To be reviewed or not to be with specifics and details!!!!!!

[+ Axiom2001]

For four plus years, I have sought the services of escorts, and in the majority of instances, I have truly had the time with these guys that I have sought. I have also written quite a few reviews afterwards, all detailed and positive. My question to you is this: as an escort who is or has been reviewed, do you mind it if the client goes into detail about your encounter with him, thus providing guidance for others who seek your service?

 

In far too many reviews of late, the client or reviewer states that he choses not to go into detail to protect the privacy (or some sorts of dribble) of both parties.

 

What is your take? I hope ONLY escorts address this topic since it is in the "Ask an Escort" sector. :-) :9 :-)

[Guest Jesse Dane]

I personally would not mind of clients gave out details about our encounter. I want as many people as possible to know what I am great at and if a client had a good time with me.

 

I do think clients should keep in mind though that because an escort did something with another client in a review it does not always mean that it will happen with them. For example I never promise to rim anyone, but it has happened with some clients. If there is something specific you want, make sure to still ask the escort as opposed to just relying on the fact he's done it with someone else.

 

Now if I can only get some clients to actually take the time to write a review.

[SAdler]

>as an escort who is or has been

>reviewed, do you mind it if the client goes into detail about

>your encounter with him, thus providing guidance for others

>who seek your service?

 

If you're giving details ABOUT the encounter great! Be as detailed as you'd like - that's the point of a review. Things I'd probably leave out are details about the person that might identify them in their normal lives that aren't necessarily relevant for future clients.

 

>In far too many reviews of late, the client or reviewer states

>that he choses not to go into detail to protect the privacy

>(or some sorts of dribble) of both parties.

 

Privacy can be a pretty wide scope. If things they say could be IDENTIFY the person based on unique qualities, like the above mentions, are those REALLY that important to tell everyone?

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Omit Needless Words

 

The problem with being specific is that, as already shown on here, some escorts refuse to do all activities with all of their clients, some escorts will not do all activities with some clients when confronted with a particular problem in a specific instance (e.g., no kissing if the client smoked or had bad breath, etc.), or that some clients may not wish to engage in specific acts (some bisexual of newly out clients may not be comfortable enough to engage in, for example, actual penetration as a client posted in another thread in the Deli, or may simply feel a certain act - going down on the escort, kissing him - may be too intimate or not manly).

 

I think the best think a client can do in his reviews (and in spite of the fact that this topic comes up once every year or so, apparently it is not going to happen), is for the client to say if (a) he was satisified; (b) if the escort met or exceeded the expectations and/or promises directly made; © if the client would or would not return to this escort, and why; (d) and what specifically the client enjoyed (be it a specific act, how the client was treated over all, how the client was made to feel or whatever that client wishes to comment on as noteworthy, assuming it was a good experience.

 

Conversely, in a negative review, it is important to know (a) how or why the escort failed to meet the expectations and, more importantly, follow through and keep any direct promises made; (b) if the client was disatisfied through a potential miscommunication between both parties or a lack of compatibility assignable to both parties (as some clients frequently comment in reviews) or if the disatisfaction arose solely by or through the acts (or failures) of the escort; and, finally and probably more importantly, why the client was unhappy and disatisfied in specificity: the escort was late, the escort offered no excuse, the escort was supposed to bring condoms and forgot them, knowing the client was from out of town and that being topped was very important to the client, etc.

 

To be honest, having Client A saying that Escort 1 gives good head is no guarantee to any other client that the same escort will give them good head. However, a string of reviews suggesting that Escort 1 is an excellent cock-sucker might. Nonetheless, were I client, I would be more interested in a string a of reviews telling me a broad section of clients were satisifed and that this string listed what I felt were significant and valid reasons for that satisfaction, since good head, while crucial, would not be the only thing I might want to spend $200 or more dollars on.

[pierrot]

RE: Omit Needless Words

 

How about whether an escort can keep it up or not? That's the problem I've run into most often and that I sometimes hesitate to tell. It's the big variable that is unpredictable and can be affected by many things. If the escort is tired out from too many clients, or if he is simply turned off by the client, or some other external problem is giving him wood problems -- whatever the reason, the client is still disappointed. When this has happened to me (as a client) I sometimes felt sorry for the escort and didn't want to say it in a review. At other times, I've been annoyed, especially if I think he's just scheduled me too soon after another client. Still it's an embarrassing thing for the escort, and may or may not be a frequent problem.

But shouldn't I tell other prospective clients, or not?

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Up - Way Up

 

>How about whether an escort can keep it up or not?

 

>But shouldn't I tell other prospective clients, or not?

 

This specific situation has been discussed in the past (as well as an analogous one - an escort agreeing to bringing condoms and/or lube, particular to an out of town client who expects and specifically requests to be topped who might not be able to pack same or locate same in a strange town, due to bisexuality or other concerns, or simple unfamiliarity). As I have stated on those threads, this is akin to reserving and paying for a first class ticket and being placed into coach, particularly if the carrier provides no compensation for the discrepency.

