-
Posts
10,367 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Donations
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by RadioRob
-
Published by Radar Online Prince Andrew reportedly wants to remarry his ex-wife Sarah “Fergie” Ferguson even though he is in the middle of a sex abuse scandal. According to The Post, the divorced couple reportedly renewed their relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic and even began living with each other again. MEGA “It has rekindled something, and I can see a second wedding happening if it all goes Andrew’s way,” a source reportedly told media outlets. This latest development between Andrew and Fergie comes amid a sex abuse lawsuit against the prince brought on by Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Giuffre alleges she was forced against her will to have sex with Andrew three times, and the earliest incident allegedly occurred when she was only 17 years old. After the accusations first came out, Andrew was relieved of his royal duties. Although Andrew is in the middle of this royal scandal, Ferguson has reportedly continued to defend her ex-husband against the allegations. Andrew also adamantly denies the alleged incidents ever took place. “I keep my commitment, no matter what,” Andrew’s ex-wife reportedly said. The couple divorced in 1996 after ten years of marriage together. MEGA This news regarding Andrew and Ferguson reportedly getting back together comes only days after Radar reported how the Duke of York has hired the high-profile and celebrity lawyer Blair Berk in an attempt to get the sex abuse lawsuit by Giuffre tossed out of court. Berk is known for representing other high-profile celebrities and figures such as Mel Gibson, Harvey Weinstein, Britney Spears, and Lindsay Lohan. “The Prince’s United Kingdom team has slowly but surely been putting together a team of highly-skilled, big-name lawyers to fight on his behalf in the United States,” a source has reportedly claimed. “People will be surprised by the names of those who will be defending him. It’s a dream team of some of the sharpest minds in the business. There is a great deal of confidence among everyone. Andrew included, that the civil suit will be thrown out before it ever comes to court.” If Prince Andrew and his ex-wife do get remarried, it is unclear whether they will wait until the lawsuit against him is either thrown out of court or until the trial comes to a definitive end. MEGA View the full article
-
Miley Cyrus and Dolly Parton are quite a duo even if one were not the others Godparent. Published by BANG Showbiz English Miley Cyrus idolises Dolly Parton because of her “steadfast morals and values”. The ‘Wrecking Ball’ hitmaker has praised her godmother for both her “incomparable career” and her humanitarian work and insisted it’s easy to understand why she is a role model for so many people. Writing in praise of Dolly for Time magazine’s annual list of the 100 most influential people, she said: “Have you ever met anyone who doesn’t love Dolly Parton? I never have. “Dolly is not only my idol because of her incomparable career—she’s also my role model because of her steadfast morals and values. At her core, she is the definition of a humanitarian. She’s also the world’s most impeccably purposeful walking contradiction, having developed her iconic look after being inspired by the town tramp. Now she’s known as a saintly, even godlike, figure… “But though she created an identity that she downplays as being built on wigs, lots of gingham and silicone, the foundation for this empire is actually her honesty, truth and her faith. People look to Dolly for guidance, and she knows that. “She wears that responsibility with the same grace and pride she rocks a two-piece Nudie suit. She recognizes how impactful her choices will be as one of the most iconic and powerful voices in country music, and she leaves no one behind. Dolly has diligently celebrated the queer community and her Imagination Library provides millions of books for kids. (The only thing Dolly loves more than glitter is children.)” The 28-year-old singer went on to praise the ‘9 to 5’ hitmaker’s donation to coronavirus vaccine research and how important that has been for the music industry. She wrote: “Last year, she donated $1 million to COVID-19 vaccine research, which helped in critical early stages. There’s a multitude of reasons why vaccination is important to protect other people. But it’s also to get the show back on the road and bring live music to our audiences again.” And Miley admitted she wished everyone was able to meet her “fairy godmother”. She concluded: “There’s a theory that you shouldn’t meet your heroes, but I wish everyone had the chance to meet Dolly Parton, because she’s even better than your sparkliest dreams. She may be my fairy godmother, but I think she’s that to everyone else too. I am happy to share her with the world.” Miley Cyrus and Dolly Parton on Towleroad Pregnant man among new emojis More White House plans new system for international travel, contact tracing rules More Simone Biles condemns U.S. Olympic Committee, FBI for sex-abuse crisis More U.S. court upholds dismissal of lawsuit against NSA on ‘state secrets’ grounds More What Does “Peg the Patriarchy” Even Mean? More Lil Nas X feared he’d die More Ed Sheeran Gifts Another Monumental (6-foot) Marble D to Sam Smith– Very Much Like One He Sent to Elton More Fashion Statements: The AOC Met Gala Dress Recalls 5 Times Fashion Helped Make Change. ‘I Really DO Care Don’t You?’ More Dan Levy Brings Met Gala 2021 Queer Love, in An Inspired Loewe, @cartier and Wojnarovicz Collab For the Fashion Benefit More New York begins work on LGBTQ museum set for 2024 opening More Many Relationships Won’t Make It Through The Pandemic Conflicts? Couples Boil Over OR Reconnect More Load More View the full article
-
Does your covid vax card have a lot expiration date or......
