Jump to content

Steven Draker


Chuck50
This topic is 6982 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

RE: Steven Draeker

 

i do not think he ever had a clear face shot on his site. however, from the reviews and various threads he is reputed to be a handsome man (as well as skilled at what he does). while i have not met him, i would like to someday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steven is extremely handsome, top notch escort, with a great personality. Besides, when he is standing in front of you with out a shirt on, removing his skin tight blue jeans and revealing an awesome body in tight calvins, everything looks good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>But, deej, tight pants look good on NO ONE!

 

OMG, I think you are so wrong, tight pants looks so hot on some hot guys. This way I can see the package. Steven is one of the hottest guys I ever seen in tight pants :9 :9

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Is this 1970?

>I'm more than slightly disturbed that he's wearing skin-tight

>jeans?

 

Eric,

I am glad that you brought this up.

Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

 

"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

Needless to say, no store, chain or reputable brand sells (or have sold in the last two decades) that kind of jeans. I have to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an affirmative response.

 

I think that it is not that people want (or own) skin-tight jeans. It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound sexy... (The image itself fills our minds with perfectly rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

So, they dont want skin-tight jeans... they want a hot stud, right?

 

(I hope.)

 

If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin jeans... please let me know. After all, the client is -almost- always right, remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Is this 1970?

>I'm more than slightly disturbed that he's wearing skin-tight

>jeans?

 

Eric,

I am glad that you brought this up.

Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

 

"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

Needless to say, no store, chain or reputable brand sells (or have sold in the last two decades) that kind of jeans. I have to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an affirmative response.

 

I think that it is not that people want (or own) skin-tight jeans. It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound sexy... (The image itself fills our minds with perfectly rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

So, they dont want skin-tight jeans... they want a hot stud, right?

 

(I hope.)

 

If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin jeans... please let me know. After all, the client is -almost- always right, remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmmm... being the PB&J in a Juan-Vincent Michael sandwich... oh, sorry, I seem to be drooling again.

 

>I am glad that you brought this up.

>Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is

>any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the

>excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same

>request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

>

>"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

They came of age (or perhaps middle age) in the 70s I guess & nothing will free them from the shackles thereof.

 

>I have

>to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an

>affirmative response.

 

Thank God!

 

>It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we

>subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound

>sexy...

 

LOL, papi, it makes them sound fairly revolting!

 

 

>(The image itself fills our minds with perfectly

>rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost

>illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger

>than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

All it conjures in my mind is sterility and jean-sweat!

I'd much rather see those buttocks in khakis or non-denim pants. The basket can wait until the pants come off. For God's sake, underwear!

 

Besitos!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in

>our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin

>jeans... please let me know.

 

Juan, a Levi's 501 can look like "tight-skin" depending on your ASSets ...

but I definitely prefer you naked ! }(

 

Steven Draker ~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...