Jump to content

Love Letters from a 12 Year Old


Huey
This topic is 8403 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apparently any combination of two brothers 12 & 13 years old and an adult male killed the boy's father about a year ago in Florida. The brothers now 13 & 14 originally confessed, now blame the adult male who happens to be a convicted sex offender.

 

As if the above isn't distrubing enough :( the 12 year old is in love with the adult male. In part one of his letters states, "Before I met Rick I was strate (sic) but now I am gay." When you were a 12 year old did you think in terms of straight and gay (not did you know you were gay, I'm asking about the use of the terms)? I knew I liked to have sex with boys (my age) when I was 12 yet had no idea that this meant anything more than that.

 

His love letters are part of the public court record and have been scanned to be read at this link:

 

http://www.courttv.com/trials/king/docs/alexnotes1.html

 

 

-----------

WAR IS OVER

if you want it

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE

Posted

The second page of the letters states: "Biography, Do Not Read." So I didn't go further.

Why these letters are available to the public confounds me. It only seems to perpetuate the assault on a young boy.

Posted

The latest outrage is the state of Florida is trying them as adults...talk about child abuse. x(

Posted

>When you were a 12 year old did you think in terms of

>straight and gay (not did you know you were gay, I'm asking

>about the use of the terms)? I knew I liked to have sex with

>boys (my age) when I was 12 yet had no idea that this meant

>anything more than that.

 

Well, in what year were you 12? This is 2002 and kids know these terms. Derek and I have a 5 year old niece who knows we're gay and married to each other. A gay kid or teen today could definitely know he/she's gay.

Posted

>

>Well, in what year were you 12?

 

Sorry I have to take the 5th of this one :)

 

> This is 2002 and kids know

>these terms. Derek and I have a 5 year old niece who knows

>we're gay and married to each other. A gay kid or teen

>today could definitely know he/she's gay.

 

It just seems odd to me that a 12 year old understands one moment he was straight then the next he is gay and in love with an adult male.

 

I am not intentionally trying to pass judgment on the young boy related to the criminal charges against him and his brother. Also, I'm not intentionally trying to make a moral judgment about him, yet I can see how my statemenet might be taken that way.

 

I was simply looking for how others felt about these events? It's apparent that he is a disturbed youth who needs assistance not endless confinement.

 

 

-----------

WAR IS OVER

if you want it

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE

Posted

>It just seems odd to me that a 12 year old understands one

>moment he was straight then the next he is gay and in love

>with an adult male.

 

Remember that he was lusted after and housed / protected by a predatory gay man. It isn't hard to imagine that freethinking and indoctrination may overlap with him. :-(

 

Dick

Posted

>It just seems odd to me that a 12 year old understands one

>moment he was straight then the next he is gay and in love

>with an adult male.

>

>I am not intentionally trying to pass judgment on the young

>boy related to the criminal charges against him and his

>brother. Also, I'm not intentionally trying to make a moral

>judgment about him, yet I can see how my statement might be

>taken that way.

>

>I was simply looking for how others felt about these events?

>It's apparent that he is a disturbed youth who needs

>assistance not endless confinement.

 

This whole case make me very, very angry. From what I've read (there was a front page article in the New York Times that included a picture of one of the brothers, testifying in court, with one hand handcuffed to the witness stand), it sounds like this whole tragedy is the result of both boys being victimized by a pedophile. x( Sadly, this is not the first time that this has happened. x( We had a similar case here in New Jersey a couple of years ago. A young teenager was victimized by some sicko who he met online. He was further victimized by both the courts (a judge refused his parents pleas to have him committed) and the system (the prosecutor's office used him in their sting operation against the pedophile). x( He claimed to be in love with the pedophile and refused to testify against him at the trial. (The pedophile eventually plead guilty to reduced charges.) He wound up killing some poor kid who was going door to door selling candy and gift wrap for a school fund raiser. He eventually plead guilty and is going to serve a long prison sentence. I very much doubt if he'll ever get the help that he so desperately needs. x(

 

The two brothers in this case obviously need help. The pedophile who abused them needs to be cut into little pieces. Florida's infamous defective electric chair is too good for him!

