Client Confidentiality

[Doug69]

>http://www.dfapam.com/ari.gif

>

>HTH

 

 

Hey Deej - if you think what Woodlawn is saying is so worthless and boring, why don't you follow your friend Conway's sage advice and go trolling for that free lawyer to sue Woodlawn for defamation?

 

Nothing would be funnier.

[+ deej]

>All of that assumes that Deej could get a pro bono lawyer

 

No thanks. I'm quite happy with the one I'm paying.

 

>Seriously, when people uneducated and uninformed with regard

>to the law start pontifficating [sic]

 

Yes, let's leave the pontificating to the NY lawyers that don't have any client work to do.

[Doug69]

>>All of that assumes that Deej could get a pro bono lawyer

>

>No thanks. I'm quite happy with the one I'm paying.

 

Ohhhh, scary - Hey Woodlawn, he has a PAID lawyer!

 

>Yes, let's leave the pontificating to the NY lawyers that

>don't have any client work to do.

 

I know that "NY lawyer" pales in comparision to "ex-moderator of a who-re site" in terms of status, prestige and accomplishment, but it really is unseemly how you try to wield that phrase as some sort of dark insult.

 

As for the bit about not having any client work to do, that's great news! Now I can represent Woodlawn pro bono in the big, powerful lawsuit Conway thought up for you and make sure that the amount you are paying to your "paid" lawyer increases by a magnitude of 100 or so.

[+ deej]

I've never mentioned a lawsuit, Doug, and you know it.

 

You're making shit up for the sake of using a lot of words. (This is also called telling a lie.)

 

I have never once contemplated a lawsuit, although there is a stalking report filed with the county sheriff in case something should happen in the future.

 

How much of the time you spend here gets billed to clients? I'll bet the majority does. We all know how lawyers pad their bills. You do it with hooker time.

 

 

http://www.dfapam.com/ari.gif

[woodlawn]

>I have never once contemplated a lawsuit,

 

Considering your background, that's probably wise. I'm sure you've heard the old saying that people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. In your case it would be more like someone in a glass house firing a machine gun.

 

> although there is a

>stalking report filed with the county sheriff in case

>something should happen in the future.

 

Doug, do you happen to know the penalty in California for filing a false report of criminal activity? I recently looked up the statute in Georgia because someone raised the issue in connection with the famous "Runaway Bride" incident, but I have not checked on California.

 

>How much of the time you spend here gets billed to clients?

>I'll bet the majority does. We all know how lawyers pad their

>bills. You do it with hooker time.

 

Gosh, Doug, that sounds like an accusation of criminal activity to me. Doesn't that qualify as "defamation per se"? I think so. You ought to sue. If you need any help, let me know.

[+ deej]

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

[Guest Conway]

Maybe you don't read well. He has been offered pro bono (that means free) legal representation.

 

I didn't bother to read the rest of your whining. However, i'll save it because it could certainly be influential in turning a jury's opinion agauisnt you.

[Guest Conway]

"that if the Deej were foolish enough to follow Conway's

advice and commenced the litigation Conway were proposing

with a pro bono lawyer, and the Court read Conway's advice to

Deej that he should do so NOT in order to win, but simply in

order to impose litigation costs on Woodlawn and subject him

to invasive discovery, the lawsuit would not only be

dismissed, but the Court would almost certainly impose all

costs and fees - and additional sanctions - on Deej and the

imaginary pro bono counsel he has dancing around in Conway's

head."

 

You're confusing my reason for offering Deej free clounsel with his reason for seeking legal sanctions against Woodlawn.

 

Certainly damaging somone's reputation by claiming that he is a meth addict is enough to support a slander suit in and of itself whether Deej takes up my offer for pro bono representation or not.

[Guest Conway]

It's certainly obvious why you have no clients. I wouldn't hire a former prostitute to represent me.

[woodlawn]

>Maybe you don't read well. He has been offered pro bono (that

>means free) legal representation.

