Colton Posted February 18 Posted February 18 I was wondering if there would be value to creating a forum where Onlyfans channels could be reviewed and discussed. I find it really annoying when you join an OF channel and the videos all require additional PPV. NYXboy and dcbbvers 1 1
viewing ownly Posted February 19 Posted February 19 It's of benefit to an OnlyFans content creator to indicate "no pay per view", or we may presume that it's not worth our while to subscribe. He has since stopped having an Only Fans page and I've no recollection of his name, but a guy I liked when his site was free back in 2020 suddenly switched up to only pay content for everything he posted. I let him know privately that I completely forgot what he even looks like since nothing is without a paywall!
mike carey Posted February 19 Posted February 19 Remember, gents, that this thread is here to discuss the idea of having a separate forum for OF (and potentially JFF accounts) and NOT to discuss the accounts themselves (there are already some threads for that, and if we proceed with this idea, the new forum would be where such things are canvassed). The moderators will discuss the idea of starting a separate forum once we get an idea of the value members think that it would add. The status quo where these accounts are discussed in the existing forums would be one option for what we end up deciding. pubic_assistance 1
Colton Posted February 22 Author Posted February 22 On 2/18/2025 at 9:40 PM, mike carey said: The status quo where these accounts are discussed in the existing forums Which existing forum is the appropriate place to discuss OF right now?
56harrisond Posted February 22 Posted February 22 3 minutes ago, Colton said: Which existing forum is the appropriate place to discuss OF right now? Some fan page discussions:
NYXboy Posted February 22 Posted February 22 I agree: I think a Deli where people can post about OF creators and we can discuss it like we do providers would be well received here. I find it so frustrating when I subscribe and they only have 10 second clips, or no face.
ArchwayAlex Posted February 26 Posted February 26 I support this as well - especially since OF is often used for providers to market themselves, and in some ways offers me a chance to preview their stuff
SirBillybob Posted February 28 Posted February 28 (edited) I was surprised, not dismayed, that creators now have a way of blocking subscribers’ attempts to screenshoot or screenrecord. Only one I know has utilized it; and he charges high premiums for individual vid access that of course only lasts as long as the remaining sub time. I used to make clips of portions for my own use or to alter speed. Edited February 28 by SirBillybob
Colton Posted February 28 Author Posted February 28 On 2/21/2025 at 8:51 PM, NYXboy said: I find it so frustrating when I subscribe and they only have 10 second clips, or no face. This is my big pet peeve as well.
NYXboy Posted February 28 Posted February 28 @AdminI think the idea of a Deli for OF reviews or feedback would be VERY popular here. Dolman, ArchwayAlex and + Just Sayin 3
SirBillybob Posted March 3 Posted March 3 (edited) What distinguishes OnlyFans from any other PPV erotica platform? Nothing really. At LPSG any interest in profiles usually devolves to begging to see visual content another member paid for. Such content on LPSG is mostly under subscription paywall so I wonder if there is a kickback deal with OF. Although Rentmen is also subject to the DMCA, images entered here simply reinforce traffic to ads and are mainly presented as links that RM supports thru URL. Nobody is saving $ by sharing. In contrast, I would expect a greater quantity of copyright infringement complaints from OF content creators beyond reviews and commentary on our board restricted to text format. This might be an example where best to redact a specific OF handle in a topic title. Edited March 3 by SirBillybob
Guest Posted March 4 Posted March 4 I'd happily donate my hand to the cause for reviewing onlyfans content
Archangel Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just put it in The Deli with a different number than 411. Or say OF in the subject. Seems sufficient for me 🤷🏼♂️ But what do I know?
SirBillybob Posted March 6 Posted March 6 418: a teapot permanently refusing to brew coffee, if the emphasis is worthless rip-off subscription scams. Archangel 1
Archangel Posted March 6 Posted March 6 2 hours ago, SirBillybob said: 418: a teapot permanently refusing to brew coffee, if the emphasis is worthless rip-off subscription scams. I share your opinion on OF as a ripoff but I was trying to hone narrowly to the OP topic of a specific forum for OF. I don’t see the need.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now