Posted

The people who run Court TV have no shame. Nor does the judge who allowed this case to be televised. Nor does the DA who is trying these kids as adults.

What a case of the system gone wrong.x(

Posted

NO wonder the kids liked thi guy he let them do all the thing there dad wouldnt. Smoke Dope and party and stay up as late as they wanted. He was just getting them to play into his hands. And then the shameless Tv Stations which broadcast it live today and what are the courts doing? Double Standards. Not sure what to think about this but Sic Sic Sic (Sp)

Guest Thunderbuns
Posted

>The people who run Court TV have no shame. Nor does the

>judge who allowed this case to be televised. Nor does the DA

>who is trying these kids as adults.

>What a case of the system gone wrong.x(

 

Well as it is happening in Jeb Bush country, very little surprises me.

 

And the fact that the pedophile was gay will no doubt become a lightning rod for all sorts of homophobic nuts.

 

Thunderbuns

Guest in yer face
Posted

LETS GET COURT TV!!!LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

This whole thing is so fucked up. You dont suppose this has anything to do with the gay adoption debate going on in Florida. Its pretty obvious that these kids are not going to be charged by a jury. So why is Florida bothering? Maybe its to make all gay men out to be pedophiles that should be kept away from children. I think it may be meant to send the message that gay men will make little boys into murderers. Court TV on the otehr hand needs a good smacking!

 

Lets do something about this! Let court TV know that they are out of bounds by showing these kids faces on TV.

 

WRITE THEM EMAIL!

http://courttv.com/contact/

 

PHONE THEM OR WRITE THEM!

 

Toll-free viewier information line: 1-800-COURT-56

 

Courtroom Television Network LLC

600 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10016

 

 

x(

Posted

I'm with Lucky.

 

I stopped reading. It just seems wrong that is up for public review.

Guest Kalifornia
Posted

RE: LETS GET COURT TV!!!LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

>

>Lets do something about this! Let court TV know that they

>are out of bounds by showing these kids faces on TV.

>

>WRITE THEM EMAIL!

>http://courttv.com/contact/

>

>PHONE THEM OR WRITE THEM!

>

WHY? All trials should be open to the public including juvenile hearings. Our courts system is based on an openiness, no trial should be behind closed doors. What is the big deal about showing these kids, a rape victim, a white collar criminal? I guess a black male would probably be OK though, HUH? OJ where are thou?

 

I have ea background in this "business" and I can tell you IT NEEDS TO BE AN OPEN SYSTEM REGARDLESS OF AGE OR YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE MAJOR ABUSES.

 

Mark -Kalifornia

Posted

RE:LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

Duh! We already have major abuses: Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas.....not to mention corruption, megalomania, and incompetence. At least the Senate committee did the right thing on Priscilla.

Guest in yer face
Posted

RE: LETS GET COURT TV!!!LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

Tradionally, minors faces are blocked out in televised trials.

 

>>

>>Lets do something about this! Let court TV know that they

>>are out of bounds by showing these kids faces on TV.

>>

>>WRITE THEM EMAIL!

>>http://courttv.com/contact/

>>

>>PHONE THEM OR WRITE THEM!

>>

>WHY? All trials should be open to the public including

>juvenile hearings. Our courts system is based on an

>openiness, no trial should be behind closed doors. What is

>the big deal about showing these kids, a rape victim, a

>white collar criminal? I guess a black male would probably

>be OK though, HUH? OJ where are thou?

>

>I have ea background in this "business" and I can tell you

>IT NEEDS TO BE AN OPEN SYSTEM REGARDLESS OF AGE OR YOU ARE

>GOING TO HAVE MAJOR ABUSES.

>

>Mark -Kalifornia

Posted

RE:LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

>At least the Senate committee did the right

>thing on Priscilla.

 

Yeah right. She had a unanimous rating of "highly qualified" from that liberal cesspool, the American Bar Association. First time this has ever happened. The senate fool, Leahy, will get his comeuppance soon enough. Pres. Kerry or Edwards or whomever won't get a single nominee through the senate. I don't believe that this is quite what the founding fathers thought of the phrase advise and consent.

 

Later.

Posted

RE:LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

Traveller:

Ain't this what the Republicans did to Clinton's nominees? And isn't that what they said then? How awful to reject a pres' nominee?

