coriolis888

Interacting by phone and hearing his voice for 3 or 4 minutes can yield valuable info & intuition about a guy that texts or emails often will not.

I'm not an escort, but if you read other threads in the deli section, it seems RM's reviews are anything but reliable.
 
I've always tried to rely on the more detailed reviews on daddys website as well as the collective wisdom of members of this forum. I think sometimes a bit of luck helps too.
 
Even with the help of this board and daddys I've had my share of dud hires...
 
Good luck!

I emailed him and got a courteous and friendly response also. He requested that I wait until he is actually in town before making a firm appointment. I guess that is OK. He is supposed to arrive in Seattle on Thursday.

A poster to this forum has given me several referrals of guys he has personally met. All of his referrals have been great to excellent.
 
The poster has met Mr Carlos and highly recommended him to me.
 
I have been trying to get that poster to write a few words of endorsement in this thread. He said he will post something good. I have been waiting for his response.
 
I have also communicated with the escort via his ad. His responses have been polite and timely. The escort lives in Dallas.
 
I will contact the forum poster again to see what is causing the delay in his posting about the escort. With luck, we should see something soon.

He travels a lot. Also, his telephone number is a Los Angeles number.
 
He seems friendly when communicating with him.
 
His photos are certainly impressive.

Well, I know who I will not hire.

Yes sir, all escorts websites have fakes. No exceptions.

My response is not intended to be rude.
 
To say that Adam4Adam "has fakes, too" is like asking which escort ad agency has honest ads.
 
No escort site has a high track record for honest ads. Many ads are genuine while many are misleading or out and out frauds.
 
Take a look at the rent men site. If a negative review is posted to an escort's site, usually, within days the negative review vanishes. One can hardly say that practice is honest.
 
Even when rentboy was around, a huge amount a escort ads had stolen or severely outdated photos.
 
It should come as no surprise that A4A also contains bogus ads.
 
Birds of a feather, flock together.

I don't think there is any problem when you share diverse pictures. At least I would not mind going through 50 pictures that show me 50 different sides, styles, characters, etc. but some guys post 20 pictures of their dick, or always the same character and fashion. Definitely a turn off.

I post a slew of photos in an attempt to give potential clients less of a fantasy about what I look like and more of a reality of what I actually look like. More photos give more insight into my appearance even on my bad days. I don't want to appear so hideous as to turn too many people away, but I am willing to present a more complete picture of myself rather than my best self and let the chips fall where they may. I would rather meet the people who will take me at my ugliest than the people who think I'm just borderline attractive enough to be worth hiring.
 
Showing less is ultimately sexier and more attractive than showing more, but I personally feel more comfortable presenting a more comprehensive image of myself rather than luring people in. I'm not trying to look my best on screen just to look worse when I meet someone in person.

A bad review that says the photos are not accurate plus a session that was not relaxing - "48 hours" is generous.
 
I agree with your comment "less than 48 hours"
 
The"escort" will have an unblemished ad, complete with all 5 star reviews.
 
Then, the escort will be ready for the next person to deceive.

A bad review that says the photos are not accurate plus a session that was not relaxing - "48 hours" is generous.
 
I agree with your comment "less than 48 hours"
 
The"escort" will have an unblemished ad, complete with all 5 star reviews.
 
Then, the escort will be ready for the next person to deceive.

A bad review that says the photos are not accurate plus a session that was not relaxing - "48 hours" is generous.
 
I agree with your comment "less than 48 hours"
 
The"escort" will have an unblemished ad, complete with all 5 star reviews.
 
Then, the escort will be ready for the next person to deceive.

Right, $350 to show up.
 
Any activity from him, other than just standing there posing for an hour is extra.
 
EDIT:

Correction - He does not charge for each activity. When communicating with him via text, that is how his answer appeared although, in person, everything is included in his rate.

Now Mr. Unicorn, take a cold shower.