RadioRob replied to + azdr0710's topic in Men's Health
A COVID vaccine card should have the following information: Patient full name Patient date of birth Patient number (not always filled in) For each shot administered, there is a separate line collecting: Brand of vaccine received (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J) Lot number Date administered Issuing health authority/location This might look something like "Pfizer EW9999, 12/31/2020, CVS #2222". The back of the card has a space to record the date in which you should come back for a follow up dose (if applicable). I had my first shot at the local health department, which was just noted as "FCHD" (Fairfax County Health Department) and the second at a CVS pharmacy. The expiration date does not matter for the patient record. It only matters for before you get the shot. Once administered, it is not going to expire. If there was ever a question about the lot itself and if it was safe (not expired), they could find details about it by looking up the lot number. -
Published by BANG Showbiz English A pregnant man is among the new emojis released by the Unicode Consortium. The draft list of the newest emojis was unveiled earlier this year by the non-profit company and aims to promote more diversity in gender. Another new emoji is a handshake featuring two different skin tones in response to a year of action surrounding racial inequality. More new emojis include hands making a heart shape and somebody biting their lip, as well as faces melting, saluting, holding back tears and peeking out between their fingers. The list contains 37 new emojis and takes the total amount up to 3,633. The new additions will be rolled out on devices over the coming months. A large majority of the new emojis will be presented as a man, a woman and gender-neutral – for example, a crown emoji has now been added alongside the prince and princess emoji. The Unicode Consortium revealed last year that it was releasing a new batch of emojis in 2021 to reflect on the crazy events of 2020, such as the coronavirus pandemic. The new additions include a heart with a bandage wrapped around it, a heart on fire, a face exhaling, a face in the clouds, and a shocked face with spiral eyes. A small number of new emojis were released last year after being hit by a delay due to COVID-19. Unicode tweeted: “With #Unicode14 delayed due to COVID-19, this is a minor #emoji release. It is also a bit of a change from recent years where announcements have been made between January and March, and landing on platforms by September/October.” View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States is developing a “new system for international travel” that will include contact tracing for when it eventually lifts travel restrictions that bar much of the world’s population from entering the country, a senior White House official said on Wednesday. White House coronavirus response coordinator Jeff Zients told the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board the administration does not plan to immediately relax any travel restrictions citing COVID-19 Delta variant cases in the United States and around the world. Reuters first reported early in August that the White House was developing vaccine entry requirements that could cover nearly all foreign visitors. The White House previously confirmed it was considering mandating vaccines for foreign international visitors. “The American people need to trust that the new system for international travel is safer even as we – I mean at that point – we’ll be letting in more travelers,” Zients said on Wednesday, adding it will eventually replace existing restrictions. “We are exploring considering vaccination requirements for foreign nationals traveling to the United States,” Zients said. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said at the same meeting that the spike in COVID-19 cases is preventing lifting international travel restrictions. “We want to move to a metrics-based system,” Raimondo said. “Before we can do that, we have to get a better handle on the domestic situation, which requires us to get everyone vaccinated.” Zients said the new plan would replace the current restrictions and would be “safer, stronger and sustainable.” He did not lay out specific metrics for when the administration might relax restrictions. “Vaccination rates matter here at home and other countries,” Zients said, urging travel companies like airlines to quickly mandate employee vaccines. Some industry officials fear the Biden administration may not lift travel restrictions for months or potentially until 2022. The extraordinary U.S. travel restrictions were first imposed on China in January 2020 to address the spread of COVID-19. Numerous other countries have been added, most recently India, in May. The administration wanted to lift travel restrictions “as soon as we can,” Zients said. CONTACT TRACING Zients said the new system will include collecting contact tracing data from passengers traveling into the United States to enable the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to contact travelers if exposed to COVID-19. The Trump administration in 2020 blocked an effort to require airlines to collect contact tracing information from U.S.-bound international passengers after some senior administration officials cited privacy concerns. Zients said they want the new system to be “ready to press go on” when it is safe to lift restrictions. “We get the importance of this,” Zients said. The United States currently bars most non-U.S. citizens who within the last 14 days have been in the United Kingdom, the 26 Schengen countries in Europe without border controls, Ireland, China, India, South Africa, Iran and Brazil. The United States separately bars non-essential travel by most non-U.S. citizens at U.S. land borders with Mexico and Canada. Critics say restrictions no longer make sense because some countries with high rates of COVID-19 infections are not on the restricted list while some countries on the list have the pandemic under control. (This story refiles to correct spelling error in the headline) (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, Bernadette Baum and Aurora Ellis) View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Sarah N. Lynch WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Olympic gymnast Simone Biles held back tears on Wednesday, as she told lawmakers how the FBI and U.S. gymnastic and Olympic officials failed to stop the sexual abuse that she and hundreds of other athletes suffered from former doctor Larry Nassar. “To be clear, I blame Larry Nassar and I also blame an entire system that enabled and perpetrated his abuse,” she said before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee alongside fellow gymnasts McKayla Maroney, Aly Raisman and Maggie Nichols. Biles added that USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee failed to act while the FBI “turned a blind eye.” The emotional hearing painted a damning picture of FBI, which botched the Nassar investigation so badly that he was able to continue abusing more victims for over a year before he was finally arrested. FBI Director Chris Wray made no excuses and said the bureau had fired one of the agents who had falsified the