Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of BrunoGaucho

[sman]

can someone please explain to me what is sooooooo exciting and interesting in this bruno man??

there are more beautifull and probably nicer guys in the business in america /nyc.........

please stop making an idol out of this man.

[sman]

can someone please explain to me what is sooooooo exciting and interesting in this bruno man??

there are more beautifull and probably nicer guys in the business in america /nyc.........

please stop making an idol out of this man.

[trilingual]

No, I can't explain to you what it is about Bruno that makes some guys go into palpitations over him. Nobody else will be able to, either.

 

Hello? We're talking sex and animal attraction here. We all respond to different stimuli, and I doubt any of us can explain exactly why. Some guys like the fresh-faced blond twink type, of which Bruno is a prime example. Others like older, hairy-chested types with three days worth of stubble. Some of us are size queens (me, for example). Others here could care less about that. We've got tops, we've got bottoms, we've got everything in between. There are escorts reviewed glowingly here that I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole (even if they had one), and I'm sure there are escorts I find hot that leave some of the other guys here completely cold. That's the point. There's something or someone for everyone here. Find what you like and enjoy it, but kindly have the grace not to attack the escorts here who aren't your type, or the readers/posters whose tastes are different than yours.

 

In my book, the only grounds for a bad review or posting are based on real actions by an escort or client, like being a blatant "no-show" (and not just because dates/times/place got legitimately mixed up), failure to perform as agreed upon after having been paid, actual rip-offs, etc. In the case of the "no-show" review about Bruno, there's a lot about it that doesn't ring true, and it goes against the grain of everything else here about him, so I'm taking it with a very large grain of salt.

 

As for the posters here who go on and on bad-mouthing Bruno, some are clearly obsessed in the clinical sense. Others seem to be angry because they're very much turned on by him and now they've discovered they can't afford him. Their response to their frustration is to try to trash him by launching an "If I can't have him, then I'll make him damaged goods so nobody else will want him" attack. Either way, that's truly sick.

 

Unfortunately, we don't have any way of completely screening out the mentally disturbed from this site, or any other, but we should try not to cater to them and their delusions; it just ends up perpetuating threads like this one. Maybe they can't be excluded altogether, but perhaps the moderators could put a "cuckoo" icon next to the handles of some of our more deranged posters so people would be warned and can steer clear of them and their rants and attacks and conspiracy theories and whatever? }(

[trilingual]

No, I can't explain to you what it is about Bruno that makes some guys go into palpitations over him. Nobody else will be able to, either.

 

Hello? We're talking sex and animal attraction here. We all respond to different stimuli, and I doubt any of us can explain exactly why. Some guys like the fresh-faced blond twink type, of which Bruno is a prime example. Others like older, hairy-chested types with three days worth of stubble. Some of us are size queens (me, for example). Others here could care less about that. We've got tops, we've got bottoms, we've got everything in between. There are escorts reviewed glowingly here that I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole (even if they had one), and I'm sure there are escorts I find hot that leave some of the other guys here completely cold. That's the point. There's something or someone for everyone here. Find what you like and enjoy it, but kindly have the grace not to attack the escorts here who aren't your type, or the readers/posters whose tastes are different than yours.

 

In my book, the only grounds for a bad review or posting are based on real actions by an escort or client, like being a blatant "no-show" (and not just because dates/times/place got legitimately mixed up), failure to perform as agreed upon after having been paid, actual rip-offs, etc. In the case of the "no-show" review about Bruno, there's a lot about it that doesn't ring true, and it goes against the grain of everything else here about him, so I'm taking it with a very large grain of salt.

 

As for the posters here who go on and on bad-mouthing Bruno, some are clearly obsessed in the clinical sense. Others seem to be angry because they're very much turned on by him and now they've discovered they can't afford him. Their response to their frustration is to try to trash him by launching an "If I can't have him, then I'll make him damaged goods so nobody else will want him" attack. Either way, that's truly sick.

 

Unfortunately, we don't have any way of completely screening out the mentally disturbed from this site, or any other, but we should try not to cater to them and their delusions; it just ends up perpetuating threads like this one. Maybe they can't be excluded altogether, but perhaps the moderators could put a "cuckoo" icon next to the handles of some of our more deranged posters so people would be warned and can steer clear of them and their rants and attacks and conspiracy theories and whatever? }(

[ad rian]

>As for the posters here who go on and on bad-mouthing Bruno,

>some are clearly obsessed in the clinical sense. Others seem

>to be angry because they're very much turned on by him and now

>they've discovered they can't afford him. Their response to

>their frustration is to try to trash him by launching an "If I

>can't have him, then I'll make him damaged goods so nobody

>else will want him" attack. Either way, that's truly sick.

