IvyLeagueJJX, traveling

[Peter Eater]

Really enticing looking and sounding guy. But $1,000/hour seems…steep. No? 
Any experience?
https://rentmasseur.com/IvyLeagueJJX

 

[chadLA]

bump. I know a lot has been written about him. coming to palm springs.

[Peter Eater]

2 minutes ago, chadLA said:

bump. I know a lot has been written about him. coming to palm springs.

Under another name? Didn’t locate anything under this one.

[+ azdr0710]

hesitant to even mention who this is and post the links......all the forum drama this created in the last couple or three years!!......here's one main thread, now closed after it degenerated into utter silliness......

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/119789-411-on-ivyleaguehungvrs/

and this newer, also closed, thread.....

https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/141319-411-on-ivyleaguemrbig/

I have a headache now......

 

[Capitano]

OMG, I had no idea, we are about to write War & Peace, Book Three! 🙂

I was going to email him my standard inquiry about his rates for 60 & 90 minutes, but he blocks that option on rentmasseur and only takes text messages. Not worth my time, pass.

[RadioRob]

As others have noted, we have a few threads about him. I highly recommend against him based on his actions here on this site. 

[RadioRob]

It seems the provider has chosen to have a "lawyer" reach out to us.  Below is the back and forth from the conversation:

Quote

To Whom It May Concern:

I write to place you on notice of the defamatory writings that are being posted on, hosted on, and disseminated by your website and that your disregard of the truth is causing my client significant reputational and monetary losses. Some of these statements appear to have been made by agents (administrators) of yours, more specifically, administrator RadioRob. Defamation involves the making of an untrue statement that causes injury to a person's reputation. These statements are being made without regard for the truth by people with no personal knowledge of their truthfulness. You have been placed on repeated notice of their falsity by people who do have personal knowledge. Those with first-hand knowledge have had their accounts banned and have been denied access to correct the truthfulness of your postings. Your website is engaged in a reckless disregard of the truth, even taking the admittedly extraordinary step of maliciously stating that my client has mental illnesses; and maliciously stating that my client was behind his patrons' posts on your forum. My client provided our law firm proof that he was not behind the posts by users StarGz or VictorXX. My client provided us with psychiatric and psychological evaluations proving that he doesn't have mental illnesses. Your blatant, malicious, knowing, intentional, and wanton disregard for and suppression of the truth make your website, its administrators, and those posting knowing false postings liable for the considerable damages they are inflicting by their untruthful statements regarding my client.

For your information, libel is the written form of defamation by which one disparages another's reputation through written statements. To set forth a claim for defamation under New York law, one must allege that:

1. the disparaging statement (whether oral or written) is, in fact, false; 
2. that, at the very least, the person making the statement was negligent in doing so; and
3. that the disparaging statement actually caused damage. 

In most situations, damages must be specified. Some statements, i.e., the ones that implicitly tend to injure one's personal or professional reputation, are considered defamatory per se. Statements that are defamatory per se include those which impute chastity or sexual misconduct; those which expose a person to ridicule or contempt; those which call into question financial responsibility or reliability; and those which affect business, office, trade, or profession. With respect to statements which are defamatory per se, the damages to one's reputation is presumed, and, as such, an allegation of special damages is not necessary.

I am in receipt of multiple of my client's patrons who have refuted the statements made and hosted on your website, including patrons behind the accounts StarGz and VictorXX. Your malicious, defamatory conduct is causing my client's reputation to suffer irreparable harm and is resulting in significant economic losses for my client's practice. 

I hereby demand that:

1. the following threads be deleted from your site:
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/141319-411-on-ivyleaguemrbig/
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/138403-hungivyleaguexl-rentmen/
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/141576-411-on-ivyleaguebig-from-ny/?do=findComment&comment=2109147
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/141945-ivyleaguejjx-traveling/; and

2. at the very least, reinstate the accounts of those banned simply for presenting truthful refutations of the slanderous posts you are publicizing; and

3. allow the verifiable refutations of your own members who have sought to contradict the malicious and ignorant posts by those who are actively defaming my client; and

3. stop ridiculing or deleting the posts of members who write about their positive experiences with my client; and

4. refrain from the "unprecedented" targeting of my client's work and dignity; and

5. permanently cease any future defamation of my client, direct or indirect; and

5. permanently cease any future defamation of my client to other people including through threads, posts, emails, texts, or direct messages.

If you do not act within the next seventy-two (72) hours to delete your defamatory statements, delete the mentioned threads, and completely cease any future defamation of my client, our firm will institute litigation naming your website, the forum administrators, moderators, and certain members of the forum. 

If your site, its members, or administrator RadioRob make any future defamation of my client to other people including through threads, posts, emails, or direct messages, our law firm will institute litigation naming your website, the forum administrators, moderators, and certain members of the forum.