 

In fact, "pro bono" does not mean "free." You really shouldn't use words you don't understand. It makes you look stupid.

 

 

>I didn't bother to read the rest of your whining. However,

>i'll save it because it could certainly be influential in

>turning a jury's opinion agauisnt you.

 

In a way, it's a pity deej isn't enough of a fool to adopt your suggestion. I was rather enjoying the notion of making him sit on a witness stand and read aloud to the jury some of the posts he has authored on this message board. Ah, well.

[Guest Conway]

Obviously, you don't even know the difference between a criminal claim and a civil claim. But please do keep yapping. Hating you is going to be one of the easiest sells I have ever made to a jury.

[Guest Conway]

Actually, you spending your days and nights stalking a male prostitute because you have no cleints is immensely funnier, counselor.

[Guest Conway]

Ah, the all is lost semantics argument. Pro Bono representation won't cost deej a penny.

 

Just jow much money does a professional loser keep in the bank,Woody.

 

I can't wait to see that platinum personality of yours in front of a jury.

[woodlawn]

>Obviously, you don't even know the difference between a

>criminal claim and a civil claim. But please do keep yapping.

> Hating you is going to be one of the easiest sells I have

>ever made to a jury.

 

Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the term "defamation per se." It's one of the things attorneys normally learn in the basic torts class that is given in the first year of law school. What is also obvious is that you have never sold a jury anything other than sandwiches and soft drinks from behind the counter of a fast-food joint.

 

Why you are pretending to be a trial lawyer I don't know -- you seem to have some compulsion to tell only the most transparent lies. Whatever the reason, please keep trying to persuade deej to go along with your idea. It's possible he's even dumber that I think, in which case he might eventually go for it.

[woodlawn]

>Ah, the all is lost semantics argument. Pro Bono

>representation won't cost deej a penny.

 

He'd be crazy to pay a penny to someone like you.

 

>Just jow much money does a professional loser keep in the

>bank,Woody.

 

I haven't seen your bank statement, so I really don't know.

 

 

>I can't wait to see that platinum personality of yours in

>front of a jury.

 

Bring it on, junior. A couple of months from now I'll be reminding you of all the empty threats you made in this thread. If you're still around, that is.

[Guest Conway]

What do you do with your days,Woody? I'm guessing you're hourly retail or probably on some type of disability. Are you that guy that begs for change in the 51st street Subway station.

 

Let's be honest. With your personality, you have little chance of obtaining gainful employment around others.

 

Your avoidance of the issue speaks volumes about you.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Goud Spelled Backwards = Hypocrite

 

In his classic clueless and bitter jaded angry fashion, here comes Douggie (of all people) speaking about confidentiality, breach of trust and protection of privacy. And, being Doug, he does all this while dripping with his standard scorn that drips with denigrating and patronizing comments about escorts generally. On a site about escorts. As per usual, Doug never has a nice word, about anyone and about anything, although he always takes great pains to disguise his "critique" as something he is doing far a higher good. I guess this explains why he sits on "proof" for a year before he conveniently brings it up.

 

Since Doug is someone who has stalked others, been banned by corporate parents from their subsidiary web site and web portals for lying on his membership applications and for Doug's misuse of their sites terms of service and terms of membership, and for all his other and multitudinous acts which serve purely to benefit his agenda and to score points for his own behalf, this current concern of his is both sad and laughable as well as disingenious and malicious.

 

This is not to say that the breach of confidentiality, of your own clients or the clients of anyone else you know (and this is equally as true of a therapist or a lawyer as an escort). It is merely to point out that Doug talking about breach of trust or confidentiality is the same as the Borgias talking about acting in good faith and fair dealing.

[woodlawn]

>What do you do with your days,Woody?

 

I spend a small part of each day mocking idiots on message boards like this one. As I said elsewhere, I've always found shooting fish in a barrel to be a much underrated pastime.

 

> I'm guessing you're

>hourly retail or probably on some type of disability.