 

And what pray tell, Dr. Trilingual is your diagnosis for those involved in his 6 month advertising that consisted of at theast 6 separate threads in three 4 separate lounges with posts from about 4 regulars? Ever considered that some of usfind that annoying and perhaps a trifle strange?

[ad rian]

>As for the posters here who go on and on bad-mouthing Bruno,

>some are clearly obsessed in the clinical sense. Others seem

>to be angry because they're very much turned on by him and now

>they've discovered they can't afford him. Their response to

>their frustration is to try to trash him by launching an "If I

>can't have him, then I'll make him damaged goods so nobody

>else will want him" attack. Either way, that's truly sick.

 

And what pray tell, Dr. Trilingual is your diagnosis for those involved in his 6 month advertising that consisted of at theast 6 separate threads in three 4 separate lounges with posts from about 4 regulars? Ever considered that some of usfind that annoying and perhaps a trifle strange?

[BewareofNick]

RE: Today's (11/10)

 

Just tell him that Bruno is Jewish. THAT really ought to set him off.

[ad rian]

RE: Today's (11/10)

 

>Just tell him that Bruno is Jewish. THAT really ought to set

>him off.

 

Nah, only if he is an Israeli....! Actually, he looks quite Aryan to me. Do you know something I don't know? Speaking of Orwell: "The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

[trilingual]

And exactly how are you or anyone else on this site harmed by participants' enthusiasm for Bruno, their anticipation of being able to get together with him, or their helping him communicate with interested people (considering his limited English)? And how is their interest/enthusiasm any different than that of other M4M'ers for other escorts, like Rick Monroe or Talvin deMacchio or Michael Brandon? If Bruno, or any other escort guys may get excited about, aren't your cup of tea, nobody is standing with a gun to your head making you click on the posts about them, are they?

 

On the other hand, your posts, and those of some others, ARE harmful, in their utterly unfounded attacks on Bruno, his motives, his professionalism, his performance, etc. So are your attacks on the people who are attracted to him or who have evidently been helping him. Especially when you go on and on making baseless comments speculating that these guys are somehow benefitting financially from Bruno and his visit (like that were remotely possible, considering that Bruno's here to MAKE money, not to give it away, duh). Furthermore, the crap you've been posting cleary isn't based on ANY personal experience or contact with Bruno, so it's all the work of your fevered imagination. I wouldn't be surprised that Bruno may have scored some free places to stay, some free meals and advice, and may even have rewarded the guys who've helped him with certain, um, favors, but unless Bruno is working for an agency (and as far as can be told, he isn't) nobody is benefitting monetarily from his visit to the U.S. except himself. In fact, it's probably costing his supporters some time and money to host and help him. And if that's the case, and they're happy with the arrangement, it really isn't any of your business. So please, give us, and Bruno, and any other escort who doesn't ring your chimes, and their clients, a rest!

 

By the way, I never commented on your observation many posts back in this thread, but flying into São Paulo (especially the close-in commuter airport at Congonhas) is a very impressive experience, with views of high-rise buildings stretching from horizon to horizon. As you said, a helicopter flight over the city could be quite exciting, even if SP isn't particularly beautiful scenically (although it is bordered by mountains on at least a couple of sides). SP has to be seen to be believed! So we do agree on at least one thing!

[ad rian]

>And how is their interest/enthusiasm any different

>than that of other M4M'ers for other escorts, like Rick Monroe

>or Talvin deMacchio or Michael Brandon? If Bruno, or any

>other escort guys may get excited about, aren't your cup of

>tea, nobody is standing with a gun to your head making you

>click on the posts about them, are they?

 

Since I started reviewing this site, I have never seen anything that smacked so much of an organized marketing campaign. And after watching it for 6 months, I entered the fray to point that out. I am still fascinated by the depth of attraction to him, and the extent of the activities of his local support committee. It is truly impressive! By the way, if you don't like my posts, I am not standing with a gun to your head making you click on my posts about Bruno, am I? Again, I find theese goo goo ga ga posts and reviews of Bruno to be simply "incredible" in the literal sense of that word.

[Guest YFSC]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of BrunoGaucho

 

>Since I started reviewing this site,

 

Oh, you review this site???

 

 

> And after watching it for 6 months,

 

It's nowhere near 6 months. You keep saying that, but you are grossly exaggerating. This is another one of your Big Lies that you keep repeating.

 

> It is truly impressive!

 

Are you jealous?

 

>Again, I find theese goo goo ga ga posts and reviews of Bruno

>to be simply "incredible" in the literal sense of that word.

 

Please point to "theese goo goo ga ga posts and reviews of Bruno".

