Reviews....Much About Nothing..

[+ Axiom2001]

VaHawk, now I wish that I have read all of the reviews first before posting mine. I indeed concur with everything that you wrote in yours in spite of what I posted. Thanks!

[VaHawk]

Oooh, I get so excited when a hot, handsome young man calls me "sir"! Could we get together sometime for a steamy Daddy/Son scene? }(

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Sure thing... But i get to wear the daddy pants

 

 

 

 

Warmest Regards,

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

Escort@ChiKindaKid.com

http://www.ChiKindaKid.com

[Godiva]

Thanxs for all the input on this post..as you can see the responses vary widely...

 

I can tolerate some of the novels... but they must reach some point where they are giving info instead entertaining us..

 

Some of you said that you don't want graphic details and that is your perogative..but you will be the same people who will post in the Escort Forum ...Has anyone been with Escort A and what was it like even tho there may be 4 posted reviews..1 probably by the escort himself...1 by the escorts friends or an alias and 2 novels by Danielle Steele...the sum of which say absolutely nada..

 

This doesn't happen in all cases hmmmm.. yet I don't think anything gets by the more intuitive members of this community. This info generally isn't shared all the time which is why so many of us continually get burned by the same assholes.

 

I can only speak for myself....When I have a positve experience which adds more than the previous reveiws... I will post..You will know after reading my reviews whether the experience was good or bad.

When I have a positive experience which is similar to an already posted reveiw I usually don't post..Too many similar posts often become suspect in my opinion. The same with a negative..unless the experience was sooo bad that I have to post it in the "Escort Forum" where it can be seen instantly.. as in the Joseph thread a while back. In fact in his situation, clients were with him that didn't post at all and I along with others took the plunge and lost out. That info ahead of time could have prevented us from being ripped off. Everyone has a reason why you chose not to post reviews but this board is only gonna be as good as we make it..I plan to do my part regardless.....

 

Just so it doesn't seem like I am talking out of my ass..I want you to read one of my reviews I posted under one of my alias (Richard) which I don't use anymore..The escort was Angel and the reveiw is #3. It is certainly not a standard but when you read it does it help in your selection process? Is it too graphic? I am curious. Hey maybe I need to change..

 

Thanxs guys for your thoughtful responses..

[jackhammer91406]

A REview of Atlanta

 

ok, Godiva,

You have guilted me into it. A few weeks back I posted about my recent trip to Atlanta. I had indicated that of the three escorts I had booked for my trip, 1 was a no show, 1 was a rip off and the one bright spot was my encounter with Tony Cummings. I submitted a review of my enjoyable time with Tony, but deferred on the other two because I didn't want to stir up negative publicity for these two guys. The no show, mailed me the next day after I inquired about where was he, told me that he had stopped escorting and dared me to find any ad still posted. Now, I had messaged this guy 4 or 5 times prior to the trip making arrangements. I gave him my cell phone and the hotel I was at as well as my real name. the reason I went to this trouble was because I didn't have full access to my e-mail and since his cell phone wasn't working (and in his one e-mail he said he had forgotten his new number) I wanted to give him a way to contact me. I am told by locals via this board (in private responses to my post) that the guy is a flake and it's well known to locals. His ads have indeed disappeared although his reviews on this site remain. The escorts name was Scott Bradley. In checking his website, it is no longer working so i take him at his word. (In one e-mail I had mistated the date but corrected it in three subsequent mails which he acknowledged). I didn't write a review of the rip off because as I said in my initial post, it could have been me. Maybe he just wasn't excited about spending time with me. He certainly had no interest in my pleasure, but as you know I am new to this and get nervous at first. I paid his full fee and a tip. All of my expectations had been carefully spelled out in advance and his reply had been that he would not only be ok with everything but would give me a memory I could take to bed with me. It was in this e-mail that he included another picture which at the time didn't seem like the same guy advertised. Today I find the same picture being used by someone called Brandson here in the L.A. area. After reading the last post of Godiva, I realize that my warning about Atlanta guys who can send a great e-mail and not live up to the message wasn't enough. I hate to say bad things about people. It is hard for me because I have so much room for improvement myself, but the 2nd guy was Jaysen Reeves who had one negative review already and his response made me feel that he took responsibility for it. I mailed Jaysen once after I returned to L.A. and in a kind way pointed out my disappointment. I have gotten no reply, but guess i didn;t expect one.

There I have gotten that off my chest and now can read any future posts on this thread with no guilt (except for saying bad things about Scott and Jaysen).