Screw Bush. Someone has to save us from him.

(oops, sorry Hooboy. I forgot- no politics!)

Posted

RE:LET THEM KNOW THEY SUCK!!

 

>(oops, sorry Hooboy. I forgot- no politics!)

 

I know Lucky. Sorry. Too much coffee this morning. I just hate to lose. Have a super-wunnerful weekend.

 

Later.

 

PS. This vote will cost the Democrats the open senate seat in Texas in the fall election and thus control of the senate. Ooops, I did it again. Oh well.

Posted

As I'm sure you all know the King brothers have been found gulity of second degree murder and arson. The adult male R Chavez was found not guilty of murder and arson.

 

I didn't follow the trial so I cannot really comment on the verdicts. I was a little suprized to hear the attorney state he had no problem with either verdict and did not feel strongly that R Chavez was a "principal." Then why put the guy on trial for murder? Could it be because he is a convicted sex offender?

 

No one really won and it appears the system worked by saving one man from being wrongly convicted.

 

Now we are left with two very troubled teenagers facing life in prison. And R Chavez facing obstruction of justice charges. The entire case is very distrubing :(

 

-----------

WAR IS OVER

if you want it

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE

Guest Kalifornia
Posted

RE: They got what was coming to them

 

These two cute white boys got exactly what was coming to them. They intentionally killed another person, their father, without regard to any consequences. Then they tried to cover up the murder by trying to burn down their home. To add to their minpulative woes they tried to take advantage of a pedophile because of what he is not what he might or might not have done with them.... they claimed he killed their father. This after both confessed to the crime knew the details of the crime and had gasoline on their shoes. Really a sad state of affairs.

 

I don't care much about their age I care about their actions.

 

Mark -Kalifornia

Posted

RE: They got what was coming to them

 

>I don't care much about their age I care about their

>actions.

>

>Mark -Kalifornia

 

I'm not sure it is reasonable to say that caring about age versus actions needs to be mutually exclusive.

 

If age isn't relevant, then why not seat this kids in "Old Sparky" and fry them? As far as I know, Florida law would allow that. Of course that won't happen (and I'm glad) because it would shock the sensibilities of the voting public and while politicians want to look "tough on crime", they know they can only go so far when it comes to children. If I heard correctly, I think these boys are facing 30 years to life as it is.

 

In no way do I think there shouldn't be some measure of accountability for criminal behavior, especially when it involves

murder. There certainly appears to be a host of mitigating factors involved in this case, not the least of which is the rather sordid home environment these boys came from. Living in a society where violence is glorified, packaged and sold, even to children (violent video games and movie fare come to mind) why are we shocked when something like this happens? When we sow the seeds of violence and destruction, how can we be surprised to reap the whirlwind? When we put out the cultural message that violence is ok in entertainment, and when we continue to patronize violent films or buy those video games for our children, are we not somehow complicit in creating this kind of atmosphere? Sex is so much better than violence, but our convoluted puritan politicians haven't recognized that fact, or won't. As long as there is a profit to be made in selling violence, and the public continues to crave it, we're destined to see more of the same.

Posted

>And R Chavez facing obstruction of justice charges.

 

And, a whole set of sex charges involving a minor. He's cooked, too.

 

>The entire case is very distrubing :(

 

Agreed.

 

Dick

Guest Kalifornia
Posted

>>And R Chavez facing obstruction of justice charges.

>

>And, a whole set of sex charges involving a minor. He's

>cooked, too.

>

>>The entire case is very distrubing :(

>

>Agreed.

>

>Dick

 

See here is an area I know well. He hasn't been charged as yet with anything other than obstruction of justice in regard to this case. The murder and arson charges were dismissed. He is a previously convicted sex offender and he might be charged with having sex with one or both of the brothers yet there is no eveidence, physicl or verbal that shows there was any sexual involvement. Even when the brothers recanted their story they did not claim any sexual involvement with him that I am aware of. The letters would indicate this however, again to the best of my knowledge only the obstruction charges remain. He will be found guilty on these and becuase of this case involving the brothers who are so young, he will get the max. That we can all count on.

Mark -Kalifornia

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...