details of Maroney’s 2015 interview about the abuse. “On no planet is what happened in this case acceptable,” he said, later adding that the conduct of the agents who botched the case “was beyond the pale.” With anger in her voice, Maroney recalled how in 2015 she spent three hours on the phone telling the FBI the details of her story that her own mother had not even heard, including accounts of sexual abuse she endured during the Olympic games in London by Nassar, whom she described as “more of a pedophile than he was a doctor.” Nassar, who is also a former employee of Michigan State University, has been found guilty in three separate cases, with one of the prison sentences running up to 175 years. It was not until July of this year, however, that she said the Justice Department inspector general revealed in a scathing report https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/21-093.pdf what the FBI actually did with the information she provided. It failed to document it for a year and a half, and misrepresented what she told them about her experiences. “Not only did the FBI not report my abuse, but when they eventually documented my report 17 months later, they made entirely false claims about what I said,” Maroney said. Wednesday’s hearing comes after the Justice Department’s Inspector General Michael Horowitz in July issued a scathing report https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/21-093.pdf which blasted the FBI for botching its investigation https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-justice-watchdog-release-report-into-fbi-probe-ex-usa-gymnastics-doctor-2021-07-14 in a series of errors that allowed the abuse to continue for months. Several of the gymnasts said they were furious that the FBI failed to immediately interview them about the abuse after they had reported it. Once the FBI finally did contact them, they said the agents tried to downplay the severity of the abuse. “I remember sitting with the FBI agent and him trying to convince me that it wasn’t that bad,” Raisman said. “It’s taken me years of therapy to realize that my abuse was bad, that it does matter.” Horowitz, who also testified, said that the now-fired agent who falsified Maroney’s statement “could have actually jeopardized the criminal investigation by providing false information that could have bolstered Nassar’s defense.” The FBI declined to name the fired agent, but Senator Richard Blumenthal identified him as Michael Langeman. Langeman served as a supervisory special agent in Indianapolis, where he led a task force that investigated child sexual exploitation, according to an interview he gave to a local podcast in 2018. Reuters could not immediately reach Langeman for comment. The FBI’s investigation into Nassar started in July 2015, after USA Gymnastics President and CEO Stephen Penny reported the allegations to the FBI’s Indianapolis field office. That office, then led by Special Agent in Charge W. Jay Abbott, did not formally open an investigation. The FBI only interviewed one witness – Maroney – several months later, in September 2015. It failed to formally document that interview in an official report known as a “302” until February 2017 – well after the FBI had arrested Nassar on charges of possessing sexually explicit images of children in December 2016. Abbott, who retired from the FBI in 2018, also violated the FBI’s conflict of interest policy by discussing a possible job with the U.S. Olympic Committee while he was involved with the Nassar investigation. As the FBI delayed its probe, Nassar went on to abuse more victims. At one point in Wednesday’s hearing, Senator Richard Blumenthal asked all four athletes whether they knew of victims who were abused after the July 2015 disclosure to the FBI. “Yes,” all four of them said. Neither Abbott nor Langeman were prosecuted. Wray said the case was presented twice for possible prosecution and declined, but he deferred to federal prosecutors to explain their reasoning. “We have been failed and we deserve answers,” Biles said. Raisman, meanwhile, expressed frustrations that more has not been done to investigate USA Gymnastics or the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee for covering up Nassar’s abuse for years. “Why did none of these organizations warn anyone? USAG and USOPC have a long history of enabling abuse by turning a blind eye. Both organizations knew of Nassar’s abuse, long before it became public,” she said. In a statement, the USOPC said it remains “completely dedicated to the safety and well-being” of its athletes, and it has implemented reforms after hiring a law firm to conduct an independent investigation. USA Gymnastics did not immediately reply to requests for comment. (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; additional reporting by Frank Pingue in Toronto; Editing by Scott Malone and Lisa Shumaker) View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Kanishka Singh (Reuters) -A U.S. federal appeals court has upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit by the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, that challenged the National Security Agency’s mass interception and searching of Americans’ international internet communications. In a divided ruling on Wednesday, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the lawsuit must be dismissed after the government invoked the “state secrets privilege”, which meant that a full exploration of the issue in a court would damage national security. The Wikimedia Foundation had said in its lawsuit that the NSA’s “Upstream” surveillance program captures some of its international communications and is a violation of the U.S. constitution’s First Amendment free-speech rights and its Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. “Although the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the government as to Wikimedia’s standing, we agree that the state secrets privilege requires the termination of this suit,” Judge Albert Diaz wrote in a majority opinion by the court. Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, who dissented in the court ruling, warned that the majority opinion “stands for a sweeping proposition: A suit may be dismissed under the state secrets doctrine, after minimal judicial review, even when the government premises its only defenses on far-fetched hypotheticals.” Upstream’s existence was revealed in leaks by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in 2013 and the lawsuit was filed in the aftermath of those revelations. The Wikimedia Foundation said it disagreed with the ruling on Wednesday and is considering options for further review in the courts. “In the face of extensive public evidence about NSA surveillance, the court’s reasoning elevates extreme claims of secrecy over the rights of Internet users,” said James Buatti, senior legal manager at the Wikimedia Foundation https://bit.ly/2XwK14n. The lawsuit was first dismissed in 2015 after a U.S. District judge found lack of evidence that the NSA was conducting surveillance “at full throttle.” But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived the case in 2017 https://reut.rs/2XuMRXx and sent it back to the lower court, which again dismissed it in 2019 https://bit.ly/3hVOepp. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Sam Holmes) View the full article
