Our Bruno

[robbguy]

Hi,

I joined the Yahoo BrazilNut group, but for you guys who haven't, here are a couple of new pics of our Bruno to enjoy:

 

http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_7705400/BRUNO+GAUCHO/BRUNO04.jpg?bcB2CY9AGHYY4T20

 

http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_7705400/BRUNO+GAUCHO/BRUNO08.jpg?bcB2CY9ATFzJiHxl

 

YUM!:9

[+ glutes]

I wish he was 'My Bruno'!!! Holy smokes.

[IamI2002]

Those pictures are HOT !! And so realistic !!! And he's so fucking delicious !!!! I'll be in Rio over LD and plan to ask him to marry me, so no more Bruno for hire !!! The rest can have Ernani. Hell, you can share his Social Security and Medicare benefits if you do.

 

Thanks for all your work. Were you there with him? If you have more pix, please share.

 

Badboy

[Houston Bonfires]

My Friend,

 

I would hope you would look around yourself and realize that there is a bounty of hurt and hate. Please reconsider adding to the glut of negative energy with which we are daily beseiged. If you have nothing positive to say kindly remain quiet.

 

With all due respect,

 

Houston Bonfires

 

:-)

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>My Friend,

>

>I would hope you would look around yourself and realize that

>there is a bounty of hurt and hate. Please reconsider

>adding to the glut of negative energy with which we are

>daily beseiged. If you have nothing positive to say kindly

>remain quiet.

>

>With all due respect,

>

>Houston Bonfires

 

I see the M4M "Thought Police" are working weekends too.

 

Maybe it would save us all a lot of time and grief if HooBoy would simply post a list of the members that must be consulted before any un-PollyAnna like thoughts are posted.

 

That way their delicate mental balance won't be upset and they won't have to have their meds adjusted. :-)

 

Thunderbuns

[trilingual]

In this case it isn't the "thought police." It's the fact that IamI2002 keeps running down another escort in his postings whom he hasn't met, hasn't hired, and in whom he doesn't seem to have any particular interest. (I do know Ernani, and he's far from collecting Social Security or Medicare, as IamI2002 implies. He's also a very nice guy.)

 

I wouldn't have a problem with IamI2002 posting a less-than-satisfied review of Ernani had he hired him and had a poor experience. But in this case, it's clear that Ernani just isn't his type, and he's got a thing for Bruno. That's cool, but it doesn't justify saying malicious things about Ernani that an unwitting reader might misinterpret and that could cut into Ernani's business. So I agree that IamI2002 needs to clean up his act. If he wants to sing Bruno's praises (untried) let him do it all he wants. But he doesn't have a right to denigrate other escorts he hasn't hired, or, for that matter, other contributors to this board.

[Boston Guy]

I agree with Tri.

 

If this were a conversation around a dinner table and someone at the table kept putting down another person who he'd (a) never met and (b) never talked to and © never planned to hire, meet or talk to, it would get tiresome and embarrassing.

 

I don't know Ernani and, truth to tell, he isn't my type so I probably never will meet him. But those here who have met him seem to pretty much unanimously say he's a nice guy worth knowing and a good escort.

 

Why do you consider it unseemly or irritating when one poster asks another -- nicely -- to stop running down someone else just because they aren't attracted to his looks?

 

BG

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>Why do you consider it unseemly or irritating when one

>poster asks another -- nicely -- to stop running down

>someone else just because they aren't attracted to his

>looks?

 

I guess my problem with Huston Bonfires' post stems from the fact that I didn't find IamI2002's post to be offensive or a put-down. I thought he was just trying to inject a little humour.

 

Don't you think that many of us (myself included) tend to be a bit too sensitive at times?

 

Thunderbuns

[Boston Guy]

>>Why do you consider it unseemly or irritating when one

>>poster asks another -- nicely -- to stop running down

>>someone else just because they aren't attracted to his

>>looks?

>

>I guess my problem with Huston Bonfires' post stems from the

>fact that I didn't find IamI2002's post to be offensive or a

>put-down. I thought he was just trying to inject a little

>humour.

>

>Don't you think that many of us (myself included) tend to be

>a bit too sensitive at times?

>

 

Sure, it's human nature. We're all guilty of it.

 

But humor at the expense of another, especially on the basis of that person's appearance and most especially when that person isn't around to defend himself, is the cheapest kind of humor of all.

 

It would be one thing if Ernani kept protesting, taking a "poor, poor me" approach. It's a different thing altogether for other people to say "Look, you've made your point. Move on."

 

Standing by and accepting it when someone keeps ridiculing another is no different than doing nothing when a bully picks on a someone else. We may be anonymous here but that doesn't mean that we have to drop all of our standards to the gutter.

 

 

BG

[+ Lucky]

Well, here's the shocking thing to me: I looked at the photos linked above, and my attraction, while still there, diminished!

Having been to Rio, I can vouch that there are a lot of guys there just as cute, and also hung big!

[+ Axiom2001]

Man, what is your "fucking" problem? Last week or a week before that, someone tried to denegrate Ernani, an individual whom I have not met but have had a couple of brief chats on the telephone. If you choose NOT to engage this man's services, then DON'T, but the incessant rude and salacious comments aren't going anywhere here. You can fire back some sizzling candid comments at me if you wish, for I will NOT give "a rat's ass" if you do.

 

I will be in Brasil during much of October (I've changed my dates.), and during that time I DO PLAN and hope to see both Bruno and Ernani and enjoy them as decent human beings who have feelings.

 

Enough said... And I do hope that you will "cut the shit"!

 

Thanks to the other respondents who resented and refused to dignify this man's warped comments!

[+ Axiom2001]

My response is directed AT THE MAN who wrote the unnecessary negative stuff; it's misdirected in terms of where it should have been placed. Perhaps I did something incorrect in positioning my message. It should have preceded Tri's.

[+ Lucky]

whew! I am taking a licking around here already, so I am glad you cleared that up!:7

[+ Axiom2001]

Lucky, I am really glad that I did a double take and sensed that my last response had not been directed beneath the irritant man's response! Sorry! I also appreciate what you wrote!

[IamI2002]

Beanfart, you really make a lot of assumtions here that you would be hard pressed to substantiate. Is that how you go through life, just ASSuming and concluding without substance? Did you work for a public accounting firm?

 

Love,

 

[IamI2002]

Am I "THE MAN", cutie? And what makes you so sure I am a MAN.

 

Now, let's ponder that one !!