 

I think it is fair game for a review, depending on the actual circumstances. Escorts who overbook or who book back to back clients are asking for this type of problem, particularly if they book 3 clients in one day, two of them within an hour of each other, all of whom expect to be topped, for example. However, if you were the only client for that escort that day (or the first client) and there were contervailing reasons for this "problem" or if the escort offered to make it up to you or discounted the session, that is something to keep in mind and to take into account (or, at minimum, to also mention) if you were to discuss this in a review.

 

Escorts with a prevelance of this are going to get bad reviews. On the other hand, having this happen infrequently is, perhaps, not noteworthy, unless the escort did not provide some way to make this up to the client.

[+ Charlie]

RE: Omit Needless Words

 

Whether to comment on the escort's hardness or lack thereof really depends on the situation. If he was hired as a fucker, he can't very well perform if he is soft, so that should certainly be mentioned in the review, regardless of the cause. If he is only receiving oral, it is probable that he will be soft some of the time during a session, so I wouldn't complain about it. If he is bottoming, then he shouldn't be expected to be hard, although if he is, I would consider it worthy of approval. I wouldn't make much of the reasons for hardness or softness, since they are largely guesswork on the client's part, unless you have observed him using artificial stimulants, or he actually tells you why he can or can't get it up.

[+ ArVaGuy]

I know this question is addressed to escorts on prefereces about including details but I am going to respond as a client anyway. I thought the purpose of a review was to inform potential clients about the services of a particular guy. Details can help in making decisions about hiring a guy. I tend to give less credence to short reivews than to those with more detail.

[Epigonos]

I too am responding as a client rather than an escort. If this site is going to be of assistance to me I want to know exactly and graphically what an escort will and will NOT do. I also what to know how well he does what he does. I find comments like "What we did will remain between us" silly and juvenile. As far as I'm concerned if this is what a reviewer writes he might as well NOT BOTHER.

[jawjateck]

I just read this week's reviews. Surprisingly, there were only 3 or 4 that were totally useless. Is this a hopeful trend for the future or a fluke? I'll tune into this same bat-channel next week and find out. :-)

[augustman]

Actually I am sort of happy this topic came back in. I just had a meeting with an escort who I reviewed last month. I had a great time again. We discussed the reviews and their effect and these reviews have a definite effect on his business. A good review no matter how short is still a positive. For clients for an excort to continue to get good reviews is a good thing because that means a history is growing. Given I gave this guy(Mark #3) chicago a long review the next one or two can be short because he has a history.

 

But I agree I would like to see a bit more meat. Not just "He is fabulous..." Well why was he so fabulous.

 

I think all reviews should answer at least a couple of basic questions. First, how was communication with the escort for setting up the appointment and answering questions and requests-Phone and/or e-mail, type of response, and how was the turn around.

 

Second, arrival or intial contact, a. on-time, early, called if late.

b. In-call or out call? c. Comparison to description and pictures.

 

Third activity, to say "He did everything I asked" what was "I asked".

An excellent review a few weeks ago gave the escort good marks on everything except he did not do what the client asked. He was looking for a dominant top escort as was advertised. Client stated escort was a good top but more vanilla or romantic, but not dominant. Well that tells a lot for those looking for a romantic or vanilla top this guy is good but as a dominant look elsewhere. Not a big negative just a fact. I always like a more dominant or aggressive top guy, but who kisses french. I would probably pass on this escort. That is why I think it is important to go into some of the details. Kissing, body and hand contact, rim or not, passive or active top or bottom or switch. I was looking for this 1, 2, 3 and he did them all and well or somethings better than others.

 

Fourth, a personality review. Very talkative or quiet, engaging personality or stand offish, very open or secretive.

 

Finally overall impression. Like, I would say he is very professional about everything and certainly keeps his clients desires uppermost and followed up with a thank you e-mail or phone call or I felt like a cash cow and not very professional overall.

 

For me an escort that shows a lot of energy and enthusiasm is always going to be a top item but short reviews usually do not convey that type of quality, that longer more in-depth reviews can.

[+ Cash4Trash]

If something happens between me and an escort that he doesn't

advertise I'll run it past him before posting the review.

 

If someone in a review says a guy is a great kisser but he pulls away

from me when I start to kiss it really sours the experience. I agree

a review should give as much info as possible (including client

acurately describing himself) but I only mention those activities

the escort is comfortable doing with all clients.

[JT Brooklyn]

Anton..LOL

IMHO.The Review should be of the Experience the Reviewer had, when HE Hooked up... Not what should have been Totally expected, by what was said in Previous Reviews..Chemistry between to Guys, can be a VERY individual thing..

NO 2 experiences can be exactly the same..Unless the Guy is an Android, which is Boring. That's why in some Review cases like mine, the Working Guy has the "Response" Option. Which some use Truthfully and some(won't mention Names) donot. Details do make or break some decision making, sometimes. :+