 

An excellent application of the same mental powers that led you to pretend you're a trial lawyer when it's obvious you know nothing about the subject. Does the Guinness Book of World Records have a listing for "Highest Number of Times Poster Made a Fool of Himself in One Thread"? If so, you should contact them. It's probably the only chance you'll ever have to become famous.

 

>Let's be honest.

 

Great idea. Let us know when you're ready to stop pretending you're a lawyer.

 

>With your personality, you have little chance

>of obtaining gainful employment around others.

 

Really? Not being a trial lawyer, you won't have heard of the "Cardiac Club."

 

 

>Your avoidance of the issue speaks volumes about you.

 

I'm not avoiding the issue of your history of lies and hypocrisy. On the contrary, I refer to it every chance I get. And I'll continue to do so.

[woodlawn]

RE: Goud Spelled Backwards = Hypocrite

 

>Since Doug is someone who has stalked others, been banned by

>corporate parents from their subsidiary web site and web

>portals for lying on his membership applications

>and for

>Doug's misuse of their sites terms of service and terms of

>membership,

 

Really? What did he do, use his AOL membership to operate a business as a prostitute even after signing a contract with AOL promising not to use their network for any illegal purpose? I can certainly understand why YOU would find it outrageous that anyone would do such a thing.

[LovesYng]

How long we going to drag this shit out. I think we all got the point about Princess Ben

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

[Doug69]

>Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the term "defamation

>per se." It's one of the things attorneys normally learn in

>the basic torts class that is given in the first year of law

>school.

 

LOL!!! Oh my fucking God, this is THE funniest thing I have ever seen.

 

Woodlawn, here is Conway, trying to pretend to be a trial lawyer, offering poor Deej legal representation.

 

But then, you made the point that Deej's comment about me is defamatory per se, because it alleges criminal misconduct (Deej's statement constitutes, at least in many states, per se defamation for an independent reason as well: it alleges unethical practices with respect to one's business, but let's leave that to the side for now).

 

In response to what you wrote, Conway came and said you don't know the difference between criminal and civil law, all because you mentioned "criminal activity." LOL! He has no fucking idea what defamation per se is, and has no idea what you were even talking about.

 

Given that he's parading around as some scary trial lawyer, it would be humiliating and hilarious enough if he was unaware of something that every lawyer would know. But this, as you pointed out, is something every fucking FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT learns, and not only did Conway not know it, it confused him so much he actually had no idea what you were even talking about.

 

Lucky, lucky Deej - what a high-powered trial lawyer he can have - and for free. Some pitiful, borderline illiterate sicko who runs around the Internet pretending to have different jobs.

 

I wonder if tomorrow Conway will pretend to be an astronaut?

[Doug69]

I just have to say again - this exchange is the FUNNIEST FUCKING THING EVER:

__________________

 

WOODLAWN: Gosh, Doug, that sounds like an accusation of criminal activity to me. Doesn't that qualify as "defamation per se"? I think so. You ought to sue.

 

CONWAY, pretending to be a lawyer, but saying something every first-year law student would guffaw upon hearing: Obviously, you don't even know the difference between a criminal claim and a civil claim.

_________________

 

Seriously, Conway, if you're going to run around the Internet pretending to be a lawyer, you really have to avoid talking about any legal issues. I can't tell you the joy you brought me in exposing yourself this way.

 

I'm sure you stil don't know why what you said is so funny - but that's the whole point.

[Doug69]

RE: Goud Spelled Backwards = Hypocrite

 

OK - First the Conway debacle above, and now my favorite barebacking/non-barebacking escort chimes in with some truly deranged, rambling drool. This night turned out to be way more entertaining than I had any right to expect.

 

>In his classic clueless and bitter jaded angry fashion, here

>comes Douggie (of all people) speaking about confidentiality,

>breach of trust and protection of privacy.

 

Yes, that's right, Franco - here comes Doug - saying that it's wrong for escorts to disclose information they learn about clients, and also saying that it's wrong for escorts to dishonestly tell prospective clients that they engage in safe sex only when, in fact, they troll around the Internet seeking load after load in their hungry hole.