[ad rian]

>I wouldn't be surprised

>that Bruno may have scored some free places to stay, some free

>meals and advice, and may even have rewarded the guys who've

>helped him with certain, um, favors, but unless Bruno is

>working for an agency (and as far as can be told, he isn't)

>nobody is benefitting monetarily from his visit to the U.S.

>except himself. In fact, it's probably costing his supporters

>some time and money to host and help him. And if that's the

>case, and they're happy with the arrangement, it really isn't

>any of your business.

 

Look, if it costs me $5.00 for a bag of apples, and I tutor the grocery store owner's daughter with or without the expectation of compensation, but the store owner gives me the bag for free, then I have benefited monetarilly. So too with Mr. Bruno and his "handlers"? Why is it my business? Because his handlers are oming forward withposts here to induce others to come and buy more apples at his store in return for more free apples for them. I would like to preserve the integrity of this site from these sorts of marketing campaigns.

[Guest YFSC]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of Bruno...

 

Adrian, go back to both math class and logic class. You flunked.

 

Tri said >> In fact, it's probably costing his supporters

>>some time and money to host and help him. And if that's the

>>case, and they're happy with the arrangement, it really isn't

>>any of your business.

 

Aside from the fact that he's right in saying it's none of your business, if it costs Bruno's supporters time and/or money, maybe they are just getting reimbursed. Or maybe they are not even getting fully reimbursed. Or maybe they are not getting reimbursed at all. In any of those cases they are not benefiting monetarily - and in the last two they would be "more whole" if they didn't get into the arrangement in the first place. Where do you get the knowledge or the right to claim that any reimbursement is over and above the cost? And what about the opportunity cost?

 

Adrian said>Look, if it costs me $5.00 for a bag of apples, and I tutor

>the grocery store owner's daughter with or without the

>expectation of compensation, but the store owner gives me the

>bag for free, then I have benefited monetarilly.

 

Yeah, but if it costs you $2.50 each way in subway and bus fares to come and tutor the grocer's daughter, you're not benefiting monetarily. And if it costs you $3.00 each way, you're losing. And if you could have spent your time fixing refrigerators instead at $25/hr you're losing a lot.

 

>So too with

>Mr. Bruno and his "handlers"? Why is it my business? Because

>his handlers are oming forward withposts here to induce others

>to come and buy more apples at his store in return for more

>free apples for them.

 

Wrong again. Whatever you get for tutoring the grocer's daughter you get, and it's over. Done. Paid. You don't keep getting residuals every time she correctly applies what you taught her in chemistry class. And the grocer doesn't keep sending you another apple every day afterwards. You got your bag; now go away. No more free apples just because now she's smarter.

[ad rian]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of Bruno...

 

>Aside from the fact that he's right in saying it's none of

>your business, if it costs Bruno's supporters time and/or

>money, maybe they are just getting reimbursed. Or maybe they

>are not even getting fully reimbursed. Or maybe they are not

>getting reimbursed at all. In any of those cases they are

>not benefiting monetarily - and in the last two they

>would be "more whole" if they didn't get into the arrangement

>in the first place. Where do you get the knowledge or

>the right to claim that any reimbursement is over and above

>the cost? And what about the opportunity cost?

 

Look, I have repeatedly said that I don't understand what is going on here, what motivates his "support" team, and what incentives induce the odd behaviour of a 6 month marketing campaign and an on-line defense committee? I tend to think that rational economic behaviour is a more likely explanation. You disagree, fine. Go spend your money on him, but I will continue to expose this marketing campaign for what it is. They made it my business bu using this site for this public campaign.

[Guest YFSC]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review ...

 

>Look, I have repeatedly said that I don't understand what is

>going on here,

 

That's for sure. When you don't understand what you are talking about you ought not to talk.

 

>what motivates his "support" team, and what

>incentives induce the odd behaviour of a 6 month marketing

>campaign and an on-line defense committee?

 

Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I'll tell you what motivated me - or, rather I'll tell you again, because I have already told you before: I had not posted anything in the threads about Bruno until last week, several days after you had started your anti-Bruno campaign. And I got into these threads not because of Bruno, but because of you. Because I couldn't take your willful distortion, irrational obsession and unfair attacks any more. And in order to expose your distortions and unfair tactics.

 

And you just reminded me above both that you are still trying to perpetuate the fiction that this alleged marketing campaign has been going on for 6 months, and that you have ignored my earlier challenge to show that it has been.

 

> I will

>continue to expose this marketing campaign for what it is.

>They made it my business bu using this site for this public

>campaign.

 

No, that's not your business, it's HooBoy's business. He even put up a post banning (certain) advertising on this site, and he apparently took down some post or posts with regard to that. He has not seen fit to take down anything related to Bruno Gaucho, though, so he must not consider it to be a violation of the policies of the site. As has often been heard, this is HooBoy's site and he can do what he pleases with it. He apparently does not consider any of the threads about Bruno to be inappropriate.

