GTMike

Curious if anyone knows if potentially "Sly" from Sean Cody ( 2017 ) might perhaps have a profile on any of the Masseur or Escort sites? (https://www.gayporno.fm/jax-sly-raw-anal-video_1521181.html).

Are you referring to Sly or Jax?

Then i think it is ok to post this type of link? (https://www.gayporno.fm/jax-sly-raw-anal-video_1521181.html) Again the point is to see if there is any 411 on "Sly" from this Sean Cody video if he potentially has/had a profile like Jax.

Should start a new thread and will but curious if anyone knows any 411 regarding "Sly" from Sean Cody who was one of Jax's scene partner in 2017? I have the link but i don't know if that is against rules/policy to post a link from a site that has old Sean Cody videos?

Bumping this ( https://rent.men/Davidboyw) to see if anyone might have any other relevant info potentially? Appears to be traveling to LA. Might that Instagram provide additional pieces to the puzzle?

I can't comment on what the experience might be but FWIW can at least verify that i randomly saw him with the person who he mentions in his profile that they can do client calls together. Ironically i had seen his profile on RM and discovered his "partners" via a massage site and didn't know he had an RM profile. So i recognized both of them independently and thought to myself "how funny they know each other?" Hahahaha.

Haven't met him but might when he travels to my city. It's not a put down or ageism, but he (to me at least) he looks much older than 26 as reported on his profile. Wondering based on your meeting with him if that looked to be reasonably accurate? Again if he's closer to 36 (as an example), still doesn't take away from his hottness but still curious to know what to expect hahaha. Glad you had a fun visit.

Yeah exactly. That explanation makes sense and would be consistent with both your experience and my observation. Though in your case that is concerning that you would have difficulty reclaiming and controlling your profile and keeping it current on one hand, but on the other maybe it's potentially expanding your reach? But regardless you guys should know about it and opt in etc..

Here i am shamefully bumping my own bump on, https://rent.men/JoeyxDC Here is prior thread from before with slightly altered profile name. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/joeyxdmv.156830/#post-1946239 But due to name change and way more recent activity on RM, travel scheduling and Onlyfans account, i thought new fresh perspectives could be in order if anyone had further insights who may have met or have seen prior/current professional porn videos that he references.

Yeah thanks for bringing to attention. Haven't seen it before but going through it there are definitely many profiles that are the same pictures and very similar copy to profiles i've seen on RM, friendboy etc... I found some profiles of known legit escorts and one for sure that i had the number of and it was same number as listed on this site. There were a couple profiles that i know were legit a couple years ago but i think the escorts no longer has Ad's but still will see prior clients so not sure what to make of that. Also there were nearly identical "fake" profiles (in terms of pictures) that are currently running on RM as well. So overall to me it is just as "legit" having it's share of real and fakes profiles similar to other sites.

RM can't reliably really verify whether someone met or not. Even if both provider and client both say they did or didn't meet. RM can basically just confirm that communication occurred on the site between whoever is controlling the escort site profile and whoever is controlling the client profile. The site administrator without even reviewing the content of the communication could determine there was legit contact and communication back and forth. Personally i almost immediately try and move to text communication for both party's privacy. So who knows what kind of communicaiton may or may not have gone on between parties. To be clear 'm not defending the escort or taking any sides regarding this specific situation. But i will say having known many and having been in the prescence of escorts when they get text's and calls from potential clients, i can surely imagine situations whereby a potential client feeling like they can't get what they want for a price point they deem acceptable could provide an unflattering review of an escort who they legitimately may have originally communicated with on RM but then ultimately hadn't met happening.

Gone, "404"

The one i accessed still works? (https://rent.men/MartinPro)

Thanks. Appreciated. Just wanted to make sure i wasn't going too crazy, hahaha

Great thank you. Greatly appreciate the assist.

I seem to remember this gentlemen (https://rent.men/Johnyylong) having been discussed before but can't find thread? Trying to see what name may have been used on Corbin Fisher per his profile.

I swear i've seen some of those pictures before but not with that Profile name.

That type of communication is aggravating and frustrating. Good for you to pull the rip cord.