-
Published by InsideHook By Kayla Kibbe The Met Gala has always been a place for celebrities to compete for headlines in head-turning, often bizarre outfits usually representing questionable interpretations of the ever-elusive Met Gala theme. This year, however, the A-listers in attendance at Monday night’s event used their gala getups to make very literal, if arguably hypocritical, statements. While AOC’s controversial “Tax the Rich” gown stole the show, model and actress Cara Delevingne was making a sartorial statement of her own. That statement, emblazoned in red block letters across a white bulletproof vest: “Peg … Read More View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Lil Nas X was convinced he was “going to die” when he got famous. The 22-year-old star went though a period of anxiety when he first started making music, which escalated when his single ‘Old Town Road’ became a global hit, but he credits his career for ultimately providing a distraction to allow his worst thoughts to subside. Speaking to Zane Lowe on Apple Music 1, he said: “The entire time I was making music, I thought soon I was going to die for some reason. Worst anxiety period. “You know, I lost my grandmother and was the first person that was close to me that I had ever lost. I was like, ‘Oh my God, everything’s building up.’ And then especially when ‘Old Town Road blew up’. I was like, ‘Oh, I’m definitely dying soon.’ All of these artists that were coming into, or starting to pop into the music industry were passing away, I was like, ‘What the f*** is happening?’ “I guess I tried to ignore it until it went away. And then that’s when I found belief in the universe, for sure. And I was like, ‘Oh my God, I’m really not alone in this.’ “That’s another thing music was for me though. It was something I love, but it was also a distraction from those thoughts. It’s like, oh, those thoughts, here’s the song guys.” Nas came out as gay publicly in June 2019 and he admitted he expected some people to be “shocked” by the admission. He said: “I knew some people would be shocked. Because a lot of people, when they hear a song, they maybe look up the artist and don’t think much don’t, don’t get too involved into your life or what they’re talking about, or their captions or what they’re posting on their story or whatnot. So then it’s just like, ‘Wait, what the.’ “Because there’s a lot of songs I like right now and I’ve seen the artist’s face, but I have no idea about them outside of that. So that’s how it was for… It was like, ‘Oh, this cowboy country? Wait, huh? How’s that possible?'” The ‘Montero (Call Me By Your Name)’ hitmaker feels a sense of “responsibility” and wants to put in “even more effort” to push boundaries because of his sexuality. He added: “I feel responsibility. I don’t know if I want to say a lot, but it’s certain things that I see in the world that fuel me to go harder or put even more effort, or to make sure I’m getting across. “Because I feel like, I said this before in the past, when people come out as gay or whatnot, it becomes like, ‘OK, let’s sanitise the hell out of this. Let’s make sure it’s appropriate and super safe.” “And it’s like where they don’t do anything that’s considered too far, even the things that we see other artists doing. And even to defend ourselves… I feel like we still haven’t reached a place where I can do something right now that no straight person has done that’s considered too far. Because then, it’s really too far because no straight person has done it yet. You know what I’m saying?” Watch the interview in full on Apple Music at apple.co/_MONTEROInterview. View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Ed Sheeran is planning to give Sam Smith a 6ft-tall marble penis. The ‘Bad Habits’ hitmaker has revealed he’s having the life-size phallic model made for the 29-year-old singer after the ‘Dancing With A Stranger’ saw the unusual decorative piece in the flame-haired hunk’s pub at his home in Suffolk, England, recently. Speaking to Zoe Ball on BBC’s Radio 2, the 30-year-old singer said: “I’m having a life-size one made for Sam Smith as well because Sam saw one of them in my pub at home and said, ‘Oh my God, I’d love one of them’. So I’m having one the size of them.” This isn’t the first time Ed has gifted a marble penis to a friend, as he also gave Elton John one for his birthday in March. Elton, 74, said previously: “For my birthday this year, he [Ed] gave me a giant marble penis. “I don’t know if that’s because I’ve always been a p***k or what. It’s really big, it’s beautifully made.” The iconic musician admitted his husband David Furnish wouldn’t let him put the X-rated statue in their garden because of their sons Zachary, 10, and eight-year-old Elijah. He laughed: “It’s hidden in an area in the house where they wouldn’t see it!” When it comes to raunchy gifts, Ed has a history after Courteney Cox previously revealed he’d sent her a “leather gimp mask”. Ed – who is close friends with the 57-year-old actress – revealed how he thought up an X-rated prank when she told him she could buy anything she wanted from her Alexa device. He explained: “So, she walks out the room, and I go, ‘Alexa, order me a leather gimp mask’. “Unbeknownst to me, Courteney’s assistant opened the post, and she finds this mask and instantly goes, ‘Oh, I don’t think I was meant to see that,’ and leaves it on Courteney’s bed.” The ‘Lego House’ hitmaker revealed the ‘Friends’ star found out about his joke, and he’s kept it up by ordering more and hiding them in unusual places. He added: “Anyway, she found out the story, and now every time I go back there, I order her another gimp mask. “And she has maybe 12, and I hide them in people’s bedrooms. So they’ll go in a drawer, and they’ll just find this leather S&M mask.” Marble on Towleroad Fashion Statements: The AOC Met Gala Dress Recalls 5 Times Fashion Helped Make Change. ‘I Really DO Care Don’t You?’ More Dan Levy Brings Met Gala 2021 Queer Love, in An Inspired Loewe, @cartier and Wojnarovicz Collab For the Fashion Benefit More New York begins work on LGBTQ+ museum set for 2024 opening More Many Relationships Won’t Make It Through The Pandemic Conflicts? Couples Boil Over OR Reconnect More U.S. Senate Democrats to seek quick passage of revised election reform plan More Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awards More Pop princess Britney Spears engaged to boyfriend Sam Asghari; Good Sign the Conservatorship Horror Gets Better More Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Load More View the full article
-
Autocorrect is not a function of the site. It’s done by the device itself. If you don’t want to use autocorrect at all, I can tell you how to disable it if you let me know what device and browser you’re using. Partial results are much harder. You can try using a wildcard as part of the search term but it’s by no means Google. Speaking of which you can also search Google for results on this site only by using a search term such as: site:https://www.companyofmen.org david_* The star on the end finds anything that starts with david_
-
