wiltshirede

My call is that he has written most of them himself (check the spelling and punctuation quirks), and as for the others, who knows with RM's famous quality control.

No, although fabrication seems to be indicated in some of his reviews, which contain identical punctuation errors. There might be a mixture of real and unreal, or he may have a person (Client?) who writes them for him using a VPN, $15 accounts and emails.
Fabricated feedback isn't necessarily evidence of a bad provider.

I think it’s super dodgy that he has a few review  now telling people to trust him with deposits . Also he claims to spend weekends in London now . Last i checked London is a good 1 1/2 - 2 hours away , each way . 
the plot thickens . If true this ought to be reported to sleepy boy 

He took the deposit from the client, the arrangement fell through and he then sent mocking messages after he asked for the money back. I have no reason to doubt the client. He was regular, known for years, took me out a few evenings and nights when I was doing that kind of thing, and quite pragmatic about the way he was conned by the advertiser.
My recommendation is only engage this advertiser if you are visiting his premises. He will otherwise ask for advances.
His feeback also has fabrication indicated, both on his present and deleted profiles. Sleepyboy only accepts reviews from paid client accounts*, so high frequency feedback written in a very similar style is likely the advertiser himself using a £10 burner account to submit one.
*Since all features bar a few photos are free, I know few clients who ever paid for an account on Sleepyboy.

I have been informed in the past that Matt Black is a conman who operates a deposit scam, so proceed with caution and don't send any money.
And to be clear... Matt Black is "Henry" and not "Matt".

Comes across as a lunatic and a tryhard.
 
Also, (very) basic analysis of his reviews reveals them to have been written by himself.

If 80% is fabrication, indeed, 20% may be real.
 
The reviews came in quick succession, because like most fake reviews on RentMen, they were written at a point in time to fulfill a present purpose. See for example, three reviews (all on on Feb 1!), some by previous reviewers. No narrative, just fabricated for a purpose. His narrative reviews are nearly all written by the same person, with the same errors.
 
There are numerous accounts on RM, writing very similar narrative and blank reviews for the same itinerant South American escorts, often multiple times for the same provider.
 
Your criteria for selecting escorts is bizarre - as if they are some kind of product that is pure and gets "used". And taking it at face value, using a review count is an incredibly naive way of measuring how much "contact" they have with the "outside world" (it sounds insane to even entertain something so inane).

It's a crude method, but paying to review an escort is what makes the reviews on Sleepyboy.com more reliable. Yes, there are fakes active on Sleepyboy.com, but they are usually far more proactive when it comes to removing them as opposed to RM's real estate money farm - outright disrespect towards genuine advertisers.
 
The dutch code on advertising implicates RM as a violator on many grounds, but how strictly it is enforced is another matter. Nevertheless, it lingers over them like a dark cloud, and there can't be much respect these days for any advertiser of sex work, let alone one with their track record.
 
I know there are a number of escorts in the UK who strongly dislike the approach of RM and would happily see it eliminated to open up the market for an alternative. US, I gather has become more dependent upon RM, which could cause some disruption if it suddenly disappears.

> https://www.sleepyboy.com/uk/london/escort/alon

Make a call on the provider based on their advert - a few things to keep in mind:
 
Age and experience... older providers who have been in the business for longer are more likely to have a non judgemental attitude towards larger clients, since this is what they have come to expect.
 
Fitness model type escorts are likely to provide a reduced service to larger men - not exclusively, but for a number of reasons - not limited to the fact that escorting is rarely the chosen path for this type of provider. This applies again to some foreign providers who might have less of an interest in securing regular customers in a country they will be leaving in a few weeks time.
 
Fake tops - the major European cities are riddled with these. You can usually weed them out by the fact that the adverts make rather hysterical allusions to the essence of being active or masculine. The tone of the advert is often shorthand, arrogant, "look at me" - and the service given will match that attitude.

Make a call on the provider based on their advert - a few things to keep in mind:
 
Age and experience... older providers who have been in the business for longer are more likely to have a non judgemental attitude towards larger clients, since this is what they have come to expect.
 
Fitness model type escorts are likely to provide a reduced service to larger men - not exclusively, but for a number of reasons - not limited to the fact that escorting is rarely the chosen path for this type of provider. This applies again to some foreign providers who might have less of an interest in securing regular customers in a country they will be leaving in a few weeks time.
 
Fake tops - the major European cities are riddled with these. You can usually weed them out by the fact that the adverts make rather hysterical allusions to the essence of being active or masculine. The tone of the advert is often shorthand, arrogant, "look at me" - and the service given will match that attitude.

That's because it's fake ;-)
 
"Massage agencies" generally = Fake photos and reviews on their own site, fake reviews on Trustpilot, etc......
 
The quality of the service is as good as the provider they arbitrarily decided was available and suitable for you - so follows no reliable pattern.
 
And no, the services provided by apple/google compliant massage apps and in Neals Yard salons are solely therapeutic. They would be prosecuted out of existence and barred by the tech monops if it were any other way.

Make a call on the provider based on their advert - a few things to keep in mind:
 
Age and experience... older providers who have been in the business for longer are more likely to have a non judgemental attitude towards larger clients, since this is what they have come to expect.
 
Fitness model type escorts are likely to provide a reduced service to larger men - not exclusively, but for a number of reasons - not limited to the fact that escorting is rarely the chosen path for this type of provider. This applies again to some foreign providers who might have less of an interest in securing regular customers in a country they will be leaving in a few weeks time.
 
Fake tops - the major European cities are riddled with these. You can usually weed them out by the fact that the adverts make rather hysterical allusions to the essence of being active or masculine. The tone of the advert is often shorthand, arrogant, "look at me" - and the service given will match that attitude.

It's a crude method, but paying to review an escort is what makes the reviews on Sleepyboy.com more reliable. Yes, there are fakes active on Sleepyboy.com, but they are usually far more proactive when it comes to removing them as opposed to RM's real estate money farm - outright disrespect towards genuine advertisers.
 
The dutch code on advertising implicates RM as a violator on many grounds, but how strictly it is enforced is another matter. Nevertheless, it lingers over them like a dark cloud, and there can't be much respect these days for any advertiser of sex work, let alone one with their track record.
 
I know there are a number of escorts in the UK who strongly dislike the approach of RM and would happily see it eliminated to open up the market for an alternative. US, I gather has become more dependent upon RM, which could cause some disruption if it suddenly disappears.

There is no will to remove the fakes, as long as they pay! Try addressing these concerns, and you will discover that all of the major advertising sites are compromised.
 
Fakery of the body-tone is now standard among escorts in London. You can usually assume the same build, with less muscle definition.
 
Fakery of the dick size is very common and increasingly hard to detect with the advancement of image manipulation.
 
Rentmen are among the worst, as they attempted to philosophise their indifference when I mentioned some of the more obvious fakes, such as where the photoshopped dick was so inflated, it was warping all the objects around it. For them, it is a matter of client discretion, and customer reviews are suggested as the solution to fakes. They also initiate "photo verification" of users that have been complained about - of course, this always comes back positive, as it bears no relation to the manipulation of images.

Unfortunately, it is common here.
 
Another fake one a client got me to hire: https://www.sleepyboy.com/uk/london/escort/Baron