Not disagreeing with your idea but thinking through it all, do you think if that were to happen that many of the "fake reviewer" profiles on RM would just migrate and create "fake" Daddy's accounts and potentially then dilute the percentage of more objective client user feedback and overall quality and effectiveness of a Daddy review? Just thinking out loud.

Well for the most part i agree with the others who are saying that you could run the risk of if he didn't respond well to the outreach and took it so far as to make it an issue regarding your place of employment since he asked you. The only reason why i said it was tough and asked if he listed that he was open to more back on RM but now only has Women clients is if in the chance he personally made big distinctions between muscle worship and other services for men. But then just decided it was easier to only have to filter through women. For me it would come down to my gut in terms of his reaction to asking if you were indeed the salesman and followed it up with, he only services women or if he said he only services women and then said, "oh were you the salesman?". But that is a really fine line and as others say the potential downside risk probably far outweighs the potential upside.

Tough one. Though wait. In his RM profile do you recall if he specifically was only available for muscle worship sessions or was it listing available for more than that?

To further some of the elements of your comment there are also other subtle and not so subtle societal elemental factors at play in all of those studies. WARNING: In order to illustrate the point i am trying to make, it is necssary to use some very offensive caricatures and language that i do not condone. So please if you might be offended don't read any further or think I am being insensitive. Again it is to make a critical point. That is that in the majority of our past and current societal norms, "whiteness" is typically considered the "normal" state of being. So if you're "not white", then you don't need further descriptive characterizations to describe your state of being. And often other "non-white" standards of race and ethnicties are loaded with other negative implications and connotations so unfortunately in our society one only needs those otherwise very broad macro level descriptions to be used perjuratively. Let me try to explain the concept in a simple example; A waiter at a restaurant is angry because he or she felt that they didn't receive a good tip. How might that waiter go about voicing and describing their displeasure to someone else? Often, if the person was "White", the waiter might call them "a jerk", "a tight-wad", or "a dick" or "an asshole". They used descriptions to explain their actions and behaviors. Or to explain the experience they might say they couldn't believe it because the person "looked like a Wall street banker type", (read rich) and they didn't tip well. Again they don't use the person's "race or ethnicity" to explain it. Or maybe the reason was because they were "teenagers/kids" and didn't know any better. They might also say they didn't get a good tip because the patrons "were poor white trash". Here "Whiteness" needs the extra clarifier of "poor and trash" to help you understand why the tip was bad. Now contrast that to if the person who didn't tip well happened to be considered of an "other" category what the waiter might say; 1) "I thought Asians were good at math" 2) "Black people don't tip well" 3) " He Jew'd me" out of the tip 4) "What did you expect? They were Mexicans". In those types of simplified expressions the group's race, ethnicity etc.. is just lumped together with no further descriptive qualifications necessary to help explain the situation. Whereas if the person who doesn't tip well is White, there often needs to be further clarifying statements or adjectives. I am NOT attacking "white people" or "whiteness" at all!!!! But just adding further context of learned psychological biases that people don't often recognize which can influence and cloud some sociological studies. Much peace love and health and happiness to everyone!

If you're very sensitive about it and stress over when is the better time to feel like the onus is on to make a disclosure, go to the RM profiles and you'll see many of them will say they are accepting of all enthnicities, ages and LGBTQ communities etc... commentart to that effect.

I guess there just has to be a reliable and competitive alternative. As a client/user i find that RM has much more thorough profile information (not that profiles can't be faked) but that the search and usability is much more advanced than the other services that you mentioned. I also find that with more information at least attempted to be covered in a RM profile it helps me not waste the other sides time with unnessary communication trying to find out some basic information that other sites don't have as standard in their profiles. I don't disagree with you but one quick example that comes to mind is that Mintboys doesn't list Weight metrics. Also i find more of the personality can come through by RM interviews and allows more of that ability to provide information that i sometimes find helpful when determining if profiles are more or less likely to be real or fake. And in addition to the better searchable criteria in RM's database structure, i have also found incremental value from being able to directly and confidentially contact other reviewers through their (former email) and current messenging service. Again i am not disagreeing with your assessment of their dominant market share and the collective reliance on it, but from my client user perspective the information and tools to me are easier to use and superior.

If you're very interested to see it, i can download it and PM it to ya. It's a video that includes him giving a footjob.