-
Posts
10,338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Donations
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by RadioRob
-
As @keroscenefire noted, PMs are doable. The rest are not default features. I'll add it to the wish list and see if there are any plugins that could possibly support some of this. If not, I'll note it for my rounds of custom coding.
-
One other note I'm going to add here... as @Coolwave35 noted, we don't discuss actions taken by moderators but given this is framed around a generality and not around a specific scenario I'll give a few thoughts: Posts that are simply in the wrong forum, etc are not issued warnings. They're simply moved with no warnings given. We still ask people to use the "Report" feature to draw our attention to something, be it a rule violation or just general housekeeping. But the moderators are smart enough to know when to issue warnings and when something is just cleanup. If a warning is issued by a moderator, those warnings can be issued with or without warning points being associated with them. In general, if someone does violate our community guidelines... if this was their first time doing so, we will issue a zero point warning. This is simply a way to notify the member (privately) that something is not allowed and to draw their attention to it. Our warning system requires the person to acknowledge the warning which includes the reason why it was issued and what content was involved. They are unable to post or take action until the warning is acknowledged. This allows us to make sure they are 100% aware of the situation so there is no question around "I didn't know". If a person has been warned previously and/or the violation was of a more serious nature... we may forgo the zero point warning and associate warning points with the violation. Historically the number of warning points given was just the number noted in the Community Guidelines. However we have recently changed how we issue warning points to use the Guidelines as a "max warning". For example, an attack against other people according to the guidelines is a 10 point violation. We might start with a zero point warning. If it happens again, issue a 5 point warning. If it happens again, issue a 10 point warning. Those points typically stay "active" on a person's account for 6 months. (Think of these like DMV points on your license... you get enough points assessed and you lose your license). Just receiving a warning (and even some warning points) does not automatically result in banning. Bans are based on the number of ACTIVE warning points when the new warning is issued. When a threshold is crossed, that is how long a person is banned for. You can find the exact number of points required and the length of time for each threshold in the guidelines themselves. In looking through all of the bans in the system, the only ones done without prior warnings have been those involving spam where a spammer registered an account and was just posting crap. In those cases, we flag those accounts as spam which automatically bans new content AND automatically deletes all posts by that account. Now... with all of that said, if you have additional questions about how warnings work, I would recommend using the Contact Us feature. I don't want to derail the original topic at hand, but I did want to add a few public thoughts on this.
-
In general, I've operated under the model of "you praise in public and critique in private". Maintaining a "Wall of Shame" post of everyone banned/suspended would be difficult: It's more work to maintain. Most bans are temporary in nature. Not only would we have to manually add someone to the list, we would have to remember to remove them from it later. It would call out publicly that the person was breaking the site rules. By posting this, it can be seen as another form of punishment by calling the person out. It leads to conversations about actions taken by moderators when that post is updated which as has been noted is against the community guidelines. With that being said however, I understand the need to do a virtual "wellness check" on someone who has disappeared. In those cases, I would recommend using the Contact Us feature to note your concern. A moderator can reach out to the person via email (given that is our only method of contact). If the person is suspended, we would simply note back after a day or so that we've heard back and they're fine. If they're not suspended and we don't hear back, we would note just saying we've not gotten a reply either. This would allow us to maintain discretion around a person's disciplinary status while also not overly worry someone else.
-
Published by DPA People generally don’t show their best side in a crisis like the pandemic. In times like these, unresolved conflicts become particularly clear. Christin Klose/dpa The coronavirus crisis has put a serious strain on many aspects of our lives. Many couples’ relationship has been sorely tested too. “Like a fire accelerant,” crises intensify unresolved conflicts, points out Dominik Borde, a relationship coach in Vienna. He’s not the only couples therapist expecting a wave of break-ups and divorces on the back of the Covid-19 pandemic. Berlin-based psychotherapist Holger Kuntze, for example, reports a veritable stampede for counselling by couples with relationship problems. The number has increased by more than a third, he says. This doesn’t surprise the therapists. For one thing, people who are fearful and in difficulties – as during a pandemic – typically don’t show themselves from their best side. And the crisis has shifted many people’s focus. Fulfilling long-held dreams has taken on new urgency. People are asking themselves how they really want to live, and with whom. Kuntze divides couples who were locked down together into two groups. For one group, the forced togetherness was hell: Long-simmering conflicts boiled over and many a partner decided that the relationship wasn’t worth continuing. In the other group, the partners made things cosy for themselves. “They reconnected and enjoyed the extended time together. But the normal daily routine is now back, they’ve got the same problems and are frustrated,” Kuntze says. “The extensive restrictions on our freedom have made many of us realize that life isn’t endless and we don’t have forever to fulfil lifelong dreams that we’ve always put off,” says Borde. The kinds of couples that are especially at risk of a break-up, in his view, are the ones prone to blaming each other for things that go wrong. The same goes for those who have never learned to manage their emotions and build relationships. But self-improvement is possible if they draw on their pandemic experiences, Borde says. Kuntze advises couples to discuss what each partner has learned during the coronavirus crisis. This could reveal common ground and facilitate compromise, he says, but adds they’ve got a problem if it turns out their takes are very different. “If one partner doesn’t want to resume the couple’s pre-lockdown lifestyle, while the other thinks it was just as it should be, there’s trouble ahead,” Kuntze remarks. To illustrate his point, he cites a couple that shared a love of cultural activities before the pandemic hit. One partner sorely missed not being able to go to the opera, theatre and exhibitions during the lockdown, while the other didn’t and discovered it was far more enjoyable to be outdoors surrounded by nature. “Something like this shakes up everything, of course,” says Kuntze. Ideally, couples use these differences to recalibrate their relationship, which he likens to the “moulting process” of animals that shed old feathers, hair, or skin to make way for new growth. If the couple fails to reconcile their differences and splits, one partner is usually the instigator and also gets over the break-up more easily. The decision is typically prompted not only by current problems, but with the past and future in mind too – ie the relationship may never have been particularly satisfying and/or its prospects may not be promising. Kuntze says the instigator should explain his or her motives and be sensitive to the rejected partner’s feelings. “You shouldn’t summarily brush aside your partner’s pain,” he says, “for example with the excruciating line, ‘Let’s stay friends.’ People want to be seen, heard and taken seriously.” Most couples can’t handle such a one-on-one talk though, according to Kuntze, who says one partner’s heartache or the other’s impatience are usually impediments. So he recommends that they go to a therapist. Borde, for his part, recommends seeing a therapist when you’re struggling to decide whether to continue or to end a relationship. A therapist, he says, can help you recognize your share of the responsibility for the problems and avoid repeating your mistakes – be it in your current relationship or any future ones. Pandemic Conflicts on Towleroad U.S. Senate Democrats to seek quick passage of revised election reform plan More Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awards More Pop princess Britney Spears engaged to boyfriend Sam Asghari; Good Sign the Conservatorship Horror Gets Better More Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban Debut ‘Smart’ Shade. Analysts Unsure on Built in Privacy Protections More Load More View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Richard Cowan WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Senate Democrats on Tuesday unveiled a new version of an election reform bill that is a top priority of President Joe Biden, amid a wave of Republican state legislatures imposing restrictions on voting. Senator Amy Klobuchar and seven fellow Democrats, including moderates such as Joe Manchin, introduced the bill that would set national standards for states to follow as they administer elections. The Democratic senators said their bill, dubbed the “Freedom to Vote Act,” would ensure that all qualified voters can request mail-in ballots and have at least 15 days of early voting. The legislation also would allow people to register to vote as late as Election Day. “Following the 2020 elections in which more Americans voted than ever before, we have seen unprecedented attacks on our democracy in states across the country,” the senators said in a statement. But with Republicans accusing Democrats of a “power grab” that would rob states of their ability to fashion voting rules, the legislation faces a tough battle in the Senate, which is divided 50-50 between the two parties. In June, all 50 Senate Republicans banded together to block a more ambitious bill, leaving Democrats 10 votes short of the minimum needed for it to advance. Under the Senate’s “filibuster” rule, at least 60 votes in the 100-member chamber are needed for most legislation to advance. On Monday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said a vote by the full Senate on the retooled bill could come as early as next week. The bill also would reduce the ability of states to fashion congressional districts in a partisan way and would aim to lift a veil of secrecy over some campaign contributions. Democrats accused Republican-controlled states of imposing new voting rules to suppress Election Day turnout, especially among Black, Hispanic and young voters, many of whom lean Democratic. Those Republican efforts expanded significantly after November’s U.S. presidential election in which defeated ex-President Donald Trump falsely claimed he was the victim of widespread voter fraud – an allegation that was rejected multiple times by courts and by his own Justice Department. In mid-term elections set for Nov. 8, 2022, voters will decide whether control of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives should remain in Democratic hands or be turned over to Republicans. Democrats hold the narrowest of majorities in Congress. Last week, Texas joined the list of states enacting new election restrictions, which Biden called an “all-out assault” on American democracy. The state’s new rules would make it harder for Texans to cast mail-in ballots and would add identification requirements for such voting. Texas Governor Greg Abbott said the law would make it “harder for people to cheat at the ballot box.” If Republicans again refuse to provide the support needed in the Senate for the bill to clear the 60-vote threshold, some Democrats are expected to urge Schumer to carve out an exception to the filibuster rule so that only a simple majority of the 100-seat Senate is required for passage. (Reporting by Richard Cowan. Editing by Gerry Doyle) View the full article
-
Published by The Bangkok Post Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awardspublished : 13 Sep 2021 at 11:45 NEW YORK – A stacked slate of artists lit up MTV’s 40th annual Video Music Awards on Sunday, returning in full force to Brooklyn’s Barclays Center after last year’s scaled-back pandemic show. The 2021 VMAs — a show known more for ostentatious performances, made-for-Twitter moments and wild costumes than the actual awards — was back with its signature elaborate performances before a masked full audience after a 2020 show that saw many celebrities accept prizes via video stream. The show opened with a pr… Read More View the full article
-
Published by AFP Britney Spears’ high energy pop burst onto the global stage in the late 1990s Los Angeles (AFP) – Pop princess Britney Spears on Sunday announced her engagement to her boyfriend Sam Asghari via social media. Spears, 39, showed off a diamond ring in an Instagram micro-video post and wrote “I can’t f***ng believe it!!!!!!!” By her side in the video is her boyfriend — now fiance — Sam Asghari, whom she turns to and kisses on the cheek. “Look at that — you like it?” Asghari, 27, asks. “Yeah!” Spears squeals in delight. Congratulations poured in and over 1.6 million people had liked the post by Sunday night. “Congratulations love!! So happy for you! Welcome to the club!” said celebrity heiress Paris Hilton in a comment on the video. Asghari’s Instagram page has a simple picture of him kissing Spears as she lifts her hand — and ring finger — to show off her new bling. Spears and Asghari met in 2016 when they co-starred in a music video for her single “Slumber Party.” Spears has two children with former husband rapper Kevin Federline, and had a brief Las Vegas marriage to childhood friend Jason Alexander that was annulled after just 55 hours. The star rocketed to fame in her teens with hits like “…Baby One More Time,” but suffered a highly public 2007 breakdown, attacking a paparazzo’s car at a gas station. That led to her being placed under a court-ordered conservatorship largely governed by her father, Jamie Spears. She swiftly returned to performing, released three albums, appeared on various television shows and even took up a Las Vegas residency. But in January 2019, she abruptly announced she was suspending her performances until further notice, and became increasingly vocal about the conservatorship. In July she launched a bid to remove her father from the 13-year guardianship that she said amounted to “abuse,” and in early September Jamie Spears filed a petition to end the conservatorship. Britney Spears Engaged on Towleroad Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban debut ‘smart’ shades More Judge blocks enforcement of Florida’s ‘anti-riot’ law More Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate angers Republicans, libertarians More Gayle King proud to be Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham’s third wheel More Load More View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Lil Nas X stole the show on the MTV Video Music Awards (VMAs) red carpet with his lavender suit-dress hybrid. The 22-year-old singer – who went on to win the prestigious Video of the Year accolade for ‘Montero (Call Me By Your Name)’, as well as Best Visual Effects and Best Direction at Sunday’s (12.09.21) ceremony – arrived at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn wearing a show-stopping Atelier Versace creation which sparkled with hundreds of gemstones and sequins. The luxury label noted on Instagram: “The asymmetrical