… AOC Met Gala Fashion Statement NDZ/STAR MAX/IPx Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has ignited both controversy and celebration after wearing a gown to the Met Gala emblazoned in red graffiti text with the statement “Tax the Rich”. Appearing as a guest of the Metropolitan Museum of Art at the annual fund raiser, (for which tickets cost tens of thousand dollars), the left-wing politician wore a custom gown by fashion brand Brother Vellies, bringing with her the label’s founder, the young Black designer and activist Aurora James. Using fashion as a tool to address wider social concerns has, in fact, long been a strategy for people seeking to make change — including wearing these clothes in spaces of influence. From 19th century Suffragettes who pounded the streets in heels, ultra-feminine dress and large “picture” hats to refute claims that they were unwomanly, to patriot textiles in the second world war, to Indigenous Australian street clothes and accessories by a brand such as Dizzy Couture today, dress has historically conveyed political messages, creating “looks” for generations of change agents. Here are 5 clothing acts as provocations that changed history. 1. George Washington’s suit Houdon’s sculpture of Washington. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY The founders of the American Revolution wished to break with the old codes of European aristocracy. Much of the world still had “sumptuary laws”: legal edicts that regulated the types, materials and amounts of cloth, colours, jewellery and accessories permitted to various social groups. In North America, the formal clothing codes of the old regime were actively resisted: men were not expected to wear the expensive and colourful embroidered silks typically worn to European courts. Their imported fabrics were considered bad for local economies, and their elite air at odds with the idea that all men might now be (relatively) equal. President elect George Washington was sculpted by Houdon in the late 18th century with a button missing from his waistcoat. This was a deliberate gesture to show his actions were more important than his appearance. He also wore plain, home-spun American woollen cloth for his inauguration instead of the expected silk or velvet. This was a firm demonstration of North American independence and perhaps the first American “business casual”. 2. The Abolitionist handbag Abolitionist bag full of anti-slavery pamphlets. ©Victoria and Albert Museum, London, CC BY-NC Since the late 18th century, a range of objects from jewellery to printed dishes were produced to critique the Slave Trade. British Quakers had advocated for Abolition in 1783. The Female Society for Birmingham (originally the Ladies Society for the Relief of Negro Slaves, the first such group) mobilised their anti-slavery followers with handbags printed with images and slogans designed to gain support for the Abolitionist movement. The silk drawstring bags, made by women in sewing circles, were presented to prominent figures such as George IV and Princess Victoria. The bags contained newspaper articles and tracts supportive of Abolition. The Slavery Abolition Act, which provided for the immediate abolition of slavery in most of the British Empire was passed ten years later, in 1833. A similar Act was ratified in the USA only in 1865. 3. No feather hats Feather fan circa 1902. Te Papa, CC BY-NC-ND The ostrich and exotic bird industry was massive in the 19th century: as well as plumes, women wore whole bodies of birds as accessories, such as hummingbird earrings. The ostrich plume “double fluff” industry was centred on South Africa, where the feathers were worth more than gold. They were exported to rooms in London and New York where exhausted young girls finished and dyed them for retail. In 1914 a massive “feather crash” saw the raw material become close to worthless. Young women interested in the growing national park and conservation movements objected to the trade on ecological grounds. They simply stopped wearing the fashion, starting a global “anti-plumage” movement. The women involved with the Massachusetts Audubon Society were so successful that their lobbying led to the first US federal conservation legislation, The Lacey Act (1900). Taxidermied birds, feather boas and birds as earrings became largely unfashionable and were rarely seen again in women’s fashion. 4. The ACT UP T-shirt “Act Up Oral History Project”, CC BY-NC-SA The AIDS crisis of the 1980s-90s saw the mobilisation of a unique blend of activism born from the women’s, Hispanic, Black power and 1970s gay movements. ACT UP New York determined that only anger and civil disobedience would focus the attention of government and big pharma on the plight of mainly gay men’s health. A series of extraordinary “zaps” or site-specific protests, often theatrical, was engineered. ACT UP’s membership included skilled figures from advertising and design who created unified and stylish T-shirts, posters and banners. The designs were clean, slick and looked just like good advertising. As Sarah Schulman recently demonstrated in her 20 year history of ACT UP, the bold T-shirt designs both created optimum impact for ACT UP’s protests on the TV news and a new pro-gay identity. Worn with Doc Marten shoes, leather jackets, clean and tight jeans or denim shorts, ACT UP established the look of gay urban men for a generation. Government bodies and large drug companies were shamed by the public protests into adopting better and more rational health messaging, conducting better funded and more equitable drug trials and selling cheaper retrovirals. 5. When Katharine met Maggie In 1984, designer Katharine Hamnett wore a t-shirt that read, “58% DONT WANT PERSHING” (a reference to nuclear missiles) to a high profile fashion evening attended by conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Hamnett made her T-shirt the night before, recognising the opportunity she had, and hid it under her coat upon entry. Its graphic format owes a debt to both 1970s Punk and ACT UP. She later recalled of the widely photographed encounter with Thatcher: She looked down and said, “You seem to be wearing a rather strong message on your T-shirt”, then she bent down to read it and let out a squawk, like a chicken. Social change needs its visual forms. Fashion is one of them. Fashion is a brilliant communicator of new ideas. That we are reading about AOC’s clothing “controversy” shows she fully understands fashion’s power. Peter McNeil, Distinguished Professor of Design History, UTS, University of Technology Sydney This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. AOC Met Gala on Towleroad Dan Levy Brings Met Gala 2021 Queer Love, in An Inspired Loewe, @cartier and Wojnarovicz Collab For the Fashion Benefit More New York begins work on LGBTQ+ museum set for 2024 opening More Many Relationships Won’t Make It Through The Pandemic Conflicts? Couples Boil Over OR Reconnect More U.S. Senate Democrats to seek quick passage of revised election reform plan More Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awards More Pop princess Britney Spears engaged to boyfriend Sam Asghari; Good Sign the Conservatorship Horror Gets Better More Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Load More View the full article
-
Sorry about that... try now! It should show in the footer for everyone now. Dang permissions settings always get me.
