coriolis888

Very pragmatic, in my opinion!

The escort had two different screen names then was a bad experience for a client. I am always suspicious when an escort changes a screen name. Changing screen names is one way to get rid of bad reviews and a bad reputation.

Hi, thanks for the advice and for the link to a search method. However, the link to the escort being discussed is still not shown. It is no wonder the person asking the question does not get any answers concerning the escort he finds interesting.

Something must be wrong with my computer or my eyes - I cannot see a link for the escort in question. Without a link or a name, it is next to impossible to offer any past experience. "Yea I’ve asked about this guy before and no one responded with feedback." No link is probably why you do not get any responses about the escort. I do see a couple of earlier requests for a link to the escort but I do not see any link. Where is my eye doctor or my computer repairman?

Not all negative reviews are deleted on rentmen. I wrote a negative review of a scammer using photos that were not of him. I also wrote some uncomplimentary truthful comments about the guy. The reviews are still there after several months. I noticed that the fake escort has now let his ad expire. The ad will disappear soon. That is a way a fake escort can get rid of bad reviews by letting an ad expire. He can then open a new ad with other stolen photos and a new name.

Please tell me that you don't really believe what you just wrote. Those of us who formerly enjoyed Montreal before its major decline, certainly are not "MTL Village haters" as you just erroneously claimed in your post above. Quite simply, we do not want to waste our time and money to visit Montreal, a formerly fun place that has materially declined in many ways, street drugs being the worst factor. Hate is a strong word. Where in the world did you get that idea? Hate! My goodness. Rather than "hate" Montreal (as you falsely claimed without any logical basis), we moved on to other cities and places that offer enjoyment that we no longer find in Montreal village. Furthermore, drugs have taken over much of the village and I wonder why you did not acknowledge that fact. We who truthfully responded about the decline of Montreal have no reason to "convince someone" (you) that you should not like what you like. By all means, continue to like Montreal. I don't know you and do not care if you want to ignore the changes in Montreal. By the way, who said you should not like Montreal? One more thing to consider - don't you find it strange that this forum used to have countless posts telling how great Montreal was but over the past several years, not one post has anything good to say about Montreal? Being in denial must not be fun.

"Hyperbole/exaggeration & confirmation bias operating here?" Not at all! You wrote - - -" - - - as a former visitor who established residency downtown here some 17 years ago, my assessment is that things have not changed much qualitatively overall.- - - My response to your comment is that if I had made an investment in Montreal real estate and established residency as you say you did, and if I saw my investment and change of residency go downhill, I might be inclined to be in denial, as you seem to be. Don't you think it odd that the Montreal posts section of this forum used to be filled with posters telling how much they enjoyed Montreal? Now, there is rarely a post except to complain about how Montreal has deteriorated in the gay village - Ste. Catherine street specifically. [MEDIA=reddit]montreal/comments/63nedc[/MEDIA]

The gay village is a mere ghost of what it was several years back. The great restaurants and shops are closed (out of business). The people walking up and down Ste Catherines have been converted from normal to druggies. The street hustlers are almost non-existent anymore (unless you want to settle for a druggie). On lucky afternoons and nights, the Campus has some acceptable hustlers, but not many. On Wednesday, you will find "ladies night" at Campus - otherwise, Campus is hit or miss, mostly miss. Why bother to go there for what little that remains unless you want to get bummed out. One nice thing, the city is pretty and there are some cultural things to see. How is that for an "update" - ?

I am willing to bet that he will not contact you unless you contact him on the 29th! Even then, I hope you don't - the guy has too many red flags that indicate nothing but a big disappointment for you if you meet with him. Then, I could be wrong. I have been known to be wrong, every now and again.

Hilarious, this fake poster claims to be age 21. However, if you look at the date of one of his cock photos, the photo was taken in 2013 which would mean he was age 15 at the time of the photoshoot. the same photo was used in many other places with different years assigned to the same photo. That is nonsense. He is not even a good liar. Here is a link to the 2013 photo and other dates of the same photo: https://www.tineye.com/search/fc07e689869575ffdf12badaff862e2b4dd44ace?page=1 Better to avoid this fraudster.

Hi, it has been only one and one-half years ago when all that nonsense started about imaginary sex trafficking. Check this out: https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/23/17155110/craigslist-personal-ads-anti-sex-trafficking-bill Of course, it was Trump who signed the bill that caused the end of escort advertising as it was once known. Although I read many ads on Craigslist and Backpage, I never saw any children advertised as claimed in Trump's bill. Then, he is not the most truthful person around.

Very Trumpish, indeed!

