oldNbusted

Back to massage only, new face pics, new name https://rent.men/Massuerjock

Well, there was this one thread... How To Clean Your Ass - Best Instructional I've Seen

How about the Burrows twins, Demetrius Burrows and DeMorris Burrows? Burger King: Twins cars.com: Twins

Cute.

They made this change on the website a while back, when they started referring to the guys as "porn stars". There was some conversation about it here at the time and the problems it could cause, for example, in the case of an actual porn star who was under exclusive contract to one studio and his ad says he's available for porn movies! One guy was quite upset since he didn't want anything to do with porn. I encouraged him to change it so he was just available for BFE.

https://www.adam4adam.com/profile/view/TranquilityOne I like that he's older, just looking for any feedback...

I've been thinking of a trip to NYC and since my favorite guy appears to have retired, I was browsing and ran across this guy. He's seems very new, so I'd be surprised if anyone here has met him.... https://rent.men/ParkerPayneXLXL

Link?

I'm reminded of the dire warnings about the telephone, how it would be the end of the oh-so-genteel custom of calling upon people, which up to then had meant visiting people in person, not calling them on the phone. I'm squarely in the 'it's different but not intrinsically worse' camp. I've long had a theory that one of the reasons the Sherlock Holmes stories have have endured is the romantic idea that when the stories started in 1887, that was probably the last time in the history of civilization that one person could be somewhat familiar with the entire breadth of human knowledge. Speaking of the 1880s, I think this story is in the public domain now. theatlantic.com: Mark Twain eavesdrops A Telephonic Conversation "I touched the bell and this talk ensued" Mark Twain, June 1880 Issue I consider that a conversation by telephone—when you are simply sitting by and not taking any part in that conversation—is one of the solemnest curiosities of this modern life. Yesterday I was writing a deep article on a sublime philosophical subject while such a conversation was going on in the room. I notice that one can always write best when somebody is talking through a telephone close by. Well, the thing began in this way. A member of our household came in and asked me to have our house put into communication with Mr. Bagley's, downtown. I have observed, in many cities, that the gentle sex always shrink from calling up the central office themselves. I don't know why, but they do. So I touched the bell, and this talk ensued:— Central Office. [Gruffly.] Hello! I. Is it the Central Office? C. 0. Of course it is. What do you want ? I. Will you switch me on to the Bagleys, please ? C. 0. All right. Just keep your ear to the telephone. Then I heard, k-look, k-look, k'look— klook-klook-klook-look-look! then a horrible "gritting" of teeth, and finally a piping female voice: Y-e-s? [Rising inflection.] Did you wish to speak to me?" Without answering, I handed the telephone to the applicant, and sat down. Then followed that queerest of all the queer things in this world,—a conversation with only one end to it. You hear questions asked; you don't hear the answer. You hear invitations given; you hear no thanks in return. You have listening pauses of dead silence, followed by apparently irrelevant and unjustifiable exclamations of glad surprise, or sorrow, or dismay. You can't make head or tail of the talk, because you never hear anything that the person at the other end of the wire says. Well, I heard the following remarkable series of observations, all from the one tongue, and all shouted,—for you can't ever persuade the gentle sex to speak gently into a telephone:— Yes? Why, how did that happen? Pause. What did you say? Pause. Oh, no, I don't think it was. Pause. No! Oh, no, I didn't mean that. I meant, put it in while it is still boiling,—or just before it comes to a boil. Pause. WHAT? Pause. I turned it over with a back stitch on the selvage edge. Pause. Yes, I like that way, too; but I think it 's better to baste it on with Valenciennes or bombazine, or something of that sort. It gives it such an air,—and attracts so much notice. Pause. It 's forty-ninth Deuteronomy, sixty-fourth to ninety-seventh inclusive. I think we ought all to read it often. Pause. Perhaps so; I generally use a hair-pin. Pause. What did you say ? [Aside] Children, do be quiet! Pause. Oh! B flat! Dear me, I thought you said it was the cat! Pause. Since when? Pause. Why, I never heard of it. Pause. You astound me! It seems utterly impossible! Pause. Who did? Pause. Good-ness gracious! Pause. Well, what is this world coming to? Was it right in church? Pause. And was her mother there? Pause. Why, Mrs. Bagley, I should have died of humiliation! What did they do? Long Pause. I can't be perfectly sure, because I haven't the notes by me; but I think it goes something like this: te-rolly-loll-loll, loll lolly-loll-loll, O tolly-loll-loll-lee-ly-li-i-do! And then repeat, you know. Pause. Yes, I think it is very sweet,—and very solemn and impressive, if you get the andantino and the pianissimo right. Pause. Oh, gum-drops, gum-drops! But I never allow them to eat striped candy. And of course they can't, till they get their teeth, any way. Pause. What? Pause. Oh, not in the least,—go right on. He's here writing,—it does n't bother him. Pause. Very well, I'll come if I can. [Aside.] Dear me, how it does tire a person's arm to hold this thing up so long! I wish she'd— Pause. Oh, no, not at all; I like to talk,—but I'm afraid I'm keeping you from your affairs. Pause. Visitors? Pause. No, we never use butter on them. Pause. Yes, that is a very good way; but all the cook-books say they are very unhealthy when they are out of season. And he does n't like them, any way,—especially canned. Pause. Oh, I think that is too high for them; we have never paid over fifty cents a bunch. Pause. Must you go? Well, good-by. Pause. Yes, I think so. Good-by. Pause. Four, o'clock then—I'll be ready. Good-by. Pause. Thank you ever so much. Good-by. Pause. Oh, not at all!—just as fresh—Which? Oh, I'm glad to hear you say that. Good-by. [Hangs up the telephone and says, "Oh, it does tire a person's arm so!"] A man delivers a single brutal "Good-by," and that is the end of it. Not so with the gentle sex,—I say it in their praise; they cannot abide abruptness.

