Turbook

[MarkR]

Any information on this young man?

Turbook - Pornstar Performer, Rentboy, Gay Massage in Washington, DC | RentMen

RENTMEN.EU

---

Pornstar Performer & Rentboy in Washington, DC - Turbook: Young boy

 

[+ jimbosf]

The search feature is your friend. 

 

[Harryinny]

Delicious!

[+ Pensant]

I missed him when he was in Seattle since he moves around the country pretty quickly. My regular Seattle provider (who doesn’t advertise) knows him and says I’d like him. He’s pretty responsive. 500 out call.

[Chancealot]

Drama with one of our members 

I’ve seen him a couple x and enjoyed immensely 

not a clock watcher 

smooth fit body nice cock and ass 

into it 

[+ Twinkluvr]

He had a pretty good rep until he stole a deposit from a client.  Maybe a one off, but that’s enough for me.  Also a name changer. Play at your own risk.

Edited August 16 by Twinkluvr

[Chancealot]

7 hours ago, Twinkluvr said:

He had a pretty good rep until he stole a deposit from a client.  Maybe a one off, but that’s enough for me.  Also a name changer. Play at your own risk.

He’s got a great rep 

the situation between he and the member is debatable 

 

 

 

 

[DC Guy 92]

Not that debatable actually.  Entirely provable.   But other than this incident, his rep is provides a good experience most of the time.

Edited Saturday at 10:19 PM by DC Guy 92

[DC Guy 92]

On 8/17/2025 at 10:56 AM, Chancealot said:

This makes no sense, but confirms the value of your assessment.  Refusal to look at and believe actual evidence because there’s a pretty boy that had sec with you seems much more on the mark of your comparison, however, avoiding politics is one of our community standards, so I will  honor them.

To the topic, he definitely stole and made it extremely difficult to get it back.  I found him to be shallow and not very intelligent, but that may be the language barrier.  As long as you don’t give him any money prior to services, he will probably be ok, but still a risk.   Happy to provide evidence, including a letter from Venmo I got for my records, feel free to DM me.  The money was eventually returned, without any assistance from  Turbook, so I don’t feel the need to keep going on it. But I will defend myself from spurious accusations.

[+ glutes]

1 hour ago, DC Guy 92 said:

  The money was eventually returned, without any assistance from  Turbook, so I don’t feel the need to keep going on it. 

He should be named Turdbook.

[Chancealot]

3 hours ago, DC Guy 92 said:

This makes no sense, but confirms the value of your assessment.  Refusal to look at and believe actual evidence because there’s a pretty boy that had sec with you seems much more on the mark of your comparison, however, avoiding politics is one of our community standards, so I will  honor them.

To the topic, he definitely stole and made it extremely difficult to get it back.  I found him to be shallow and not very intelligent, but that may be the language barrier.  As long as you don’t give him any money prior to services, he will probably be ok, but still a risk.   Happy to provide evidence, including a letter from Venmo I got for my records, feel free to DM me.  The money was eventually returned, without any assistance from  Turbook, so I don’t feel the need to keep going on it. But I will defend myself from spurious accusations.

You seem to be the only one with a problem with him 

that might “confirm the value of your assessment”

doth protest too much 

[DC Guy 92]

I will always have a problem with a thief.  Hopefully he’s learned his lesson, and I will be the only one who has this problem with him.

[DFdub]

On 8/18/2025 at 3:50 AM, DC Guy 92 said:

This makes no sense, but confirms the value of your assessment.  Refusal to look at and believe actual evidence because there’s a pretty boy that had sec with you seems much more on the mark of your comparison, however, avoiding politics is one of our community standards, so I will  honor them.

To the topic, he definitely stole and made it extremely difficult to get it back.  I found him to be shallow and not very intelligent, but that may be the language barrier.  As long as you don’t give him any money prior to services, he will probably be ok, but still a risk.   Happy to provide evidence, including a letter from Venmo I got for my records, feel free to DM me.  The money was eventually returned, without any assistance from  Turbook, so I don’t feel the need to keep going on it. But I will defend myself from spurious accusations.

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.

The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

[Chancealot]

9 hours ago, DFdub said:

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.

The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

BINGO

[DC Guy 92]

12 hours ago, DFdub said:

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.

The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

I made multiple calls to Venmo to make sure this was not a misunderstanding and got written documentation from them to verify my claim.  I investigated the consideration this might be a misunderstanding with how Venmo works, which granted, is not the most clear in how it displays disputed balances. The evidence just didn’t back that up.  The only other possibility is that he “accidentally” filed a dispute on money he had ‘refunded’ me….which, if you’ve ever done this, is pretty hard to believe.  His suspicious behavior on top of that made it nearly impossible to believe.  His total refusal to help resolve the matter other than ‘I guess I won’t fight you trying to get your money back’, at a minimum demonstrated poor customer service at best.  The screenshots posted are a very small slice of the evidence, although I think sufficient once you understand how Venmo displays accounting.

At the very least, once he did find out what happened (assuming it was all a big misunderstanding), not even an apology for keeping money he should’ve returned?

Edited Wednesday at 03:53 PM by DC Guy 92

[MikeThomas]

Not following how Venmo was "partially to blame."

[DFdub]

8 hours ago, MikeThomas said:

Not following how Venmo was "partially to blame."