off-the-shoulder design features a lace-up back detail that cascades to long train and is enriched with hand-applied crystal embroidery.” The ‘Old Town Road’ hitmaker’s stylist, Hodo Musa, accessorised the creation with matching boots, butterfly earrings and long tumbling locks. And fashion fans will be looking forward to seeing what Nas wears at the Met Gala on Monday (13.09.21) evening as he promised it will be worth the wait. He told ‘Entertainment Tonight’: “We finna give y’all something! It’s gonna be a week. This is not a moment, this is a week, baby!” Nas’ stylist previously admitted he felt he was “destined” to meet the singer and he thinks they’ll have a very long working relationship. Hoda said last year: “I really feel like I was destined to meet Lil Nas X. It might sound silly or crazy, but I instantly knew our collaboration was going to be fruitful and long. He gives you the freedom that’s needed in order to do your job well, cause he has faith in the people around him. And he doesn’t have an ego. His ego is dead, just like mine.” Suit-Dress Lil Nas X On Towleroad Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass’s twin babies will arrive “any day now” More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban debut ‘smart’ shades More Judge blocks enforcement of Florida’s ‘anti-riot’ law More Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate angers Republicans, libertarians More Gayle King proud to be Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham’s third wheel More Gay man in alleged homophobic attack in Spain says he made it up More Load More View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Madonna was a surprise performer at the MTV Video Music Awards on Sunday night (12.09.21). The 63-year-old star shocked the crowd at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York City, as she kicked off the latest VMAs in a dominatrix-style outfit. Madonna – who opened the first VMAs in 1984 with her hit ‘Like a Virgin’ – arrived at the ceremony in a New York-style yellow taxi. Before she appeared on stage, her voice could be heard in the ceremony recounting her early years in the city and her love of MTV. She said: “I came to New York City with nothing but $35 and a pair of dance shoes. I was 19 and terrified. “Forty years ago, another underdog arrived in New York City hoping to create something revolutionary. “An all-music channel premiered in the middle of the night and called itself MTV. “We found each other and from then on changed my life, changed music and created a new art form. That’s why there’s only one place to be tonight.” Madonna – who has won 20 of the VMAs’ Moon Person trophies over the years – walked on stage to her 1990 song ‘Vogue’, and stripped off her trench coat to reveal a BDSM-inspired PVC outfit. Shortly before she departed the stage, the star – who famously shared a smooch with Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera at the 2003 VMAs – told the crowd: “They said we wouldn’t last, but were still here motherf******. “Happy 40th MTV. Welcome to the 2021 MTV VMAs.” Other surprise appearances on the night came from Cyndi Lauper, 37 years after she won the Best Female Video at the first-ever VMAs. Cyndi – who presented the Best Pop Award – said: “I won a Moon Person at the very first VMAs in 1984. Things are a little different now. “Yeah, girls wanna have fun. But we also want to have funds. Equal pay! Control over our bodies! You know, fundamental rights!” Other performers at the spectacle included Justin Bieber, who took to the stage with The Kid Laroi to sing their tune ‘Stay’. Camila Cabello wowed with a version of her latest song ‘Don’t Go Yet’, and her boyfriend Shawn Mendes – who also took to the stage to perform – was spotted dancing to her music. Doja Cat – who hosted the ceremony – had a break from her evening duties to perform her songs ‘Been Like This’ and ‘You Right’. Kacey Musgraves, Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo, and Twenty One Pilots also performed at the ceremony. View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Lance Bass has revealed that his twin babies are due to arrive “any day now”. The former N*Sync star, 42, announced in June that he and his husband, artist Michael Turchin, 34, were to be parents via surrogacy. He said: “I got twins on the way. They could come any day which I’m kind of really scared about.” He made the exciting announcement at 2021 VMAs, which he joked would be his last appearance at the ceremony for quite a while. He told ‘Entertainment Tonight’: “I won’t be at the VMAs for the next 18 years!” The couple – who have been married since 2014 – confirmed to People in a Q&A that they are expecting a boy and a girl, and Lance is thrilled that they will be here in time for Halloween. He said: “They have no choice but to love Halloween because I’m obsessed and they’re going to be obsessed!” Happiness follows heartbreak for the couple, after going through several failed IVF attempts and sadly losing a baby boy at eight weeks in 2020. At the time, he said: “You try to trick yourself into not getting excited because you know anything can happen at any time, especially in those first few weeks when there’s a huge possibility that the (embryos) won’t stick.” News of the twins’ impending arrival comes as 98 Degrees frontman Nick Lachey spoke of an upcoming benefit concert, in which his band will unite with Bass’s band ‘N*Sync’, as well as other 90s favourites the Backstreet Boys next year. He said: “We’re working on a little something together for January 2022, called ‘TRL,’ Total Relief Live, and it’s a benefit concert benefiting feeding America. If you’re going to call something ‘TRL,’ you gotta bring out the heavy hitters of TRL.” AJ McLean of the ‘Backstreet Boys’ also teased that this may not be the only time the boybands collaborate. He said: “I mean, look. We get the best of the best in the same studio in the same booth. Magic is definitely happening. I mean. Who knows. We’ll see.” View the full article
-
The only way to do so would be to email past site users and ask. That makes the assumption that the email we have for them is valid and that they even respond. I’ve resisted emailing people, even those who have nor opted out of receiving email communications from us in an effort to maintain discretion. Even with the move to the new site domain earlier this year, I did not need to resort to email blasts instead leveraging Google, redirects, and site notifications to communicate the change. Since I don’t know who can see someone’s email, I try to minimize my use of it except in absolutely required scenarios (resetting passwords etc) and in those cases it is still discrete. In past conversations, people take a break from the site for many different reasons. This has included: - Real life taking priority - No longer hiring and not wanting the temptations that come from the discussions here. - Having a disagreement with others on the site and not wanting to engage anymore. - Having a disagreement with the staff. (A topic not open for discussion but that I’m simply noting for transparency.) - Less interest in forums/online discussions. Above are just high level categories that break down into many nuanced reasons. I’m always attempting to do whatever I can to drive more visibility to the site and encourage it’s use. This includes attracting new members, adding capabilities so that existing members get more value, and retaining the members that we have. It’s an interesting juggling act as there is typically not one clear right/wrong answer to a question. Our members are varied in their interests, technical abilities, and needs. Literally for any decision that is made, someone will like it and someone else won’t. I’ve learned that I’m never going to please EVERYONE. Instead I try to make decisions that will benefit as many people as possible and minimize the problems for everyone else. Some of the changes are stepping stones as an effort to a much bigger change. This is somewhat like a chess game where you have to plot several moves ahead to be successful.
