Spencer L

any place with a hot guy

I appreciate the input and I have modified the page
 
Seriously didn’t know it’s still a working page since rent boy shut down and it’s an alternative so I almost forgot that one existed lol
 
Also that’s a checked choices from the website so I guess I learnt a lesson then
 
As for the masked face, I’m doing this on the down low so;)
 
Anyway your input is great advice;)

just like the title says

Using one's imagination, I suppose that the guy might offer / get into massage + "somewhat more"....but still, my original comments stand.....(in his signature, his "Rentboy" link goes to "friendboy.pro")
 
https://friendboy.pro/boys/spencerlee

Look at his rentboy.pro link.

I looked at the tumblr link and I don't see that info anywhere? Says $120 and no discrimination-what am I missing?

I booked my room. Get in on Thursday and leave Monday. Now I need to arrange some companionship!

My preference is gorgeous & wealthy.
 
My reality is breathing and not indigent.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/3059c11d50f53394f80c69e0a8bba166/tumblr_mys41zHJdg1sl1yvgo1_500.gif

#2 is ugly

All these pics are good... But how do we get these hotties in reality.... Any of them escort, that you know of??? Would love to get one of these studs.... Would even pay $550 for an overnight

I do not think that a disclaimer is necessarily useless or ineffective. It really all depends on the particular facts of a given situation.
 
First, remember that it is not a crime to be an escort. Providing someone nonsexual companionship for a fee is perfectly legal. Moreover, as has been discussed many times on this forum, such companionship does occur and may be more common than many people assume. http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/a-session-with-no-sex.111157/; https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/time-only.106963/#post-993783 (post 2), https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/cuddle-up-day-and-miscellaneous-mentions.120706/, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/fashion/professional-cuddling.html, https://blogs.lawyers.com/attorney/...tween-prostitution-and-escort-services-24035/. For example, many people might be skeptical that a client would pay someone $200 simply to have brunch together with no sex before or after…just to talk, and yet I know for a fact that this kind of thing does happen.
 
Second, even assuming that many people use escorting as a cover for what is actually prostitution, that does not mean that law enforcement can simply go around arresting escorts on the assumption that they are actually sex workers. The reason cops go to the trouble of setting up stings is that they are trying to get some fairly explicit evidence of a sex-for-money-exchange in a particular case. Remember, a prosecutor may ultimately need to unanimously convince a jury of his case beyond a reasonable doubt, which can be a tough standard to meet if there is any ambiguity or gap in the evidence.
 
So, for example, if an undercover police officer invites an advertiser to a hotel and gets him to say, “yes, I will fuck you for $200,” then the fact that his ad said, “I do not accept money for sexual acts” would not be particularly helpful to him. If the disclaimer is obviously not true, it won't do the advertiser any good. On the other hand, if the advertiser refuses to get dragged into that kind of talk and goes back to the language in his ad that he does not accept money for sexual acts and any fee will be for his time only, I should think that without more evidence, this would be a much harder case to prove. Not necessarily impossible, depending on the context and other details, but certainly harder.
 
The only concern I would have about this kind of disclaimer, particularly for those advertisers who are actually sex workers, is that it might lure them into having a false sense of security. They should remember that there is no set of legalish sounding “magic words” that will transform an illegal activity into a legal one. If the State can prove that they are in fact engaging in illegal activity, a disclaimer to the contrary in their advertisement will not protect them.