He has a Miami phone number listed on rentmen.
 
You can call him to see if his apparent charm also exits in his voice.

Emailed the guy and got a response a couple days later. FYI he charges $300, will be in and around the Seattle area for about 10 days, doesn't do in calls, and requests to be called only on the day of the proposed meet up presumably to see if he is available. I am trying to figure out just how that is supposed to work. Think I will give this one a pass.

There is no logical reason the escort needs the information that he asks for in his questionnaire.
 
Any client that answers the personal questions asked makes the client extremely vulnerable to any whim of the escort.
 
Privacy and/or confidentiatity of the client disintegrates upon submission of a completed questionnaire.

let's not piss off MrMB with all this criticism, though some of the suggestions are very important for him to consider....we've chased off a few other good escorts over the years with the board's drama (though some deserved chasing off).....don't take it too seriously, MB, and stay in touch around here.....you'll notice several other escorts maintain an effective presence here, too

I think that's what he's saying... at least now. But there are mixed messages coming from him. On his website, under the contact tab, he writes: "For those who are new-comers, shy, or busy and on the go, I have provided an easy to use form below." This is the infamous form that requests the client's real name, phone number, email address, age, occupation, location, etc.
 
On that same page, he notes that you are allowed to text or call him, but he adds: "When texting or calling, please fill [sic] free to use the contact form below as a guide to provide all necessary information about you and our future meeting." In other words, if you call or text him, you should still provide "all necessary information" requested on the form, even if you don't use the actual form.
 
This point is reinforced under the bookings & rates tab, where it is stated: "Please fill out the submission form, if you are hoping for a faster response send me a text message and be sure to include your: Name, age, occupation, location, and day and time you would like to meet."
 
In this forum, however, MrMattBig has appeared to walk back a bit on the form itself and wishes to convey that the form is intended to address only three central concerns of his:
 
"1. The prospective client is not law enforcement.
2. The prospective client is serious about meeting.
3. The prospective client will treat me with the upmost [sic] respect."
 
It is doubtful that the form will help him accomplish his first goal. It is more likely that the form will help him with his second goal. (Who in their right mind would fill out the form if they weren't serious?) And I can only assume that it will also help him with his third goal, insofar as MrMattBig will have sufficient data to blackmail his clients if they don't treat him with the "upmost [sic] respect."

davidrman: your post may not last as "reviews" aren't allowed in these forums....and, being a new member, a glittering review is sometimes suspect....believe it or not, some fakery and deception occurs here!
 
please submit a review here:
 
http://daddysreviews.com/submit

You should write a review. Your post seems suspicious to me. . Just a thought.

While you furnished a very long denial of certain comments that were made, I noticed that you did not mention the very detailed and intrusive questionnaire you require from prospective clients.
 
Your questionnaire asks for a prospective client's REAL first and last name and other personal information about the person contacting you. The questionnaire is as though a client were applying to purchase some tangible item.
 
In this world where trust is not instant, I think your requirements are not reasonable.
 
But, reasonable people can disagree.
 
Your "contract" or application is found at your linked website in the first post of this thread.

Billy's yes I know... isn't that one of the reasons you and I don't like him, to be honest the only difference is that you don't like the fact that he's old and I don't mind an escort in his 40's as long as he looks good or great like in this case.
 

 
I am really confused. I goofed in my last post which caused my post to combine itself with another post.
 
It was not my intention to imply that I did not like him because he is supposedly old (40).
 
My point was to say that an escort who charges $450.00 an hour, doing bareback, at age 40 is excessive.
 
Actually, $450,00 is excessive based on what I see from other escort ads.
 
He might be a nice guy. My personal opinion is that $450,00 per hour is too high. He might get many clients at that price, I do not know.

40 years old, barebacking and charging $450.00 an hour.
 
As I said the other day, even my lawyer doesn't charge these rates.
 
Good luck to him if he can get that kind of money.
 
-