Golem

Lol indeed.

I'm confused, marylander, because you quoted my second sentence too, and that is exactly the thing I was discussing the drawbacks to in that sentence.

Well, yes and no. The train ain't free, so prices that are pretty reasonable in NY start to feel less exciting if you're going down just for that. There are cheap buses, but good luck having a relaxing day if you're taking one of those (let alone one each way)

Unless I'm crazy, the thread used to say August 25, so I think cahill was basically just saying we should go by what RM says.

The link says to July 23. Can you confirm that he's actually around till August 25?

https://rentmen.eu/RexStarXXL Very new ad, so this may not be a fruitful request, but... anyone with info to share?

Yeah, hotels are definitely ridiculous here. Rent is insane here, too, which further reduces the proportion of residents that have spending money. It does seem like every young person is doing the "settle down and get married" thing. I think the cause is actually how close we are to NYC. Boston has a lot going on but it will never be as frenetically fast-paced and in-your-face as NYC. So I would believe that live-for-the-moment types are more likely than others to hightail it over to New York, rather than sticking around here. And that means the population here is going to have fewer of them. Of course, I could just be talking out of my ass. I think we get more visits from top quality gents than most medium-sized U.S. cities do. It's just hard to feel like you have a decent selection when that... bulging menagerie is just a few hours down the road.

Well, we do put the cents symbol after the number in the U$A, and technically mike just wrote "the currency symbol"

I'll second the sentiment. Looks terrific.

They left under a cloud, after this thread (in which they stated they were going to cease development of the site now known as friendboy but, like everything else they stated, what actually happened speaks for itself). (Besides posting ads for providers without their knowledge or consent, they were also criticized for a scheme in which staff members potentially received free sessions in exchange for special verification/review on the website.)

Bumping re Billy Dubris. Still no takers?

Thanks, g, for setting me off on that carefully worded daydream.

Just chatted with him a bit; sounds like kissing is his primary limit. Oh well. FWIW, based on identical travel dates and the name "Logan" appearing on the Daddy's Reviews page, looks like he can be found at both of these accounts: https://rentmen.eu/LoganStud https://rentmen.eu/Therightmassage https://daddysreviews.com/search/Active/logan/logan_ftlauderdale

I think this is the key point here. And that's part of the reason that some of us, like @ITakeItDeep above, have a bad feeling when we listen to Max be charming as he apologizes. An apology can undo hurt feelings, but it can't undo a violation of privacy on the internet. So, when Max says whoops and tells his side of the story while still trying to be cool with everyone here and move on with life... there's a bit of a disjunction. I think this is something where providers and clients are in this together. If anything, providers have their personal information shared publicly in an unwanted and problematic way more often than clients do. IMHO, this thread should be a reminder to all of us that this line cannot be crossed. A charm offensive runs counter to that purpose.

After that lovely apology... I was surprised to see that there is still a name and phone number listed on twitter (here).

The juiciest of the many existing threads on him: https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/lucasstrom-411.122668/#post-1258069 I too would love to have the existing consensus proven wrong in this case, but it does seem to have come from many quarters...

It looks like they still have an old version of the site with male snugglers listed -- if you google it, some links go to that one. (It uses html files for each page instead of a different directory, in the URLs.) The explanation for the loss may be here, in the old application: "5-15 hours per week with completely flexible hours based on when you are free to work for female snugglers. Male snugglers rarely ever get any hours."

One angle that hasn't been mentioned: if it is clear that this is a problem 10, 15, or 30 minutes into a session, it is incumbent on the client to speak up at that point if it is taking away the value of the session for them. Up until then, it is basically a question of the provider matching their description. But once the client sees it and goes along with it anyway, without speaking up, the ball has been in their court. Paying less at that point would mean changing the agreement without informing the other party or getting their agreement -- which is obviously not fair.

Yes, we should: I am just going to repeat my request. Please stop turning threads with ACTUAL, USEFUL INFORMATION -- that should be accessible via the search function -- into bar brawls.

Definitely two of the same pics as Luke Cotter had.

bostonman, he did actually make a post about Cody Dean, in which he stated he was wrong about some of his earlier assumptions to correct them for the record. An excellent and helpful thing to do. He then immediately made two additional posts in which he insulted other posters. @former lurker , the last thread you did this in got hidden away from public view. Please stop turning threads with ACTUAL, USEFUL INFORMATION -- that should be accessible via the search function -- into bar brawls. It hides the information and is a public disservice. This needs to not be a pattern.

Ditto to this.

The issue here is that you both put time and resources into the potential meeting (along with good intentions). The original meeting time didn't work out. In this case it wasn't anyone's fault. But the fact is that the plan you both agreed on was not able to take place. When this was first apparent, you were able to agree on a backup plan instead. (The client wasn't thrilled, but he agreed nonetheless.) Cool! But that backup plan also didn't work out. You then suggested a third plan (the "pushing 11:30" plan) which the client did not agree to. This isn't a small adjustment to an agreed-upon plan, this is a schedule difference of 2 hours from the second plan (more than 4 from the first plan!). The first plan (and the second plan) didn't work out. Not anyone's fault. But that does not force either one of you to agree to a third plan. And it doesn't entitle you to what you expected to get out of the expired agreement. Exact parallel: if the client lost all his money, he would not be entitled to what he expected to get out of the original agreement, despite his inability to fulfill his end of it. He could make you a different offer instead, but you wouldn't be obligated to accept it -- and no one would expect you to give him a "cancellation service" due to the original agreement going away. (Edit: This would be a different situation if either one of you were at fault for the plan not working out, but it doesn't sound like that's the case. The client clearly was 0% at fault for it, anyway.)

Enough, meaning you have gone way beyond disagreeing with another poster, or even critiquing their stated actions, and are now attacking them as a person. Also, for the love of god, learn how to edit posts to add comments. Five posts in a row (one of which doesn't even have any actual content of yours?) over an hour or two is a little ridiculous.

Hahahaha. Have to admit I had the same thought...