GTMike

I swear i've seen some of those pictures before but not with that Profile name.

That type of communication is aggravating and frustrating. Good for you to pull the rip cord.

Not disagreeing with your idea but thinking through it all, do you think if that were to happen that many of the "fake reviewer" profiles on RM would just migrate and create "fake" Daddy's accounts and potentially then dilute the percentage of more objective client user feedback and overall quality and effectiveness of a Daddy review? Just thinking out loud.

Well for the most part i agree with the others who are saying that you could run the risk of if he didn't respond well to the outreach and took it so far as to make it an issue regarding your place of employment since he asked you. The only reason why i said it was tough and asked if he listed that he was open to more back on RM but now only has Women clients is if in the chance he personally made big distinctions between muscle worship and other services for men. But then just decided it was easier to only have to filter through women. For me it would come down to my gut in terms of his reaction to asking if you were indeed the salesman and followed it up with, he only services women or if he said he only services women and then said, "oh were you the salesman?". But that is a really fine line and as others say the potential downside risk probably far outweighs the potential upside.

Tough one. Though wait. In his RM profile do you recall if he specifically was only available for muscle worship sessions or was it listing available for more than that?

To further some of the elements of your comment there are also other subtle and not so subtle societal elemental factors at play in all of those studies. WARNING: In order to illustrate the point i am trying to make, it is necssary to use some very offensive caricatures and language that i do not condone. So please if you might be offended don't read any further or think I am being insensitive. Again it is to make a critical point. That is that in the majority of our past and current societal norms, "whiteness" is typically considered the "normal" state of being. So if you're "not white", then you don't need further descriptive characterizations to describe your state of being. And often other "non-white" standards of race and ethnicties are loaded with other negative implications and connotations so unfortunately in our society one only needs those otherwise very broad macro level descriptions to be used perjuratively. Let me try to explain the concept in a simple example; A waiter at a restaurant is angry because he or she felt that they didn't receive a good tip. How might that waiter go about voicing and describing their displeasure to someone else? Often, if the person was "White", the waiter might call them "a jerk", "a tight-wad", or "a dick" or "an asshole". They used descriptions to explain their actions and behaviors. Or to explain the experience they might say they couldn't believe it because the person "looked like a Wall street banker type", (read rich) and they didn't tip well. Again they don't use the person's "race or ethnicity" to explain it. Or maybe the reason was because they were "teenagers/kids" and didn't know any better. They might also say they didn't get a good tip because the patrons "were poor white trash". Here "Whiteness" needs the extra clarifier of "poor and trash" to help you understand why the tip was bad. Now contrast that to if the person who didn't tip well happened to be considered of an "other" category what the waiter might say; 1) "I thought Asians were good at math" 2) "Black people don't tip well" 3) " He Jew'd me" out of the tip 4) "What did you expect? They were Mexicans". In those types of simplified expressions the group's race, ethnicity etc.. is just lumped together with no further descriptive qualifications necessary to help explain the situation. Whereas if the person who doesn't tip well is White, there often needs to be further clarifying statements or adjectives. I am NOT attacking "white people" or "whiteness" at all!!!! But just adding further context of learned psychological biases that people don't often recognize which can influence and cloud some sociological studies. Much peace love and health and happiness to everyone!

If you're very sensitive about it and stress over when is the better time to feel like the onus is on to make a disclosure, go to the RM profiles and you'll see many of them will say they are accepting of all enthnicities, ages and LGBTQ communities etc... commentart to that effect.

I guess there just has to be a reliable and competitive alternative. As a client/user i find that RM has much more thorough profile information (not that profiles can't be faked) but that the search and usability is much more advanced than the other services that you mentioned. I also find that with more information at least attempted to be covered in a RM profile it helps me not waste the other sides time with unnessary communication trying to find out some basic information that other sites don't have as standard in their profiles. I don't disagree with you but one quick example that comes to mind is that Mintboys doesn't list Weight metrics. Also i find more of the personality can come through by RM interviews and allows more of that ability to provide information that i sometimes find helpful when determining if profiles are more or less likely to be real or fake. And in addition to the better searchable criteria in RM's database structure, i have also found incremental value from being able to directly and confidentially contact other reviewers through their (former email) and current messenging service. Again i am not disagreeing with your assessment of their dominant market share and the collective reliance on it, but from my client user perspective the information and tools to me are easier to use and superior.