-
Escort wants to move in with me... Any feedback, advice?
RadioRob replied to + 7829V's topic in The Lounge
A friendly recommendation to keep on topic. If we’re going to resort to petty bickering, the topic is going to be locked. -
Published by BANG Showbiz English Jodie Foster’s mother never wanted her to go to college. The 58-year-old actress-and-director began her career in the 1960s when she was just three years old with appearances in adverts and television shows, and in the next decade she established as a major young talent with her acclaimed performances in Martin Scorsese’s ‘Taxi Driver’ and the hit children’s musical ‘Bugsy Malone’. However, in 1980 she took a break from Hollywood to study African-American literature at Yale University, something which her mother Evelyn tried to dissuade her from her from as she though it would ruin her acting career. And Jodie’s mom also didn’t want her to step behind the cameras and become a director. Discussing some of the biggest risks she’s taken in her career, she shared: “Well, there are a number of them. The first one was to go to university instead of staying in the cinema. I studied at Yale for five years. Everyone was telling me, ‘Your career will be finished!’ But my education was so useful for what I did later. I learnt how to read deeply at university and this helped in my work as an actress. “And then I became a director just after the Oscar and the same person, [whispers] my mother, told me that it was a very bad idea to be a director since I was at the height of my acting career and it was the moment when I could make the most money. So it was a very bad choice, according to her. I did not listen and am very happy.” Jodie has won two Best Actress Academy Awards; the first for her performance as a rape survivor in powerful 1988 drama ‘The Accused’ – which was directed by Jonathan Kaplan – and the second for playing serial killer chasing FBI trainee Clarice Starling in 1991 horror film ‘The Silence of the Lambs in which she starred opposite Best Actor winner Sir Anthony Hopkins as cannibal murderer Dr. Hannibal Lecter. Foster believes that her journey to those accolades started when she played an underage prostitute in ‘Taxi Driver’ opposite Robert De Niro. In an interview with the UK issue of OK! magazine, she said: “It’s a difficult path. I have this sort of faith in things and when the waves are difficult, it gives me depth. That’s the way I view it as a writer, an actor, a director and a producer. “For me, ‘Taxi Driver’ is a film which was a kind of transformation in the cinema. “It was the golden age of American films, it was an arthouse film and I was very proud to be in it. It was destiny, it was fate and I was very lucky. I’d already made a film with [Martin] Scorsese and that’s why he knew me. People thought I was too young to play the part of a prostitute and people – lawyers that is – in the government of California, wanted to make sure I was psychologically ready. I had to do some tests.” Jodie Foster Previously on Towleroad Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban debut ‘smart’ shades More Judge blocks enforcement of Florida’s ‘anti-riot’ law More Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate angers Republicans, libertarians More Gayle King proud to be Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham’s third wheel More Gay man in alleged homophobic attack in Spain says he made it up More Explainer – Beyond Delta, scientists are watching new coronavirus variants More Singapore robocops patrol for smokers and pandemic rule-breakers More Spanish leader to crack down on hate crimes after homophobic attack More Load More View the full article
-
Published by AFP Prince Andrew has vehemently denied claims he had sex with Virginia Giuffre, and said he has no recollection of meeting her New York (AFP) – Britain’s Prince Andrew has been served legal papers in a US lawsuit brought by a woman who says he sexually abused her when she was a teenager, a court filing showed Friday. The complaint was delivered to the royal’s home in Windsor, England, on August 27, according to an affidavit filed in the Southern District of New York. Virginia Giuffre says she was “lent out” for underage sex by late US financier Jeffrey Epstein who killed himself in a New York prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking minors. Giuffre sued Andrew last month, alleging he sexually abused her at the London home of socialite Ghislaine Maxwell more than 20 years ago, when she was under 18. Giuffre also claims Andrew abused her at Epstein’s New York mansion and on Little St. James, Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. Andrew, 61, has vehemently denied claims he had sex with Giuffre, and said he has no recollection of meeting her, but the allegations have damaged the British royal family. An agent for Giuffre said in the affidavit that he handed the papers to a police officer at the main gates of Andrew’s property and did not meet Queen Elizabeth II’s second son. A spokesperson for Andrew refused to comment when asked to by AFP. Andrew, a divorced father of two and former Royal Navy helicopter pilot who flew in the 1982 Falklands War against Argentina, was forced to step back from frontline royal duties in late 2019. That followed a furore at a rare television interview he gave to the BBC, in which he defended his friendship with Epstein, a multi-million-dollar hedge fund manager to befriended countless celebrities. Andrew — who as a young man was considered one of Britain’s most eligible bachelors and was dubbed “Randy Andy” in the tabloid press — later issued a statement in which he said he “unequivocally” regretted his “ill-judged association” with Epstein. He has made few public appearances since, although joined other senior royals for the funeral of his father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, at Windsor Castle in April. Maxwell pleaded not guilty in April to charges of recruiting underage girls for Epstein. She is due to go on trial on November 29. Giuffre sued Andrew under the Child Victims Act as she was 17 at the time. The first hearing in the case is set for Monday. View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Jessica Chastain was shaking with fear before starting work on ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’. The 44-year-old actress plays the titular role in the upcoming film about the controversial televangelist Tammy Faye Bakker and her husband Jim Bakker and admits that many elements of the film “terrified” her. Jessica told DuJour magazine: “There were so many parts of making this movie that terrified me. On the first day of shooting, I started shaking before the first take. That’s never happened to me on a movie before, and it was so embarrassing. “But I thought, if I’m going to throw myself off this cliff, I’m going to jump off the deep end. People might really make fun of me. But Tammy Faye probably thought that every day, and she did it anyway.” Jessica, who is also a