[ad rian]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review ...

 

>Because I couldn't take your willful distortion, irrational

>obsession and unfair attacks any more. And in order to expose

>your distortions and unfair tactics.

 

I don't think that I have been unfair or engaged in any distortion. Why can't you appreciate that someone miht just interpret his reviews and posts differently from you? If you want to rent him, go ahead and do so, but I won't for reasons repeated here ad nauseum. All I will say is that I have tryed to add balance after the 6 month marketing campaign. Do a search on Bruno's name if you doubt me on the start date.

 

>No, that's not your business, it's HooBoy's business.

>He even put up a post banning (certain) advertising on this

>site, and he apparently took down some post or posts with

>regard to that. He has not seen fit to take down anything

>related to Bruno Gaucho, though, so he must not consider it to

>be a violation of the policies of the site.

 

Well, I suppose the same apples to my posts as well. I think he is right. Free speech is always the best disinfectant, let all sides have their say and caveat emptor!

[ad rian]

I just read Bruno's reply. It had the ring of truth. I commend his backers for not corecting the Enlish. It had the rythym of Brazilian speech. I still think there was a mis-communication here, but now would give the benefit of the doubt to Bruno. My advice to his marketing team is to stand back, and let the boy fend for himself. For my part, I read his Ads in the Escort lounge, and while allowing for different tastes, I prefer the illusion that an escort sees one guy a day. Bruno's Ad is far too "interactive" for my tastes.

[Guest Hole_4_Hire]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of BrunoGaucho

 

>I just read Bruno's reply. It had the ring of truth. I commend his backers for not corecting the Enlish. It had the rythym of Brazilian speech.

 

I'm really glad he posted a reply. His explanation sounds very plausable and I think he took heroic measures to try and contact the client.

 

I am concerned about his comments concerning threats by the client. Sounds to me like the client is someone to be avoided. x(

[Guest]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of BrunoGaucho

 

I don´t believe his response for a minute. First of all, I don´t buy the innocent "sorry but I don´t speak English" act. He clearly has friends here in the US who speak/write English and who have been helping him with his e-mail and marketing. If his English were really that bad, he couldn´t understand what was written at all. If he could read it and had a good explanation, he would have done it long ago. Besides, he seemed to communicate perfectly well with this potential client whom he describes as a psycho.

Frankly, this whole ruse of "It´s all the client´s fault... He was completely crazy!" is getting really old. Of course, the client can´t respond, since the escort has the last word (unless the client happens to read these forums as well, which it seems he doesn´t, since he hasn´t chimed in). Nevertheless, someone would have to be majorly psychotic to fly to Brazil to meet someone who´s told him a number of times he doesn´t want to meet him. I´m talking hallucinating and getting thoughts broadcast to him by the TV psychotic. And I somehow doubt that someone that psychotic would have the money to spend on the airfare, etc.

I might be slightly more inclined to believe a story about the event never having happened, since it was written by a first-time reviewer, after all. It would have had a little more credibility if it had been written within the first 2 or 3 days after the review was written. At this point, I´m more inclined that he didn´t bother to respond since he may have had good business his first ten days here, and didn´t give a rat´s ass. Then when business began petering down, so to speak, he enlisted his friend(s) to do damage control.

Well, there will always be people who´ll believe the escort no matter how far-fetched the response!

[Guest alanm]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of BrunoGaucho

 

You did not read HooBoy's message with Bruno's response.

 

HooBoy: "He [bruno] responded earlier, but I am late posting it, with all apologies."

 

Bruno's response made a believer out of me. His response sounds right,

especially since he wrote so much, struggling with his English the whole time.

 

Finally, I do not understand the number of postings on this thread. I started it (if I had not, someone else would have), but I even got sick of all the arguing early on. Don't people have better things to do, like hiring an escort!

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of Bruno...

 

I agree that Bruno should post more on his own, without help from his American friend(s). His rebuttal was not only believable, but that Brazilian accent is very sexy when it's typed. :9

[+ Axiom2001]

RE: Today's (11/10) "No Show" Review of Bruno...

 

We guys are too, too much! Lets all of us go to a big stadium en mass and cheer his name! So much has been written about him, good as well as nauseating recanting of CRAP! I too have gotten on the bandwagon, but my comments have been in support of him as an individual. He HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING that one would consider a felony or a misdemeanor except to please the sexual appetites of gay/bi/and perhaps questioning men! "Leave the guy alone at last!" That rebuttal came in, so let us leave it at that rather there are some dubious ones amongsst us or not!

 

The only thing that I would like to say about his response is that I found it to be much too long......

 

BRUNO! BRUNO! BRUNO! Hip, HIP, Hoorah! That's all folks!