coriolis888

The process to retrieve those old ads is often somewhat time-consuming. There are no new Backpage or Craigslist ads. New ads are not accepted because of foolish rules created by people like Trump and his henchmen. I personally did not archive the ads, but remember, nothing on the internet ever really is deleted. The "deleted" material is merely inaccessible unless you know how to retrieve it. Here is more data of the Backpage guy you like - https://backpage.com.memphis.listcrawler.com/post/26448946/ Remember, the Backpage ads are several years old. The guy is using the same photos in his current ads that he used in the Backpage ads. He may not look at good today as he did when the photos were taken.

Back before Backpage and Craigslist removed the personal ads, this guy used to advertise in Memphis - Here is his Backpage ad that shows some of his interesting photos. He is probably okay given the length of time he has been advertising without any bad reports: https://yandex.com/images/search?pos=1&url=https://media.rentmen.eu/public/photos/thumb/68/433700_1560825727_4b52ahc4j4.jpg&img_url=https://img2.lodef.net/imgs/f/6/5/6/f6565f508c96fac898ab2aaaacd74cd7_f.jpg&rpt=imagelike

Don't you mean "some" clients? All due respect, blonds do nothing for me. Most of my friends feel the same way.

Given the facts and circumstances of the matter, it appears that Austin Wolf is a mean-spirited individual who had no concern for the flight attendant or the potential of losing his job by posting the video to social media. It is very costly to sue. Most likely, the former flight attendant would not have the resources to sue Austin Wolf. Moreover, it is unlikely an attorney would take the potential lawsuit on a contingency basis. Bad lesson learned by the former flight attendant.

Thanks for posting the link to the video. I knew only that the flight attendant said he did not know he was being recorded. The film clearly disputes his false claim. As is said, "a picture paints a thousand words" which leaves no credibility for the flight attendant to claim lack of knowledge in connection with the video. However, it is possible the flight attendant did not know that the video would be sent out on social media. That escapade on the flight was quite expensive for the flight attendant in that he lost his job over it. That was a severe penalty. Had the flight attendant not been in uniform in the video, he might not have been fired by Delta Airlines.

Thanks for your response. How do I watch the video? I do not see a link on the article that reported the event.

Did you read the news article at the provided link in my post? It specifically stated that the male flight attendant did NOT know he was being videotaped.

He must be a nice guy to take a video of a supposed secret sexual encounter in an aircraft restroom with a male flight attendant then publishing the video on social media. The flight attendant was subsequently fired: http://www.ladbible.com/news/news-flight-attendant-suspended-after-having-sex-with-adult-film-star-20181019

I hope you can cancel in time. He is a total fake. Just today one of his cock photos dates back to 2015 and he is using a different name for that photo - Here is a photo of a search on tineye: https://www.tineye.com/search/5b1f10e44b8df0f54974d34612b3735545b619aa?page=1 rentmen.com SEXYLAD/ - First found on Dec 02, 2015 SEXYLAD - First found on Dec 02, 2015 view all 4 matches Filename: 119850_1445446320_dg6t8fwdet.jpg (469 x 400, 21.7 KB) rentmen.com HOTLUCASXXL/ - First found on Mar 23, 2016 HOTLUCASXXL - First found on Mar 22, 2016 Filename: 144186_1456889426_3m6dqrj25b.jpg (469 x 400, 21.8 KB) rentmen.com photos/ - First found on Jun 18, 2015 Filename: 2w7n932nq5q38pb3k9fqzak8z.jpg (323 x 275, 12.8 KB) Good luck on getting away from this faker and who knows what else he is.

It appears the fake advertiser was also not familiar with the search engine. Had he known about it, he would not have put up his stolen (borrowed) cock photo.

Inconsistency after inconsistency - today his ad says he is in Las Vegas, earlier it said San Diego - you said Ft Lauderdale - The photos of the cock that is in his ad are not his cock. Just do a tineye search and you will find the same cock photos in EIGHT different places on the internet. In short, the guy is a scammer and is not truthful. Here is a current tineye result: https://www.tineye.com/search/6628776b74aa56369cdc45b1b9b9d806cb6c1817?page=1

If that were so, why would he use photos that are nearly a decade old? Why would he mix his photos in his ad with the photos of other guys? No, I suspect the guy who placed the ad is a scammer.

Catching scams is one of the reasons we are sharing information. Take care.

This ass shot from four years ago belonging to a different person, is this the one you mean? https://yandex.com/images/search?pos=0&url=https://media.rentmen.eu/public/photos/thumb/59/380684_1546911117_yatf3jem87.jpg&img_url=https://i.pinimg.com/736x/9f/83/b6/9f83b68e57d4f1b1264a4af0903fdc3e--male-photography-beautiful-men.jpg&rpt=imagelike This advertiser is not using his own photos. What is he trying to hide? At a minimum, he is not being honest. Would you trust this person?

Look at the photo in his ad. Then compare his ad photos with the many photos in the link I provided. The photos do not match. Also, look at the date of the photos I provided. The photos that I provided are almost a decade old. I smell a fake.

Here is a link to several photos of the guy whose cock is shown in the ad. It seems the photos were "borrowed" for the ad. Be careful Here is the link - scroll down for the cock photo used in the ad: http://www.manhuntdaily.com/cock-a-doodle-do-me-emilio/

[quote

Speaking of aircraft food, how about this? https://thepointsguy.com/news/airplane-food-expiration-date/ The most disgusting part of the article is this: "Next time you’re chowing down at 35,000 feet, you might catch a glimpse of your meal’s manufacture date and discover that your produce and protein were put into that little plastic tub months ago — maybe even more than a year before your flight." Yikes - - - -

Ah, ha! Now it makes sense. Thanks much.

You might not realize it but he did you a favor. Suppose his nasty personality had not shown through until you two actually met. If you two had met and his rudeness then became evident, you would be out money to give him for his time. This way, you are out nothing except for a bit of a hurt feeling from his rejection. Lucky you.

Unless you hold a strong allegiance to a particular airline, you might want to give United another chance even if only to try its Polaris lounge. Smisek is long gone. The quality of the restaurant food in the Polaris lounges is equal to any fine non-airline restaurant. There is also a buffet in the Polaris lounges. That buffet food is nothing special.

This does not answer my question - how will a coat and smile get better service on an airplane?

Please call me dumb. I cannot imagine what service is improved? You get assigned a seat on the flight, during the flight you are served food or a beverage or nothing, depending on the class of service you fly or your preference. I cannot imagine what improvement a passenger would get if the passenger wore a coat and smiled at a flight attendant. I don't mean to be difficult. I am just not able to see how a coat and a smile would improve service that you already get merely by being a passenger. Maybe I will try your technique on my next flight.

I have also - We each have our opinion of what is good or bad or in between -

I suspect that you have not tried the Polaris lounges. I would think the same as you regarding most airline food. However, Polaris lounges are unique. That is why I think they might not last long. They far outshine the AA lounge counterpart. And, no, I do not represent United Airlines.