producer on the film, recalled how it would take her over seven hours to get into makeup as the character and that she would use the time to study Tammy Faye. The ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ star said: “I just wanted to cry. “People don’t understand that (that kind of makeup) takes a lot of energy, but I used that time to listen to her voice. I just rewatched and rewatched her on video. I’ve seen every video she’s ever done.” Jessica acquired the rights to the film by watching the 2000 documentary of the same name and described it as one of her “crazy ideas”. She explained: “I knew about Tammy from what I’d seen on ‘Saturday Night Live’, but I actually had never seen her give an interview until I watched the documentary. “My impression from sketch television was that she cried all the time, she was a crook and always had mascara running down her face.” Jessica added: “I have these ideas that we have to push against an old-fashioned way the film industry has worked.” Jessica Chastain acquired on Towleroad Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban debut ‘smart’ shades More Judge blocks enforcement of Florida’s ‘anti-riot’ law More Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate angers Republicans, libertarians More Gayle King proud to be Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham’s third wheel More Gay man in alleged homophobic attack in Spain says he made it up More Explainer – Beyond Delta, scientists are watching new coronavirus variants More Singapore robocops patrol for smokers and pandemic rule-breakers More Spanish leader to crack down on hate crimes after homophobic attack More Solar could comprise almost half US power by 2050, govt says More Load More View the full article
-
Published by AFP A young man holds an American flag in January 2021 outside the State Capitol in Texas, which just signed strict measures into law that essentially amount to a total ban on abortion Washington (AFP) – With conservative moves to restrict abortion and voting rights dominating headlines, an outsider might be forgiven for thinking it was Republicans, not Democrats, who run Washington. But the most important elections of 2020 probably weren’t for who would take the White House or Congress — it was the battle for control of America’s state houses. “The Republicans have been especially good at winning state legislative elections,” Wendy Schiller, a professor of political science at Brown University, told AFP. “They smartly focused time, money and energy into winning the House of Representatives back in 2010, and state legislatures.” In that year alone, she said, Republicans picked up more than 600 seats, eventually amassing a nationwide lead of almost 1,100 seats. While control of the executive and legislative branches might seem like the endgame in US politics, Americans’ happiness and prosperity depends as much on what happens in state capitols as in the US capital. Republican legislatures have wielded state power with alacrity in recent weeks, passing a barrage of what opponents characterize as voter suppression bills, while Texas just signed strict measures into law that essentially amount to a total ban on abortion. Critics expect the eventual outcome of the laws, which are seen spreading across numerous red states, to be wide disparities in access to services from one part of the United States to the next. “Federalism has always produced stark inequality in the arena of civil rights and voting, and again now with restrictions on abortions,” said Schiller. “In some cases the federal government has been able to prevail, but unlike civil rights and voting, abortion has not produced the same level of national consensus in favor of increased access.” Outgunned When they ratified the Constitution, states agreed the federal government would have responsibility for two dozen or so national and international issues, while all other duties would be discharged locally. “So the 10th Amendment provides a great amount of latitude and protection of individual states to make their own legislative and legal decisions that may be starkly different from Washington,” Capri Cafaro, of American University’s School of Public Affairs, told AFP. These days the federal government’s exclusive responsibilities include coining money, regulating the mail, declaring war and conducting other foreign policy. It is states, though, that are charged with ensuring the welfare, safety and health of their citizens, taking responsibility for most public services and running elections. Democrats acknowledge that in recent years they have been much more focused on winning the presidency and controlling Congress while being outgunned in grassroots funding and organization. As a result, the Republicans have control of the House and Senate — or the single chamber — in 31 of America’s 50 states. The Texas abortion law, a dramatic escalation of the campaign to undo Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized the procedure nationwide, flies in the face of public opinion. Polls consistently show that over half of Americans believe abortion should be legal all or most of the time. Balance of power “If we do not defend our Democratic majorities and invest in Democratic power, progress on reproductive rights can and will be lost,” Heather Williams, executive director of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, said in a statement. US states are currently redrawing their legislative districts in a constitutionally required process that will determine the balance of power in state capitols and Washington for the next 10 years. In most states, legislators meet to come up with the new maps of congressional districts after the census. As a result, redistricting can be as important to the balance of power in the US House of Representatives as the parties’ performances in elections. Most political analysts agree that Republicans — known in Washington as the Grand Old Party, or GOP — have a clear advantage. They control mapmaking in 20 out of the 35 states with multiple congressional seats and legislatures that are in charge of the process. Democrats control just 11. But for all the emphasis on local politics, the state houses need the White House as much as the White House needs the states, according to Schiller, the Brown University professor. “The GOP has moved well beyond its traditional message that the federal government is too big, to a message that the federal government is bad overall,” she said. “Anything federal is bad for states according to the GOP, except of course when it comes to disaster aid, which GOP governors take readily and without objection.” View the full article
-