I further demand that you preserve as evidence, any and all internal communications concerning these posts, the identities of any and all parties who were involved in the topics, and in the decisions to post these comments. Should litigation become necessary, our firm will seek to obtain all of this information as part of our discovery requests and intend to use it in court to prove our client's case.

I look forward to your prompt attention and rectification of this matter without the need for embarrassing and costly litigation.

Best regards,
David Smith, Esq.

My reply:

Quote

Hi David!

I tried to find contact information for your law office, however I was not able to find you registered to practice law in the state of New York.  I also could not find you listed in the New York Bar Association.  Could you please provide your registration number along with your office's physical address and phone number?  

Also, congratulations on your brand new website.  I saw that the domain itself was just registered today!  I'm sure you'll have your actual web content along here shortly!  I hope it is able to help serve as a great lead generation system for your practice.  

Quote

Domain Name: davidsmithlawny.com
Registry Domain ID: 2772006785_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.google.com
Updated Date: 2023-04-10T20:00:35Z
Creation Date: 2023-04-10T19:59:20Z

 

His reply:

Quote

Thank you for your prompt response; this address was created for obvious reasons as part of our special affairs/Pro Bono work. I'll be working on this case alongside other lawyers of my firm, but in a few minutes, you'll be receiving a second notice from the lead attorney in this case, Grant Gardner, who will be instituting litigation should you decide not to cooperate. He'll include his registration number, address, and phone number should you have any questions, as he'll be the lead attorney in this case. Thanks for your attention.


All the best,
David Smith, Esq.
 

Also other "lawyer's" reply:

Quote

I am Grant Gardner, Esq., Registration Number 2290864, New York, NY. You also are in receipt of a notice from my colleague, David Smith. I write to place you on notice of the defamatory writings that are being posted on, hosted on, and disseminated by your website and that your disregard of the truth is causing my client significant reputational and monetary losses. Some of these statements appear to have been made by agents (administrators) of yours, more specifically, administrator RadioRob. Defamation involves the making of an untrue statement that causes injury to a person's reputation. These statements are being made without regard for the truth by people with no personal knowledge of their truthfulness. You have been placed on repeated notice of their falsity by people who do have personal knowledge. Those with first-hand knowledge have had their accounts banned and have been denied access to correct the truthfulness of your postings. Your website is engaged in a reckless disregard of the truth, even taking the admittedly extraordinary step of maliciously stating that my client has mental illnesses; and maliciously stating that my client was behind his patrons' posts on your forum. My client provided our law firm proof that he was not behind the posts by users StarGz or VictorXX. My client provided us with psychiatric and psychological evaluations proving that he doesn't have mental illnesses. Your blatant, malicious, knowing, intentional, and wanton disregard for and suppression of the truth make your website, its administrators, and those posting knowing false postings liable for the considerable damages they are inflicting by their untruthful statements regarding my client..

<SNIP THE COPY PASTE FROM ABOVE>

And finally my reply:

Quote

Hello,

I have spoken with our lawyer and reviewed this request with him.  We are unable to accommodate your request at this time.  If you feel you have a legal case to be made, please feel free to proceed with your filing.  There are numerous legal standards that would prevent this case from being successful, but in particular 47 USC 230 would especially be problematic for you.    

In the mean time, we will also be sharing this and all further communications with our members as I'm sure they would also like to know your client is threatening lawsuits against potential customers.  

So...  again, we do not recommend this provider in any way.  He will threaten you with lawsuits from email addresses that were literally just created that day from lawyers that either don't exist or that are licensed to practice law.  When called on it, he provides another lawyer's name that has just recently had his law license suspended and works for a firm that does wealth management.  (Needless to say, nothing to do with the topic at hand.)  I have the phone number to call the firm directly, but at this point I can't be bothered to waste my time anymore.  

There are so many things factually wrong with the arguments made with the statements made by the "lawyers" above, I'm fairly confident the provider is simply posing as one in order to scare the site into his list of demands.  The list of demands themselves already should in itself be enough to tell you it's not a real lawyer making the request.  

[RadioRob]

It's been 3 minutes since I made my last post in this thread, but in that time he's replied again...

My response:

Quote

We've made our position clear.  Save yourself the 72 hours... if you're going to file a lawsuit, go ahead and do it now.  

I hope your client understands this is going to associate his "real life" name and other associated information with his side gig as HungIvyLeague.  As a lawyer, I'm sure you know how all of that information will need to be linked in order to prove standing, damages, etc.   

I forgot to mention it in my email, but on the off chance this lawsuit would proceed, it would also mean that his "clients" StarGZ and VictorXX could also be compelled to testify.  Which would mean they would have their real names associated with hiring escorts as well.  So much for them being discreet gentlemen!

(But again...  that would only happen if I'm actually wrong and those two actually existed.)

See the kind of crazy I get to deal with?