Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

Why?

I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, maninsoma said:

I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. 

Exactly. And you might mistakenly actually hire someone under legal age of consent.  

Edited by Just Chuck
Posted
53 minutes ago, maninsoma said:

I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. 

Thank you. This is all new to me. Having to watch out for the police...

Posted
57 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

So they name the escorts potential victims of trafficking? 🤮

Maybe I missed it...I didn't see anyone's names in terms of those arrested or those believed to be victims of trafficking.

Posted

Human trafficking does happen. We often read about it - every few years we hear about a diplomat or a rich family that abuse and basically hold hostage a domestic helper. Happened here in NYC not too long ago and also in other locations.


https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240621-uk-s-richest-family-get-jail-terms-for-exploiting-staff-at-swiss-villa

That said: I think we all know that law enforcement has a way of exaggerating and can rarely be taken by their literal word. Which is disappointing. 
 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, maninsoma said:

Maybe I missed it...I didn't see anyone's names in terms of those arrested or those believed to be victims of trafficking.

NBC probably has a policy of not providing names.  I would think the names of the adults could be easily found.

Posted
8 hours ago, FrankR said:

That said: I think we all know that law enforcement has a way of exaggerating and can rarely be taken by their literal word. Which is disappointing. 

Exactly. You'll note in the above articles that they call it "sex trafficking" when it was simply a trap for Johns.

It's just a new term they made up, and they now use it everywhere. Americans are smart enough to realize "prostitution" should be legal, so LA use a new term that sounds worst. So they can continue collecting our tax dollars for victimless crimes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...