Jump to content

Not again!!


Boink
This topic is 4989 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

For the second time within a month they've made Friday's cover boy a 13 year old looking twink. And every time I visit this site over the whole weekend I'll be greeted by that innocent, childish face. Makes me feel like an old perv for coming here, wondering just who this site is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't look young to me... he looks his age, which is the very early 20s category just making it out of teen awkwardness. Don't be so judgemental.

 

I agree. In my veiw there is no comparison to the Friday Sept 17 (and weekend) coverboy as far as looking extremely young so I have no issue with Seth and find that he is very handsome with a youthful look but not too far out of line with his age in his ad on M4RNow, which is stated as 26. In this case I don't feel like a pervert or pedophile enjoying looking at his pics.

 

There is a wide range of tastes in the type of guys people find attractive and there has been many a coverboy I have found unappealing but I know soon enough another guy that I will find attractive will appear. So do what I do and suck it up and wait til Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to have to side with jgoo and Rapaz on this one. My initial, 10 nanonsecond reaction to Seth was that of Boink's (I too am hypersensitive to it now), I looked at it closer and realized that this isn't really close to the disaster that was 2 weeks ago, at least not in my opinion. Am I attracted to him? Not in the least. I'd have put his age somewhere in the very low 20s. The guy 2 weeks ago was immediate and universally believed to be under 18. I don't believe this one is quite the same. Just MHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least in the case of this week's twink, it appears that some form of puberty has indeed set in. He's not totally pre-pubescent like the guy 2 weeks ago was. This kid is most definitely not my type, but the pic doesn't make me feel like a pedophile either each time I open the site. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the dude does list his age as 26..which would be a whole lot of "Bumping it Up" IF NOT TRUE...as opposed to some "Working Guys" Who Bump their Ages Down on the "Average" of 5 years!

 

I'm thinking if he got some decent Pix's taken.. no one would mind the Weekend Cover so much. He's definitely NOT in Last Fridays Category....

 

also..anyone else from Fridays Group has had a Face Shot up recently....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't look young to me... he looks his age, which is the very early 20s category just making it out of teen awkwardness. Don't be so judgemental.

 

Umm....OK, I promise not to be judgemental on an escort review site. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also had the same thought, still under the influence of the disaster of the 27th. I can look at almost anything for a day, but the entire weekend! At least it isn't the picture of the ancient Chinese guy with no teeth that pops up on RB every once in awhile.

 

Please tell your kidding. Oh thank god. RentBoy. For a minute I thought you meant Randy Blue. My heart almost stopped. :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every man's sexual proclivities and what "type" of man that we are attracted to is unique. I personally prefer hiring 30-something studs with some sexual experience (and a hawt bubble-butt) under their belts! However, I also appreciate the diversity that Daddy depicts in his "Cover Boy" selections. I think Seth is a sexy young man, too. And at 26 years-old, anyone who crushes on Seth should definitely not feel like a perv, imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...