IronMaus

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

I know it has been discussed here before. Visiting LA in two weeks and am into hung guys. Two that come to mind are Kristin and Jaycali. Any others that are legitimate?

A full panel STD test at Talent Testing Services uses only blood and urine analysis. This does NOT include a throat swab or a butt swab for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea. Yet this is all that most major (especially higher quality) studios require from both gay and straight performers for bareback and condom scenes alike. That's pretty silly, huh?
 
TIM may be "known" to use HIV+ performers, but its not a prerequisite and ALL of the studios use HIV+ performers. TIM depends on the guise of "unsafe" sex to maintain relevance, and in order to portray more realistic sex, they seek less inhibited models with a greater understanding of STD's. Higher quality studios are no more diligent about obtaining test results from their models, turn a blind eye to the lack of tests they require, and are much more likely to use chemicals and needles to keep their models dick's hard for a 30 minute scene that takes 12 hours to shoot. Think about that.
 
HIV+ men contract it through sex with someone who THOUGHT they were negative. NOT someone who is HIV+ and on meds and NOT someone who is on Truvada and tested regularly. The next time you have bareback sex with someone who insists they are negative but is not on Truvada, please keep in mind that they are a much higher risk than anyone else.
 
Honestly, it's up to the models to determine how safe a shoot is. We talk to each other. We share test results that some studios need only a vocal confirmation of. I am HIV- and on Truvada, and so is my dear friend Nate Grimes. We don't shoot if we've come up with something and we certainly don't take clients if we have or have been exposed to an STD. To believe otherwise because of the studios we shoot for is a grand assumption based on gossip and a lack of knowledge. You want two big dicked studs in LA to give you the ride of your life (or at least your summer) and not have to worry about STDs? Look no further.
 
Maus

If I may speak for myself -- this copy was not written by me, nor have I ever been consulted as to how I am described in promotional material. I am fully aware that some people may choose not to meet with me based upon what I have done in front of a camera, and I am ok with that. However, I will say that the studios do not speak for me, and what I have done in front of a camera is not always indicative of my personal sex practices. Let us not forget, porn is fantasy. I believe that the safest sex is sex that is the most informed, regardless of whether a condom is used or not. Direct communication and trust between partners is paramount. I take my health seriously, and the health of my clients even more so. If you have any questions or comments for me, do send me a private message. Very truly yours -- Nate.

Wow! Just wow!
That is just rude and uncalled for.

I think you most definitely ARE make such an implication and think it’s unfair and unfounded. Yes, everyone has to be aware, be safe, take precautions, but just because 2 people who happen to be good friends, engage in sexual acts knowing each are STD free does not make them irresponsible, or dangerous Mr. Robot.
 
I’ve been with @nategrimes several times and he’s always updated me on his health status, being tested regularly.
We’re currently attempting to coordinate a three way with @IronMaus

Kristian is fantastic and I hear great things about Iron Maus.

I have been with all 4 guys mentioned in this thread (Kristian, JayCal, IronMaus, and Nate Grimes). The only one I wouldn't repeat personally is JayCal. The other three are fantastic.

I’m not sure what you’re trying to imply but didn’t you just recommend Kayden Gray? Shouldn’t you be equally worried?
 
http://www.gaytimes.co.uk/news/73900/gay-porn-star-kayden-gray-reveals-hiv-positive-powerful-video/
 
FWIW I am a fan of both Nate Grimes and IronMaus

I third it. Just had @IronMaus in Chicago. Incredible time incredible man . Zero attitude, incredible sex.

From what I have read, this is very common on the straight side of the industry, but very rare on the gay side. This may have to do with the average physical power imbalance between men and women resulting in greater security concerns. Certainly, there are some crazy people out there and knowing someone’s identity could provide a sense of accountability for misbehavior. On the other hand, providing this information comes with its own set of risks. During coverage of a major local “sting” operation, I recall the authorities expressing shock that people would freely give out their drivers’ license, employee ID badge, etc. Of course, after such an operation, people are far less likely to be so forthcoming in the future. In this way, the government authorities inadvertently discourage a safety/screening method and make life more dangerous for those they are supposedly trying to protect.

Many of the best experiences I've had with clients begins with me contacting them. I only do this if there is enough information in there profile for me to decide that we would be compatible.

I ask for a name, but not a full name. Sometimes a photo. Typically a phone number and a (first) name is enough to work with.

Many of the best experiences I've had with clients begins with me contacting them. I only do this if there is enough information in there profile for me to decide that we would be compatible.

Many of the best experiences I've had with clients begins with me contacting them. I only do this if there is enough information in there profile for me to decide that we would be compatible.

For what it's worth... I've never asked a clients last name... If they want you to know, they'll share it with you

that has sorta happened to me when I've made a bunch of inquiries in a row and don't write down names and numbers......you can try replying to the text with an honest explanation that you forgot who he was, but that may not work.....certainly could look questionable and suspicious to the provider.....

Funny....I just got a phone call from someone I texted. I don't have an account on RM. Imagine my surprise when I got the call. The guy on the other end told me his name and was calling me to see if I was interested. I let the call go to VM just incase it was a robocall. He then texted me and started giving me all this info, but I totally forgot who he was on the website. I think it pissed him off and he hasn't responded to my texts.

I have a completely filled out profile, and it’s amazing how many people I’ve hired haven’t read it. Especially funny when they say they didn’t know I was black, because I fill it out to make sure it’s known. Luckily I haven’t been turned away because of it.
 
I’ve only been interested in one guy that contacted me first, but it was right before my hiatus. Now that I’m back, he’s gone.

well my pics look good so they contact me to tell me they want me and they want to do what I want, so win win win win for me

beg to differ.
 
i have a complete "client" profile and because i live in a rather crowded market (New York City) escorts who contact me jump to the front of the line for me. and if they have actually read my profile, i am super likely to hire them.