Published by AFP Facebook and Ray-Ban have launched new smart glasses, seen here in an undated handout photo San Francisco (AFP) – Facebook and iconic eyewear brand Ray-Ban on Thursday launched their new smart glasses, the latest effort in a tricky, niche market but which the social media giant sees as a step toward its future. The “Ray-Ban Stories” shades can take pictures and video upon the wearer’s voice commands, and the frames can connect wirelessly to Facebook’s platform through an app. “We took our Wayfarer (frames), born in 1952, and we reinvented the design squeezing in some cool technology,” said Fabio Borsoi, global research and design director at the EssilorLuxottica group, Ray-Ban’s maker. Facebook is wading into a market that has already seen 2013’s Google Glass, which sparked a privacy backlash over built-in cameras and prompted the tech titan to pivot its focus for the device away from the general public. Messaging app SnapChat has also released its camera-equipped Spectacles, but they are pricey and have struggled to catch on broadly with tech lovers. Notably, the Ray-Ban Stories glasses will not have augmented reality features — technology that can mesh online computing with visual cues such as mapping or face recognition. Instead, the shades are an early step toward efforts to create futuristic eyewear that adds to real-world views with data or graphics from the internet, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has said previously. The company had said in July it was combining specialists from across its hardware, gaming and virtual reality units to build an immersive digital world known as the “metaverse.” Privacy features Priced starting at $299, the Ray-Ban Stories will roll out in Australia, Britain, Canada, Ireland, Italy and the United States. Cameras are built into the front of the frames, while the arms are designed to act as directional speakers for listening to calls or streamed audio. A white light in the front of the frame goes on when the cameras are being used, which is intended as a privacy feature to alert people they could be filmed. Users can take a picture or a video clip of up to 30 seconds by pressing a button at the temple or using a voice command, both of which can be cues that a camera is on. “We need the user to feel completely in control of their capture experience,” said Facebook Reality Labs product manager Hind Hobeika. “And, similarly, we need people around them to feel comfortable that these smart glasses exist and always be in the know when a capture is happening,” Hobeika added, referring to filming. The glasses also have a physical switch for turning them off. Users log into the glasses’ Facebook View app using their accounts at the social network. Ray-Ban Stories frames sync wirelessly to a smartphone app designed specifically for handling images or video captured by the glasses. Users can decide using the app whether they want to share pictures or video they have just captured, such as posting to Facebook or attaching them to an email. Only data needed to run the app is gathered, and no information is used for targeting ads, said Hobeika. View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Dan Whitcomb (Reuters) -A federal judge on Thursday blocked enforcement of an anti-riot law spearheaded by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in response to nationwide protests last year over racial injustice, saying the legislation likely violated the U.S. Constitution. U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, ruling in a lawsuit brought by civil rights groups, did not rule the entire statute was unconstitutional but found that the Florida legislature’s new definition of the word “riot” was too vague and confusing to satisfy free-speech rights guaranteed under the First Amendment. “If this court does not enjoin the statute’s enforcement, the lawless actions of a few rogue individuals could effectively criminalize the protected speech of hundreds, if not thousands, of law-abiding Floridians,” he wrote. In the 90-page ruling, Walker, who was appointed in 2012 by then-President Barack Obama, included a three-page history of the civil rights movement in Florida dating back to 1956. “We vehemently disagree with today’s decision, but this case was always going to be decided by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals,” DeSantis said in a written statement. “There is a difference between a peaceful protest and a riot, and Floridians do not want to see the mayhem and violence associated with riots in their communities.” The law, prompted by last year’s summer of sometimes violent nationwide protests over police brutality and racism, created criminal offenses tied to rioting and increased penalties for people taking part. “We are glad the court has agreed to suspend enforcement of this key provision while we continue to advocate to ensure that protesters in Florida can safely exercise their right to speak out against injustice,” the ACLU of Florida said. (Reporting by Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Peter Cooney and Sandra Maler) View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Nandita Bose and Diane Bartz WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republicans and libertarians are vowing to fight U.S. President Joe Biden’s new vaccine mandate covering big companies, healthcare workers and federal employees, announced as the Delta strain of the coronavirus rapidly spreads through the country. The mandate https://reut.rs/3niM2M3, which the White House says would cover 100 million U.S. workers and applies to about two-thirds of all U.S. employees, is being written in part by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Within hours of the new measures being announced https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-deliver-six-step-plan-covid-19-pandemic-2021-09-09 on Thursday, some lawmakers, state governors and political party officials were threatening lawsuits or pledging to defy it. “When this decree goes into effect, the (Republican National Committee) will sue the administration to protect Americans and their liberties,” RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel said in a statement. A majority of those opposed questioned the authority the administration has to mandate vaccines. “The Biden administration’s ill-conceived ‘Path out of the Pandemic’ plan vastly exceeds the powers the United States Constitution allots the executive branch,” said the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonprofit funded by the Charles Koch Foundation, a deep-pocketed conservative group. “The federal government has no police power, and likewise no authority to force private employers of any size to mandate vaccines,” the group said. Asked Friday about possible legal challenges, Biden said “Have at it. I’m so disappointed that because some of the Republican governors have been so cavalier with the health of these kids, so cavalier with the health of their communities.” The disease has killed https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/countries-and-territories/united-states more than 655,000 people in the United States, and deaths and hospitalizations have been rising sharply as the easily transmissible Delta variant of the virus spreads. The vast majority of those are unvaccinated. The