NEW PHOTOS ?

[Luv2play]

This has probably been discussed before but I don't see the point of including "New Photos" in the daily review section. Most of these photos are old ones, which can be plainly seen if you look at the personal web sites of these escorts or their magazine ads. The "new" photo of Carlos of Toronto yesterday is not new, it is OLD OLD OLD. So why bother? If these escorts want to update their photos, just amend their entry in the Escort Review section and leave it at that. The only purpose I can see for submitting a new photo is so that we get to reread old reviews, when these guys haven't been reviewed recently. And who wants to reread old reviews (unless, of course, they are really hot, but these are few and far between. :-(

[Guest 2004]

I agree. However, I believe we are seeing a rush of "new photos" now because of the 2257 law. My guess is someone from this site, sent an email to all escorts with X pics to send in a toned down version. If you notice none of the "new photos" show much skin. The email from this site probably sent escorts scrambling to find something we clothes on.

 

What I feel is wrong is the way this site is treating the 2257 law. Unlike any other site, including hard core porn site. This is a listing and review site there is nothing illegal about the pics that had been posted. NO OTHER SITE OF MERIT is acting this way. Makes one think wonder why?

 

---/

they said i was so old that no one cared. but then a little boy's mother who clutched him tightly to her bossom looked into my eyes and said he was born during your tenure, thank you 04.

[Chairmans Pig]

I would respectfully disagree. The new photos supply a morning's dose of eye-candy, plus the showing the new photo indicator as part of the list of new reviews quickly indicates that the escort is still active without having to go through a state's entire listing, (for me it's NY).

 

CP

[JT Brooklyn]

I Totally Agree with the Chairman. IMHO..There is nothing wrong with knowing that a Guy is "Still Available", by Posting a Photo. Most Guys don't "ask" for a Review, So "asking" to Post a Photo, is somewhat of an Update on their part. Maybe someday, we will return to the "Size Queen" Photos, But unfortunately not right now..LOL :+

[+ Cock Eyed Optimist]

I agree as well. Also, sometimes it jogs one's memory about a particular escort that hasn't been reviewed lately and is still "out there" and active.

[Bilbo]

And at the top of each review is the date the reviewer and the escort got together. So you don't need to read the whole review to know that its not a new one.

[Guest 2004]

>I would respectfully disagree. The new photos supply a

>morning's dose of eye-candy, plus the showing the new photo

>indicator as part of the list of new reviews quickly indicates

>that the escort is still active without having to go through a

>state's entire listing, (for me it's NY).

>

>CP

 

But this isn't what the thread is about. The thread is now about whether the pic is hot or not or whether an escort is still active. It's about truth in advertizing. Are these really enw photos, no they are not. Some are years aged.

 

I made an additional comment as to why I feel we're seeing an onslaught of new photos. That being the word was sent to escorts to send in 2257 compliant pics. Again, when actually looking at these "new photos" there no longer is any real skin showing. That doesn't mean the escort isn't attractive it simply is a viewable fact.

 

---/

To hear millions yell out my name at once was a real rush, then they rushed to forget about me. To dim a years spirits, how sad, oh how very sad.

[Luv2play]

I agree with you that the revisited reviews do indicate that the escort is still active, a point I hadn't considered. So to that extent, I suppose there is some utility in having the "new photos" included in the Newest Reviews section. Of course, time changes everything, and in some cases, not for the better. We have no way of knowing whether an escort who sends his picture in but who has not been reviewed recently is still the same guy who was reviewed God knows when. He may have grown fat and sloppy, for all we know, since the photos are mostly recycled old pics. To this extent, it may be misleading to have these old reviews resurrected and potential clients may be led astray. Caveat Emptor, I guess!