Easy.

Review the receipts Turbook shared with ansh0620.  First one shows the original $200 was on hold so Turbook did not get it. Second one on that comment shows the $194 refund sent to DC. I suspect if I sent a refund for money I never received, I would cancel it too.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Third another screenshot from Turbook showing the dispute.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Fourth - DC sent a screenshot showing the dispute was pending during the 3-4 week dispute period he himself mentioned.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Finally, Venmo resolved the dispute in his favor per his last screenshot. Venmo resolved the dispute in the time they said, even though it took way too long - ergo partial blame.

Take a step back as mature adults / grown ups - both parties had screenshots supporting their version. Almost a dozen members have very positive feedback over a long period. One single member had a very large reaction to a Venmo-related issue and now is pursuing some sort of blood oath vendetta to ruin a person's livelihood because he wants an apology without offering one himself for larger harm he caused to Turbook over an unfortunate misunderstanding.

Decide for yourselves, but review all evidence rather than just repeated rants.

Edited yesterday at 12:11 AM by DFdub
Forgot halfway that I was responding to Mike about DC, and referred to DC in second person which confused Mike. :)

[DFdub]

37 minutes ago, MikeThomas said:

Are you responding to me?  I never sent a screenshot to anyone.  I was never involved in a dispute with Venmo.

Corrected the second person pronouns that were distracting. 😐

[Whoisyourdaddy]

I liked my interactions with Turbook the few times I saw him (this was years ago). However, most of this site's members frown on sending deposits for good reasons.

[DFdub]

Absolutely agree. Never ever send deposits.

But, let's not disregard many positive reviews from multiple members that actually met the provider, and boycott a provider due to one single deposit refund fiasco that ended with everyone even. 🤷🏻‍♂️

After all, not a single member who has actually MET Turbook has given negative feedback. Maybe having scammer alert warnings follow him perpetually due to a resolved issue is a bit much - and exactly the type of questionable behavior Turbook referenced as a red flag in the texts.

[Chancealot]

Tired of bullies who think typing the most and the loudest = truth  

[DC Guy 92]

9 hours ago, DFdub said:

Easy.

Review the receipts Turbook shared with ansh0620.  First one shows the original $200 was on hold so Turbook did not get it. Second one on that comment shows the $194 refund sent to DC. I suspect if I sent a refund for money I never received, I would cancel it too.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Third another screenshot from Turbook showing the dispute.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Fourth - DC sent a screenshot showing the dispute was pending during the 3-4 week dispute period he himself mentioned.

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616

Finally, Venmo resolved the dispute in his favor per his last screenshot. Venmo resolved the dispute in the time they said, even though it took way too long - ergo partial blame.

Take a step back as mature adults / grown ups - both parties had screenshots supporting their version. Almost a dozen members have very positive feedback over a long period. One single member had a very large reaction to a Venmo-related issue and now is pursuing some sort of blood oath vendetta to ruin a person's livelihood because he wants an apology without offering one himself for larger harm he caused to Turbook over an unfortunate misunderstanding.

Decide for yourselves, but review all evidence rather than just repeated rants.

Actually, if you know how Venmo works, this isn’t factual.  That’s maybe where Venmo is to blame in confusing people looking at these screenshots.  The original amount doesn’t display “on hold”  until a dispute is filed, then it will display next to the date of the original transaction.  If you look at the dispute date of the original transaction, it is not until AFTER Turbbok got money back from his dispute of the transaction labeled “Refund”, labeled so to make me think he was refunding the original deposit.  His dispute was filed the same day he sent it to me, so there is no way he would think that the original 200 was on hold at the time he filed a dispute.  The screenshots posted with the dates of the disputes was the damning evidence (along with my multiple conversations with Venmo to confirm these facts).

When someone sends you Venmo, the money is available instantly. Which is why I was able to transfer it immediately to my bank.  My account goes into default when his dispute is resolved and the money transferred to his account, another point which he damn well knows he has 200 bucks that shouldn’t be there.  Regardless of how confusing Venmo display is, they had no part in his filing a dispute of his supposed refund.  Venmo did nothing wrong other than make it difficult to detect his scheme.  Ironically, it’s the very scam he accused me of trying to pull by not sending him money as “family and friends” which is not refundable.  I believe he knew exactly what he was doing and wasn’t confused at all.  One person’s experience doesn’t need to determine your hire, it’s just additional data to decide along with all the others.  I got my money back, but I know it wouldn’t have happened without this website and people who support clients in holding escorts accountable and warning each other when things like this happened.  I have stopped deposits all together, even when I fly guys into whatever city I’m in for the night.  I think it’s too tempting for even the usually decent escort to make a quick buck and think there won’t be repercussions.  

Edited yesterday at 08:25 AM by DC Guy 92

[MikeThomas]

12 hours ago, DFdub said:

Corrected the second person pronouns that were distracting. 😐

Thanks 🙂 I deleted my post.

 

[+ Pensant]

Interestingly, he never asked me for a deposit. I intend to meet him the next time he happens to be where I am!

[+ mature_guy]

1 hour ago, Pensant said:

Interestingly, he never asked me for a deposit. I intend to meet him the next time he happens to be where I am!

Same.  He remains one of my favorites.