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Dan Levy’s Met Gala 2021 ensemble celebrated “queer love and visibility”. The ‘Schitt’s Creek’ star wore a Loewe costume depicting two men kissing inspired by the late LGBTQIA+ activist and multimedia artist David Wojnarovicz’s art based on a homophobic cartoon at the fashion fundraiser at New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art on Monday night (13.09.21). The 38-year-old actor, who was accessorised by Cartier, also revealed that Loewe made a donation to the charity Visual AIDS. Sharing the meaning behind the bold look, Dan explained on Instagram: “A big heartfelt thank you to @cartier for so generously welcoming and accessorizing me tonight. What I’ve so long admired about the Costume Institute is its commitment to educate and inspire people through fashion. “I was fortunate enough to also get to work with @jonathan.anderson and the incredible team of designers and craftspeople at @loewe on a look that meant something to all of us. With support from the estate of American multimedia artist and LGBTQIA+ activist, David Wojnarovicz (1954-1992), Jonathan and the design team built upon an image of two men kissing from Wojnarovicz’s work, F*** You F-t F*****, named after a homophobic cartoon the artist had come across. But rather than feed on the message of hate, we wanted to celebrate queer love and visibility – acknowledging how hard artists like Wojnarovicz had to fight, while also presenting the imagery in a way that offered a hopeful message. Tonight, we’re celebrating the resilience, the love, and the joy of the community while honoring a crucial American voice that was taken from us too soon. “To mark the collaboration, Loewe has made a donation to Visual AIDS, an organization Wojnorovicz supported, that continues to promote AIDS awareness and education (sic)” Dan came out as gay to his parents – actor Eugene Levy and screenwriter Deborah Divine – when he was 18. Met Gala 2021 on Towleroad New York begins work on LGBTQ+ museum set for 2024 opening More Many Relationships Won’t Make It Through The Pandemic Conflicts? Couples Boil Over OR Reconnect More U.S. Senate Democrats to seek quick passage of revised election reform plan More Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awards More Pop princess Britney Spears engaged to boyfriend Sam Asghari; Good Sign the Conservatorship Horror Gets Better More Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More Load More View the full article
-
Published by DPA Former tennis player Billie Jean King speaks at the groundbreaking ceremony for the LGBTQ+ Museum, scheduled to open in 2024. Christina Horsten/dpa Museum founders in New York have broken ground on a site set to become an LGBTQ+ museum opening in 2024. The museum is an expansion of the New-York Historical Society and will tell the stories of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people, as well as others who feel they belong to this group. Founded in the early 19th century, the Historical Society is primarily dedicated to the history of metropolitan New York. “We are so happy that the museum has found a home,” former professional tennis player and activist Billie Jean King said at the Tuesday groundbreaking event. “It’s our time, for our American LGBTQ+ community, to tell our stories.” The whole world will take notice of this museum, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said. “People will come from literally every corner of the world to learn, to be educated, to be inspired, to remember that, yes, a change can come, and it did here in New York City.” The 1969 “Stonewall” riots in New York, when revellers resisted a police raid at the popular gay bar the Stonewall Inn on Christopher Street in Manhattan’s Greenwich Village, are widely considered the birth of the movement. Every year, parades around the world celebrate the LGBTQ+ community and their resistance to discrimination. View the full article
-
There was a few comments from members who expressed an interest in having a dark colored theme. Adding this was a fairly low effort project and does not require a tremendous amount of upkeep to support. If you would prefer to have a dark color background and colors instead of our normal whites and grays, you can switch your default theme to use Dark Mode. Simply scroll to the bottom of any page in the site. At the very bottom in the footer (to the left of our Privacy Policy) is a Theme option. Click on it and then choose either Normal or Dark Mode. You can switch back and forth at your leisure and your preference is persistent as long as you are logged into the site.
-
Showing the post ID was removed by IPB many years ago. However if you want to refer to a specific post itself the date/time of a post is a direct link to that content. For example, the direct link to your post is: https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/129154-is-there-a-way-to%E2%80%A6/?do=findComment&comment=1888893 Rather than say tell someone "find Comment 1888893 earlier in this thread", you can provide them a link to the content you're talking about. So in the above case, you would hover over the "Posted Friday at 05:52 PM" and right click, then copy link. That would copy the above URL to your clipboard and you can paste it anywhere you want.
-
As @keroscenefire noted, PMs are doable. The rest are not default features. I'll add it to the wish list and see if there are any plugins that could possibly support some of this. If not, I'll note it for my rounds of custom coding.
-
One other note I'm going to add here... as @Coolwave35 noted, we don't discuss actions taken by moderators but given this is framed around a generality and not around a specific scenario I'll give a few thoughts: Posts that are simply in the wrong forum, etc are not issued warnings. They're simply moved with no warnings given. We still ask people to use the "Report" feature to draw our attention to something, be it a rule violation or just general housekeeping. But the moderators are smart enough to know when to issue warnings and when something is just cleanup. If a warning is issued by a moderator, those warnings can be issued with or without warning points being associated with them. In general, if someone does violate our community guidelines... if this was their first time doing so, we will issue a zero point warning. This is simply a way to notify the member (privately) that something is not allowed and to draw their attention to it. Our warning system requires the person to acknowledge the warning which includes the reason why it was issued and what content was involved. They are unable to post or take action until the warning is acknowledged. This allows us to make sure they are 100% aware of the situation so there is no question around "I didn't know". If a person has been warned previously and/or the violation was of a more serious nature... we may forgo the zero point warning and associate warning points with the violation. Historically the number of warning points given was just the number noted in the Community Guidelines. However we have recently changed how we issue warning points to use the Guidelines as a "max warning". For example, an attack against other people according to the guidelines is a 10 point violation. We might start with a zero point warning. If it happens again, issue a 5 point warning. If it happens again, issue a 10 point warning. Those points typically stay "active" on a person's account for 6 months. (Think of these like DMV points on your license... you get enough points assessed and you lose your license). Just receiving a warning (and even some warning points) does not automatically result in banning. Bans are based on the number of ACTIVE warning points when the new warning is issued. When a threshold is crossed, that is how long a person is banned for. You can find the exact number of points required and the length of time for each threshold in the guidelines themselves. In looking through all of the bans in the system, the only ones done without prior warnings have been those involving spam where a spammer registered an account and was just posting crap. In those cases, we flag those accounts as spam which automatically bans new content AND automatically deletes all posts by that account. Now... with all of that said, if you have additional questions about how warnings work, I would recommend using the Contact Us feature. I don't want to derail the original topic at hand, but I did want to add a few public thoughts on this.