situation reignites a long-standing U.S. battle over individual rights, states’ constitutional remit to police citizens and regulate public welfare, and the powers of the executive branch. Similar fights have raged over gun laws and government healthcare. U.S. vaccine mandates in the past have mostly been administered by state and local governments in relation to public venues and schools. Roughly 16% of the adult American population – nearly 34 million people – are currently unvaccinated but open to getting one, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll. The poll arrived at this estimate by asking respondents a series of questions about their vaccination status. Legal challenges are likely to focus on the executive branch’s power to enforce the requirements. The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, argued in its blog that the private-sector mandate would present the Biden administration with a “tsunami of legal filings.” “There’s a separation-of-powers issue in that this sweeping new regulation is being imposed by presidential diktat, with related claims about the proper scope of OSHA’s statutory authority and whether Congress can even delegate such broad power to the executive branch.” Many Republican lawmakers, who said they have received vaccines and support Americans getting a COVID-19 shot, also accused the administration of overreach. “While I support the vaccine and have received it, Americans have the right to exercise personal choice when it comes to their health,” said Republican U.S. Senator Ted Cruz. “Getting the vaccine is a decision to be made in consultation with one’s doctor, not forced on Americans by the government.” (Reporting by Nandita Bose and Diane Bartz, Additional reporting by David Shepardson and Andrea Shalal in Washington and Chris Kahn in New York; editing by Heather Timmons and Jonathan Oatis) View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Gayle King is a “proud third wheeler”. The 63-year-old broadcaster – who has adult children Kirby and William with ex-husband Bill Bumpus – admitted it wouldn’t “occur” to her that she wouldn’t be invited on vacations with her best friend Oprah Winfrey and her long-term partner Stedman Graham because they have always been so “welcoming” towards her. She admitted: “I’m a proud third wheeler. I make no apologies for that. I got divorced back in 1994 and I’ve been their third wheel ever since. “The good news is that Stedman is always very welcoming, so it never occurs to me when she says, ‘We’re going to so and so,’ I’m like, ‘When?’ It doesn’t occur to me that I’m not invited. “But throughout the years, we’ve gone on some great trips together. And that’s not gonna change.” The two friends always put their bond ahead of any relationship. Gayle told ‘Entertainment Tonight’: “Oprah came to my house after my favourite daughter, Kirby, was born and she was wearing a T-shirt that said, ‘Husbands come and go, best friends last forever,’ and I went, ‘Whoa, why are you wearing that T-shirt?’ She didn’t even realise, she said she didn’t even realise she had it on, but there is some truth to that. “When you have a best friend, you really are there through thick and thin, and that’s not always true with husbands and spouses or you know, co-workers, anybody in your life, but when you have a true best friend, it really does. It is something that really is a lifelong thing.” After embarking on a cross-country trek 15 years ago, the two women have embarked on another road trip for new series ‘OG Chronicles: Joy Ride’ and Gayle knew all along she’d be the one taking the wheel. She said: “She ain’t changed. She doesn’t like to merge, she doesn’t like to get on the highway, she doesn’t like to parallel park, man, she doesn’t like to change lanes, all the things that come with…driving! “I really enjoy driving. I actually do, but what I really like is the rule [that] if you’re behind the wheel, you get to control the radio!” View the full article
-
Published by DPA Pedro Sanchez, Prime Minister of Spain and Secretary General of the PSOE, speaks during an interparliamentary meeting of the socialist parliamentary group pf the Spanish parliament. Óscar Cañas/EUROPA PRESS/dpa A Spanish man who claimed he was the victim of a homophobic attack in Madrid that sparked widespread outrage has recanted and said he made up the story, according to press reports Wednesday. The 20-year-old man claimed he was attacked late Sunday by eight hooded men in Malasana, a Madrid neighbourhood popular for its nightlife. The victim was hospitalized with injuries that included the word “maricon” – slang for “gay” – carved into one of his buttocks. In a fresh statement to police on Wednesday, the 20-year-old man said there had been no attack and that he had allowed another man to carve the word into his backside, the online edition of the newspaper El Pais reported, citing police. He claims he lied in order to not lose his current partner. Reports from RTVE and El Pais indicate he was trying to conceal another sexual relationship. Madrid police had been unable to verify the alleged victim’s story and questioned the 20-year old further, leading to his confession that the incident never happened, according to the media outlets. The alleged homophobic attack had led Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to promise tougher penalties to prevent hate crime. Speaking to lawmakers Wednesday, Sanchez said the government would do everything in its power to prevent hate crimes. He called on parliament to move swiftly to pass a bill on equal treatment of minorities that was introduced earlier this year. Although the Sunday attack turned out not to have transpired, human rights groups point out that organized attacks targeting homosexuals and other minorities have been reported across the country. There were 43 per cent more hate crimes targeting people for their sexual orientation throughout Spain in the first half of 2021 than in the whole of 2020. Pedro Sanchez, Prime Minister of Spain and Secretary General of the PSOE, attends an interparliamentary meeting of the socialist parliamentary group pf the Spanish parliament. Óscar Cañas/EUROPA PRESS/dpa View the full article
-
I can add a dark theme and allow members to pick. I've avoided doing it because most people here tend to not like change too much. Given this site has had a light background for 20+ years, it did not seem to be something that was important to people. The comment earlier was literally the first time I've seen anyone bring it up since I've taken over running the site. It's not overly difficult to do. In fact, I would most likely just purchase a pre-created dark theme and customize it a bit to save time/effort. My suggestion if something like this would be helpful is to post the ask in the Features and Feedback forum. (That also keeps the discussion on topic for the original post in the thread.) The more people that say "hey yeah that would be helpful to me", the higher on the priority list it goes.
