Olympic gold medalist Snyder arrested in prostitution sting

[Anthony]

On 11/7/2025 at 10:57 PM, coriolis888 said:

If you expect an answer to your rude question, your method is not conducive to generating a positive reply. 

Had you taken the time to review numerous reports about the arrest, you would have seen, for yourself, that rentmen was mentioned as a source for the police to entrap the athlete. 

If you are going to make stuff up, that's the response you will get. State the source and prove it like you did posting the other video.  

On 11/9/2025 at 2:05 PM, coriolis888 said:

If anyone is interested, the link below will take you to the actual recording of the trial wherein Kyle Snyder was required to plead guilty or not guilty. 

Obviously, he pleaded guilty. 

He was fined $250.00 plus court costs of an undisclosed amount.  He had also been required to take a paid course about how negative it is to hire a prostitute. 

It was pathetic to hear Kyle say, in court, that the "class" taught him about his behavior and about prostitution.  In short, the court hearing required Kyle to agree that he was a negative person because he tried to hire a prostitute. 

I think the entrapment law of someone who merely tries to hire a prostitute is from a different era.  Times have changed, but the outdated laws stay on the books that allow police to entrap and arrest someone for a non-violent "crime".  

Here is the link to the recorded court appearance of Kyle:

 

I appreciate you sharing this video and the other info. Wish they shared the video of the Zoom call. I was shocked to hear they have a freaking class they have to take. They also mentioned something about STI school. Was he taught about STIs or was it an STI screening? Sounds like there was way more harm done to his public image than a $250 fine and the disorderly conduct charge that is on his record now. 

[coriolis888]

On 11/16/2025 at 3:40 PM, Anthony said:

Sounds like there was way more harm done to his public image than a $250 fine and the disorderly conduct charge that is on his record now. 

If you had listened to the court video, you would have heard that the case would remain unsealed for two years, after which, the case would be sealed from public access.  

 

 

[Anthony]

13 hours ago, coriolis888 said:

If you had listened to the court video, you would have heard that the case would remain unsealed for two years, after which, the case would be sealed from public access.  

 

 

What difference does that make? The entire world already knows what happened.