experiences?...

[best hotel]

.....hope i can schedule with Wes while he is in nyc.... and yes, xafnndap, our tastes are similar, thanks for noticing

[Luv2play]

He's strictly "gay for pay". I wrote about my experience trying to hire him some years ago but won't bother repeating the story.

[gregkidman]

I am the original poster. I took one for the team -- I saw him yesterday (May 11). Yes, he is 'gay for pay' or something similar -- he is not very interactive. His dick is slow to get hard, but once it is hard, it stayed hard and it was a thing of beauty! Just the thickest I have ever seen! PM if you need more info.

[BaronArtz]

Pardon my ignorance, but how come he's labeled 'gay for pay'? I definitely get a gay vibe from his pictures, and from chatting with him on a4a ... Just curious!

[gregkidman]

BaronArtz -- I assume that 'gay for pay' is another phrase for not very interactive. In my case, iust that he didn't seem 'into it' but he did perform very well. Hope this helps answer your question.

[+ azdr0710]

well, GK, in my opinion, "gay for pay" is not at all synonymous with "not very interactive".....but I know what you might be saying, GK....it's possible he's entirely gay or bi and just wasn't into it that night....."gay for pay", to me, means just what it says.....

[+ honcho]

Uh, I had the impression that "gay for pay" meant men who were primarily sexually interested in women, but could function with men in exchange for suitable monetary incentives - term was originally used in the context of porn stars ....

[AdamATL77]

Uh, I had the impression that "gay for pay" meant men who were primarily sexually interested in women, but could function with men in exchange for suitable monetary incentives - term was originally used in the context of porn stars ....

 

I usually see that term for porn stars too. Some of my friends have used it for stripper/escorts who will do a limited range of things or require str8 porn to perform. It sounds like a more appropriate term for the lack of interaction might be too "laid-back" for your taste. Some gay-for-pay guys would be laid-back as their limited range might be the client does all the work. Some go for that but not many.

[+ Axiom2001]

I usually see that term for porn stars too. Some of my friends have used it for stripper/escorts who will do a limited range of things or require str8 porn to perform. It sounds like a more appropriate term for the lack of interaction might be too "laid-back" for your taste. Some gay-for-pay guys would be laid-back as their limited range might be the client does all the work. Some go for that but not many.

 

Precisely, Adam; I strongly agree with you and the other's respondent's assessment of the term. To me it also includes not being very "interactive" at all--"no kissing," etc.....

[seeker630]

Precisely, Adam; I strongly agree with you and the other's respondent's assessment of the term. To me it also includes not being very "interactive" at all--"no kissing," etc.....

 

It seems that the terms means different things to different people, and various (& different) assumptionsare made based on its use.

 

In previous discussions, some posters have stated they would not hire anyone who is 'gay for pay'. Other posters have said that as long as the escort performs to their satisfaction, their true orientation isn't an issue.

 

We all have the right to hire - or not hire - whomever we want based on our own preferences & idosyncrasies, and none of us has to defend our hiring practices.

[Kevin Slater]

I just met him for my first time today on a double booking. He's very attractive, articulate, and much friendlier than his pics convey. (He had this goofy smile which really worked for me.) And to state the obvious, his cock is huge. Unlike most guys with that sort of endowment, he had no trouble keeping it hard. I look forward to working with him again.

 

Kevin Slater

[jjkrkwood]

I just met him for my first time today on a double booking. He's very attractive, articulate, and much friendlier than his pics convey. (He had this goofy smile which really worked for me.) And to state the obvious, his cock is huge. Unlike most guys with that sort of endowment, he had no trouble keeping it hard. I look forward to working with him again.

 

Kevin Slater

 

Well then I guess his performance is totally based on WHOM he is performing WITH ? If he's turned on, he's into it, if he's NOT turned on, not so much... I think that conclusion can be drawn from the comments here. But in the final analysis, he has always "risen" to the occasion and performed his "duty" with his major tool, so just forego the passion and gushy stuff and TAKE that big meat, which is probably why you are hiring him anyway. I dont see any problem here. I would hit it myself....:o

[BaronArtz]

Well then I guess his performance is totally based on WHOM he is performing WITH ? If he's turned on, he's into it, if he's NOT turned on, not so much... I think that conclusion can be drawn from the comments here. But in the final analysis, he has always "risen" to the occasion and performed his "duty" with his major tool, so just forego the passion and gushy stuff and TAKE that big meat, which is probably why you are hiring him anyway. I dont see any problem here. I would hit it myself....:o

 

Is he still around though? I haven't seen him on a4a in a long time.

[jjkrkwood]

Is he still around though? I haven't seen him on a4a in a long time.

 

He's in Rentboy

[+ Italiano]

Well it would be nice to hear the comments from the client...