-
There are a number of things I've done to improve SEO already... including removing the restrictions placed on search engines entirely. Daddy originally specifically prohibited Google, Bing, etc. I've also started embedding keywords and meta tags, I've setup site maps, and made structural changes to the site code to make it easier for the search engines to read content. This has drawn significantly more page views since I first took over the site. In fact, we've gone from an average of 800 clicks from Google per day to around 2000 per day and 2K impressions (meaning turning up in the results) to 38K impressions per day. This coincides with how much coverage of the site is actually done by the search engine as well. The chart below represents the number of pages that have not only been crawled by Google but also added to the index and overlying that with the daily click through rate. I've made literally dozens of changes to improve the ability to find and drive traffic to the site. Many of the things are items that are done under the hood transparently. I'll continue doing this, but at the end of the day... CONTENT IS KING. One of my long term goals for the site is to have more than just the forums. My goal is to have news feeds, articles, reviews, and other content of interest to the affluent gay male. One thing that I'll point out here as a reminder... only about *15 PERCENT* of our site's traffic comes from people that are logged into the site. The green line represents a session tied to someone who is logged in with an actual username/password. So there is a LOT more people that view the site than actually participate. Regarding advertising... I would love to be able to do this. However I honestly don't have the budget to do this. I'm also not sure it would make sense (at least right now based on how much content we have along with our limited ability to monetize content currently) to try and push for a donation campaign to do it. https://follows.com/blog/2017/01/much-spend-twitter-ads https://www.webfx.com/social-media/how-much-does-it-cost-to-advertise-on-twitter.html Even setting a SUPER SMALL budget of $25 per day would cost $750 per month. You would want to run any real campaign at least 3 months to measure the impact and be able to make changes along the way with a series of A/B tests to figure out what message resonates the most. The average return per click is typically 0.86% (meaning the percent of people that view an ad that actually click through). Of those that click through, only 3-5% actually convert (meaning take an action such as buying something or signing up, etc). It would mean even if we did get a bunch of people to click the ad, the percentage that would actually signup and join here would be limited. We would then have to measure that gained membership versus the spend to figure out the ROI. I have more thoughts on this topic, but I'm in the middle of the "day job". So I'll save that for later. But yes... this is a topic near and dear to my heart and is something I've actively worked on literally since I've taken control of the site. It's something I don't really talk about on a regular basis because most of the things that need to be done are not really all that interesting. Ya'll know I'm a tech nerd at heart... you don't need me shoving it in your face on a daily basis.
-
We have logs, but remember... you don't have to be logged in to see that information. It can be viewed as a guest. As a result, it's impossible to tie to a specific person. With the bots that crawl this (and every other site on the internet), just about every thread has views on a daily basis.
-
Published by Reuters By Julie Steenhuysen CHICAGO (Reuters) – The continued spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has spawned a Greek alphabet of variants – a naming system used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to track concerning new mutations of the virus that causes COVID-19. Some have equipped the virus with better ways of infecting humans or evading vaccine protection. Scientists remain focused on Delta, now the dominant variant around the world, but are tracking others to see what may one day take its place. DELTA – STILL DOMINANT The Delta variant first detected in India remains the most worrisome. It is striking unvaccinated populations in many countries and has proven capable of infecting a higher proportion of vaccinated people than its predecessors. The WHO classifies Delta as a variant of concern, meaning it has been shown capable of increasing transmissibility, causing more severe disease or reducing the benefit of vaccines and treatments. According to Shane Crotty, a virologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology in San Diego, Delta’s “superpower” is its transmissibility. Chinese researchers found that people infected with Delta carry 1,260 times more virus in their noses compared with the original version of the coronavirus. Some U.S. research suggests that the viral load in vaccinated individuals who become infected with Delta is on par with those who are unvaccinated, but more research is needed. While the original coronavirus took up to seven days to cause symptoms, Delta can cause symptoms two to three days faster, giving the immune system less time to respond and mount a defense. LAMBDA – ON THE WANE The Lambda variant had attracted attention as a potential new threat, but this version of the coronavirus, first identified in Peru in December, appears to be receding. Although cases involving Lambda were rising in July, reports of this variant have been falling globally for the past four weeks, according to data by GISAID, a database that tracks SARS-CoV-2 variants. The WHO classifies Lambda as a variant of interest, meaning it carries mutations suspected of causing a change in transmissibility or causing more severe disease, but it is still under investigation. Lab studies show it has mutations that resist vaccine-induced antibodies. MU – ONE TO WATCH Mu, the variant formerly known as B.1.621, was first identified in Colombia in January. On Aug. 30, the WHO designated it as a variant of interest due to several concerning mutations, and assigned a Greek letter name to it. Mu carries key mutations, including E484K, N501Y and D614G, that have been linked with increased transmissibility and reduced immune protection. According to the WHO’s Bulletin published last week, Mu has caused some larger outbreaks in South America and Europe. While the number of genetic sequences identified as Mu have fallen below 0.1% globally, Mu represents 39% of variants sequenced in Colombia and 13% in Ecuador, places where its prevalence has “consistently increased,” WHO reported. The global health agency said it continues to monitor Mu for changes in South America, especially in areas where it is co-circulating with the Delta variant. Maria van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases unit, said circulation of the variant is decreasing globally but needs to be observed closely. In a press briefing last week, White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said U.S. officials are watching it, but so far Mu is not considered an immediate threat. MORE ON THE WAY? Getting more people vaccinated against COVID-19 is critical as large groups of unvaccinated people give the virus more opportunity to spread and mutate into new variants. That effort must be stepped up internationally to keep variants from emerging unchecked among the populations of poor nations where very few people have been inoculated, experts say. Even so, while the current vaccines prevent severe disease and death, they do not block infection. The virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets. To defeat SARS-CoV-2 will likely require a new generation of vaccines that also block transmission, according to Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine developer at the Mayo Clinic. Until then, Poland and other experts say, the world remains vulnerable to the rise of new coronavirus variants. (Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen; Additional reporting by Ahmed Aboulenein in Washington; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Bill Berkrot) View the full article
Contact Info:
The Company of Men
C/O RadioRob Enterprises
3296 N Federal Hwy #11104
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306
Email: [email protected]
Help Support Our Site
Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.