 

Since I never disclosed client confidences or lied about my safe sex activities and never would engage in such reprehensible activities, I think I'm as good as anyone to bring these important matters to light.

 

And, being Doug, he

>does all this while dripping with his standard scorn that

>drips with denigrating and patronizing comments about escorts

>generally. On a site about escorts.

 

I like lots of escorts, including many I hire.

 

I just don't like escorts who violate client confidences or who lie and claim that they into "safe sex only" when they, in fact, are hungry barebacking bottoms begging for loads in their hole.

 

Why do you think that distinction eluded you?

 

>Since Doug is someone who has stalked others, been banned by

>corporate parents from their subsidiary web site and web

>portals for lying on his membership applications and for

>Doug's misuse of their sites terms of service and terms of

>membership, and for all his other and multitudinous acts which

>serve purely to benefit his agenda and to score points for his

>own behalf, this current concern of his is both sad and

>laughable as well as disingenious and malicious.

 

LOL! If anyone can translate the above from pompous uneducated prostitute into English, I'd appreciate it.

 

First, I'm an escort. Then I own a porn website for hairy guys. Then, I'm a laywer in New York. Now I'm a stalker who gets "banned by corporate parents from their subsidiary web site and web portals for lying on his membership applications" - whatever the fuck that means.

 

I love learning about myself here. I just wish it were a little more consistent so I could keep track of what I'm doing.

 

Ultimately, it doesn't really fucking matter what I do, since I'm not offering my services as a wh-ore or asking others to hire me. Benji and Franco are.

 

So whether I'm a great guy or not couldn't possibly be of interest to the nice gentlemen here who are interested in how escorts behave. But Benji and Franco's behavior - documented with objective proof - that is of interest to many.

[Guest Conway]

You didn't answer the question, Woody. what do YOU do with your days. Sit around your musty apartment and scratch your balls? Call the super and complain about the neighbors dog barking? Beg for change and curse at people who tell you to get a job?

 

There's a joke here indeed. The joke who spends 24 hours day arguing with folks he doesn't know on the internet.

 

As I have said before, you're a lonely friendless piece of shit motherfucker who has to carry on a social life on the internet because you have fewer social skills than dog shit has.

 

Laugh now. Because when you die alone, they'll throw you in the landfill and no one will give a shit. To bad your dick sucking mom didn't take the "Woody" load down the throat from the milkman like she usually did.

 

^^Complain. This is full of personal insults.

[woodlawn]

RE: A Rich Vein of Mockery

 

>You didn't answer the question, Woody.

 

Are you still fantasizing about being a lawyer who gets to compel people to answer his questions? You really need to get back in touch with reality. If possible.

 

>As I have said before, you're a lonely friendless piece of

>shit motherfucker who has to carry on a social life on the

>internet because you have fewer social skills than dog shit

>has.

 

Here you repeat your usual pattern. When someone you're arguing with posts arguments you can't challenge -- as I did when I exposed you for pretending to be a lawyer -- you ignore what was said and resort to gutter vituperation. It's getting to be so familiar.

 

>Laugh now. Because when you die alone, they'll throw you in

>the landfill and no one will give a shit. To bad your dick

>sucking mom didn't take the "Woody" load down the throat from

>the milkman like she usually did.

 

I will, as you say, laugh at the pathetic spectacle of a hooker caught trying to intimidate people by pretending to be a scary trial lawyer. But I won't only laugh now. As I said earlier, I'll be reminding you and the audience a couple of months from now of all the empty threats you posted here so I and my pals will have another opportunity to laugh at you. I've already put it down on my calendar.

 

>^^Complain. This is full of personal insults.

 

I have no intention of complaining. Mocking idiots is, again, one of my favorite pastimes. You have provided me with a rich vein of mockery to mine, and I intend to mine it until there is nothing left to extract. I couldn't do it without your help. And don't think I don't appreciate it.