EastVillageTwunk, new thread

[+ glutes]

2 hours ago, Chancealot said:

imo he def misrepresented himself with his pics but I didn’t reduce his fee

What I saw (and projected) from his social media (and RM pics) I imagined an amazing experience 

live and learn

 

Do you know how much time, energy and $$ you have saved us Chancealot?

 

Thank you.

 

[Chancealot]

1 hour ago, glutes said:

Do you know how much time, energy and $$ you have saved us Chancealot?

 

Thank you.

 

That’s sweet of you 🙂

I’ve realized we all have different tastes and a couple here on this thread enjoyed his looks, manner and company so to each his own is a real thing 

 

[+ Gar1eth]

9 hours ago, Chancealot said:

I didn’t think he was nearly as fit or handsome as his pics or his social media content - living in the city as a young graduate isn’t easy especially if you’re not working 

I’m super picky so we chatted it wasn’t uncomfortable but I wasn’t into it 

Obviously being picky is certainly fine. I mean in the field of attraction and hiring, I'd say it's difficult to not want specific things or change what we want. My main question being -if you classify yourself as picky-how, I wonder, would the 'average client' (assuming there is such a beast) feel about Mr. Twunk's current looks.  
 

In my case, I can definitely remember hiring  guys who were in nowhere near as good as shape as their photos ( I can remember two in particular-one was much older-I mean I didn't ask his age   But I wouldn't have been surprised if the photos were 10 years old. The other guy was athletically slim in his photos and pudgy (=unpleasingly plump) when he showed up).

But on the other hand, I can remember lots of guys, particularly porn stars, who, while they looked good, didn't look as good as their photos. But I always figured they had probably been dieting for some time, restricting fluid, and working out like a fiend prior to the photo session. 

 

So again I have no problem thinking Mr. Twunk looked better in his photos compared to real life. But for me, if he had been even 85% of his photos, I probably would have been happy.  
 

If I can ask, how close to his photos did you think he was, @Chancealot?

Edited yesterday at 01:11 AM by Gar1eth

[Chancealot]

3 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

Obviously being picky is certainly fine. I mean in the field of attraction and hiring, I'd say it's difficult to not want specific things or change what we want. My main question being -if you classify yourself as picky-how, I wonder, would the 'average client' (assuming there is such a beast) feel about Mr. Twunk's current looks.  
 

In my case, I can definitely remember hiring  guys who were in nowhere near as good as shape as their photos ( I can remember two in particular-one was much older-I mean I didn't ask his age   But I wouldn't have been surprised if the photos were 10 years old. The other guy was athletically slim in his photos and pudgy (=unpleasingly plump) when he showed up).

But on the other hand, I can remember lots of guys, particularly porn stars, who, while they looked good, didn't look as good as their photos. But I always figured they had probably been dieting for some time, restricting fluid, and working out like a fiend prior to the photo session. 

 

So again I have no problem thinking Mr. Twunk looked better in his photos compared to real life. But for me, if he had been even 85% of his photos, I probably would have been happy.  
 

If I can ask, how close to his photos did you think he was, @Chancealot?

I’m a “look like your pics” guy period no wiggle 

the ad has pics - I select the person in the ad - if I can I ask/get a current pic via text where the individual makes a sign (🤞 or 👍) so I know it’s legit.  

Not gonna give you a % but the guy I met was a less than in shape less ripped less buff version body and face 

I shoulda required a pre right now pic or vid - sometimes I let it go - I didn’t require here - I’d seen his social media and I was gotta have 

Imo it’s a very big issue on RM and one that people I guess accept as a it is what it is thing - I can’t 

its prob a big reason why I’m more of a grindr find guy tbh when I partake 

 

 

Edited yesterday at 02:04 AM by Chancealot

[curiousheartguy]

10 hours ago, Chancealot said:

I met him while back

he was out of work doing this to pay rent and such - well read educated decent guy - not as masc as I imagined (that’s on me)

I didn’t think he was nearly as fit or handsome as his pics or his social media content - living in the city as a young graduate isn’t easy especially if you’re not working 

I’m super picky so we chatted it wasn’t uncomfortable but I wasn’t into it 

imo he def misrepresented himself with his pics but I didn’t reduce his fee

What I saw (and projected) from his social media (and RM pics) I imagined an amazing experience 

live and learn

 

I met him a few months back also.  The pics are definitely a bit outdated.......not nearly as cut and defined as the pics suggest.  That said, pickings are so slim these days (even in NY) that he is probably one of the better guys that u will find in Manhattan.  PLUS, he doesnt ask for pics, which is a rarity.

[BuzzLiteQueer]

On 1/18/2026 at 1:15 PM, Wanderoz said:

Twink, twank, twunk.

What comes next?

the twuth!

[marylander1940]

On 8/12/2026 at 11:54 AM, Chancealot said:

I met him while back

he was out of work doing this to pay rent and such - well read educated decent guy - not as masc as I imagined (that’s on me)

I didn’t think he was nearly as fit or handsome as his pics or his social media content - living in the city as a young graduate isn’t easy especially if you’re not working 

I’m super picky so we chatted it wasn’t uncomfortable but I wasn’t into it 

imo he def misrepresented himself with his pics but I didn’t reduce his fee

What I saw (and projected) from his social media (and RM pics) I imagined an amazing experience 

live and learn

 

Do you think his pictures where "enhanced" or fixed? AI maybe? 

[Larry8]

I think the somewhat polarized opinions are very interesting!   A very good example of to each his own as I do really like him and found him quite consistent with his photos (and for me a beauty!).  

[Chancealot]

4 hours ago, marylander1940 said:

Do you think his pictures where "enhanced" or fixed? AI maybe? 

Don’t think so just dated maybe touched up ?  For me it was a “different” guy 

[marylander1940]

46 minutes ago, Chancealot said:

Don’t think so just dated maybe touched up ?  For me it was a “different” guy 

Interesting! 

Thank you for sharing!