Am I misreading the post? The link you provided says the escorts are blond. However, when you look at the photos at the links, it shows dark-haired guys. It also says that the rentmen profiles of each escort is expired. https://rentmen.eu/KenBlond_VIP - bleached hair with expired ad - https://rentmen.eu/MichaelDom - a dark-haired guy with expired ad - Something seems amiss here unless my screen monitor is playing tricks with me or the expired ad shows photos without sufficient lighting.

The process to retrieve those old ads is often somewhat time-consuming. There are no new Backpage or Craigslist ads. New ads are not accepted because of foolish rules created by people like Trump and his henchmen. I personally did not archive the ads, but remember, nothing on the internet ever really is deleted. The "deleted" material is merely inaccessible unless you know how to retrieve it. Here is more data of the Backpage guy you like - https://backpage.com.memphis.listcrawler.com/post/26448946/ Remember, the Backpage ads are several years old. The guy is using the same photos in his current ads that he used in the Backpage ads. He may not look at good today as he did when the photos were taken.

Back before Backpage and Craigslist removed the personal ads, this guy used to advertise in Memphis - Here is his Backpage ad that shows some of his interesting photos. He is probably okay given the length of time he has been advertising without any bad reports: https://yandex.com/images/search?pos=1&url=https://media.rentmen.eu/public/photos/thumb/68/433700_1560825727_4b52ahc4j4.jpg&img_url=https://img2.lodef.net/imgs/f/6/5/6/f6565f508c96fac898ab2aaaacd74cd7_f.jpg&rpt=imagelike

Don't you mean "some" clients? All due respect, blonds do nothing for me. Most of my friends feel the same way.

Given the facts and circumstances of the matter, it appears that Austin Wolf is a mean-spirited individual who had no concern for the flight attendant or the potential of losing his job by posting the video to social media. It is very costly to sue. Most likely, the former flight attendant would not have the resources to sue Austin Wolf. Moreover, it is unlikely an attorney would take the potential lawsuit on a contingency basis. Bad lesson learned by the former flight attendant.

Thanks for posting the link to the video. I knew only that the flight attendant said he did not know he was being recorded. The film clearly disputes his false claim. As is said, "a picture paints a thousand words" which leaves no credibility for the flight attendant to claim lack of knowledge in connection with the video. However, it is possible the flight attendant did not know that the video would be sent out on social media. That escapade on the flight was quite expensive for the flight attendant in that he lost his job over it. That was a severe penalty. Had the flight attendant not been in uniform in the video, he might not have been fired by Delta Airlines.

Thanks for your response. How do I watch the video? I do not see a link on the article that reported the event.

Did you read the news article at the provided link in my post? It specifically stated that the male flight attendant did NOT know he was being videotaped.

He must be a nice guy to take a video of a supposed secret sexual encounter in an aircraft restroom with a male flight attendant then publishing the video on social media. The flight attendant was subsequently fired: http://www.ladbible.com/news/news-flight-attendant-suspended-after-having-sex-with-adult-film-star-20181019

I hope you can cancel in time. He is a total fake. Just today one of his cock photos dates back to 2015 and he is using a different name for that photo - Here is a photo of a search on tineye: https://www.tineye.com/search/5b1f10e44b8df0f54974d34612b3735545b619aa?page=1 rentmen.com SEXYLAD/ - First found on Dec 02, 2015 SEXYLAD - First found on Dec 02, 2015 view all 4 matches Filename: 119850_1445446320_dg6t8fwdet.jpg (469 x 400, 21.7 KB) rentmen.com HOTLUCASXXL/ - First found on Mar 23, 2016 HOTLUCASXXL - First found on Mar 22, 2016 Filename: 144186_1456889426_3m6dqrj25b.jpg (469 x 400, 21.8 KB) rentmen.com photos/ - First found on Jun 18, 2015 Filename: 2w7n932nq5q38pb3k9fqzak8z.jpg (323 x 275, 12.8 KB) Good luck on getting away from this faker and who knows what else he is.

It appears the fake advertiser was also not familiar with the search engine. Had he known about it, he would not have put up his stolen (borrowed) cock photo.

Inconsistency after inconsistency - today his ad says he is in Las Vegas, earlier it said San Diego - you said Ft Lauderdale - The photos of the cock that is in his ad are not his cock. Just do a tineye search and you will find the same cock photos in EIGHT different places on the internet. In short, the guy is a scammer and is not truthful. Here is a current tineye result: https://www.tineye.com/search/6628776b74aa56369cdc45b1b9b9d806cb6c1817?page=1

If that were so, why would he use photos that are nearly a decade old? Why would he mix his photos in his ad with the photos of other guys? No, I suspect the guy who placed the ad is a scammer.