I would recommend you take a trip through that account's recent posts.

Delete Facebook?

Speak for yourself.

It's also present in fried potatoes. The golden arches better watch out, but I haven't given up my occasional hash brown.... fda.gov: You Can Help Cut Acrylamide in Your Diet

I'm not optimistic, the book is just really good in a way that I'm skeptical can be translated to the screen.

variety.com: Christopher Nolan to Present ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ at Cannes For the first time since the original release, this 70mm print was struck from new printing elements made from the original camera negative. Nolan worked closely with the team at Warner Bros. Pictures throughout the mastering process. I will admit, I didn't like it back then, but came to love it later. The AFI owns one of the original 70mm prints so they show it every couple of years and I always make an effort to go see it. That print is not too bad, but I want to see the difference. I also liked Steven Soderbergh's fanedit, he took out most of HAL's breakdown and it's a totally different film, amazing in its own way, I wonder if that variation occurred to Kubrick and Clarke when making it.

He got a good review today from his time in DC. https://www.daddysreviews.com/review/mark_tunnel_palmsprings

I told him not to take it personally. That's partly why I think he's kinda new at it. I also explained how videocalls are considered the gold standard to make sure he's the guy. I know this will make me sound really jaded and cynical, but it was almost cute how he seemed to believe that having the "Photos Verified" tag in his profile would make those requests go away.

Interesting that his one reviewer also left a nice review for [uSER=12155]@Dominiking[/uSER] a couple of years ago. He's showing up in DC now.

That's good to know. I almost thought we might not meet. I only book outcalls, and it turned out he had not made a reservation and apparently drove up to DC the day of the March and was surprised to find the place I had suggested was booked up, at about 3 am. Since I had only stipulated a place be metro adjacent, he found a room and sent me another text to let me know, at about 4 am. So maybe not overly organized...

I took one for the team and met up with him and... it worked out. I think he's kinda new and gets a lot of rude messages, so that's why his profile is written the way it is. In person he is extremely nice and friendly, not all stern like his pics might lead one to believe. I'm open to PMs.

I wouldn't mind this so much if it was made clear up front I was on the "standby" list.

I guess being a slut for free is still legal!

Many Happy Returns, @BigRic

The thread title changed.