-
In general, I've operated under the model of "you praise in public and critique in private". Maintaining a "Wall of Shame" post of everyone banned/suspended would be difficult: It's more work to maintain. Most bans are temporary in nature. Not only would we have to manually add someone to the list, we would have to remember to remove them from it later. It would call out publicly that the person was breaking the site rules. By posting this, it can be seen as another form of punishment by calling the person out. It leads to conversations about actions taken by moderators when that post is updated which as has been noted is against the community guidelines. With that being said however, I understand the need to do a virtual "wellness check" on someone who has disappeared. In those cases, I would recommend using the Contact Us feature to note your concern. A moderator can reach out to the person via email (given that is our only method of contact). If the person is suspended, we would simply note back after a day or so that we've heard back and they're fine. If they're not suspended and we don't hear back, we would note just saying we've not gotten a reply either. This would allow us to maintain discretion around a person's disciplinary status while also not overly worry someone else.
-
Published by DPA People generally don’t show their best side in a crisis like the pandemic. In times like these, unresolved conflicts become particularly clear. Christin Klose/dpa The coronavirus crisis has put a serious strain on many aspects of our lives. Many couples’ relationship has been sorely tested too. “Like a fire accelerant,” crises intensify unresolved conflicts, points out Dominik Borde, a relationship coach in Vienna. He’s not the only couples therapist expecting a wave of break-ups and divorces on the back of the Covid-19 pandemic. Berlin-based psychotherapist Holger Kuntze, for example, reports a veritable stampede for counselling by couples with relationship problems. The number has increased by more than a third, he says. This doesn’t surprise the therapists. For one thing, people who are fearful and in difficulties – as during a pandemic – typically don’t show themselves from their best side. And the crisis has shifted many people’s focus. Fulfilling long-held dreams has taken on new urgency. People are asking themselves how they really want to live, and with whom. Kuntze divides couples who were locked down together into two groups. For one group, the forced togetherness was hell: Long-simmering conflicts boiled over and many a partner decided that the relationship wasn’t worth continuing. In the other group, the partners made things cosy for themselves. “They reconnected and enjoyed the extended time together. But the normal daily routine is now back, they’ve got the same problems and are frustrated,” Kuntze says. “The extensive restrictions on our freedom have made many of us realize that life isn’t endless and we don’t have forever to fulfil lifelong dreams that we’ve always put off,” says Borde. The kinds of couples that are especially at risk of a break-up, in his view, are the ones prone to blaming each other for things that go wrong. The same goes for those who have never learned to manage their emotions and build relationships. But self-improvement is possible if they draw on their pandemic experiences, Borde says. Kuntze advises couples to discuss what each partner has learned during the coronavirus crisis. This could reveal common ground and facilitate compromise, he says, but adds they’ve got a problem if it turns out their takes are very different. “If one partner doesn’t want to resume the couple’s pre-lockdown lifestyle, while the other thinks it was just as it should be, there’s trouble ahead,” Kuntze remarks. To illustrate his point, he cites a couple that shared a love of cultural activities before the pandemic hit. One partner sorely missed not being able to go to the opera, theatre and exhibitions during the lockdown, while the other didn’t and discovered it was far more enjoyable to be outdoors surrounded by nature. “Something like this shakes up everything, of course,” says Kuntze. Ideally, couples use these differences to recalibrate their relationship, which he likens to the “moulting process” of animals that shed old feathers, hair, or skin to make way for new growth. If the couple fails to reconcile their differences and splits, one partner is usually the instigator and also gets over the break-up more easily. The decision is typically prompted not only by current problems, but with the past and future in mind too – ie the relationship may never have been particularly satisfying and/or its prospects may not be promising. Kuntze says the instigator should explain his or her motives and be sensitive to the rejected partner’s feelings. “You shouldn’t summarily brush aside your partner’s pain,” he says, “for example with the excruciating line, ‘Let’s stay friends.’ People want to be seen, heard and taken seriously.” Most couples can’t handle such a one-on-one talk though, according to Kuntze, who says one partner’s heartache or the other’s impatience are usually impediments. So he recommends that they go to a therapist. Borde, for his part, recommends seeing a therapist when you’re struggling to decide whether to continue or to end a relationship. A therapist, he says, can help you recognize your share of the responsibility for the problems and avoid repeating your mistakes – be it in your current relationship or any future ones. Pandemic Conflicts on Towleroad U.S. Senate Democrats to seek quick passage of revised election reform plan More Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awards More Pop princess Britney Spears engaged to boyfriend Sam Asghari; Good Sign the Conservatorship Horror Gets Better More Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban Debut ‘Smart’ Shade. Analysts Unsure on Built in Privacy Protections More Load More View the full article
-
