Pulgasari1991

From anecdotal first-hand experience, it changes from uncomfortable and mildly painful to very smooth and pleasuring, depending on the lube (so far found myself noticeably better with durex eternal) and most importantly, on using disposable gloves; as mentioned above, bare fingers can be quite rough.

You don't feel like making a wild guess?

You don't feel like making a wild guess?

How much do you think it would have been in USA 1993?

How much do you think it would have been in USA 1993?

So that you see how he can beat you even on your field..!

But Grindr took it steps further, isn't it?

Oh well, I came to associate those characteristics with being cheap as well. I don't find weird at all that you don't feel like you're missing out.

What is that?

It can come off as a form of bargaining

How many you managed to collect? How nice you played to get those?

"Without a break" from Moranbong band https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADN0H6MREHA

To my understanding, prostitution is legal in UK, so why are you using that line of thought? Surely enough, rates can still be measured with time, but "only for the escort's time" sounds quite oversimplified, if not even out of place to me here. Or, am I missing something there? My take is he became overzealous; you expressed a wish, then an obstacle came up, so you ate the wish back. At this point, to an external observer it becomes quite tricky to determine what you would truly prefer, even if you speak it out explicitly, because you wouldn't have changed your mind in the first place, if the obstacle weren't there. For the provider to just let it go, would have meant finally leaving a request unsatisfied. What OP could have done. What the provider could have done. Well, the provider did persuade OP to not take that way; and then insisted on going ahead with it anyway. It's not impossible somehow, but it doesn't add up well to me.

Notably, he registered on 20th June and hasn't any reviews. Perhaps he's experimenting with price discovery?

It never occured to me yet, but I'd be glad to receive a donation in cryptocurrencies; perhaps Monero or Zcash for the added privacy (since you mention larger amounts). It can be fast, secure, the money can't be counterfeited; there could be no excuses, no ATM needed, just 2 smartphones. Cashing out could be troublesome taxation-side, depending on where you live, though.

Any cryptocurrency will keep your full name and email address unknown to the receiver, were you to send it to him.

Didn't he price himself above average already? He must have figured out that bb is usually regarded as premium-worthy. The offer from the poster blows my mind a bit, as it contradicts the market at a first glance; but also, it puts on the spotlight the unicity and potential irreplaceability of each provider. Want condom with that exact guy? Sorry, we don't do that here despite what the vast majority says or does. That's neat in his own way.

It's not uncommon to have clients messaging a provider to know if he does bareback even if the profile already specifies he doesn't. But there are also clients who wouldn't touch you with a pole if the profile is anyhow bareback-friendly, no matter what. Maybe this provider doesn't want to scare away the second group (on the contrary, reassuring them in first place by explicitly stating he doesn't bareback), while staying open for business for the first one.

Wondering if I got this right: they keep ads just like others, on rentmen and the usual sites, except that the phone number in the ad leads to a third person explaining the details, taking questions, etc? Isn't that a turn off for many clients?

Wondering if I got this right: they keep ads just like others, on rentmen and the usual sites, except that the phone number in the ad leads to a third person explaining the details, taking questions, etc? Isn't that a turn off for many clients?

At first, it sounds like you are talking of people contacting you but not booking afterwards; but when you mention deposits and cancel fees, I get that you talk of no-shows. Which ones are you talking about?

I'd bet he meant that the customer can cum multiple times.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-millennials-stick-out-their-tongues-for-pictures

Hence a bad client will still screw both the provider and the agent at once. Not that I was betting on it being otherwise, really, but for a moment I had assumed that the reliability/reputation of the single agent would transmit over his many "protegees", effectively allowing anticipated payment.

Thank you, guys. But I meant: do provider and agent get the full rate before the actual session?