Golem

I just got this from an SA guy and really liked it
 

Kiss on the Forehead ↔ "Ultimate respect and appreciation ".
Kiss on the Ear ↔ "I'm horny".
Kiss on the Cheek ↔ "We're friends".
Kiss on the Hand ↔ "I adore you".
Kiss on the Neck ↔ "We belong together".
Kiss on the Shoulder ↔ "I want you".
Kiss on the Lips ↔ ..... you tell me ?
Holding Hands ↔ "We can learn to love each other.
Holding on tight ↔ "Don't let go".
Looking into each other's Eyes ↔ "Don't leave me".
Laughing while Kissing ↔ "I am completely Comfortable with you".

The fine escorts with whom I have my true BFE's have become my friends (not boyfriends!) and the majority of my repeat hires remain so. There are also a number of repeat hires with whom I have mind-blowing sex but never a BFE. These guys are exactly what I need when I am super horny but only want an hour or two of getting worked up to a completely satisfying explosive release! Lately it seems the guys who advertise as "straight" but are happy to enthusiastically perform every act a gay guy will do, have fallen into this category! :eek:
 
TruHart1

As I am also in touch with the client, I've asked him to confirm this statement with me directly. I sincerely hope he does, I too would love for you to stop screaming about this

Oh, and one more thing. If "DaveWilliam" = "Dwilli" as seems quite possible, then in fact this client had met WB before (possibly more times than the one Dwilli review attests), and answering that first RM question "yes" would not be a lie even under Cahill/WB's version.

The other thing, of course, is that we don't actually know they DIDN'T meet! All we know is that this guy posted that review, cahill asked WB, and according to WB, he overslept, missed the meeting, and later offered something to try and make it up to the client.
 
I too see no reason to distrust WB. But imagine this: you're a great provider who has a rare bad session where you just don't connect with the client. The following day, a regular client of yours, who posts about you online every chance he gets , contacts you and asks what happened. You know this highly attentive client is probably going to say something online based on what you tell him. So do you say, "yeah, he had a bad time" or "that review is fake, we didn't even meet"?
 
This isn't Sophie's Choice or anything, but it's not hard to imagine being tempted by that second option when this decision will directly affect your livelihood. It's not out of the realm of possibility that someone might answer that way.
 
This is why I think it's a problem to assume that Cahill's version is the truth.

Oh for crying out loud. I'm not encouraging "retaliation" with the "easiest option" -- I'm encouraging "communication for the good of the greater community" with "what he probably thought was the only option".
 
I'm not encouraging use of that option, since of course we have a better one -- posting here. I just refuse to condemn someone because they didn't know that option existed.

Wait when you go to leave your review the first question that pops up asks if the meeting took place. The minute he said yes he lied. It does not matter if he is justified or has no justification for the bad review. Now WB is definitely not blameless if he indeed overslept. It unfortunately shows a degree of unprofessionalism that proves to be a very costly in any service industry. It is sad but true but in the service industry your only as good as your last move/performance/action because at the end of the day there will always be someone else that can take your place.
 
However, since the client chose to lie not 1 but 4 times without a proper explanation in the comments I am sticking to my earlier assessment of this clients character.

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

Also, FWIW, the user who left the 2 star review has, according to RentMen, sponsored/gifted 27 different escorts on the site, and has left a number of reviews, which mostly seem to be positive. And it's a 2 star review, not even a 1 star review... even great providers have people they just don't click with!

Does anyone else find it weird that the last two reviews are
 
August 24, 5 stars, from "Dwilli"
August 26, 2 stars, from "DaveWilliam" (premium user)
 
Seems like quite a coincidence.
 
Also, respectfully @freecahill1965, you keep repeating that this guy never met Wickedboy, but we don't know that. What we know is simply that Wickedboy says they never met. Not saying there is any reason to doubt that, especially given the nice things people here have had to say about him. But, we don't know for sure what happened, especially without an actual account from both people.

Also, FWIW, the user who left the 2 star review has, according to RentMen, sponsored/gifted 27 different escorts on the site, and has left a number of reviews, which mostly seem to be positive. And it's a 2 star review, not even a 1 star review... even great providers have people they just don't click with!

That's really helpful, thanks @Hung_Cody.
 
I haven't met him, but I definitely remember seeing his face (and his brawn) on Manhunt back in the day.

Also, FWIW, the user who left the 2 star review has, according to RentMen, sponsored/gifted 27 different escorts on the site, and has left a number of reviews, which mostly seem to be positive. And it's a 2 star review, not even a 1 star review... even great providers have people they just don't click with!

WickedBoy is a fantastic companion, my recommendation to my Boston area colleagues is to befriend him...he is looking to make Boston a regular stop and looking for some regular clients here. He is a real treat and a premium experience.....! :rolleyes::D:rolleyes:

Ah, I see. Yes, I don't want it to be role-play, either. But BFE for me is a short-hand for not wanting the session be a pump-and-dump experience.

There are as many reasons to hire an escort as there are clients. Ultimately everything about this hobby is based on creating a fantasy: the very basis of our interactions is paying for someone to spend time with us who would (normally) not do this without any sort of payment attached to it.
 
So I don't think wanting a BFE is delusional. Is it a fantasy? Absolutely. But so is hiring an escort to verbally abuse you or physically dominate you or even just have nothing else but mutual oral with. I see no difference between that and in wanting to have cuddles and being caressed, kissed and have an interest be taken in me (which I see as part of the BFE).
 
Some escorts and clients recoil at the thought of showing or undergoing affectionate touch or kissing deeply. Others can't even imagine having any sort of interaction without these present. Different folks, different strokes.
 
I agree with @TruHart1 's description. Beautifully put.

I hired him in June and had a great time. I was in the mood to get pounded by a bigger guy with a big dick and he definitely scratched that itch. However, he was definitely on the chunky/chubby/thick side....still very muscular but not cut like in his pics. I'm attracted to strong/thick guys so it wasn't a big deal. However, I generally attract those guys on Grindr and at bars for free, so I was a bit disappointed that I spent money when I could have had a similar guy for free.
 
If you're looking for a chiseled muscle guy you may want to see if you can get current pics before hiring; it's possible he's back i fighting shape. If you like 'em thick & hung but not necessarily cut, he's a great choice.

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

What a wonderful description of an exceptionally rewarding experience !

There's been a couple threads on this over in the Ask An Escort forum - above is what I feel best describes what BFE can mean.
 
Further reading: https://m4m-forum.org/threads/a-true-bfe.139729/

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

Ultimately, as @latbear4blk said, it's a useful expression. It's just a way of talking about things, it's vocabulary. And it's a good way of distinguishing between what @TruHart1 describes, and other things that are less relational (though not necessarily less awesome).
 
The tricky part, and the reason I think it can feel like a "fake" description, is of course that you can't simply manufacture that kind of personal connection. There has to be some kind of spark, some meshing of persons that is conducive to giving a shit about the other person. However, good providers are often skilled at finding ways to make that spark happen, both for themself and for the other party.
 
As a psychotherapist friend likes to say, "You can pay me for my professional services. You can't pay me to care about you. But I do care about other people, because I'm human, and when I care about a client it becomes a 100% relevant part of my professional services."
 
I've always parsed the phrase as meaning "an experience like you might have, for a few hours, with a boyfriend" -- not "the totality of what it's like to have a long-term boyfriend."

http://cdn.slowrobot.com/411201812114555401.jpg
 

 
http://img.sparknotes.com/content/sparklife/sparktalk/2013/auntie0926132013926_LargeWide.png