Published by Reuters By Richard Cowan WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Senate Democrats on Tuesday unveiled a new version of an election reform bill that is a top priority of President Joe Biden, amid a wave of Republican state legislatures imposing restrictions on voting. Senator Amy Klobuchar and seven fellow Democrats, including moderates such as Joe Manchin, introduced the bill that would set national standards for states to follow as they administer elections. The Democratic senators said their bill, dubbed the “Freedom to Vote Act,” would ensure that all qualified voters can request mail-in ballots and have at least 15 days of early voting. The legislation also would allow people to register to vote as late as Election Day. “Following the 2020 elections in which more Americans voted than ever before, we have seen unprecedented attacks on our democracy in states across the country,” the senators said in a statement. But with Republicans accusing Democrats of a “power grab” that would rob states of their ability to fashion voting rules, the legislation faces a tough battle in the Senate, which is divided 50-50 between the two parties. In June, all 50 Senate Republicans banded together to block a more ambitious bill, leaving Democrats 10 votes short of the minimum needed for it to advance. Under the Senate’s “filibuster” rule, at least 60 votes in the 100-member chamber are needed for most legislation to advance. On Monday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said a vote by the full Senate on the retooled bill could come as early as next week. The bill also would reduce the ability of states to fashion congressional districts in a partisan way and would aim to lift a veil of secrecy over some campaign contributions. Democrats accused Republican-controlled states of imposing new voting rules to suppress Election Day turnout, especially among Black, Hispanic and young voters, many of whom lean Democratic. Those Republican efforts expanded significantly after November’s U.S. presidential election in which defeated ex-President Donald Trump falsely claimed he was the victim of widespread voter fraud – an allegation that was rejected multiple times by courts and by his own Justice Department. In mid-term elections set for Nov. 8, 2022, voters will decide whether control of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives should remain in Democratic hands or be turned over to Republicans. Democrats hold the narrowest of majorities in Congress. Last week, Texas joined the list of states enacting new election restrictions, which Biden called an “all-out assault” on American democracy. The state’s new rules would make it harder for Texans to cast mail-in ballots and would add identification requirements for such voting. Texas Governor Greg Abbott said the law would make it “harder for people to cheat at the ballot box.” If Republicans again refuse to provide the support needed in the Senate for the bill to clear the 60-vote threshold, some Democrats are expected to urge Schumer to carve out an exception to the filibuster rule so that only a simple majority of the 100-seat Senate is required for passage. (Reporting by Richard Cowan. Editing by Gerry Doyle) View the full article
-
Published by The Bangkok Post Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo clean up at MTV Video Music Awardspublished : 13 Sep 2021 at 11:45 NEW YORK – A stacked slate of artists lit up MTV’s 40th annual Video Music Awards on Sunday, returning in full force to Brooklyn’s Barclays Center after last year’s scaled-back pandemic show. The 2021 VMAs — a show known more for ostentatious performances, made-for-Twitter moments and wild costumes than the actual awards — was back with its signature elaborate performances before a masked full audience after a 2020 show that saw many celebrities accept prizes via video stream. The show opened with a pr… Read More View the full article
-
Published by AFP Britney Spears’ high energy pop burst onto the global stage in the late 1990s Los Angeles (AFP) – Pop princess Britney Spears on Sunday announced her engagement to her boyfriend Sam Asghari via social media. Spears, 39, showed off a diamond ring in an Instagram micro-video post and wrote “I can’t f***ng believe it!!!!!!!” By her side in the video is her boyfriend — now fiance — Sam Asghari, whom she turns to and kisses on the cheek. “Look at that — you like it?” Asghari, 27, asks. “Yeah!” Spears squeals in delight. Congratulations poured in and over 1.6 million people had liked the post by Sunday night. “Congratulations love!! So happy for you! Welcome to the club!” said celebrity heiress Paris Hilton in a comment on the video. Asghari’s Instagram page has a simple picture of him kissing Spears as she lifts her hand — and ring finger — to show off her new bling. Spears and Asghari met in 2016 when they co-starred in a music video for her single “Slumber Party.” Spears has two children with former husband rapper Kevin Federline, and had a brief Las Vegas marriage to childhood friend Jason Alexander that was annulled after just 55 hours. The star rocketed to fame in her teens with hits like “…Baby One More Time,” but suffered a highly public 2007 breakdown, attacking a paparazzo’s car at a gas station. That led to her being placed under a court-ordered conservatorship largely governed by her father, Jamie Spears. She swiftly returned to performing, released three albums, appeared on various television shows and even took up a Las Vegas residency. But in January 2019, she abruptly announced she was suspending her performances until further notice, and became increasingly vocal about the conservatorship. In July she launched a bid to remove her father from the 13-year guardianship that she said amounted to “abuse,” and in early September Jamie Spears filed a petition to end the conservatorship. Britney Spears Engaged on Towleroad Spectacular Suit-Dress Steals Show; Lil Nas X Turns Head, Wins the VH1 Red Carpet More Madonna wows MTV Video Music Awards with surprise performance More Lance Bass twin babies to arrive ‘any day now’; N’sync + Backstreet Boys Project Called ‘TRL: Total Relief Live’ Is Jan 2022 More Jodie Foster Says ‘Taxi Driver’ Transformed Cinema…I Was Very Proud’; Say ‘Bad Choices’ Gave Her Depth, Made Her Happy More Prince Andrew served with papers in US sexual assault lawsuit More Jessica Chastain Acquired ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ After Documentary Went Beyond SNL’s Crying, Crook Cartoon Image More ‘By the people, for the people’… but who really runs America? More Facebook and Ray-Ban debut ‘smart’ shades More Judge blocks enforcement of Florida’s ‘anti-riot’ law More Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate angers Republicans, libertarians More Gayle King proud to be Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham’s third wheel More Load More View the full article
Contact Info:
The Company of Men
C/O RadioRob Enterprises
3296 N Federal Hwy #11104
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306
Email: [email protected]
Help Support Our Site
Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.