Billy the Fraud

[woodlawn]

I see that Billy from Orlando has posted yet another fake review today, obviously written by the exact same "first time" reviewer who has penned the previous "review" as well as a number of his other "reviews." Is there no limit to the number of fake reviews that one escort can post? Enquiring minds want to know.

[KY_TOP]

> Enquiring minds want to know.

 

I usually don't jump on the fake review bandwagon but the description of the client for the 2 Reviews today made me a bit suspect. I'd guess he wrote one review and it didn't get posted fast enough to suit him so he basicly resubmited it under a different handle. Then they both finally got posted.

[Skyyguy]

You know, this is why I don't bother posting reviews. I've tried over 3 times to post valid reviews. But HB tries to call me to verify me. I'm sorry that I prefer not to receive calls; or share my number with this service. However, it does annoy me that these fake reviews for Billy, and Timmy prep make it through, not just once, but several times. Many of them first time reviews etc.

 

Has the verification process been redeisgned, so it doesn't catch this stuff? There are several "real" escort reviews I'd love to post. But it somehow doesn't seem worth the hassle. Now I hate to complain without posting a suggestion on how to improve the process. I feel that is always required when complaining about something. I'm going to try and think about it over the next few days, while being annoyed at the breeders around the holidays. hehe..

 

Is it me, or have others noticed an increase in bogus reviews?

 

Please, don't get me wrong, this service is awesome, and it has proved invaluable many times. The best part is this forum, where you have gentlemen like yourselves who point out the fraudulent ones.

 

Maybe there is a way to vote a review "suspect" or something, or a confidence level based on a group of registered "observers"?

 

Just a thought..

 

Have a great holiday everyone!

[+ Lucky]

RE: Billy the Tease

 

You must be interested in Billy's appearance to bother reading the review in the first place. So now we know that woodie is into feminine looking guys with long hair! I'm shocked!

[Guest OralBtm4Top]

The rules are simple, you just need to follow them. It's for the same reason Hooboy asks for phone numbers that helps prevent fruads writing reviews. No system is foolproof and I'm sure some bogus reviews slip through. Nonetheless, it's amazing to me that this site can perform as efficiently as it does. It's a tremendous resource for escort services at all levels. My advice is to either give your phone number to Hooboy or accept that you cannot write reviews. As for the bogus ones, my best advise is only hire those with at least two credible reviews.

[jackhammer91406]

I have no answer as to why some reviews don't get posted (mine have always been, so it's never been a problem). But I do have a thought as to why there is value in printing a bogus review. It seems it didn't take any of us much time to realize these were bogus reviews and that says something about the escort doesn't it? I mean, if that's not a red flag, then red isn't a color ( or a vegetable for you catsup lovers). Here's my point: Not having any reviews leaves the door open to any prospective client that this kid in Orlando might be good (I mean if you are into long flowing hair and all that). BUT, having these bogus reviews let's clients know that there is something stinky in all of that hair.

 

Well, just my humble opinion

[+ deej]

It's just like getting out to vote on election day. The best way to improve the process is to participate.

 

I've heard of no changes, so I presume Hooboy still phones first-time reviewers. If they sound credible on the phone, the review goes through.

 

So go ahead and submit your review, sound credible on the phone, and then you'll be participating and improving the process. If not, well, you won't.

[LovesYng]

RE: Billy the Tease

 

DAMN, this asshole is as bad as the guy out west that has about 95 reviews from first timers

 

When in doubt I whip it out:+

[Guest TommyTam]

RE: Billy the Tease

 

>DAMN, this asshole is as bad as the guy out west that has about 95 reviews from first timers

 

Just a note: I meet with David in Seattle last month aka.95 reviews from first timers guy. He was a really nice guy, professional and really nice to the customer, I will put him on my threesome list.

Merry Christmas and I still waiting for Santa to show up :+

 

Tommy Tam

Best Asian Escort in the State

512-635-0379

Website: http://www.tommytx.com

Review: http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/tommytamaustin.html

for more information please send e-mail to austintt@hotmail.com or tommy@tommytx.com

[+ Cock Eyed Optimist]

RE: Billy the Tease

 

: I meet with David in Seattle last month aka.95

>reviews from first timers guy. He was a really nice guy,

>professional and really nice to the customer, I will put him

>on my threesome list.

 

Tommy,

 

This is nice to hear. I assume "met with" means you were the customer or worked with him with another client. I've always wondered why no one ever reviewed him except "first-time reviewers". Surely out of all those reviews, someone had hired him who had posted a review before. It is just mathematically probable. Thanks for your input.

[woodlawn]

>> Enquiring minds want to know.

>

>I usually don't jump on the fake review bandwagon but the

>description of the client for the 2 Reviews today made me a

>bit suspect. I'd guess he wrote one review and it didn't get

>posted fast enough to suit him so he basicly resubmited it

>under a different handle. Then they both finally got posted.

 

Interesting theory. But how does it exlain the fact that the very same person -- a person who always writes in the exact same cadences and makes the exact same grammatical errors -- posted the most recent "first time review" for this escort and also posted more than half a dozen other "first time reviews" over a period of months? The same person writing multiple reviews of the same escort, each time describing himself as a "first time reviewer" and each time giving a different description of his own age and characteristics? You aren't usually this obtuse.

 

Despite Lucky's characteristically stupid remarks, I have no particular interest in this escort. He is simply one of the more egregrious examples of the ease with which escorts can post fake reviews here.

[+ Lucky]

"Despite Lucky's characteristically stupid remarks..."

 

Which you continue to read!

[woodlawn]

>"Despite Lucky's characteristically stupid remarks..."

>

>Which you continue to read!

 

I read your remarks because I enjoy being proved right. I think you're stupid. And every time I read one of your posts, I have the satisfaction of being proved right.

 

As for "Billy," he obviously thinks the management of this website and everyone who reads the reviews are stupid. How else can we explain that he doesn't make even a modest effort to conceal the fact that he is the same person who has penned one "first time review" after another on the same escort?

[KY_TOP]

>Interesting theory. But how does it exlain the fact that the

>very same person -- a person who always writes in the exact

>same cadences and makes the exact same grammatical errors --

>posted the most recent "first time review" for this escort and

>also posted more than half a dozen other "first time reviews"

>over a period of months? The same person writing multiple

>reviews of the same escort, each time describing himself as a

>"first time reviewer" and each time giving a different

>description of his own age and characteristics? You aren't

>usually this obtuse.

 

I wasn't saying that Billy didn't write the Review(s). I just think it is very obvious that the 2 Reviews were written by the same person, and yes that might be Billy boy. BTW, I definitely don't find him to be any of my types.

[theDCeBOY]

this is odd. for the first time ever, i'm in complete agreement with woodlawn!

[kjun]

Lucky, now shame on you. Your message has displeased two of the self-appointed intellectuals on this center.}(

 

the Cajun

[+ Lucky]

woodie is probably still beating off from that first pic of billy...

[woodlawn]

>woodie is probably still beating off from that first pic of

>billy...

 

Was there ever a time in your life when you had anything real to do, or have you always lead the kind of pointless, trivial existence you do now?