If you're very interested to see it, i can download it and PM it to ya. It's a video that includes him giving a footjob.

Then I suppose you love this https://www.pornhubpremium.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph59c09bcc30cdd, Haha.

Did Nate Grimes pull his profile? I used to see it quite often in Los Angeles for a couple years. And if anyone sees that Christian Wilde does indeed escort please make that known immediately! Hahaha.

The profile has been getting a few reviews from RM. https://rent.men/IvyLeagueHungVrs/reviews/. We all know how we feel about those, though ( in my opinion) a couple look legit and a couple pretty suspect based on that reviewers other reviews.

Links? Actually found and know who you're referring to regarding Jason and Dorian but can't seem to find David.

Your Wisdom and vast experience is always greatly appreciated. I feel like i missed the boat on JJ and Cade by a few years ( fame wise) who look to be very much my type. Any new LA gems you may know of even during these challenging times?

I'm no expert and have no first hand knowledge but at least from his pro porn days there are pics and video's of him bottoming. And in his new profile text (https://rent.men/JJKNIGHTXXX) he says he "mostly tops" but on occasion would bottom. Just FYI's

I have not met with him but did think i had just seen those photo's from somewhere??? - https://rent.men/DanEroticMassage But he does only list "available for" erotic massage and modelling.

Unfortunately a mighty big "If". At least two profiles in the past with those Pic's were pretty much assessed and concluded not legit unfortunately.

I'll add to my previous comment that in retrospect the membership has worked out for me. Though i would do as others have suggested and maybe get the premium for a month or two, establish some contacts and move it to private communication. Then let the membership lapse for a bit as you take stock in your fishing expedition. Hahaha. In full disclosure, I've started back up with my "Pre-Covid" regular after taking precautions and only meet spaced out every 2 to 3 weeks. He's basically a B+ or an 8 out of 10 in terms of "a perfect match" for me but i shouldn't complain as we can schedule to hang 2 weeks in advance and he's never flaked once meeting up despite a good amount of travel distance to hang for an evening. We're incredibly flexible on terms which has evolved mutually and respectfully over time. He's smart and has a clear plan and path for his career and is dedicated sticking to it while in School which i love for so many reasons. (In fact we both know that once School is done and work starts our status will stop.) We know an equal and respectful amount about each other's personal lives and (so far, knock on wood) there's never been any drama or major problems relating to each others boundaries. For example he lives with his girlfriend and she has known all about it since the beginning and is totally fine with the side hustle. There's no BS as we always do what we say we're gonna do and don't do what we say we're not gonna do. But of course that takes time to be able to confidently trust that's the case. I guess I'm sticking up for the potential and good possibilities that SA can bring hahaha, but yes there's a LOT of BS and it's a LOT of time, effort, money and luck for it to really work well in my experience.

Profile seems to be working now - https://rent.men/JoeyxDC

I concur. I have only had a similar experience traveling for work and although my boss at the time then, only would stay "at the best accomodations", somehow we ended up at a discount type motel. The walls were paper thin and i had the luxury of a couple (straight) making love most of the night but I actually was laughing the whole time because they treated ESPN SportsCenter recap highlights as pretty much hard core Porn. Loudly repeating the sportscaster's comments to up the intensity, hahaha.

Wow Gentlemen! Quite the studs!

Yeah makes sense as well. From the City's or County's perspective perhaps a lot of different objectives are met and in their estimation a collective societal net benefit. (Again all hypothesis on my part thinking out loud).

I wonder if the concept of "meeting a quota" is based on some sort of stastical analysis that is based upon in summary that it's not sp important as you say for strong court cases and high conviction rates, but actually assumes that the potential threat/risk of being cited acts more as an overall macro level deterent. Maybe every once in a while they will snag a lead related to a bigger illegal sex trafficking ring but in the meantime to lower the overall levels of what is deemed "prostitution" they reckon it keeps levels lower. (I'm hypothesizing). Similar to issuing speeding ticket citations to decrease frequency of overall speeds which has some stastical links to # of traffick related deaths.

I've texted with him as well. Per his profile he'll be visiting my city later this summer and I'm tempted to pull the trigger as well. FWIW he did receive another positive review on RM recently by what seems like a legitimate regular user and real client.

If you want some really good foot fetish sites PM me an i can forward you some links.