saminseattle

HAPPY BIRTHDAY KEVIN
 

 
Thanks for showing us how it's done with sexiness, intelligence, and style.
 
Hope you have a wonderful day.

I am very sorry that this happened to you, Victor. Having experienced a few no shows and last-second cancellations myself, I understand it can be very frustrating. And even more so if one’s livelihood is negatively affected. But regarding the suggestion to post someone’s phone number…I just have to wonder if that is the right approach. In fact, I thought I remembered reading somewhere that that kind of thing is generally verboten here under terms of service, though perhaps @Guy Fawkes could clarify that. I did see a couple of posts where these kinds of issues were discussed in the past:
 
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/warning-from-an-escort.89901/
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/no-show-clients-do-you-post-their-numbers-online-to-warn-other-escorts.113122/
 
Certainly, there have been a number of occasions when warnings about alleged escort scammers have been barred, for example:
 
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/warning.123096/
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/warning-dont-go-to-this-liar.122912/
https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/warning-hungpolo-in-nyc.120947/

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

For some people, like me, a 1% chance still sounds too high. But people should know that based on all the research, the odds of HIV being transmitted through condomless anal sex if the HIV-positive partner is undetectable are far, far, far, far less than 1%. Indeed, there has never been a recorded case of such transmission and after studies covering tens of thousands of such sexual encounters, the best estimate for the chances of transmission from someone who is undetectable is zero. http://www.beyondpositive.org/2014/03/06/study-reports-hiv-transmission-undetectable-men/ Recently, the CDC issued a memo admitting that that HIV-positive people who are able to maintain an undetectable status (defined as less than 200 copies per milliliter) are simply not infectious. https://www.hivplusmag.com/undetectable/2017/9/27/breaking-cdc-officially-recognizes-undetectableuntransmittable-hiv-prevention
 
So, as an example, if I had condomless anal sex with someone who was HIV-positive but undetectable, my odds of contracting HIV would actually be less than if I used a condom with someone whose status I did not know, who could potentially be positive. (Remember, condoms have a failure rate significantly greater than zero and some studies suggest that in the real world, where people don't necessarily use them perfectly, they may only be about 80% effective. http://www.thebodypro.com/content/70694/condoms-tried-tested-and-true.html).
 
Of course, I can't know if someone is really undetectable any more than I can know if he is really HIV-negative. A few people lie, and many people have gaps between tests and are simply unaware. Plus, there are many other STIs to worry about, some incurable, and condoms can provide some protection again these risks. So, my answer to the original question would be that I would have sex with someone who told me he was HIV-positive but undetectable, but I would still use condoms for anal sex, just as I would with someone who told me he was HIV-negative.

I've stayed in hundreds of hotels all over the world....never once had a sexual encounter with the staff.
 
I was taught early on...."Don't fuck the help"
 
Just this last week I had a bellman in NYC linger in my room.
He asked me three or four times if there was anything else he could help me with.....
I just had flashbacks to Dominique Strauss-Kahn.....
 
"No thanks...I'm fine"
 
Don't fuck the help!

I know you know this, but deciding to bareback without first being on routine PrEP is incredibly risky.
 
While you have trust in these men, the only person you can truly trust 100% with your health is yourself. Get the bloodwork done and get onto PrEP now. And as other replies have posted, be aware of the wide variety of STDs that PrEP doesn't protect you against. Vaccinate against what you can.

I get to see him on a regular basis and I, too, give him thumbs way up! Wonderful body, great personality and he's exciting to be with!!! :)
 
TruHart1

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.

I appreciate the importance of sharing information, especially to avoid scams of various kinds and certainly to avoid physically dangerous situations. At the same time, one concern I have about inviting people to critique escorts on an anonymous forum is that there is no vetting process and in most cases no opportunity to hear “the other side of the story.” This really does not seem fair when someone’s livelihood is on the line and his reputation can be sullied by gossip or innuendo. I believe there have been incidents in the past where clients and/or escorts have joined the forum simply to cause trouble, making false claims to hurt someone’s business, whether out of a rivalry with a competitor or a misguided attempt to “get back” at someone who rejected their requests or offended them in some minor way. I know it’s not your intent to create some kind of “all out bitch fest,” but I think we need to tread carefully here.
 
Having said all that, I don’t mind saying that I would personally avoid “Sexy Mega Pornstar Brodie Sinclair” who claims to be “Rentmensfinest.” IMHO, discretion is the number one rule in this business, and he has demonstrably transgressed it. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/escort-outs-conde-nasts-cfo.106197/ In addition, he is reputed to be “batshit crazy.” https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/#post-1041585 So yeah, he’s probably one to avoid.