[Southern Blue Suicide]

RE: A REview of Atlanta

 

Hello,

 

Remind Scott Bradley that he is still listed as a working boy on atlantaexecutives.com. I've also heard poor comments about Jaysen. I contend that both of these guys are known "party boys" who spend LOTS of time with Talking Tina. "She" makes their cocks inoperative and eliminates human interaction skills. "Buyer beware" is an understatement in Atlanta.

 

-Mc-

[KY_TOP]

Godiva, I want details in a review. If I am thinking of hiring a guy I must know, Does he suck Cock, does he kiss, does he get fucked and MOST of all...Is he any GOOD at it. Big difference between sticking my Cock in his mouth and him actually being any good at it.

 

I have written several reviews and have often wondered if I am too graphic in my descriptions, But I guarantee when you read one of my reviews you will know what happened, sexually and non-sexually.

[Godiva]

My panties are bunched up my ass right now so while I am trying to digg them out I have to get something off my pecs...What is up with all these lame reviews??? I know everyone takes what they can from them but many of the reviews seem to be saying absolutely nothing. Am I the only one that is bothered by this??

 

When I see the new reviews posted..I usually start with the familars..I scan for the "BIG SIX"..words..

 

FUCKING..SUCKING..TOPPING..BOTTOMMING..KISSING..RIMMING.

 

If I don't see any of those delightful adjectives I skip the review and go to the next..I don't want to know "how you got there"..that he "stayed longer".."that you have a lot in commom"..I want to know if you fucked him in his ass..Did he fuck you in your ass...Did you rim his hott rosebud..etc..

 

I usually have to go back to reviews posted 1-2yrs ago when it seemed that posters where a little more open..Many of todays reviews are fucking useless. Some will list the escort as Versatile and then go through the entire review without saying what he did..

 

What is weird now is that when a client has an awlful time with an escort than they will provide much more detailed info in the negative review. When it is a great time than you will see generic phrases like...I want to keep that private... I won't go into any details...Hello.. I want details..If he is that good tell me why...Its great that he offered you a drink.... but get a grip...well you get the drift.. I'm not looking for a porn movie either.

 

Escorts doesn't it bother you that when you have an awesome encounter with a client and the review is blahhhhh...But if there is a problem.. the client is much more detailed...and we all know that 5 blahhhh reviews are usually lost behind the 1 very detailed negative review...

 

If your review is not gonna say anything... that you might wanna keep that to yourself along with the details of your encounter.

 

My opinion only

 

 

AHHHHHHHHH I just pulled out the panties...It feels great..:*

 

My One negative post for the year...

 

 

When I'm good...I'm very good..But when I am bad I am better.. (MW)

[jackhammer91406]

RE: A REview of Atlanta

 

Hey Blue,

Excuse me for asking, but I am out of the loop. What is TALKING TINA?

[Guest DevonSFescort]

RE: A REview of Atlanta

 

"Tina" (aka "Chrissy") is crystal meth and what SBC says is basically right-on about its effects on social skills and erectile function. It's probably more of a disaster if the tweeking escort is a top; if he's a bottom he'll at least be an insatiable one. But don't hold your breath for any hard-ons or cum shots.

[jackhammer91406]

RE: A REview of Atlanta

 

Devon,

Thanks for the 411 on TINA. Maybe that was what was going on. By the way you are on my Dear Santa list. Would love to come up to SF and stay a weekend say, and let you show me the city. Saving my pennies.

[chrismac]

In the beginning of my hiring days, I wrote very descriptive reviews which included all the gorey details. Since I enjoyed reading those details myself in others' reviews, I thought it only fair to provide them. If I knew I was going to write a review after a session with the escort, I'd ask him at the end of the session if he would appreciate that. Usually they did, but occasionally one would say he preferred not to be reviewed, adding that it was really up to me. I respected those wishes and wouldn't write the review (it would have been a positive review).

 

Later, escorts began telling me they preferred reviews to be more general, and were uncomfortable with the details being put in writing. So I wrote fewer reviews, and the ones I did write were more along the lines of what Godiva described - and I totally agree with him.

 

But that's what I think is happening out there more than anything else - and maybe that caution is well-placed.

[dick_nyc]

R - I - G - H - T !!!!!

 

Actually, in my humble opinion as a consumer I am far more interested in that the guy while fucking actually took the time to make sure the pain was not too intense and that he was considerate or not as desired in insertine his cock in the mouth/throat/ass/wherever/ear/anywhere than I am in the information that he fucked. I am more concerned in the attitude to fucking/rimming/getting fucked/again whatever than in the email tag that was played.